Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 6/2016

02.06.2016 | INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION

A systematic approach for model refinement considering blind and recognized uncertainties in engineered product development

verfasst von: Hyunseok Oh, Jisun Kim, Hyejeong Son, Byeng D. Youn, Byung C. Jung

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, virtual testing has played an increasingly important role in the design and evaluation of engineered products. However, it is challenging to build the highly accurate computational models for virtual testing. Blind and recognized uncertainties are often unintentionally incorporated. These uncertainties consequently decrease the predictive capability of the models. To this end, this paper proposes a systematic approach for model refinement that minimizes the impact of unrecognized blind and recognized epistemic uncertainties in computational modeling. The approach consists of three steps: model invalidity analysis (MIA), development of an invalidity reasoning tree (IRT), and invalidity sensitivity analysis (ISA). First, in the MIA, possible causes that lead to discrepancies between the experimental and simulation responses are identified through brainstorming. Next, the IRT is built using the affinity diagram. It sequentially lists and screens potential candidate issues for model refinement at the stages of conceptual, mathematical, and computational modeling. Finally, the ISA quantifies the effect of incorporating updates in the model to address potential candidate issues with the goal of reducing the impact of the blind and recognized uncertainties. The most critical candidates are determined by using a weighted decision matrix. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a case study examining a smartphone liquid crystal display fracture is presented.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The “Top” (or “Bottom”) indicates that the driver IC in the LCD panel or the LCD module faces upwards (or downwards). The “X” (or “Y”) implies that the LCD panel or the LCD module is aligned to the x- (or y-) direction of the jig.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat AIAA (1998) Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamic simulations. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA AIAA (1998) Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamic simulations. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA
Zurück zum Zitat ASME (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY ASME (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY
Zurück zum Zitat Ayyub B (2001) Elicitation of expert options for uncertainty and risks. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef Ayyub B (2001) Elicitation of expert options for uncertainty and risks. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Callister WD (2003) Materials science and engineering: an introduction, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken Callister WD (2003) Materials science and engineering: an introduction, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Baghdasaryan L, Buranathiti T, Cao J (2004) Model validation via uncertainty propagation and data transformations. AIAA J 42:1406–1415. doi:10.2514/1.491 CrossRef Chen W, Baghdasaryan L, Buranathiti T, Cao J (2004) Model validation via uncertainty propagation and data transformations. AIAA J 42:1406–1415. doi:10.​2514/​1.​491 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dieter GE, Schimidt LC (2009) Engineering Design. 4th Edition edn. MaGraw-Hill Higher Education, Crawfordsville, IN Dieter GE, Schimidt LC (2009) Engineering Design. 4th Edition edn. MaGraw-Hill Higher Education, Crawfordsville, IN
Zurück zum Zitat Hills RG, Leslie I (2003) Statistical validation of engineering and scientific models: validation experiments to application. SAND2003-0706, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Hills RG, Leslie I (2003) Statistical validation of engineering and scientific models: validation experiments to application. SAND2003-0706, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM,
Zurück zum Zitat Jung BC, Park J, Oh H, Kim J, Youn BD (2015) A framework of model validation and virtual product qualification with limited experimental data based on statistical inference. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:573–583. doi:10.1007/s00158-014-1155-2 CrossRef Jung BC, Park J, Oh H, Kim J, Youn BD (2015) A framework of model validation and virtual product qualification with limited experimental data based on statistical inference. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:573–583. doi:10.​1007/​s00158-014-1155-2 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oberkampf WL, Roy CJ (2010) Verification and validation in scientific computing, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, UKCrossRefMATH Oberkampf WL, Roy CJ (2010) Verification and validation in scientific computing, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, UKCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG (2002) Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:209–272CrossRef Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG (2002) Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:209–272CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thacker BH, Doebling SW, Hemez FM, Anderson MC, Pepin JE, Rodriguez EA (2004) Concepts of model verification and validation. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los AlamosCrossRef Thacker BH, Doebling SW, Hemez FM, Anderson MC, Pepin JE, Rodriguez EA (2004) Concepts of model verification and validation. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los AlamosCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A systematic approach for model refinement considering blind and recognized uncertainties in engineered product development
verfasst von
Hyunseok Oh
Jisun Kim
Hyejeong Son
Byeng D. Youn
Byung C. Jung
Publikationsdatum
02.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1493-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.