Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Review of Industrial Organization 4/2013

01.06.2013

Antidumping and Industrial Organization

verfasst von: Robert M. Feinberg

Erschienen in: Review of Industrial Organization | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although antidumping duties are instruments of trade policy, they are motivated by and have potentially significant impacts on domestic industry interests. The articles in this special issue provide evidence on the effects of antidumping on domestic firms and import patterns; in particular, they stress that these effects are not likely to be uniform across all producers within an industry, and will often depend on how domestic interests respond.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Feinberg (1989) had found that dollar appreciation led to fewer antidumping cases filed for an earlier period.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Blonigen, B. A., & Bown, C. P. (2003). Antidumping and retaliation threats. Journal of International Economics, 60, 249–273. Blonigen, B. A., & Bown, C. P. (2003). Antidumping and retaliation threats. Journal of International Economics, 60, 249–273.
Zurück zum Zitat Bown, C. P. (2011). Taking stock of antidumping, safeguards and countervailing duties, 1990–2009. The World Economy, 34(12), 1955–1998.CrossRef Bown, C. P. (2011). Taking stock of antidumping, safeguards and countervailing duties, 1990–2009. The World Economy, 34(12), 1955–1998.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, R. M. (1989). Exchange rates and “Unfair Trade”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 704–707.CrossRef Feinberg, R. M. (1989). Exchange rates and “Unfair Trade”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 704–707.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, R. M. (2005). U.S. antidumping enforcement and macroeconomic indicators revisited: Do petitioners learn? Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschafliches Archiv), 141(4), 612–622.CrossRef Feinberg, R. M. (2005). U.S. antidumping enforcement and macroeconomic indicators revisited: Do petitioners learn? Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschafliches Archiv), 141(4), 612–622.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, R. M., & Hirsch, B. T. (1989). Industry rent seeking and the filing of “Unfair Trade” complaints. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7, 325–340.CrossRef Feinberg, R. M., & Hirsch, B. T. (1989). Industry rent seeking and the filing of “Unfair Trade” complaints. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7, 325–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, R. M., & Reynolds, K. M. (2006). The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 877–890.CrossRef Feinberg, R. M., & Reynolds, K. M. (2006). The spread of antidumping regimes and the role of retaliation in filings. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 877–890.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gallaway, M. P., Blonigen, B. A., & Flynn, J. E. (1999). Welfare costs of the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Journal of International Economics, 49, 211–244.CrossRef Gallaway, M. P., Blonigen, B. A., & Flynn, J. E. (1999). Welfare costs of the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Journal of International Economics, 49, 211–244.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knetter, M. M., & Prusa, T. J. (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: Evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 1–17.CrossRef Knetter, M. M., & Prusa, T. J. (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: Evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prusa, T. J. (2001). On the spread and impact of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 591–611.CrossRef Prusa, T. J. (2001). On the spread and impact of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 591–611.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbussche, H., & Zanardi, M. (2008). What explains the proliferation of antidumping laws? Economic Policy, 23, 93–138.CrossRef Vandenbussche, H., & Zanardi, M. (2008). What explains the proliferation of antidumping laws? Economic Policy, 23, 93–138.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Antidumping and Industrial Organization
verfasst von
Robert M. Feinberg
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Review of Industrial Organization / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0889-938X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7160
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-013-9384-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Review of Industrial Organization 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner