Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Bringing Success and Value in Sustainable Product Development: The Eco-design Guidelines Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Empirical Study of Visual Comfort in Office Buildings

verfasst von : Isilay Tekce, Deniz Artan, Esin Ergen

Erschienen in: Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2020

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Visual comfort is an important indicator of both occupant satisfaction and work performance. The main goal of this study is to present the visual comfort-related factors that influence occupant satisfaction. To achieve this goal, a detailed literature analysis was conducted to determine the main factors that can be used to evaluate the effect of visual comfort on the satisfaction of office workers. Afterward, interviews were conducted with 12 facility managers, and related work orders created by the facility management teams were investigated to determine visual comfort-related complaint types. Based on the collected data, a hierarchical structure of visual comfort factors was created. Finally, 308 office workers were surveyed to determine (1) the number of respondents with complaints related to each visual comfort factor, (2) the level of importance of the visual comfort related factors, and (3) office worker’s satisfaction levels for each factor. The findings reveal that the largest gap between the perceived importance and satisfaction appears in daylighting and visual privacy. The designers, facility managers, and renovators need to think of design strategies to provide more privacy and access to daylight to occupants in their working environments.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Stakeholder-Driven Conceptualization of Open Innovation Approaches in the SYNERGY Project
Nächstes Kapitel Heterogeneous Dual-Frequency IoT Network for Vital Data Acquisition
Literatur
1.
Antoniadou, P., Papadopoulos, A.: Occupants’ thermal comfort: State of the art and the prospects ofpersonalized assessment in office buildings. Energy Build. 153(2017), 136–149 (2017)CrossRef
2.
Brainard, G., Roberts, J., Veitch, J., and Van den Beld, G.: Ocular lighting effects on human physiology and behaviour. CIE Publ. 158 (2004)
3.
Aries, M.B., Veitch, J.A., Newsham, G.R.: Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. J. Environ. Psychol. 30(4), 533–541 (2010)CrossRef
4.
Charles, K., Veitch, J., Newsham, G., Marquardt, C., ve Geerts, J.: Satisfaction with Ventilation in Open-Plan Offices: COPE Field Findings. NRCC, Canada (2006)
5.
Osterhaus, W.K.: Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments. Sol. Energy 79(2), 140–158 (2005)CrossRef
6.
Chen, P., Chang, C.: Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40(5), 1354–1359 (2005)CrossRef
7.
Afacan, Y., Demirkan, H.: The influence of sustainable design features on indoor environmental quality satisfaction in Turkish dwellings. Architect. Sci. Rev. 59(3), 229–238 (2016)CrossRef
8.
Ahn, Y.H., Pearce, A.R.: Post occupancy study for green school facilities: case study of reedy fork elementary school. In: ICSDEC 2012: Developing the Frontier of Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Construction (pp. 585–592) (2013)
9.
Alzoubi, H., Bataineh, R.F.: Pre-versus post-occupancy evaluation of daylight quality in hospitals. Build. Environ. 45(12), 2652–2665 (2010)CrossRef
10.
Brown, C., Gorgolewski, M.: Assessing occupant satisfaction and energy behaviours in Toronto’s LEED gold high-rise residential buildings. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manage. 8(4), 492–505 (2014)CrossRef
11.
Galasiu, A.D., ve Veitch, J.A.: Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy Build. 38(7), 728–742 (2006)
12.
Gou, Z., Prasad, D., Lau, S.S.-Y.: Impacts of green certifications, ventilation and office types on occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality. Architect. Sci. Rev. 57(3), 196–206 (2014)CrossRef
13.
Gultekin, P., Anumba, C.J., Leicht, R.M.: Case study of integrated decision-making for deep energy-efficient retrofits. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manage. 8(4), 434–455 (2014)
14.
Hauge, Å.L., Thomsen, J., Berker, T.: User evaluations of energy efficient buildings: Literature review and further research. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 5(1), 109–127 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Healey, K., Webster-Mannison, M.: Exploring the influence of qualitative factors on the thermal comfort of office occupants. Architect. Sci. Rev. 55(3), 169–175 (2012)CrossRef
16.
Heerwagen, J., Zagreus, L.: The human factors of sustainable building design: post occupancy evaluation of the Philip Merrill Environmental Center (2005)
17.
Menadue, V., Soebarto, V., Williamson, T.: Perceived and actual thermal conditions: case studies of green-rated and conventional office buildings in the City of Adelaide. Architect. Sci. Rev. 57(4), 303–319 (2014)CrossRef
18.
Paul, W.L., ve Taylor, P.A.: Comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Build. Environ. 43(11), 1858–1870 (2008)
19.
Pheng Low, S., Gao, S., Lin Tay, W.: Comparative study of project management and critical success factors of greening new and existing buildings in Singapore. Struct. Surv. 32(5), 413–433 (2014)
20.
Preiser, W., Vischer, J.: Assessing Building Performance. Routledge, London (2006)
21.
Singh, A., Syal, M., Korkmaz, S., Grady, S.: Costs and benefits of IEQ improvements in LEED office buildings. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 17(2), 86–94 (2010)CrossRef
22.
Turpin-Brooks, S., Viccars, G.: The development of robust methods of post occupancy evaluation. Facilities 24(5/6), 177–196 (2006)CrossRef
23.
Wagner, A., Gossauer, E., Moosmann, C., Gropp, T., Leonhart, R.: Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—results of field studies in German low energy office buildings. Energy Build. 39(7), 758–769 (2007)CrossRef
24.
Atkins, R., ve Emmanuel, R.: Could refurbishment of “traditional” buildings reduce carbon emissions? Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 4(3), 221–237(2014)
25.
Cao, B., Ouyang, Q., Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Hu, H., Deng, G.: Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai. Build. Environ. 47, 394–399 (2012)CrossRef
26.
Jazizadeh, F., Ghahramani, A., Becerik-Gerber, B., Kichkaylo, T., Orosz, M.: Human-building interaction framework for personalized thermal comfort-driven systems in office buildings. J. Comput. Civ. Eng 28(1), 2–16 (2014)CrossRef
27.
Kato, H., Too, L., Rask, A.: Occupier perceptions of green workplace environment: the Australian experience. J. Corporate Real Estate 11(3), 183–195 (2009)CrossRef
28.
Laquatra, J., Pillai, G., Singh, A., Syal, M.M.: Green and healthy housing. J. Architect. Eng. 14(4), 94–97 (2008)CrossRef
29.
Nahmens, I., Joukar, A., Cantrell, R.: Impact of low-income occupant behavior on energy consumption in hot-humid climates. J. Architect. Eng. 21(2), B4014006 (2014)
30.
Nicol, F., McCartney, K.: Smart controls and thermal comfort project. Final report (2000)
31.
Rashid, M., Spreckelmeyer, K., Angrisano, N.J.: Green buildings, environmental awareness, and organizational image. J. Corporate Real Estate 14(1), 21–49 (2012)CrossRef
32.
Seshadhri, G., Topkar, V.: Validation of a questionnaire for objective evaluation of performance of built facilities. J. Perform. Constr. Facilities 30(1), 04014191 (2014)CrossRef
33.
Van Der Voordt, T.J.: Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces. J. Corporate Real Estate 6(2), 133–148 (2004)CrossRef
34.
Zalejska-Jonsson, A.: Parameters contributing to occupants’ satisfaction: green and conventional residential buildings. Facilities 32(7/8), 411–437 (2014)CrossRef
35.
Bakker, L., Hoes-van Oeffelen, E., Loonen, R., Hensen, J.: User satisfaction and interaction with automated dynamic facades: a pilot study. Build. Environ. 78, 44–52 (2014)
36.
Brown, Z., Cole, R.J.: Influence of occupants’ knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour. Build. Res. Inform. 37(3), 227–245 (2009)CrossRef
37.
Garretón, J.Y., Rodriguez, R., Pattini, A.: Effects of perceived indoor temperature on daylight glare perception. Build. Res. Inform. 44(8), 907–919 (2016)CrossRef
38.
Leder, S., Newsham, G.R., Veitch, J.A., Mancini, S., Charles, K.E.: Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: a new analysis. Build. Res. Inform. 44(1), 34–50 (2016)CrossRef
39.
Meir, I.A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., Cicelsky, A.: Post-occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 3(1), 189–219 (2009)CrossRef
40.
Voelker, C., Beckmann, J., Koehlmann, S., Kornadt, O.: Occupant requirements in residential buildings: an empirical study and a theoretical model. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 7(1), 35–50 (2013)CrossRef
41.
Parkin, J.K., Austin, S.A., Pinder, J.A., Baguley, T.S., Allenby, S.N.: Balancing collaboration and privacy in academic workspaces. Facilities 29(1/2), 31–49 (2011)CrossRef
42.
43.
Newsham, G., Birt, B.J., Arsenault, C., Thompson, A.J., Veitch, J.A., Mancini, S., Galasiu, A.D., Bradford, N.G., Macdonald, I.A., Burns, G.J.: Do ‘green’buildings have better indoor environments? New evidence. Build. Res. Inform. 41(4), 415–434 (2013)CrossRef
44.
Wilkinson, S.J., Reed, R., ve Jailani, J.: User satisfaction in sustainable office buildings: a preliminary study. Paper presented at the PRRES 2011: Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Annual Conference (2011)
45.
BS EN 12665: Light and lighting—basic terms and criteria for specifying lighting requirements (2011)
46.
Leech, J.A., Nelson, W.C., Burnett, R.T., Aaron, S., Raizenne, M.E.: It’s about time: a comparison of canadian and american time-activity patterns. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 12(6), 427–432 (2002)CrossRef
47.
Groth, A.: Climatic and non climatic aspect of indoor environment. In: Energy Efficiency Building Design Guidelines for Botswana, pp. 6–9 (2007)
48.
Konis, K.: Predicting visual comfort in side-lit open-plan core zones: results of a field study pairing high dynamic range images with subjective responses. Energy Build. 77, 67–79 (2014)
49.
BS EN 12464-1: Light and lighting—lighting of work places Part 1: Indoor work places (2011)
Metadaten
Titel
An Empirical Study of Visual Comfort in Office Buildings
verfasst von
Isilay Tekce
Deniz Artan
Esin Ergen
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2020

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8130-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-8131-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8131-1_29

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise