Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Academia–Industry Collaboration: Getting Closer is the Key!

verfasst von : Anna Sandberg

Erschienen in: Continuous Software Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Our greatest developers in industry do not typically view top researchers in academia as people who they can learn particularly much from, and our top researchers in academia do not typically view top developers as people who can contribute much to their research (except supply them with raw data). While researchers have spent years on post-university studies to learn the profession of data collection, data analysis, and data sensemaking, developers are trained to produce and deliver in time based on current best thinking. Taking different paths after the university studies soon ends up in different governing variables for developers and researchers of what brings value. This is a well-known phenomenon, and numerous articles and books are describing why this is the case (Barnes et al., Eur Manag J 20(3):272–285, 2002; Mathiassen, Inf Technol People 14(4):321–345, 2002; Mora-Valentin et al., Res Policy 33(1):17–40, 2004; Gorschek et al., IEEE Softw 23(6):88–95, 2006; Rombach and Achatz, Research collaboration between academia and industry. In: Proc. Future of Software Eng. (FOSE 07), IEEE CS Press, pp. 29–36, 2007; Van den Ven, Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford Univ. Press, 2007). In the Software Center we have found practical ways on how to make developers and researchers appreciate the same values and by that join forces to solve complex software engineering issues. A key instrument is to “get close” on all levels from steering groups to reference groups and research teams. In the following chapter, we describe how we in the Software Center work in practice to stimulate a close collaboration and what is required to make this work over time.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnes, T., Pashby, I., Gibbons, A.: Effective university–industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. Eur. Manag. J. 20(3), 272–285 (2002)CrossRef Barnes, T., Pashby, I., Gibbons, A.: Effective university–industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. Eur. Manag. J. 20(3), 272–285 (2002)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathiassen, L.: Collaborative practice research. Inf. Technol. People 14(4), 321–345 (2002)CrossRef Mathiassen, L.: Collaborative practice research. Inf. Technol. People 14(4), 321–345 (2002)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mora-Valentin, E.M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., Guerras-Martin, L.A.: Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Res. Policy 33(1), 17–40 (2004)CrossRef Mora-Valentin, E.M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., Guerras-Martin, L.A.: Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Res. Policy 33(1), 17–40 (2004)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorschek, T., Wohlin, C., Carre, P., Larsson, S.: A model for technology transfer in practice. IEEE Softw. 23(6), 88–95 (2006)CrossRef Gorschek, T., Wohlin, C., Carre, P., Larsson, S.: A model for technology transfer in practice. IEEE Softw. 23(6), 88–95 (2006)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rombach, D.H., Achatz, R.E.: Research collaboration between academia and industry. In: Proc. Future of Software Eng. (FOSE 07), IEEE CS Press, Washington, pp. 29–36 (2007) Rombach, D.H., Achatz, R.E.: Research collaboration between academia and industry. In: Proc. Future of Software Eng. (FOSE 07), IEEE CS Press, Washington, pp. 29–36 (2007)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Ven, A.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007) Van den Ven, A.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success factors for organizational change in software process improvement. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 4(4), 227–250 (1998)CrossRef Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success factors for organizational change in software process improvement. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 4(4), 227–250 (1998)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grady, R.B.: Successful Software Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1997) Grady, R.B.: Successful Software Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1997)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement. Softw. Process – Improv. Pract. 4(4), 227–250 (1998)CrossRef Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement. Softw. Process – Improv. Pract. 4(4), 227–250 (1998)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Academia–Industry Collaboration: Getting Closer is the Key!
verfasst von
Anna Sandberg
Copyright-Jahr
2014
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11283-1_3

Premium Partner