nach oben

Quality & Quantity

Erschienen in:

12.03.2019

An investigation of impact of research collaboration on academic performance in Italy

verfasst von: Luigi Aldieri, Gennaro Guida, Maxim Kotsemir, Concetto Paolo Vinci

Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate theoretically and empirically the impact of research collaborations on the scientific performance of Italian academic institutions. Data are derived from the international Scopus and Web of Science databases. We consider both quantity (the number of publications made in collaboration) and quality indicators from different databases (using indexes such as IF5Y (5-year impact factor of the journal, Web of Science), SJR (SCImago Journal Rank—key integral indicator of the quality of journals, Scopus), IPP (Impact per Publication, Scopus), AIS (Article Influence Scores, Web of Science), H-index (Google Scholar Hirsch-index metric) to evaluate the Italian case of scientific research. To this end, we develop a theoretical and empirical model to consider endogeneity of explanatory variables, the generalized method of moment estimation. The results suggest that international collaborations have a higher impact on the research quality index in Italy.

Vorheriger Artikel A quantitative model for the spread of online information

Nächster Artikel Looking for the sectoral interdependence: evidence from the Visegrad countries and China

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

See more about Scopus on https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus.

See more about Web of Science on https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science/.

All databases of Web of Science are listed and briefly described here https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science/databases/.

See more about the full coverage of Web of Science database on this link: https://clarivate.com/blog/news/back-future-institute-scientific-information-re-established-within-clarivate-analytics/.

The key ‘leitmotiv’ of the reviewed papers on application of non-overlapping generation models is related to the fair distribution of utility, wealth, money over generations.

All these indicators are calculated in Scopus SciVal analytical tool for any given set of countries, organizations and individual researchers. Scopus SciVal is ‘a ready-to-use solution with unparalleled power and flexibility, SciVal enables you to visualize research performance, benchmark relative to peers, develop collaborative partnerships and analyze research trends’ (see more about the features of the SciVal tool at https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scival and also in Colledge and Verlinde 2014; Reznik-Zellen 2016).

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., Solazzi, M.: Assessing public–private research collaboration: is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics 84(1), 173–197 (2010)

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F.: University–industry research collaboration: a model to assess university capability. High. Educ. 62(2), 163–181 (2011a)

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F., Solazzi, M.: The role of information asymmetry in the market for university–industry research collaboration. J. Technol. Transf. 36(1), 84–100 (2011b)

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Solazzi, M.: A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university–industry research collaborations. Scientometrics 91(3), 955–975 (2012)

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Rosati, F.: The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system. Scientometrics 109, 2093–2117 (2016)

Acemoglu, D.A.: Microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. Q. J. Econ. 111(3), 779–804 (1996)

Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., León, M.D.: Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: the role of economic distance. Scientometrics 87(1), 63–74 (2010)

Ajiferuke, I.: Inter-university collaboration in Canada. Can. J. Inf. Libr. Sci. 29(4), 407–418 (2005)

Aldieri, L., Vinci, C.P.: R&D spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 21(04). Paper no. 1750035 (2017)

Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M.N., Vinci, C.P.: The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: an empirical analysis for Russian universities / university library of Munich. Series “Munich Personal RePEc Archive”. No. 79408 (2017)

Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., Vinci, C.P.: The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: an empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 62, 13–30 (2018a)

Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M.N., Vinci, C.P.: The effects of collaboration on research performance of universities: an analysis by federal district and Scientific Fields in Russia. J. Knowl. Econ. (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0570-9

Alesina, A., Angeletos, G.M.: Corruption, inequality, and fairness. J. Monet. Econ. 52(7), 1227–1244 (2005)

Ancaiani, A., Anfossi, A.F., Barbara, A., Benedetto, S., Blasi, B., Carletti, V., Costantini, M.: Evaluating scientific research in Italy: the 2004–10 research evaluation exercise. Res. Eval. 24, 242–255 (2015)

Anderson, T.W.: Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. Ann. Math. Stat. 34(1), 122–148 (1963)

ANVUR: Rapporto Finale Valutazione della Qualità della Ricerca 2004-2010. Luglio, Roma (2013)

Arawatari, R.: Informatization, voter turnout and income inequality. J. Econ. Inequal. 7(1), 29–54 (2009)

Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(7), 1320–1326 (2009)

Autant-Bernard, C., Billand, P., Frachisse, D., Massard, N.: Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap. Reg. Sci. 86(3), 495–519 (2007)

Balconi, M., Laboranti, A.: University–industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Res. Policy 35(10), 1616–1630 (2006)

Balconi, M., Lorenzi, V., Saviotti, P., Zucchella, A.: Cognitive and geographic distance in research collaborations: The case of Italian biotechnology firms, 2011. Paper presented at the 9th Triple Helix International Conference, Stanford University, 11–14 July 2011 (2011)

Balland, P.A., Suire, R., Vicente, J.: Structural and geographical patterns of knowledge networks in emerging technological standards: evidence from the European GNSS industry. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 22(1), 47–72 (2013)

Banal-Estanol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., Meissner, C.: The impact of industry collaboration on research: evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Working paper of City University London (2010). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6431413.pdf. Access date 02 Aug. 2018

Bao, H.: Multi-period risk sharing under financial fairness. Ph.D. thesis, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg (2016)

Bassecoulard, E., Okubo, Y., Zitt, M.: Insights in determinants of international scientific cooperation. In: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Collaboration in Science and in Technology, pp. 13–28 (2000)

Beaudry, C., Allaoui, S. (2011 ): Impact of research funding on nanobiotechnology scientific production: Does concentration in a few universities make sense? In: 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, pp. 1–28. IEEE (2011, September)

Bergé, L.R.: Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 96(4), 785–815 (2017)

Bernela, B., Levy, R.: Collaboration networks within a French cluster: do partners really interact with each other? Pap. Reg. Sci. 96(1), 115–138 (2017)

Bertocchi, G.: The Vanishing Bequest Tax: The Comparative Evolution of Bequest Taxation in Historical Perspective. IZA discussion papers, paper No. 2578 (2007)

Bird, C., Devanbu, P., Barr, E., Filkov, V., Nash, A., Su, Z.: Structure and dynamics of research collaboration in computer science. In: Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 826–837. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2009, April)

Boschma, R.: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39(1), 61–74 (2005)

Bouba-Olga, O., Ferru, M., Pépin, D.: Exploring spatial features of science-industry partnerships: a study on French data. Pap. Reg. Sci. 91(2), 355–375 (2012)

Bovenberg, L., Mehlkopf, R.: Optimal design of funded pension schemes. Ann. Rev. Econ. 6(1), 445–474 (2014)

Broekel, T., Boschma, R.: Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. J. Econ. Geogr. 12(2), 409–433 (2011)

Broekel, T., Hartog, M.: Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration networks: an application of exponential random graph models. In: The Geography of Networks and R&D Collaborations, pp. 49–70. Springer, Cham (2013)

Bruno, B.: Economics of co-authorship. Econ. Anal. Policy 44(2), 212–220 (2014)

Calignano, G.: Italian organisations within the European nanotechnology network: presence, dynamics and effects. DIE ERDE J. Geogr. Soc. Berlin 145(4), 241–259 (2014)

Carboni, O.A.: Spatial and industry proximity in collaborative research: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. J. Technol. Transf. 38(6), 896–910 (2013)

Chakravarty, R., Madaan, D.: SCOPUS reflected study of selected research and higher education institutions (HEIs) of Chandigarh: a city of education and research. Library Hi Tech News 33(2), 12–14 (2016)

Chang, H.W., Huang, M.H.: The effects of research resources on international collaboration in the astronomy community. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(10), 2489–2510 (2016)

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Benavent-Pérez, M., de Moya-Anegón, F., Miguel, S.: International collaboration in Medical Research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(11), 2223–2238 (2012)

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Bu, Y., Robinson-García, N., Costas, R., & Sugimoto, C. R.: Revealing existing and potential partnerships: Affinities and asymmetries in international collaboration and mobility. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 869–880 (2017)

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Bu, Y., Robinson-García, N., Costas, R., Sugimoto, C.R.: Travel bans and scientific mobility: utility of asymmetry and affinity indexes to inform science policy. Scientometrics 116(1), 569–590 (2018a)

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Larivière, V., Costas, R., Robinson-García, N., Sugimoto, C.: Building ties across countries: international collaboration, field specialization, and global leadership. In: 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018), September 12–14, 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) (2018b, September)

Chuang, K.Y., Ho, Y.S.: An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Curr. Sci. 108(5), 933–941 (2015)

Chung, K.H., Cox, R.A., Kim, K.A.: On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: evidence from the finance academe. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 49(3), 893–916 (2009)

Colledge, L., Verlinde, R.: SciVal metrics guidebook. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

Crescenzi, R., Filippetti, A., Iammarino, S.: Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry. J. Technol. Transf. 42(4), 730–762 (2017)

Cunningham, S.W., Werker, C.: Proximity and collaboration in European nanotechnology. Pap. Reg. Sci. 91(4), 723–742 (2012)

D’Este, P., Guy, F., Iammarino, S.: Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter? J. Econ. Geogr. 13(4), 537–558 (2012)

Dasgupta, P.S.: On the concept of optimum population. Rev. Econ. Stud. 36(3), 295–318 (1969)

Di Cagno, D., Fabrizi, A., Meliciani, V.: The impact of participation in European joint research projects on knowledge creation and economic growth. J. Technol. Transf. 39(6), 836–858 (2014)

Dong, B., Torgler, B.: Democracy, property rights, income equality, and corruption. Nota di lavoro Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Global challenges, No. 08.2011 (2011)

Elhorst, J.P., Zigova, K.: Competition in research activity among economic departments: evidence by negative spatial autocorrelation. Geogr. Anal. 46(2), 104–125 (2014)

Evans, T.S., Lambiotte, R., Panzarasa, P.: Community structure and patterns of scientific collaboration in business and management. Scientometrics 89(1), 381–396 (2011)

Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., Pappas, G.: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22(2), 338–342 (2008)

Fantino, D., Mori, A., Scalise, D.: Collaboration between firms and universities in Italy: the role of a firm’s proximity to top-rated departments. Italian Econ. J. 1(2), 219–251 (2015)

Fernández, A., Ferrándiz, E., León, M.D.: Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: the closer, the better? Scientometrics 106(3), 1073–1092 (2016)

Fleming, L., King III, C., Juda, A.I.: Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(6), 938–954 (2007)

Frenken, K., Hoekman, J., Kok, S., Ponds, R., van Oort, F., van Vliet, J.: Death of distance in science? A gravity approach to research collaboration. In: Pyka, A., Scharnhorst, A. (eds.) Innovation Networks. Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 43–57. Springer, Berlin (2009)

Fritsch, M., Schwirten, C.: Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Ind. Innov. 6(1), 69–83 (1999)

Fu, J.Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y.H., Tong, H.F., Chen, D.Z., Huang, M.H.: Scientific production and citation impact: a bibliometric analysis in acupuncture over three decades. Scientometrics 93(3), 1061–1079 (2012)

Garcia, A., López-López, W., Acevedo-Triana, C.A., Bucher-Maluschke, J.S.N.F.: Cooperation in the Latin American behavioral sciences: motivation, evaluation and difficulties. Suma Psicológica 23(2), 125–132 (2016)

Garcia, R., Araújo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E.G.D., Costa, A.R.: An analysis of the relation between geographical and cognitive proximity in university–industry linkages. In: Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] (No. 132) (2018)

Gausia, K., Thompson, S.C., Lindeman, M.A., Brown, L.J., Perkins, D.: Contribution of university departments of rural health to rural health research: an analysis of outputs. Aust. J. Rural Health 23(2), 101–106 (2015)

Gigliotti, G.A.: Total utility, overlapping generations and optimal population. Rev. Econ. Stud. 50(1), 71–86 (1983)

Giunta, A., Pericoli, F.M., Pierucci, E.: University–Industry Collaboration in Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Italian Case. Paper presented at 55th Italian Economic Association Conference, Trento, Italy, 23–25 October 2014 (2014, May)

Giunta, A., Pericoli, F.M., Pierucci, E.: University–industry collaboration in the biopharmaceuticals: the Italian case. J. Technol. Transf. 41(4), 818–840 (2016)

Granovetter, M.: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91(3), 481–510 (1985)

Graue, M., Iversen, M.M., Sigurdardottir, Á.K., Zoffmann, V., Smide, B., Leksell, J.: Diabetes research reported by nurses in Nordic countries. Eur. Diabetes Nurs. 10(2), 46–51 (2013)

Guida, G.: Italian economics departments’ scientific research performance: comparison between VQR and ASN methodologies. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 13(9), 182–188 (2018)

Haagsma, R., Koning, N.: Endogenous norms and preferences and the farm income problem. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 32(1), 25–49 (2005)

Hardeman, S., Frenken, K., Nomaler, Ö., Ter Wal, A.: A proximity approach to territorial science systems. In: EUROLIO Conference on ‘Geography of Innovation’, Saint-Etienne, France, pp. 24–26 (2012, January)

Hautala, J.: Cognitive proximity in international research groups. J. Knowl. Manag. 15(4), 601–624 (2011)

Havemann, F., Heinz, M., Kretschmer, H.: Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes—a trend analysis. J. Biomed. Discov. Collab. 1(1), 6 (2006)

Hazir, C.S., Autant-Bernard, C.: Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: some empirical evidence from Europe in biotechnology. Ann. Reg. Sci. 53(2), 369–393 (2014)

Heringa, P.W., Hessels, L.K., van der Zouwen, M.: The influence of proximity dimensions on international research collaboration: an analysis of European water projects. Ind. Innov. 23(8), 753–772 (2016)

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., Van Oort, F.: The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Ann. Reg. Sci. 43(3), 721–738 (2009)

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., Tijssen, R.J.: Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res. Policy 39(5), 662–673 (2010)

Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: software of the mind. McGraw Hill, London (1991)

Hofstede, G., Bond, M.H.: Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. an independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 15(4), 417–433 (1984)

Hong, W., Su, Y.S.: The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: an analysis based on Chinese patent data. Res. Policy 42(2), 454–464 (2013)

Isiordia-Lachica, P., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Angulo, G., Chávez, K., Barboza-Flores, M.: Measurement of scientific research performance at the Universidad De Sonora, México. In: 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), pp. 204–210. IEEE (2015, August)

Katz, J.S.: Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 31(1), 31–43 (1994)

Khor, K.A., Yu, L.G.: Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics 107(3), 1095–1110 (2016)

Khosrowjerdi, M., Bayat, M.K., Eslami, A., Hajipoor, M., Zeraatkar, N.: Proximity rule and Matthew effect in co-authorships of Iranian medical universities. Webology 8(2), 1 (2011)

Khosrowjerdi, M., Zeraatkar, N., Hajipour, M.: Proximity and Matthew effect in co-authorship pattern of Iranian top universities. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 17(2), 71–82 (2012)

Kodama, H., Watatani, K., Sengoku, S.: Competency-based assessment of academic interdisciplinary research and implication to university management. Res. Eval. 22(2), 93–104 (2012)

Kotsemir, M., Shashnov, S.: Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members. Scientometrics 112(3), 1659–1689 (2017)

Kotsemir, M., Kuznetsova, T., Nasybulina, E., Pikalova, A.: Identifying Directions for Russia’s science and technology cooperation. Foresight STI Gov. 9(4), 54–72 (2015)

Kryger, E.M.: Fairness versus efficiency of pension schemes. Eur. Actuar. J. 1(1), 85–100 (2011)

Kuld, L.: A local idea space: the value of personal and thematic proximity in academic research. Working paper no. tep0617. Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics (2017)

Kumar, S., Jan, J.M.: Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010. Scientometrics 97(3), 491–517 (2013)

Lander, B.: Proximity at a distance: the role of institutional and geographical proximities in Vancouver’s infection and immunity research collaborations. Ind. Innov. 22(7), 575–596 (2015)

Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

Landry, R., Traore, N., Godin, B.: An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. High. Educ. 32(3), 283–301 (1996)

Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Archambault, E.: Comparative analysis of networks of collaboration of Canadian researchers in the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics 68(3), 519–533 (2006)

Lee, C., Yoon, T.-J., Sohn, S.: Reception of South Korean satellite television: In Depth Interview with Korean-Chinese in Yanbian. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Seoul, South Korea, 15–19 July 2002 (2002)

Liang, L., Zhu, L.: Major factors affecting China’s inter-regional research collaboration: regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity. Scientometrics 55(2), 287–316 (2002)

Liberati, D., Marinucci, M., Tanzi, G.M.: Science and technology parks in Italy: main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted. J. Technol. Transf. 41(4), 694–729 (2016)

Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbio, F., Pezzoni, M.: Scientific productivity and academic promotion: a study on French and Italian physicists. Ind. Corp. Change 20(1), 253–294 (2011)

Lord, W., Rangazas, P.: Savings and wealth in models with altruistic bequests. Am. Econ. Rev. 81(1), 289–296 (1991)

Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., Sivertsen, G.: Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 17(1), 101–126 (1992)

Ma, H., Fang, C., Pang, B., Li, G.: The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010. PLoS ONE 9(11), e111705 (2014)

Marek, P., Titze, M., Fuhrmeister, C., Blum, U.: R&D collaborations and the role of proximity. Reg. Stud. 51(12), 1761–1773 (2017)

Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Vindefjärd, A.N., Sundberg, C.J.: What do European research collaboration networks in life sciences look like? Res. Eval. 19(5), 373–384 (2010)

Meade, J.E.: Trade and Welfare. Oxford Press, Oxford (1965)

Medoff, M.H.: The input relationship between co-authors in economics: a production function approach. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 66(2), 289–308 (2007)

Meho, L.I., Yang, K.: A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2006). arXiv preprint arXiv:0612132

Mena-Chalco, J.P., Digiampietri, L.A., Lopes, F.M., Cesar, R.M.: Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(7), 1424–1445 (2014)

Meyborg, M., Schaffer, A.: Regional and global collaborations for knowledge in German academia. Rev. Reg. Res. 34(2), 157–176 (2014)

Muscio, A.: University–industry linkages: what are the determinants of distance in collaborations? Pap. Reg. Sci. 92(4), 715–739 (2013)

Muscio, A., Pozzali, A.: The effects of cognitive distance in university–industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities. J. Technol. Transf. 38(4), 486–508 (2013)

Nagpaul, P.: Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics 56(3), 403–416 (2003)

Nooteboom, B.: Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Res. Policy 28(8), 793–805 (1999)

Nooteboom, B.: Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. OUP, Oxford (2000)

O’Leary, J.D., Crawford, M.W., Jurczyk, E., Buchan, A.: Benchmarking bibliometrics in biomedical research: research performance of the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine, 2008–2012. Scientometrics 105(1), 311–321 (2015)

Obamba, M.O., Mwema, J.K.: Symmetry and asymmetry: new contours, paradigms, and politics in African academic partnerships. High. Educ. Policy 22(3), 349–371 (2009)

Okamuro, H., Nishimura, J.: A Hidden Role of Public Subsidy in University–Industry Research Collaborations. Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series, Paper No. 183. (2011)

Olmeda-Gómez, C., Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Antonia Ovalle-Perandones, M., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., de Moya Anegón, F.: Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities: From regionalization to internationalization. In: Aslib Proceedings, vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 83–100. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2009, January)

Ortega, J.L.: Influence of co-authorship networks in the research impact: ego network analyses from Microsoft Academic Search. J. Inform. 8(3), 728–737 (2014)

Paier, M., Scherngell, T.: Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Ind. Innov. 18(1), 89–104 (2011)

Peres-Neto, P.R., Jackson, D.A., Somers, K.M.: Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 84(9), 2347–2363 (2003)

Polanyi, K.: The Great Transformation. Beacon Press, Boston (1944)

Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., Frenken, K.: The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 86(3), 423–443 (2007)

Reiter, M.: The optimal nonlinear taxation of capital in models with uninsurable income risk. Working paper by Institut für Höhere Studien—Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Vienna (2004). http://elaine.ihs.ac.at/~mreiter/nltax.pdf. Access date 01 Aug. 2018

Rey-Rocha, J., Garzón-García, B., Martín-Sempere, M.J.: Scientists’ performance and consolidation of research teams in Biology and Biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics 69(2), 183–212 (2006)

Reznik-Zellen, R.: Benchmarking with SciVal in scholarly communication and research services. Library Connect, Elsevier (2016). https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/sites/default/files/LCN_Reznik-Zellen_April-25-2016.pdf. Access date 01 Aug. 2018

Riahi, A., Siamian, H., Zareh, A., Alizadeh Navaei, R., Haghshenas, M.R.: Quantitative evaluation of scientific productions in Iran in immunology and microbiology indexed in Scopus database (2000–2012). J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci. 24(118), 205–213 (2014)

Rivellini, G., Rizzi, E., Zaccarin, S.: The science network in Italian population research: an analysis according to the social network perspective. Scientometrics 67(3), 407–418 (2006)

Roebken, H.: The formation and development of co-operations among South African universities. High. Educ. 56(6), 685–698 (2008)

Scherngell, T., Hu, Y.: Collaborative knowledge production in China: regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Reg. Stud. 45(6), 755–772 (2011)

Shashnov, S., Kotsemir, M.: Measuring the research capacity of a university: use of Web of Science and Scopus. In: 2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2015. Conference Proceedings, Vol. II. Book 1: Psychology and Psychiatry, Sociology and Healthcare, Education, pp. 621–628. STEF92 Technology Ltd., Sofia (2015)

Shashnov, S., Kotsemir, M.: Research landscape of the BRICS countries: current trends in re-search output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics 117(2), 1115–1155 (2018)

Sokolov, A., Shashnov, S., Kotsemir, M., Grebenyuk, A.: Identification of priorities for S&T cooperation of BRICS countries. Int. Organ. Res. J. 12, 32–67 (2017)

Staiger, D., Stock, J.H.: Instrumental variables with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3), 557–586 (1997)

Stein, D.J., Daniels, W., Emsley, R., Harvey, B., Blackburn, J., Carey, P., Ellis, G., Illing, N., Flisher, A., Moolman-Smook, H., Mwaba, K.: A brain-behaviour initiative for South Africa: the time is right. Metab. Brain Dis. 21(2–3), 266–271 (2006)

Stock, J.H., Wright, J.H., Yogo, M.: A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20(4), 518–529 (2002)

Sun, Y.: The structure and dynamics of intra-and inter-regional research collaborative networks: the case of China (1985–2008). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 108, 70–82 (2016)

Sun, Y., Cao, C.: Intra-and inter-regional research collaboration across organizational boundaries: evolving patterns in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 96, 215–231 (2015)

Sutter, M., Kocher, M.: Patterns of co-authorship among economics departments in the USA. Appl. Econ. 36(4), 327–333 (2004)

Sweileh, W.M., Shraim, N.Y., Sa’ed, H.Z., Al-Jabi, S.W.: Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus 5(1), 1–8 (2016)

Trepte, S.: Cultural proximity in TV entertainment: an eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of US prime-time fiction. Communications 33(1), 1–25 (2008)

Vieira, E., Gomes, J.: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics 81(2), 587–600 (2009)

Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., Grimaldi, R.: How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: a proximity approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 114, 86–102 (2017)

Zaharopoulos, T.: International news coverage: 1988 U.S. presidential campaign in the Greek press. Journal. Q. 67(1), 190–195 (1990)

Zdravkovic, M., Chiwona-Karltun, L., Zink, E.: Experiences and perceptions of South–South and North–South scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities. Scientometrics 108(2), 717–743 (2016)

Zhou, P., Tijssen, R., Leydesdorff, L.: University–industry collaboration in China and the USA: a bibliometric comparison. PLoS ONE, 11(11), paper no. e0165277 (2016)

Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., Okubo, Y.: Shadows of the past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics 47(3), 627–657 (2000)

Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R.: Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products. J. Technol. Transf. 26(1–2), 37–58 (2001)

Titel: An investigation of impact of research collaboration on academic performance in Italy
verfasst von: Luigi Aldieri
Gennaro Guida
Maxim Kotsemir
Concetto Paolo Vinci
Publikationsdatum: 12.03.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00853-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Generalization of results and neoclassical rationality: unresolved controversies of behavioural economics methodology

Job satisfaction as a determinant of employees’ optimal well-being in an instrumental variable approach

A quantitative model for the spread of online information

Health progress and economic growth in the United States: the mixed frequency VAR analyses

Does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies in heavily polluting industries

Setting research priorities in the field of emergency management: which piece of information are you willing to pay more?

Premium Partner