Skip to main content

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Methodology for Selecting Suitable Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects

verfasst von : N. Soltanikarbaschi, A. Hammad

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate Project Delivery Method (PDM) for a project can influence a project’s success significantly. No one PDM is the perfect option for all projects. The most suitable PDM should be chosen based on specific requirements, characteristics, and success factors of the project. Design-bid-build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), and construction management at risk (CMR) are typical PDM alternatives that owners can choose based on the specific needs of the project. PDM selection is a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem that is affected by several factors. In this research, a three-phase model will be presented. First, a list of critical factors that affect PDM selection is developed. Second, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to derive selection criteria weights based on the owner’s needs and preferences. Finally, having criteria weights, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is proposed for ranking PDM alternatives. The results provide decision makers with a systematic solution to overcome the challenges in selecting the most suitable PDM for their projects.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Khalil MI (2002) Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP. Int J Project Manag 20(02):469–474CrossRef Al Khalil MI (2002) Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP. Int J Project Manag 20(02):469–474CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Harbi KA (2001) Application of AHP in project management. Int J Project Manag 19:19–27CrossRef Al-Harbi KA (2001) Application of AHP in project management. Int J Project Manag 19:19–27CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhazmi T, McCaffer R (2000) Project procurement system selection model. J Constr Eng Manag 126(3):176–184CrossRef Alhazmi T, McCaffer R (2000) Project procurement system selection model. J Constr Eng Manag 126(3):176–184CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Contractual Arrangements (Report A-7) (1982) Business roundtable, New York, USA Contractual Arrangements (Report A-7) (1982) Business roundtable, New York, USA
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung SO, Lam TI, Wan YW, Lam KC (2001) Improving objectivity in procurement selection. J Manage Eng ASCE 17(3):132–239 Cheung SO, Lam TI, Wan YW, Lam KC (2001) Improving objectivity in procurement selection. J Manage Eng ASCE 17(3):132–239
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan APC, Yung EHK, Lam PTI, Tam CM, Cheung SO (2001) Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. J Constr Manag Econ 19(7):699–718CrossRef Chan APC, Yung EHK, Lam PTI, Tam CM, Cheung SO (2001) Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. J Constr Manag Econ 19(7):699–718CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YQ, Liu JY, Li B, Lin B (2011) Project delivery system of construction projects in China. Int J Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5456–5462CrossRef Chen YQ, Liu JY, Li B, Lin B (2011) Project delivery system of construction projects in China. Int J Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5456–5462CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding J, Wang N, Hu L (2018) Framework for designing project delivery and contract strategy in Chinese construction industry based on value-added analysis. Adv Civ Eng Ding J, Wang N, Hu L (2018) Framework for designing project delivery and contract strategy in Chinese construction industry based on value-added analysis. Adv Civ Eng
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Konchar M, Sanvido V (1998) Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems. J Constr Eng Manag 124(6):435–444 Konchar M, Sanvido V (1998) Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems. J Constr Eng Manag 124(6):435–444
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane E, Verdini W (1989) A consistency test for AHP decision makers. J Decis Sci 20(3) Lane E, Verdini W (1989) A consistency test for AHP decision makers. J Decis Sci 20(3)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller JB (2000) Construction project delivery systems, public and private infrastructure. Aspen Wiley Law & Business, New YorkCrossRef Miller JB (2000) Construction project delivery systems, public and private infrastructure. Aspen Wiley Law & Business, New YorkCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K (2005) Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Project Manag 23:564–572CrossRef Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K (2005) Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Project Manag 23:564–572CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Molenaar KR, Songer AD, Barash M (1998) Public-sector design/build evolution and performance. J Manag Eng 15(2):54–62CrossRef Molenaar KR, Songer AD, Barash M (1998) Public-sector design/build evolution and performance. J Manag Eng 15(2):54–62CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mostafavi A, Karamouz M (2010) Selecting appropriate project delivery system: fuzzy approach with risk analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 136(8):923–930CrossRef Mostafavi A, Karamouz M (2010) Selecting appropriate project delivery system: fuzzy approach with risk analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 136(8):923–930CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mafakheri F, Dai L, Slezak D, Nasiri F (2007) Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: multi-criteria multi-level decision aid model. J Constr Eng Manag 23(4):200–206 Mafakheri F, Dai L, Slezak D, Nasiri F (2007) Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: multi-criteria multi-level decision aid model. J Constr Eng Manag 23(4):200–206
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Oyetunji AA, Anderson SD (2006) Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies. J Constr Eng Manag 132(1):3–13CrossRef Oyetunji AA, Anderson SD (2006) Relative effectiveness of project delivery and contract strategies. J Constr Eng Manag 132(1):3–13CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process: planning, priority, setting. McGraw Hill International Book Co., New York Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process: planning, priority, setting. McGraw Hill International Book Co., New York
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. Kobe, Japan. 1980: pp. 1–69 Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. Kobe, Japan. 1980: pp. 1–69
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Temesi J (2006) Consistency of the decision-maker in pairwise comparisons. Int J Manag Decis Making 7(2–3) Temesi J (2006) Consistency of the decision-maker in pairwise comparisons. Int J Manag Decis Making 7(2–3)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran D, Harper C, Molenaar K, Haddad N, Scholfeild M (2013) Project delivery selection matrix for highway design and construction. J Transp Res Board 2347:3–10CrossRef Tran D, Harper C, Molenaar K, Haddad N, Scholfeild M (2013) Project delivery selection matrix for highway design and construction. J Transp Res Board 2347:3–10CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its application. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):2–8CrossRef Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its application. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):2–8CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon Y, Jung J, Hyun C (2016) Decision-making support systems using case-based reasoning for construction project delivery method selection: focused on the road construction projects in Korea. Open Civ Eng J 10:500–512CrossRef Yoon Y, Jung J, Hyun C (2016) Decision-making support systems using case-based reasoning for construction project delivery method selection: focused on the road construction projects in Korea. Open Civ Eng J 10:500–512CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Methodology for Selecting Suitable Project Delivery Method for Construction Projects
verfasst von
N. Soltanikarbaschi
A. Hammad
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_48