Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Policy Sciences
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences 1/2008

01.03.2008

Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective

verfasst von: Krister P. Andersson, Elinor Ostrom

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article seeks to shed new light on the study of decentralized natural resource governance by applying institutional theories of polycentricity—the relationships among multiple authorities with overlapping jurisdictions. The emphasis on multi-level dynamics has not penetrated empirical studies of environmental policy reforms in non-industrial countries. On the contrary, many of today’s decentralization proponents seem to be infatuated with the local sphere, expecting that local actors are always able and willing to govern their natural resources effectively. Existing studies in this area often focus exclusively on characteristics and performance of local institutions. While we certainly do not deny the importance of local institutions, we argue that institutional arrangements operating at other governance scales—such as national government agencies, international organizations, NGOs at multiple scales, and private associations—also often have critical roles to play in natural resource governance regimes, including self-organized regimes.
Vorheriger Artikel Conservation and community-based development through ecotourism in the temperate rainforest of southern Chile

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The story of San Rafael is described in more detail in Andersson (2002).
 
2
For an early discussion of types of goods, see Ostrom and Ostrom (1977). For more recent discussions, see Aggarwal and Dupont (1999), Gibson et al. (2005a), Ostrom (2005), and Martin (1995).
 
3
This started to change in 2003 when the Government of Peru started to decentralize the governance responsibilities for various natural resources, including forests.
 
4
The interview instruments for Peru were slightly different from those applied in Bolivia and Guatemala. The Peruvian interviews focused on natural resource governance more broadly, while in the other two countries, interviewers asked more specific questions about decisions and activities in the forestry sector. Notwithstanding, for the purposes of analyzing why local government actors would commit scarce resources to natural resource governance activities, the interview data from all three countries is compatible because of identical ways of measuring the variables of interest in this article.
 
Literatur
Acheson, J. M. (2003). Capturing the commons: Devising institutions to manage the maine lobster industry. New Haven, CT: University Press of New England.
Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice’. World Development, 32, 447–463.CrossRef
Acuna, C. H., & Tommasi, M. (2000). Some reflections on the institutional reforms required for Latin America. In Institutional reforms, growth and human development in Latin America (pp. 357–400). New Haven, CT: Yale Center for International and Area Studies.
Adamolekun, L. (1991). Promoting African decentralization. Public Administration and Development, 22, 285–286.CrossRef
Aggarwal, V. K., & Dupont, C. (1999). Goods, games, and institutions. International Political Science Review, 20, 393–409.CrossRef
Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. C. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and African cases. Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 473–502.
Alston, L. J., Libecap, G., & Mueller, B. (1999). Titles, conflict and land use: The development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian frontier. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Andersson, K. (2002). Can decentralization save Bolivia’s forests? An institutional analysis of municipal forest governance. Dissertation, Indiana University.
Andersson, K. (2003). What motivates municipal governments? Uncovering the institutional incentives for municipal governance of forest resources in Bolivia. Journal of Environment and Development, 12, 5–27.CrossRef
Andersson, K. (2004). Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Development, 32, 233–249.CrossRef
Andersson, K., Gibson, C., & Lehoucq, F. (2006). Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development, 34, 576–595.CrossRef
Andersson, K., & van Laerhoven, F. (2007). From local strongman to facilitator: Institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 1085–1111.CrossRef
Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bahl, R. (1999). Fiscal decentralization as development policy. Public Budgeting and Finance, 19, 59–75.CrossRef
Baker, M. (2005). The Kuhls of Kangra: Community-managed irrigation in the Western Himalaya. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. PNAS, 104(39), 15188–15193.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices for social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bickers, K., & Williams, J. T. (2001). Public policy analysis: A political economy approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Bird, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (Eds.). (1999). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28, 21–39.CrossRef
Cohen, J., & Rogers, J. (1995). Associations and democracy. London, UK: Verso.
Crook, R., & Manor, J. (1998). Democracy and decentralization in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.CrossRef
Ellis, F., & Mdoe, N. (2003). Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzania. World Development, 31, 1367–1384.CrossRef
Epstein, R. A. (1997). Enforcing norms: When the law gets in the way. The Responsive Community, 7, 4–15.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (1999). State of the World’s Forests 1999. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Feeny, D. (1988). Agricultural expansion and forest depletion in Thailand, 1900–1975. In J. F. Richards & R. P. Tucker (Eds.), World deforestation in the Twentieth Century (pp. 112–143). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fiszbein, A. (1997). The emergence of local capacity: Lessons from Colombia. World Development, 25, 1029–1043.CrossRef
Fitzpatrick, D. (2006). Evolution and chaos in property rights systems: The third world tragedy of contested access. Yale Law Review, 115, 996–1048.CrossRef
Flores, G. (1998). Samaipata: Manejo de Cuencas y Manejo Forestal. In P. Pacheco & D. Kaimowitz (Eds.), Municipios y Gestión Forestal en el Trópico Boliviano (pp. 395–434). La Paz, Bolivia: CEDLA and CIFOR.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, 29, 5–42.CrossRef
Gibson, C. (1999). Politicians and poachers: The political economy of wildlife policy in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, C., Andersson, K., Ostrom, E., & Shivakumar, S. (2005a). The Samaritan’s dilemma: The political economy of development aid. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, C., Williams, J., Ostrom, E. (2005b). Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33, 273–284.CrossRef
Gibson, C., & Lehoucq, F. (2003). The local politics of decentralized environmental policy in Guatemala. Journal of Environment and Development, 12, 28–49.CrossRef
Gibson, C., McKean, M., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2000). People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldfrank, B. (2002). The fragile flower of local democracy: A case study of decentralization and participation in Montevideo. Politics and Society, 30, 51–83.CrossRef
Gow, D. D., & Morss, E. R. (1988). The notorious nine: Critical problems in project implementation. World Development, 16, 1399–1418.CrossRef
Grainger, A. (1993). Controlling tropical deforestation. London, UK: Earthscan.
Hardee, K., Bronfman, M., Valenzuela, T., & McGreevey, W. (2000). Promoting partnerships and participation in the context of decentralization. POLICY Project Paper. Washington, DC: USAID.
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Herring, R. (2001). Authority and scale in political ecology: Some cautions on localism. In L. Buck, C. Geisle, J. Schelhas, & E. Wollenberg (Eds.), Biological diversity: Balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management (pp. 187–204). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Higgs, R. (1996). Legally induced technical regress in the Washington salmon fishery. In L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, & D. C. North (Eds.), Empirical studies in institutional change: Political economy of institutions and decisions (pp. 247–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hilton, R. (1992). Institutional incentives for resource mobilization: An analysis of irrigation schemes in Nepal. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 4, 283–308.CrossRef
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97, 233–243.CrossRef
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank). (1994). Fiscal decentralization: The search for equity and efficiency. In Economic and social progress in Latin America. Washington, DC: IDB.
Johnson, C. (2001). Community formation and fisheries conservation in Southern Thailand. Development and Change, 32, 951–974.CrossRef
Lam, W. F. (1998). Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
Larson, A. M. (2002). Natural resources and decentralization in Nicaragua: Are local governments up to the job? World Development, 30, 17–31.CrossRef
Lebel, L. (2006). The state, the firm, and the farmer: Community conservation and the use of land and water in upper tributary watersheds. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Biennial Meetings, Ubud, Bali, June 19–23.
Leighton, C. (1996). Strategies for achieving health financing reform in Africa. World Development, 24, 1511–1525.CrossRef
Lewis, B. D. (2003). Local government borrowing and repayment in Indonesia: Does fiscal capacity matter? World Development, 31, 1047–1063.CrossRef
Libecap, G. D. (1989). Distributional issues in contracting for property rights. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, 6–24.
Lutz, E., & Caldecott, J. (1997). Decentralization and biodiversity conservation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Martin, L. L. (1995). Heterogeneity, linkage and commons problems. In R. Keohane & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains (pp. 71–91). London, UK: Sage.
McGinnis, M. (Ed.). (1999a). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McGinnis, M. (Ed.). (1999b). Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McGinnis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Polycentric games and institutions: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
de Mello, L. R. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28, 365–380.CrossRef
Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007). Beyond panaceas in water institutions. PNAS, 104(39), 15200–15205.
Murombedzi, J. (2001). Natural resource stewardship. In: D. Hulme & M. Murphree (Eds.), African wildlife and livelihoods (pp. 244–254). Oxford, UK: James Curry.
National Research Council. (1986). Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2002). The drama of the commons. Committee on the human dimensions of global change. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. Weber (Eds.), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nickson, A. R. (1995). Local government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Nygren, A. (2005). Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras. World Development, 33, 639–655.CrossRef
Oakerson, R. (1999). Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
Oates, W. E. (1985). Searching for leviathan: An empirical study. The American Economic Review, 75, 748–757.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (1997). Final report of the DAC ad hoc working group on participatory development and good governance, parts I and II. Paris: OECD.
de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2002). Implementing environmental policies in developing countries through decentralization: The case of protected areas in Bahia, Brazil. World Development, 30, 1713–1736.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, V. (1991). The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of democracy and the vulnerability of democracies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493–535.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (2001). Decentralization and development: The new panacea. In K. Dowding, J. Hughes & H. Margetts (Eds.), Challenges to democracy: Ideas, involvement and institutions (pp. 237–256). New York, NY: Palgrave.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. PNAS, 104(39), 15181–15187.
Ostrom, V. (2008). The political theory of a compound republic: Designing the American experiment (3rd ed). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. First published in 1987.
Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H. (2006). Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. PNAS, 103, 19224–19231.CrossRef
Ostrom, E., Schroeder, L., & Wynne, S. (1993). Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. In E. S. Savas (ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services: Toward improved performance (pp. 7–49). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Reprinted in M. McGinnis (ed.). (1999) Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis (pp. 75–103). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.CrossRef
Pacheco, P. (2000). Avances y Desafíos en la Descentralización de la Gestión de los Recursos Forestales en Bolivia. La Paz: CIFOR-BOLFOR.
Pacheco, D. (2007). An institutional analysis of decentralization and indigenous timber management in common-property forests of Bolivia’s lowlands. Dissertation, Indiana University.
Pacheco, P., & Kaimowitz, D. (1998). Municipios y Gestión Forestal en el Trópico Boliviano. La Paz: CIFOR, CEDLA, Fundación TIERRA, BOLFOR.
Palsson, G. (1998). Learning by fishing: Practical engagement and environmental concerns. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (pp. 48–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Parry, T. R. (1997). Achieving balance in decentralization: A case study of education decentralization in Chile. World Development, 25, 211–225.CrossRef
Platteau, J. P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35, 223–246.CrossRef
Platteau, J. P., & Gaspart, F. (2003). The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development, 31, 1687–1703.CrossRef
Prud’homme, R. (1994). On the dangers of decentralization. World bank policy research working paper no. 1252. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Rabesahala Horning, N. (2005). The cost of ignoring rules: Forest conservation and rural livelihood outcomes in Madagascar. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 15, 149–166.
Ribot, J. C. (1999). Decentralization, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry: Legal instruments of political-administrative control. Africa, 69, 23–64.CrossRef
Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Sayer, J., & Campbell, B. (2004). The science of sustainable development: Local livelihoods and the global environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Shivakumar, S. (2005). The constitution of development: Crafting capabilities for self-governance. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development, 23, 7–16.CrossRef
Smoke, P., & Lewis, B. D. (1996). Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: A new approach to an old idea. World Development, 24, 1281–1299.CrossRef
Sproule-Jones, M. (1993). Governments at work: Canadian parliamentary federalism and its public policy effects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
Tang, S. Y. (1994). Institutions and performance in irrigation systems. In E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, & J. Walker (Eds.), Rules, games, and common-pool resources (pp. 225–245). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (1998). Capacity 21 program, 1998 annual report. New York, NY: UNDP.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2002). Human development report 2002. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Warren, D. M., & Issachar, J. D. (1983). Strategies for understanding and changing local revenue policies and practices in Ghana’s decentralization programme. World Development, 11, 835–844.CrossRef
Wilson, J. A. (1990). Fishing for knowledge. Land Economics, 66, 12–29.CrossRef
Wilson, J. A. (2002). Scientific uncertainty, complex systems, and the design of common-pool institutions. In National Research Council, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. Weber (eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 327–359). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Wirtshafter, R. M., & Shih, E. (1990). Decentralization of China’s electricity sector: Is small beautiful? World Development, 18, 505–512.CrossRef
World Bank. (1988). World development report 1988. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (1997). The world development report 1997: The state in a changing world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
WRI (World Resources Institute). (2003). World resources: 2002–2004. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Zaz Friz Burga, J. (2001). El Sueño Obcecabo. La Descentralización Política en la América Latina. Lima, Peru: Fondo Editorial Del Congreso de Perú.
Metadaten
Titel
Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective
verfasst von
Krister P. Andersson
Elinor Ostrom
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2008
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Policy Sciences 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Does the amount of participation matter? Public comments, agency responses and the time to finalize a regulation

EditorialNotes

Note from the editor-in-chief

OriginalPaper

The policy scientist of democracy revisited

OriginalPaper

Revisiting Lasswell

OriginalPaper

Conservation and community-based development through ecotourism in the temperate rainforest of southern Chile

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise