Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Science and Society. Assessment of Research Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Additional Indexes and Indicators for Assessment of Research Production

verfasst von : Nikolay K. Vitanov

Erschienen in: Science Dynamics and Research Production

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

About forty-five indexes for assessment of research production of single researchers have been discussed in Chap. 2. These indexes are based mainly on citations of publications of the evaluated researcher. The indexes form Chap. 2 can be calculated also for groups of researchers. In addition to indexes from Chap. 2, other indexes useful for assessment of production of groups of researchers may be used. About ninety such indexes are discussed in this chapter. The indexes are grouped in the following classes: simple indexes; indexes for deviation from simple tendency; indexes for difference; indexes for concentration, dissimilarity, coherence, and diversity; indexes for advantage and inequality; indexes for stratified data; indexes for imbalance and fragmentation; indexes based on the concept of entropy; Lorenz curve and associated indexes. In addition, the set of indexes connected to the RELEV method for assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes as well as indicators and indexes for scientific research performance of nations and about comparing national scientific productions are discussed. Finally, we discuss briefly several journal citation measures as well as an example of an application of a geometric tool for detection of scientific elites in a group of institutes on the basis of Lorenz curves.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Commonly Used Indexes for Assessment of Research Production
Nächstes Kapitel Frequency and Rank Approaches to Research Production. Classical Statistical Laws
Literatur
1.
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow, The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (Sage, London, 1994)
2.
L.K. Hessels, H. van Lente, Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Res. Policy 37, 740–760 (2008)CrossRef
3.
R.A. Boschma, Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39, 61–74 (2005)
4.
I. Rafols, Knowledge integration and diffusion: measures and mapping of diversity and coherence, ed. by Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram, Measuring Scholarly Impact. Methods and Practice. (Springer, Cham, 2014), pp. 169–192
5.
W. Glänzel, Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (Ungarische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Budapest, 2003)
6.
P. Brown, The half-life of the chemical literature. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 31, 61–63 (1980)CrossRef
7.
R.E. Burton, R.W. Kebler, The “half-life” of some scientific and technical literatures. Am. Documentation 11, 18–22 (1960)CrossRef
8.
P. Vinkler, The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators (Chandos, Oxford, 2010)CrossRef
9.
P. Vinkler, Publication velocity, publication growth and impact factor: an empirical model, ed by B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series (Information Today Inc, Medford, NJ, 2000), pp. 163–176
10.
P. Vinkler, Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness. Scientometrics 26, 213–230 (1993)CrossRef
11.
A. Przeworski, (Institutionalization of voting patterns or is mobilization the source of decay? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 69, 49–67 (1975)CrossRef
12.
R.R. Shutz, On the measurement of income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 41, 107–122 (1951)
13.
14.
F.A. Cowell, Measuring Inequality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011)CrossRef
15.
P.D. Allison, Measures of inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 43, 865–880 (1978)CrossRef
16.
A.R. Wilcox, Indices of qualitative variation and political measurement. Western Political Quart. 26(2), 325–343 (1973)CrossRef
17.
A.L. Wilcox, Indices of Qualitative Variation. ORRN-TM-1919, (Oak Ridge National Laboratoty, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1967)
18.
S.S. Nagel, Public Policy: Goals, Means and Methods (St. Martin Press, New York, 1984)
19.
A.P. Lüthi, Messung wirtschaflicher Ungleichheit. Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical Systems No. 189 (Springer, Berlin, 1981)
20.
C. Gini, Variabilita e mutabilita (Bologna, Italy, 1912)
21.
L. Ceriani, P. Verme, The origins of Gini index: extracts from variabilita e Mutabilita (1912) by Corrado Gini. J. Econ. Inequality 10, 421–443 (2012)CrossRef
22.
H.G.P. Jansen, Gini’s coefficient of mean difference as a measure of adoption speed: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from India. Agric. Econ. 7, 351–369 (1992)CrossRef
23.
