nach oben

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)

Erschienen in:

31.01.2022 | Original Paper

A two-step approach for reliability-based design optimization in power transmission line towers

verfasst von: Seyed Rohollah Hoseini Vaez, Mohammad Ali Fathali, Hashem Mehanpour

Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Reliability-based design can be used to simultaneously take into account economic aspects as well as safety considerations for various failure probabilities of structures. Such problems have two categories of deterministic and probabilistic constraints. Evaluating the probabilistic constraints and calculating the reliability index, usually require a large number of evaluations of the limit state function. This increases the time and volume of computation; while there is no need to calculate the reliability index for all probable optimal solutions and this index should only be calculated for probable solutions in which deterministic constraints are met. Accordingly, in this study, a two-step approach for optimal design of reliability-based structures is proposed. In this approach, the probabilistic constraint is checked when the deterministic constraint is met; otherwise, the probabilistic constraint is not calculated and the reliability index of zero is considered as a probable solution penalty. In order to investigate the efficiency of this approach, four power transmission lines towers were studied with enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO), water evaporation optimization (WEO), and enhanced vibrating particles system (EVPS). Deterministic and probabilistic constraints defined based on the members’ axial stress and nodal displacement, respectively. Monte-Carlo simulation method was used to evaluate the probabilistic constraints. The results show an appropriate safety margin than the allowable values for the probabilistic constraints.

Vorheriger Artikel Process optimization and in-mold sensing enabled dimensional prediction for high precision injection molding

Nächster Artikel Response surface design of bellows parameters with negative pressure shrinkage performance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Jimoh, A.A., Rahmon, R., Ajide, S.O.: Reliability-based investigation on compressive strength characteristics of structural-Sized Iroko (Meliceae Excelsa) and Mahogany (Khaya Ivorensis) timber column found in Nigeria. Comput. Eng. Phys. Model. 1(1), 23–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22115/cepm.2018.105453.1002CrossRef

Zhao, Y.G., Ono, T.: Moment methods for structural reliability. Struct. Saf. 23(1), 47–75 (2001)CrossRef

Lee, S.H., Kwak, B.M.: Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 28(3), 261–272 (2006)CrossRef

Keshtegar, B., Chakraborty, S.: A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 53, 319–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.09.017MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Meng, Z., Zhou, H., Hu, H., Keshtegar, B.: Enhanced sequential approximate programming using second order reliability method for accurate and efficient structural reliability-based design optimization. Appl. Math. Model. 62, 562–579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.018MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Deng, L., Ghosn, M., Shao, S.: Development of a shredding genetic algorithm for structural reliability. Struct. Saf. 27(2), 113–131 (2005)CrossRef

Elegbede, C.: Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization. Struct. Saf. 27(2), 171–186 (2005)CrossRef

Zou, D., Gao, L., Wu, J., Li, S., Li, Y.: A novel global harmony search algorithm for reliability problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 58(2), 307–316 (2010)CrossRef

Zou, D., Gao, L., Li, S., Wu, J.: An effective global harmony search algorithm for reliability problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 4642–4648 (2011)CrossRef

10.

Valian, E., Tavakoli, S., Mohanna, S., Haghi, A.: Improved cuckoo search for reliability optimization problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 64(1), 459–468 (2013)CrossRef

11.

Hoseini Vaez, S.R., Mehanpour, H., Fathali, M.A.: Reliability assessment of truss structures with natural frequency constraints using metaheuristic algorithms. J. Build. Eng. 28, 101065 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101065CrossRef

12.

Hosseini, P., Hoseini Vaez, H.R., Fathali, M.A., Mehanpour, H.: Reliability assessment of transmission line towers using metaheuristic algorithms. Int. J. Optim. Civ. Eng. 10(3), 531–551 (2020)

13.

Kaveh, A., Hoseini Vaez, S.R., Hosseini, P., Fathali, M.A.: Heuristic operator for reliability assessment of frame structures. Periodica Polytech. Civ. Eng. 65(3), 702–716 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.17580CrossRef

14.

Olsson, A., Sandberg, G., Dahlblom, O.: On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 25(1), 47–68 (2003)CrossRef

15.

Ibrahim, Y.: Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 9(4), 269–281 (1991)CrossRef

16.

Miao, F., Ghosn, M.: Modified subset simulation method for reliability analysis of structural systems. Struct. Saf. 33(4–5), 251–260 (2011)CrossRef

17.

Au, S., Ching, J., Beck, J.: Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems. Struct. Saf. 29(3), 183–193 (2007)CrossRef

18.

Pradlwarter, H., Schuëller, G.: Local domain monte carlo simulation. Struct. Saf. 32(5), 275–280 (2010)CrossRef

19.

Pradlwarter, H., Schueller, G., Koutsourelakis, P.S., Charmpis, D.C.: Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems. Struct. Saf. 29(3), 208–221 (2007)CrossRef

20.

Kang, S.-C., Koh, H.-M., Choo, J.F.: An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis. Probab. Eng. Mech. 25(4), 365–371 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.04.002CrossRef

21.

Bucher, C.: Asymptotic sampling for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Probab. Eng. Mech. 24(4), 504–510 (2009)CrossRef

22.

Rashki, M., Miri, M., Moghaddam, M.A.: A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point. Struct. Saf. 39, 22–29 (2012)CrossRef

23.

Kaveh, A., Dadras, A.: An efficient method for reliability estimation using the combination of asymptotic sampling and weighted simulation. Scientia Iranica 26(4), 2108–2122 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2019.21367CrossRef

24.

Meng, Z., Pang, Y., Zhou, H.: An augmented weighted simulation method for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 93, 102117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102117CrossRef

25.

Nikolaidis, E., Burdisso, R.: Reliability based optimization: a safety index approach. Comput. Struct. 28(6), 781–788 (1988)MATHCrossRef

26.

Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., Bourinet, J.-M.: Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 44(5), 673–690 (2011)CrossRef

27.

Chen, Z., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Su, L., Li, P.: An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization. Comput. Struct. 117, 58–66 (2013)CrossRef

28.

Du, X., Chen, W.: Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J. Mech. Des. 126(2), 225–233 (2004)CrossRef

29.

Royset, J.O., Der Kiureghian, A., Polak, E.: Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73(3), 213–221 (2001)CrossRef

30.

Shan, S., Wang, G.G.: Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(8), 1218–1230 (2008)CrossRef

31.

Chen X, Hasselman T, Neill D (1997) Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications. In: 38th Structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, FL, U.S.A., 1997. p 1403

32.

Schuëller, G.I., Jensen, H.A.: Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties–an overview. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(1), 2–13 (2008)MATHCrossRef

33.

Aoues, Y., Chateauneuf, A.: Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 41(2), 277–294 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

34.

Yang, I.-T., Hsieh, Y.-H.: Reliability-based design optimization with cooperation between support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. Eng. Comput. 29(2), 151–163 (2013)CrossRef

35.

Hamzehkolaei, N.S., Miri, M., Rashki, M.: An enhanced simulation-based design method coupled with meta-heuristic search algorithm for accurate reliability-based design optimization. Eng. Comput. 32(3), 477–495 (2016)CrossRef

36.

Shayanfar, M., Abbasnia, R., Khodam, A.: Development of a GA-based method for reliability-based optimization of structures with discrete and continuous design variables using OpenSees and Tcl. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 90, 61–73 (2014)CrossRef

37.

Mathakari, S., Gardoni, P., Agarwal, P., Raich, A., Haukaas, T.: Reliability-based optimal design of electrical transmission towers using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Comput. Aid. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 22(4), 282–292 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00485.xCrossRef

38.

Nowak, A.S., Collins, K.R.: Reliability of structures, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2012)CrossRef

39.

Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables. Adv. Eng. Softw. 77, 66–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.08.003CrossRef

40.

Kaveh, A., Mahdavi, V.R.: Colliding bodies optimization: a novel meta-heuristic method. Comput. Struct. 139, 18–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.04.005CrossRef

41.

Kaveh, A., Bakhshpoori, T.: Water evaporation optimization: a novel physically inspired optimization algorithm. Comput. Struct. 167, 69–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.01.008CrossRef

42.

Wang, S., Tu, Y., Wan, R., Fang, H.: Evaporation of tiny water aggregation on solid surfaces with different wetting properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 116(47), 13863–13867 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp302142sCrossRef

43.

Kaveh, A., Hoseini Vaez, S.R., Hosseini, P.: Enhanced vibrating particles system algorithm for damage identification of truss structures. Scientia Iranica 26(1), 246–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4265CrossRef

44.

Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm: vibrating particles system. Scientia Iranica 24(2), 551–566 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.2417CrossRef

45.

Tejani, G.G., Pholdee, N., Bureerat, S., Prayogo, D.: Multiobjective adaptive symbiotic organisms search for truss optimization problems. Knowl. Based Syst. 161, 398–414 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.005CrossRef

46.

Degertekin, S.O., Lamberti, L., Ugur, I.B.: Discrete sizing/layout/topology optimization of truss structures with an advanced Jaya algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 79, 363–390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.058CrossRef

47.

Kaveh, A., Dadras, A., Montazeran, A.H.: Chaotic enhanced colliding bodies algorithms for size optimization of truss structures. Acta Mech. 229(7), 2883–2907 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-018-2149-8MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

48.

Tejani, G.G., Pholdee, N., Bureerat, S., Prayogo, D., Gandomi, A.H.: Structural optimization using multi-objective modified adaptive symbiotic organisms search. Expert Syst. Appl. 125, 425–441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.068CrossRef

49.

Li, L.J., Huang, Z.B., Liu, F.: A heuristic particle swarm optimization method for truss structures with discrete variables. Comput. Struct. 87(7), 435–443 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.004CrossRef

50.

Erbatur, F., Hasançebi, O., Tütüncü, İ, Kılıç, H.: Optimal design of planar and space structures with genetic algorithms. Comput. Struct. 75(2), 209–224 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00084-XCrossRef

51.

Mortazavi, A., Toğan, V.: Simultaneous size, shape, and topology optimization of truss structures using integrated particle swarm optimizer. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 54(4), 715–736 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1449-7MathSciNetCrossRef

52.

Degertekin, S.O., Lamberti, L., Ugur, I.B.: Sizing, layout and topology design optimization of truss structures using the Jaya algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 70, 903–928 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.10.001CrossRef

53.

Panagant, N., Bureerat, S.: Truss topology, shape and sizing optimization by fully stressed design based on hybrid grey wolf optimization and adaptive differential evolution. Eng. Optim. 50(10), 1645–1661 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1417400MathSciNetCrossRef

54.

Ahrari, A., Atai, A.A., Deb, K.: Simultaneous topology, shape and size optimization of truss structures by fully stressed design based on evolution strategy. Eng. Optim. 47(8), 1063–1084 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.947972MathSciNetCrossRef

55.

Husseinzadeh Kashan, A., Jalili, S., Karimiyan, S.: Premier league championship algorithm: a multi-population-based algorithm and its application on structural design optimization. In: Kulkarni, A.J., Singh, P.K., Satapathy, S.C., Husseinzadeh Kashan, A., Tai, K. (eds.) Socio-cultural inspired metaheuristics, pp. 215–240. Springer, Singapore (2019)CrossRef

56.

Kaveh, A., Mahdavi, V.R.: Colliding bodies optimization method for optimum discrete design of truss structures. Comput. Struct. 139, 43–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.04.006CrossRef

57.

Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W., Lee, S.-h, Bae, K.-w: The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Eng. Optim. 37(7), 663–684 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150500211895MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Jalili, S., Husseinzadeh Kashan, A.: Optimum discrete design of steel tower structures using optics inspired optimization method. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 27(9), e1466 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1466CrossRef

59.

Do, D.T.T., Lee, J.: A modified symbiotic organisms search (mSOS) algorithm for optimization of pin-jointed structures. Appl. Soft Comput. 61, 683–699 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.002CrossRef

60.

Ho-Huu, V., Hartjes, S., Visser, H.G., Curran, R.: An improved MOEA/D algorithm for bi-objective optimization problems with complex Pareto fronts and its application to structural optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 92, 430–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.051CrossRef

61.

Ho-Huu, V., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Vo-Duy, T., Nguyen-Trang, T.: An adaptive elitist differential evolution for optimization of truss structures with discrete design variables. Comput. Struct. 165, 59–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.11.014CrossRef

62.

Barbosa, H.J.C., Lemonge, A.C.C., Borges, C.C.H.: A genetic algorithm encoding for cardinality constraints and automatic variable linking in structural optimization. Eng. Struct. 30(12), 3708–3723 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.014CrossRef

63.

Groenwold, A.A., Stander, N.: Optimal discrete sizing of truss structures subject to buckling constraints. Struct. Optim. 14(2), 71–80 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01812508CrossRef

64.

Kaveh, A., Shojaee, S.: Optimal design of skeletal structures using ant colony optimization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 70(5), 563–581 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1898MATHCrossRef

65.

Saka, M.P.: Optimum design of pin-jointed steel structures with practical application. J. Struct. Eng. 116(10), 2599–2620 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:10(2599)CrossRef

66.

Toğan, V., Daloğlu, A.T.: Optimization of 3d trusses with adaptive approach in genetic algorithms. Eng. Struct. 28(7), 1019–1027 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.007CrossRef

67.

Toğan, V., Daloğlu, A.T.: An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy and self-adaptive member grouping. Comput. Struct. 86(11), 1204–1218 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.11.006CrossRef

68.

AISC-ASD (1989) Manual of steel construction-Allowable stress design. 9th edn. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, IL, USA

69.

Kaveh, A., Ghazaan, M.I.: Optimal design of steel lattice transmission line towers. In: Ghazaan, M.I., Kaveh, A. (eds.) Meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal design of real-size structures, pp. 123–137. Springer, Cham (2018)MATHCrossRef

70.

Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: A comparative study of CBO and ECBO for optimal design of skeletal structures. Comput. Struct. 153, 137–147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.028CrossRef

71.

Fathali, M.A., Hoseini Vaez, S.R.: Optimum performance-based design of eccentrically braced frames. Eng. Struct. 202, 109857 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109857CrossRef

72.

Kaveh, A., Eslamlou, A.D.: Optimal design of steel curved roof frames by enhanced vibrating particles system algorithm. In: Kaveh, A., Eslamlou, A.D. (eds.) Metaheuristic optimization algorithms in civil engineering: new applications, pp. 73–97. Springer, Cham (2020)MATHCrossRef

73.

Kaveh, A., Izadifard, R.A., Mottaghi, L.: Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. J. Build. Eng. 28, 101014 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101014CrossRef

Titel: A two-step approach for reliability-based design optimization in power transmission line towers
verfasst von: Seyed Rohollah Hoseini Vaez
Mohammad Ali Fathali
Hashem Mehanpour
Publikationsdatum: 31.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1955-2513
Elektronische ISSN: 1955-2505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00838-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Environment and object design for 3D simulation in context of commercial vehicles

Learning analytics: state of the art

Finite element analysis of thermo-mechanical behavior of a multi-layer laser additive manufacturing process

Enhancement of train braking efficiency by optimal flow control characteristics with aerodynamic braking system

The use of video essays and podcasts to enhance creativity and critical thinking in engineering

Development and comparison of airplane fuselage panel assembly system alternatives using axiomatic design principles and simulation methodology