nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

01.07.2011

An ERP system performance assessment model development based on the balanced scorecard approach

verfasst von: She-I Chang, David C. Yen, Celeste See-Pui Ng, I-Cheng Chang, Sheng-Yu Yu

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Previously completed research has not been significant when regarding the aspect of deriving a model for measuring the performance of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Therefore, this research attempts to present an objective and quantitative assessment model based on the Balance Scorecard approach for the purpose of appraising the performance of the ERP system. The methodology used in this research involves the Grounded Theory, Expert Questionnaire, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the Fuzzy Theory to filter out and develop the KPIs for the ERP system performance assessment model. It is expected that such a model may be used by enterprises to assess the efficiency of the ERP system during the various stages of management and support within the system. Finally, this assessment model is verified in a case company through the examination of its unbiased and quantifiable assessment approach. This result allows us to further understand authentic efficiency, and explore if enterprises have fulfilled their proposed objectives after the introduction of the ERP system.

Vorheriger Artikel Combining query-by-example and query expansion for simplifying web service discovery

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Akkermans, H. A., Bogerd, P., Yucesan, E., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 284–301.CrossRef

Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2007). Risk management in ERP project introduction: review of the literature. Information & Management, 44(6), 547–567.CrossRef

Appleton, E. L. (1997). How to survive ERP. Datamation, 43(3), 50–53.

Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Pizzini, M. J. (2004). The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. Accounting Review, 79(1), 1–23.CrossRef

Bingi, P., Sharma, M. K., & Godla, J. K. (2001). Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7–14.CrossRef

Booth, R. (1996). Accountants do it by proxy. Management Accounting, 74(5), 48.

Booth, R. (2000). E-performance, management, E-ventually. Management Accounting, 78(1), 21.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: information technology, organizational and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.CrossRef

Clemons, E. K., & Weber, B. W. (1990). Strategic information technology investments: guidelines for decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(2), 10–31.

Dilla, W. N., & Steinbart, P. J. (2005). Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 17, 43–53.CrossRef

Epstein, M. J., & Manzoni, J. (1997). Translating strategy into action. Management Accounting, 79(2), 28–36.

Evans, H., Ashworth, G., Chellew, M., Davison, A., & Towers, D. (1996). Exploiting activity-based information: easy as ABC. Management Accounting, 74(7), 24–29.

Gaiss, M. (1998). Enterprise performance management. Management Accounting, 80(6), 44–46.

Gale, S. F. (2002). For ERP success, create a culture change—small, medium, large—enterprise resource planning. Workforce, 81(9), 88–94.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Education research: An introduction. New York: Longman.

Govindarajan, V. (1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 828–853.CrossRef

Govindarajan, V., & Fisher, J. (1990). Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 259–285.CrossRef

Hammer, M. (2002). Process management and the future of Six Sigma. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 26–32.

Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge.

Hunton, J. E., Mcewen, R. A., & Benson, W. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems: comparing firm performance of adopters and non-adopters. International Journal of Accounting information systems, 4(3), 165–184.CrossRef

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 564–575.CrossRef

Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. (2000). The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. Accounting Review, 75(3), 283–298.CrossRef

Majed, A. M., Abdullah, A. M., & Zairi, M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: a taxonomy of critical factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 352–364.CrossRef

Marakas, G. M. (1998). Decision support systems in the 21st century. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Matolcsy, Z. P., Booth, P., & Wieder, B. (2005). Economic benefits of enterprise resource planning systems: some empirical evidence. Accounting and Finance, 45(3), 439–456.CrossRef

Mccutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11(3), 239–256.CrossRef

McHugh, J. (2000). Binge and pruge now we are know how ERP software’s promise died – and who killed it. eCompany. http://www.ecompany.com/articles/mag/0,1640,6580,00.html.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Milis, K., & Mercken, R. (2004). The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22(2), 87–97.CrossRef

Nicolaou, A. I. (2004). Quality of post-implementation review in ERP systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(1), 25–49.CrossRef

Norris, G., Hurley, J. R., Hartley, K. M., Dunleavy, J. R., & Balls, J. D. (2000). E-Business and ERP: Transforming the enterprise. New York: Wiley.

Olhager, J., & Selldin, E. (2003). Enterprise resource planning survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 365–373.CrossRef

Poston, R., & Grabski, S. (2001). Financial impact of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(4), 271–294.CrossRef

Reinhard, N., & Bergamaschi, S. (2001). Management of ERP System Implementation in Brazil. 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).

Sharda, R., Barr, S. H., & Mcdonnell, J. C. (1988). Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test. Management Science, 34(2), 139–159.CrossRef

Stadtler, H., & Kilger, C. (2000). Supply chain management and advanced planning: Concepts, models, software and case studies. Berlin: Springer.

Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view. Santa Monica: Goodyear.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Turban, E., & Aronson, J. E. (2001). Decision support systems and intelligent systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., & Umble, M. M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 241–257.CrossRef

Yen, D. C., David, C. C., & Jane, C. (2002). A synergic analysis for Web-based enterprise resources planning systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 24(4), 337–346.CrossRef

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., & Abthorpe, M. S. (2004). Enterprise information systems project implementation: a case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 251–266.CrossRef

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.CrossRef

Titel: An ERP system performance assessment model development based on the balanced scorecard approach
verfasst von: She-I Chang
David C. Yen
Celeste See-Pui Ng
I-Cheng Chang
Sheng-Yu Yu
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9225-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Leveraging temporal and spatial separations with the 24-hour knowledge factory paradigm

GIS enabled service site selection: Environmental analysis and beyond

Why adoption and use behavior of IT/IS cannot last?—two studies in China

Semantic enrichment process: An approach to software component reuse in modernizing enterprise systems

A process mining based approach to knowledge maintenance

Global IT and IT-enabled services

Premium Partner