I.I. Eliazar, I.M. Sokolov, Measuring statistical evenness: a panoramic overview. Phys. A 391, 1323–1353 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
25.
26.
B. Milanovic, A simple way to calculate the Gini coefficient, and some implications. Econ. Lett. 56, 45–49 (1997)MATHCrossRef
27.
C.J. Groves-Kirkby, A.R. Denman, P.S. Phillips, Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient: novel tools for analysing seasonal variation of environmental radon gas. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 2480–2487 (2009)CrossRef
28.
J. Yang, X. Huang, X. Liu, An analysis of education inequality in China. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 37, 2–10 (2014)CrossRef
29.
K. Kimura, A micro-macro linkage in the measurement of inequality: another look at the Gini coefficient. Qual. Quant. 28, 83–97 (1994)CrossRef
30.
P.A. Rogerson, The Gini coefficient of inequality: a new interpretation. Lett. Spatial Resour. Sci. 6, 109–120 (2013)CrossRef
31.
M.-H. Huang, H.-H. Chang, D.-Z. Chen, The trend in scientific research and technological innovation: a reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research and technology. J. Infometrics 6, 457–468 (2012)
32.
A. Stirling, A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J. Royal Soc. Interface 4, 707–719 (2007)CrossRef
33.
A.O. Hirschman, National Power and Structure of Foreign Trade (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1945)
34.
O.C. Herfindahl, Concentration in the steel industry. Ph.D. Thesis, (Columbia University, 1950)
35.
R. Linda, Competition policies and measures of dominant power, ed. by H.W. de Jorg. W.G. Shepherd, Mainstreams in Industrial Organization (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 287–307
36.
G. Chammas, J. Spronk. Concentration measures in portfolio management, ed. by S. Greco, B. Bouchoin-Meunter, G. Colleti, M. Fedrizzi, B. Matarazzo, R.R. Yager, Advances in Computational intelligence, in 14th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, IPMU 2012, Catania, Italy, July 9–13, 2012, Proceedings, Part IV. (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 94–103
37.
A. Arlandis, E. Baranes, Interactions between network operators, content producers and internet intermediaries: empirical implications on network neutrality. Intereconomics 2, 98–105 (2011)CrossRef
38.
W. Naude, R. Rossouw, Export diversification and economic performance: evidence from Brazil, China, India and South Africa. Econ. Change Restructuring 44, 99–134 (2011)CrossRef
39.
J. Horvath, Suggestion for a comprehensive measure of concentration. South. Econ. J. 36, 446–452 (1970)CrossRef
40.
J.L. Ray, D. Singer, Measuring the concentration of power in the international system. Sociol. Methods Res. 1, 403–437 (1973)CrossRef
41.
R. Taagepera, J.L. Ray, A generalized index of concentration. Sociol. Methods Res. 5, 367–383 (1977)CrossRef
42.
S. Lieberson, Measuring population diversity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 34, 850–862 (1969)CrossRef
43.
L.A. Renzulli, H. Aldrich, Who can you turn to? The activation within core business discussion networks. Soc. Forces 84, 323–341 (2005)CrossRef
44.
J.R. Bond, The influence of constituency diversity on electoral competition in voting for Congress 1974–1978. Legislative Stud. Quart. 8, 201–217 (1983)CrossRef
45.
46.
C. Ricotta, L. Szeidl, Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao’s quadratic index. Theor. Popul. Biol. 70, 237–243 (2006)MATHCrossRef
47.
L. Cassi, W. Mescheba, E. Turckheim, How to evaluate the degree of interdisciplinarity of an institution? Scientometrics 101, 1871–1895 (2014)CrossRef
48.
O.D. Duncan, B. Duncan, A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 20, 210–217 (1955)CrossRef
49.
R. Taagepera, Inequality, concentration, imbalance. Polit. Methodol. 6, 275–291 (1979)
50.
D.W. Rae, M. Taylor, The Analysis of Political Cleavages (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, 1971)
51.
L. Leydesdorff, Indicators of structural change in the dynamics of science: entropy statistics of the SCI Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics 53, 131–159 (2002)CrossRef
52.
H. Theil, The desired political entropy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63, 521–525 (1969)CrossRef
53.
H. Theil, On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables. Am. J. Sociol. 76, 103–154 (1970)CrossRef
54.
Y. Wang, Decomposing the entropy index of racial diversity: in search of two types of variance. Ann. Reg. Sci. 48, 897–915 (2012)CrossRef
55.
K.D. Bailey, Sociological entropy theory: toward a statistical and verbal congruence. Qual. Quant. 18, 113–133 (1983)CrossRef
56.
B. Raj, J. Koerts (eds.), Henri Theil’s Contributions to Economics and Econometrics. Volume 2: Consumer demand analysis and information theory. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992)
57.
H. Theil, Economics and Information Theory (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967)
58.
D.F. Batten, Spatial Analysis of Intercatting Economies (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1983)CrossRef
59.
K. Kesselman, French local politics: a statistical examination of grass roots consensus. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 60, 963–974 (1966)CrossRef
60.
H. Theil, Statistical Decomposition Analysis (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1972)MATH
61.
J. Fellman, Lorenz curve. ed by M. Lovric. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 760–761
62.
D. Chotikapanich, Modeling Income Distributions and Lorenz Curves (Springer, New York, 2008)MATHCrossRef
63.
E. Scalas, T. Radivoevic, U. Garibaldi, Wealth distribution and Lorenz curve: a finitary approach. J, Econ. Interact. Coordinartion (in press) (2015). doi:10.​1007/​s11403-014-0136-2
64.
G. Warner, A Lorenz curve based index of income stratification. Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 28, 41–57 (2001)CrossRef
65.
J. Tang, X. Wang, Analysis of land use structure based on Lorenz curves. Environ. Monit. Coord. 151, 175–180 (2009)CrossRef
66.
O. Alonso-Villar, Measuring concentration: Lorenz curves and their decompositions. Ann. Reg. Sci. 47, 451–475 (2011)CrossRef
67.
P. Suppes, Lorenz curves for various processes: a pluralistic approach to equity. Soc. Choice Welfare 5, 89–101 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRef
68.
L. Egghe, Conjugate partitions in infometrics: Lorenz curves, h-type indices, Ferrer graphs and Durfee squares in a discrete and continuous setting. J. Infom. 4, 320–330 (2010)CrossRef
69.
R. Rouseau, Measuring concentration: sampling design issues, as illustrated by the case of perfectly stratified samples. Scientometrics 28, 3–14 (1993)CrossRef
70.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Symmetric and asymmetric theory of relative concentration and applications. Scientometrics 52, 261–290 (2001)CrossRef
71.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, How to measure own-group preference? A novel approach to a sociometric problem. Scientometrics 59, 233–252 (2004)CrossRef
72.
R. Ketzer, K.F. Zimmermann, Publications: German scientific institutions on track. Scientometrics 80, 231–252 (2009)CrossRef
73.
S. Shibayama, Distribution of academic research grants: a case of Japanese national research grant. Scientometrics 88, 43–60 (2011)CrossRef
74.
B. Jarneving, Regional research and foreign collaboration. Scientometrics 83, 295–320 (2010)CrossRef
75.
W. Halffman, L. Leydesdorf, Is inequality among universities increasing? Gini coefficients and the elusive rise of elite universities. Minerva 48, 55–72 (2010)CrossRef
76.
T.J. Cleophas, A.H. Zwinderman, Pareto charts for identifying the main factors of multifactorial outcomes. ed. by T.J. Cleophas, A.H. Zwinderman. Machine Learning in Medicine (Springer, Berlin, 2014), pp. 101–106
77.
S.H. Kan, Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2002)MATH
78.
L. Egghe, R.A. Rousseau, A characterization of distributions which satisfy Price’s law and consequences for the laws of Zipf and Mandelbrot. J. Inform. Sci. 12, 193–197 (1986)CrossRef
79.
S. Lieberson, Rank-sum comparisons between groups, ed. by D. Heise. Sociological Methodology (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1976), pp. 276–291
80.
S. Lieberson, An asymmetrical approach to segregation, ed. by C. Peach, V. Robinson, S. Smith. Ethnic Segregation in Cities (Croom Helm, London, 1981), pp. 61–82
81.
N. Toren, V. Kraus, The effects of minority size on women’s position in academia. Soc. Forces 65, 1090–1100 (1987)CrossRef
82.
M. Fosset, J.S. Scott, The measurement of intergroup income inequality: a conceptual review. Social Forces 61, 855–871 (1983)
83.
P.B. Coulter, Measuring the inequity of urban public services. Policy Stud. J. 8, 683–698 (1980)CrossRef
84.
M.T. Marsh, D.A. Schilling, Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74, 1–17 (1994)MATHCrossRef
85.
K. Barker, The UK research assessment exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system. Res. Eval. 16, 3–12 (2007)CrossRef
86.
G. Falavigna, A. Manello, External funding, efficiency and productivity growth in public research: the case of the Italian National Research Council. Res. Eval. 23, 33–47 (2014)CrossRef
87.
B.M. Coursey, A.N. Link, Evaluating technology-based public institutions: the case of radiopharmaceutical standards research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Res. Eval. 7, 147–157 (1998)CrossRef
88.
G. Lewison, Evaluation of national biomedical research outputs through journal-based esteem measures. Res. Eval. 5, 225–235 (1995)CrossRef
89.
C.M. Sa, A. Kretz, K. Sigurdson, Accountability, performance assessment, and evaluation: policy pressures and responses from research councils. Res. Eval. 22, 105–117 (2013)
90.
F. Xu, X.X. Li, W. Meng, W.B. Liu, J. Mingers, Ranking academic impact of world national research institutes014by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Res. Eval. 22, 337–350 (2013)CrossRef
91.
L. Georghiou, Research evaluation in European national science and technology systems. Res. Eval. 5, 3–10 (1995)CrossRef
92.
N. Kastrinos, Y. Katsoulacos, Towards a national system of research evaluation in Greece. Res. Eval. 5, 63–68 (1995)CrossRef
93.
C.-G. Yi, K.-B. Kang, Developments of the evaluation system of government-supported research institutes in Korean science and technology. Res. Eval. 9, 158–170 (2000)CrossRef
94.
M. Coccia, A basic model for evaluation R&D performance: theory and application in Italy. R&D Manage. 31, 453–464 (2001)CrossRef
95.
M. Coccia, Models for measuring the research performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes. R&D Manage. 34, 267–280 (2005)CrossRef
96.
M. Coccia, A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics 65, 307–321 (2005)CrossRef
97.
M. Coccia, Measuring performance of public research units for strategic change. J. Infometrics 2, 184–194 (2008)CrossRef
98.
P. Vinkler, Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics 74, 237–254 (2008)CrossRef
99.
E. Albuquerque, Science and technology systems in less developed countries, ed. by H. Moed, W. Glaänzel, U. Schmoch. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (Kluwer , Dordrecht, 2005), pp. 759–778
100.
A. Basu, The Albuquerque model and efficiency indicators in national scientific productivity with respect to manpower and funding of science. Scientometrics 100, 531–539 (2014)CrossRef
101.
R. Klavans, K. Boyack, Thought leadership: a new indicator for national and institutional comparison. Scientometrics 75, 239–250 (2008)CrossRef
102.
A.F.J. van Raan, Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: research group indicator distributions and correlations. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57, 408–430 (2006)CrossRef
103.
D.A. King, The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430, 311–316 (2004)CrossRef
104.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 9, 281–291 (1986)CrossRef
105.
J.D. Frame, Mainstream Research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia 2, 143–147 (1977)
106.
R. Rousseau, L. Yang, Reflections on the activity index and related indicators. J. Infometrics 6, 413–421 (2012)CrossRef
107.
P. Vinkler, Weighted impact on publications and relative contribution score. Two new indicators characterizing publication activity of countries. Scientometrics 14, 161–163 (1988)CrossRef
108.
G. Abramo, C.A. D’Angelo, How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics 101, 1129–1144 (2014)CrossRef
109.
E. Garfield, Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities (Wiley, New York, 1979)
110.
H.F. Moed, Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J. Informetrics 4, 265–277 (2010)CrossRef
111.
B. Gonzalez-Pereira, V.P. Guerrero-Bote, F. Moya-Anegon, A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J. Informetrics 4, 379–391 (2010)CrossRef
112.
V.P. Guerrero-Bote, F. Moya-Anegon, A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR2 indicator. J. Informetrics 6, 674–688 (2012)CrossRef
113.
L. Waltman, N.J. van Eck, T.N. van Leeuwen, M.S. Visser, A.J.F. van Raan, Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics 87, 467–481 (2011)CrossRef
114.
L. Waltman, N.J. van Eck, T.N. van Leeuwen, M.S. Visser, A.J.F. van Raan, Towards a new crown indicator: some theoretical considerations. J. Informetrics 5, 37–47 (2011)CrossRef
115.
R. Abzug, Community elites and power structure, ed. by R.A. Cnaan, C. Milofsky, Handbook oF Community Movements and Local Organizations (Springer, New York, 2008), pp. 89–101
116.
J.S. Coleman, Power and Structure of Society (Norton, New York, 1974)
117.
L. Trilling, Technological elites in France and the United States. Minerva 17, 225–243 (1979)CrossRef
118.
N. Elias, H. Martins, R. Whitley, Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982)CrossRef
119.
M. Mulkay, The mediating role of the scientific elite. Soc. Stud. Sci. 6, 445–470 (1975)CrossRef
120.
H. Best, U. Becker, Elites in Transition. Elite research in Central and Eastern Europe. (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1997)
121.
H. Zuckerman, Scientific Elites. Nobel laureates in the United States. (Free Press, New York, 1977)
122.
J.N. Parker, C. Lortie, S. Allesina, Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics 85, 129–143 (2010)CrossRef
123.
M. Davis, C. Wilson, Elite researchers in ophthalmology: aspects of publishing strategies, collaboration and multi-disciplinarity. Scientometrics 52, 395–410 (2001)CrossRef
124.
E. Lazega, L. Mounier, M.-T. Jourda, R. Stofer, Organizational vs. personal social capital in scientists’ performance: a multi-level network study of elite French cancer researchers (1996–1998). Scientometrics 67, 27–44 (2006)
125.
C. Cao, R.P. Suttmeier, China’s new scientific elite: distinguished young scientists, the research environment and hopes for Chinese science. China Quart. 168, 960–984 (2001)CrossRef
126.
R.S. Hunter, A.J. Oswald, B.G. Charlton, The elite brain drain. Econ. J. 119, F231–F251 (2009)CrossRef
127.
G. Laudel, Migration currents among scientific elite. Minerva 43, 377–395 (2005)CrossRef
128.
B. Golub, The Croatian scientific elite and its socio-professional roots. Scientometrics 43, 207–229 (1998)CrossRef
129.
N.C. Mullins, Invisible colleges as scientific elites. Scientometrics 7, 357–368 (1985)CrossRef
130.
D. De Solla Price, Little Science, Big Science (Columbia University Press, New York, 1963)
131.
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Price distribution: an exact formulation of Price’s ’square root law’. Scientometrics 7, 211–219 (1985)CrossRef
132.
133.
134.
A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Phys. A 299, 213–221 (2001)MATHCrossRef
135.
A. van Heeringen, P.A. Dijkwel, The relationships between age, mobility and scientific productivity. Part II. Effect of age on productivity. Scientometrics 11, 281–293 (1987)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Additional Indexes and Indicators for Assessment of Research Production
verfasst von
Nikolay K. Vitanov
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Science Dynamics and Research Production

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41629-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-41631-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41631-1_3

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise