Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Agri-biotechnology: Legal and Economic Aspects of Using GMOs in EU

verfasst von : Ewa Woźniak, Tomasz Zimny, Tomasz Twardowski

Erschienen in: Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The development of the bioeconomy, including biotechnology, has significant meaning for many regions in the European Union. Nineteen member states already have a bioeconomy strategy (or a similar strategic document) in place or are in the process of developing a strategy (Haarich S, Bioeconomy development in EU regions: mapping of EU Member States/regions’ research and innovation plans and strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on bioeconomy. Final Report, Framework Contract: 2014.CE.16.BAT Lot 2. Specific Contract: RTD/F1/PP-03681-2015. European Commission, Brussels, 2017). Currently, the development of science and technology creates new opportunities that make bioeconomy one of the most dynamic sectors in the European economy. Biotechnology has the greatest potential impact in the sectors of agriculture, health and industry. The global human population is estimated to reach nine billion people by 2050, which creates a serious challenge for achieving global food security and adequate responses to the effects of climate change. Progress may be achieved by applying knowledge of molecular and genetic mechanisms to create or improve agricultural processes and food production. This chapter aims to review current knowledge on agri-biotechnology, within the context of the legal and economic aspects of using GMOs (genetically modified organisms). The area of GM crops in EU countries in 2017 was marginal. GM plants were cultivated in a few EU countries: Spain (0.1 million hectares), Portugal (less than 0.1 million hectares) and marginally in Slovakia and Czech Republic. As a consequence, EU countries import raw materials and GM products from other countries. Finally, we highlight the legal aspects of using GM plants in agriculture, including GM products that are registered as food and feed. In the last chapter, we present perspectives on the development of the bioeconomy and biotechnology in the European Union.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aboy M, Liddicoat J, Liddell K, Jordan M, Crespo C (2017) After Myriad, what makes a gene patent claim “markedly different” from nature? Nat Biotechnol 35:820–825CrossRef Aboy M, Liddicoat J, Liddell K, Jordan M, Crespo C (2017) After Myriad, what makes a gene patent claim “markedly different” from nature? Nat Biotechnol 35:820–825CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aguilar A, Wohlgemuth R, Twardowski T (2018) Perspectives on bioeconomy. New Biotechnol 40:181–184CrossRef Aguilar A, Wohlgemuth R, Twardowski T (2018) Perspectives on bioeconomy. New Biotechnol 40:181–184CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat BIOEAST (2018) Central and Eastern European initiative for knowledge-based agriculture, aquaculture and forestry in the bioeconomy. http://www.bioeast.com. Accessed 5 Jan 2019 BIOEAST (2018) Central and Eastern European initiative for knowledge-based agriculture, aquaculture and forestry in the bioeconomy. http://​www.​bioeast.​com. Accessed 5 Jan 2019
Zurück zum Zitat Castellari E, Soregaroli C, Venus TJ, Wesseler J (2018) Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations. Food Policy 78:26–37CrossRef Castellari E, Soregaroli C, Venus TJ, Wesseler J (2018) Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations. Food Policy 78:26–37CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Court of Justice of the European Union (2018) Judgment in case C-528/16 confédération paysanne and Others v Premier minister and Ministre de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt. Court of Justice of the European Union Court of Justice of the European Union (2018) Judgment in case C-528/16 confédération paysanne and Others v Premier minister and Ministre de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt. Court of Justice of the European Union
Zurück zum Zitat Custers R (2017) The regulatory status of gene-edited agricultural products in the EU and beyond. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:221–229CrossRef Custers R (2017) The regulatory status of gene-edited agricultural products in the EU and beyond. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:221–229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Directive 2015/412 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their territory Directive 2015/412 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their territory
Zurück zum Zitat EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 8:1879CrossRef EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 8:1879CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ELAW (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. ELAW, Oregon ELAW (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. ELAW, Oregon
Zurück zum Zitat Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the circular economy. EMAF, Cowes Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the circular economy. EMAF, Cowes
Zurück zum Zitat Eurobarometer (2010) Biotechnology: special eurobarometer 341. TNS Opinion & Social, Brussells Eurobarometer (2010) Biotechnology: special eurobarometer 341. TNS Opinion & Social, Brussells
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2005) New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2010) The knowledge based bio-economy (KBBE) in Europe: achievements and challenges. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2010) The knowledge based bio-economy (KBBE) in Europe: achievements and challenges. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2015) Closing the loop: an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2015) Closing the loop: an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2016a) Closing the loop: new circular economy package. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels European Commission (2016a) Closing the loop: new circular economy package. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2016b) Genetically modified commodities in the EU. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2016b) Genetically modified commodities in the EU. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2018b) Directorate-general for research and innovation. Food 2030. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2018b) Directorate-general for research and innovation. Food 2030. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2018d) A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2018d) A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat FAO (2009) The state of food insecurity in the world 2009. FAO, Rome FAO (2009) The state of food insecurity in the world 2009. FAO, Rome
Zurück zum Zitat FEFAC (2015) Economic impact assessment on the European GM authorisation “opt-out” proposal. FEFAC, Brussels FEFAC (2015) Economic impact assessment on the European GM authorisation “opt-out” proposal. FEFAC, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat German Bioeconomy Council (2015) Bioeconomy policy (Part II): synopsis of national strategies around the world. Office of the German Bioeconomy Council, Berlin German Bioeconomy Council (2015) Bioeconomy policy (Part II): synopsis of national strategies around the world. Office of the German Bioeconomy Council, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Haarich S (2017) Bioeconomy development in EU regions: mapping of EU Member States/regions’ research and innovation plans and strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on bioeconomy, Final Report, Framework Contract: 2014.CE.16.BAT Lot 2. Specific Contract: RTD/F1/PP-03681-2015. European Commission, Brussels Haarich S (2017) Bioeconomy development in EU regions: mapping of EU Member States/regions’ research and innovation plans and strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on bioeconomy, Final Report, Framework Contract: 2014.CE.16.BAT Lot 2. Specific Contract: RTD/F1/PP-03681-2015. European Commission, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat Hall J, Matos S, Gold S, Severino LS (2018) The paradox of sustainable innovation: the ‘Eroom’ effect (Moore’s law backwards). J Clean Prod 172:3487–3497CrossRef Hall J, Matos S, Gold S, Severino LS (2018) The paradox of sustainable innovation: the ‘Eroom’ effect (Moore’s law backwards). J Clean Prod 172:3487–3497CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hilgartner S (2007) Making the bioeconomy measurable: politics of an emerging anticipatory machinery. BioSocieties 2:382–386CrossRef Hilgartner S (2007) Making the bioeconomy measurable: politics of an emerging anticipatory machinery. BioSocieties 2:382–386CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISAAA (2018) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years, ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA, Ithaca ISAAA (2018) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years, ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA, Ithaca
Zurück zum Zitat Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46CrossRef Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ 143:37–46CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krön M, Bittner U (2015) Danube soya – improving European GM-free soya supply for food and feed. OCL 22:D509CrossRef Krön M, Bittner U (2015) Danube soya – improving European GM-free soya supply for food and feed. OCL 22:D509CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maciejczak M, Hofreiter K (2013) How to define bioeconomy? Ann Pol Assoc Agric Agribus Econ 15:243–248 Maciejczak M, Hofreiter K (2013) How to define bioeconomy? Ann Pol Assoc Agric Agribus Econ 15:243–248
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez J (1998) Genomics and the world’s economy. Science 281:925–926CrossRef Martinez J (1998) Genomics and the world’s economy. Science 281:925–926CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5:2589–2608CrossRef McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5:2589–2608CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osmakova A, Kirpichnikov M, Popov V (2018) Recent biotechnology developments and trends in the Russian Federation. New Biotechnol 40:76–81CrossRef Osmakova A, Kirpichnikov M, Popov V (2018) Recent biotechnology developments and trends in the Russian Federation. New Biotechnol 40:76–81CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paarlberg D, Paarlberg P (2008) The agricultural revolution of the 20th century. Iowa State University Press, Ames Paarlberg D, Paarlberg P (2008) The agricultural revolution of the 20th century. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Zurück zum Zitat Patermann C, Aguilar A (2018) The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnol 40:20–24CrossRef Patermann C, Aguilar A (2018) The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnol 40:20–24CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paull J (2018) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as invasive species. J Environ Prot Sustain Dev 4:31–37 Paull J (2018) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as invasive species. J Environ Prot Sustain Dev 4:31–37
Zurück zum Zitat Potrykus I (2017) The GMO-crop potential for more, and more nutritious food is blocked by unjustified regulation. J Innov Knowl 2:90–96CrossRef Potrykus I (2017) The GMO-crop potential for more, and more nutritious food is blocked by unjustified regulation. J Innov Knowl 2:90–96CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Regulation-EC (2003) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation-EC (2003) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (Text with EEA relevance)
Zurück zum Zitat Ricroch A, Chopra S, Fleischer SJ (2014) Plant biotechnology. Springer, Cham Ricroch A, Chopra S, Fleischer SJ (2014) Plant biotechnology. Springer, Cham
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt O, Padel S, Levidow L (2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-based Appl Econ 1:47–63 Schmidt O, Padel S, Levidow L (2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-based Appl Econ 1:47–63
Zurück zum Zitat Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) (2016a) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford. 304 pages. ISBN:9781780646534 Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) (2016a) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford. 304 pages. ISBN:9781780646534
Zurück zum Zitat Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (2016b) Biotechnology in agriculture, medicine and industry: an overview. In: Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–4CrossRef Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (2016b) Biotechnology in agriculture, medicine and industry: an overview. In: Singh HB, Jha A, Keswani C (eds) Intellectual property issues in biotechnology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–4CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Singh HB, Keswani C, Singh SP (2019) Intellectual property issues in microbiology. Springer, Singapore. 425 pages. ISBN:9789811374654 Singh HB, Keswani C, Singh SP (2019) Intellectual property issues in microbiology. Springer, Singapore. 425 pages. ISBN:9789811374654
Zurück zum Zitat Smart RD, Blum M, Wesseler J (2017) Trends in approval times for genetically engineered crops in the United States and the European Union. J Agric Econ 68:182–198CrossRef Smart RD, Blum M, Wesseler J (2017) Trends in approval times for genetically engineered crops in the United States and the European Union. J Agric Econ 68:182–198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth SJ, McDonald J, Falck-Zepeda J (2014) Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques. GM Crops Food 5:44–57CrossRef Smyth SJ, McDonald J, Falck-Zepeda J (2014) Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques. GM Crops Food 5:44–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tyczewska A, Woźniak E, Gracz J, Kuczyński J, Twardowski T (2018) Towards food security: current state and future prospects of agrobiotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 36:1219–1229CrossRef Tyczewska A, Woźniak E, Gracz J, Kuczyński J, Twardowski T (2018) Towards food security: current state and future prospects of agrobiotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 36:1219–1229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Braun J (2015) Bioeconomy – science and technology policy to harmonize biologization of economies with food security. In: Sahn D (ed) The fight against hunger and malnutrition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240–262CrossRef von Braun J (2015) Bioeconomy – science and technology policy to harmonize biologization of economies with food security. In: Sahn D (ed) The fight against hunger and malnutrition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240–262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Braun J (2018) Bioeconomy – the global trend and its implications for sustainability and food security. Glob Food Secur 19:81–83CrossRef von Braun J (2018) Bioeconomy – the global trend and its implications for sustainability and food security. Glob Food Secur 19:81–83CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Routsong R, Strand SE (2019) Greatly enhanced removal of volatile organic carcinogens by a genetically modified houseplant, pothos ivy (Epipremnum aureum) expressing the mammalian cytochrome P450 2e1 gene. Environ Sci Technol 53:325–331CrossRef Zhang L, Routsong R, Strand SE (2019) Greatly enhanced removal of volatile organic carcinogens by a genetically modified houseplant, pothos ivy (Epipremnum aureum) expressing the mammalian cytochrome P450 2e1 gene. Environ Sci Technol 53:325–331CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zilberman D, Holland GT, Trilnick I (2018) Agricultural GMOs—what we know and where scientists disagree. Sustainability 10:1514CrossRef Zilberman D, Holland GT, Trilnick I (2018) Agricultural GMOs—what we know and where scientists disagree. Sustainability 10:1514CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Agri-biotechnology: Legal and Economic Aspects of Using GMOs in EU
verfasst von
Ewa Woźniak
Tomasz Zimny
Tomasz Twardowski
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9431-7_2