nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Application of Acoustic Emission for the Inspection of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials

verfasst von : Shuncong Zhong, Walter Nsengiyumva

Erschienen in: Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Structures

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Although the application of acoustic emission (AE) to the inspection of fiber-reinforced composite materials is highly beneficial due to its effectiveness in providing information about the incipient initiation of the damage, there are limited published studies outlining the quantitative limitations of damage identification at any specific depth in composites using AE. Also, there is rare reports on the thickness limitation of the material structure being tested vis-à-vis the applicability of the AE. It is observed that most of the AE-based inspection practices reported in the literature have been devoted to the standard tensile test configurations specifically for testing in lateral (in-plane) directions on loaded pressure vessels. One of the key improvements that have been suggested to this technique involves the sourcing of elastic disturbance from within the structure as opposed to conventional ultrasound sources. However, for disturbances to be detected by the receiving transducers, they must move along the surface of the composite suggesting that good results are dependent on the adequate propagation of these disturbances. The acousto-ultrasonic technique, also known as the acoustic-emission-simulation technique or the stress-wave factor method, is an advanced complementary form of AE signal processing. The technique uses active, offset pitch-catch transducers, as opposed to a reliance on the energy released from within the structure. This improved control over the transmitted energy and the modes of obtaining the excitation waves allow for greater in-depth diffusion, and hence, the technique becomes more suitable for the examination of thick fiber-reinforced composites. Nevertheless, when it comes to complex composites such as woven fiber-based composites, the above-mentioned modifications have not always provided any noticeable benefits over conventional AE. To this end, published reports have been restricted to the examination of thin-skinned composites.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Terahertz Testing Technique for Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials

Nächstes Kapitel Other NDT Methods for Fiber-Reinforced Composite Structures

D. Mba, Development of acoustic emission technology for condition monitoring and diagnosis of rotating machines: bearings, pumps, gearboxes, engines, and rotating structures. Shock Vibrat. Digest. 38(1), 3–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0583102405059054CrossRef

W. Nsengiyumva, S. Zhong, J. Lin, Q. Zhang, J. Zhong, Y. Huang, Advances, limitations and prospects of nondestructive testing and evaluation of thick composites and sandwich structures: a state-of-the-art review. Compos. Struct. 256, 112951–113002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951CrossRef

S. Masmoudi, A. El Mahi, S. Turki, Fatigue behaviour and structural health monitoring by acoustic emission of E-glass/epoxy laminates with piezoelectric implant. Appl. Acoust. 108, 50–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.024CrossRef

C.U. Grosse, Acoustic emission (AE) evaluation of reinforced concrete structures, in Non-Destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures (Elsevier, 2010), pp. 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699604.2.185

R. Yang, Y. He, H. Zhang, Progress and trends in nondestructive testing and evaluation for wind turbine composite blade. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 1225–1250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.026CrossRef

F.P. García Márquez, A.M. Peco Chacón, A review of non-destructive testing on wind turbines blades. Renew. Energy 161, 998–1010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.145

E. Selman, A. Ghiami, N. Alver, Study of fracture evolution in FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beam under cyclic load by acoustic emission technique: an integrated mechanical-acoustic energy approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 95, 832–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.162CrossRef

S.-E. Mechraoui, A. Laksimi, S. Benmedakhene, Reliability of damage mechanism localisation by acoustic emission on glass/epoxy composite material plate. Compos. Struct. 94(5), 1483–1494 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.037CrossRef

B.V. Landau, M. West, Estimation of the source location and the determination of the 50% probability zone for an acoustic source locating system (SLS) using multiple systems of 3 sensors. Appl. Acoust. 52(1), 85–100 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(96)00066-7CrossRef

10.

S. Granger, A. Loukili, G. Pijaudier-Cabot, G. Chanvillard, Experimental characterization of the self-healing of cracks in an ultra high performance cementitious material: mechanical tests and acoustic emission analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 37(4), 519–527 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.12.005CrossRef

11.

E. Maillet, C. Baker, G.N. Morscher, V.V. Pujar, J.R. Lemanski, Feasibility and limitations of damage identification in composite materials using acoustic emission. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 75, 77–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003CrossRef

12.

D.J. Holcomb, General theory of the Kaiser effect. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. Geomech. Abst. 30(7), 929–935 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90047-HCrossRef

13.

J. Kaiser, An investigation into the occurrence of noises in tensile tests, or a study of acoustic phenomena in tensile tests (Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Doctor of Philosophy, 1950)

14.

T.F. Drouillard, F.J. Laner, Acoustic emission, in A bibliography with abstracts. (IFI/Plenum, 1978), p. 787

15.

R.G. Liptai, D.O. Harris, R.B. Engle, C. Tatro, Acoustic emission techniques in materials research. (California Univ., Livermore. Lawrence Radiation Lab., 1970)

16.

R.K. Miller, P. McIntire, Acoustic emission testing. (American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1987)

17.

D. Eitzen et al. Fundamental developments in acoustic emission measurements: The NBS program, in Quantitative NDE in the nuclear industry (1983)

18.

M.R. Gorman, W.H. Prosser, AE source orientation by plate wave analysis. J Acoust Emiss 9(4), 282–288, (1990)

19.

S.M. Ziola, M.R. Gorman, Source location in thin plates using cross-correlation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90(5), 2551–2556 (1991)CrossRef

20.

A.Y. Vinogradov, D. Merson, The nature of acoustic emission during deformation processes in metallic materials. Low Temp. Phys. 44(9), 930–937 (2018)CrossRef

21.

A. Filippov, A.Y. Nikonov, V. Rubtsov, A. Dmitriev, S.Y. Tarasov, Vibration and acoustic emission monitoring the stability of peakless tool turning: experiment and modeling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 246, 224–234 (2017)CrossRef

22.

G. Shen, Progress of acoustic emission technology on pressure equipment in China, in Advances in Acoustic Emission Technology, (Springer, 2017), pp. 3–15.

23.

H.L. Dunegan, D.O. Harris, C.A. Tatro, Fracture analysis by use of acoustic emission. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1(1), 105–122 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(68)90018-0CrossRef

24.

M. Ohtsu, Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: application to in situ hydrofracturing test. J. Geophys. Res. 96(B4), 6211–6221 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02689CrossRef

25.

A.A. Pollock, Stress-wave emission in ndt. Non-Destr. Test. 2(3), 178–182 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-1021(69)90109-1CrossRef

26.

R. Meltzer, K. Lieb, R. Horstman, I. Moore, J. Nielsen, D. Griffin, Acoustic emission of plain concrete. J. Test. Eval. 5(6), 476 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE10561JCrossRef

27.

R. Unnthorsson, T. Runarsson, M. Jonsson, Acoustic emission based fatigue failure criterion for CFRP. Int. J. Fatigue 30(1), 11–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.024CrossRef

28.

G. Kotsikos, J.T. Evans, A.G. Gibson, J. Hale, Use of acoustic emission to characterize corrosion fatigue damage accumulation in glass fiber reinforced polyester laminates. Polym. Compos. 20(5), 689–696 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10392CrossRef

29.

A. Nair, C.S. Cai, Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: review and case studies. Eng. Struct. 32(6), 1704–1714 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020CrossRef

30.

S. Degala, P. Rizzo, K. Ramanathan, K.A. Harries, Acoustic emission monitoring of CFRP reinforced concrete slabs. Constr. Build. Mater. 23(5), 2016–2026 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.026CrossRef

31.

A. Thirumalaiselvi, S. Sasmal, Acoustic emission monitoring and classification of signals in cement composites during early-age hydration. Constr. Build. Mater. 196, 411–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.067CrossRef

32.

P. Rossi, J.-L. Tailhan, F. Le Maou, L. Gaillet, E. Martin, Basic creep behavior of concretes investigation of the physical mechanisms by using acoustic emission. Cem. Concr. Res. 42(1), 61–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.011CrossRef

33.

E.N. Landis, Micro–macro fracture relationships and acoustic emissions in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 13(1–2), 65–72 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00009-4CrossRef

34.

N. Ida, N. Meyendorf, (eds.), Handbook of Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation. (Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26553-7.

35.

C.J. Hellier, Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2nd edn. (New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2013), https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071777148

36.

P.J. Shull, Nondestructive evaluation: theory, techniques, and applications. (CRC press, 2002)

37.

R. Madarshahian, V. Soltangharaei, R. Anay, J.M. Caicedo, P. Ziehl, Hsu-Nielsen source acoustic emission data on a concrete block. Data Brief 23, 103813 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103813CrossRef

38.

F. Pinal Moctezuma, M. Delgado Prieto, L. Romeral Martinez, Performance analysis of acoustic emission hit detection methods using time features. IEEE Access 7, 71119–71130, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919224.

39.

J. Griffin, Traceability of acoustic emission measurements for a proposed calibration method—Classification of characteristics and identification using signal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50–51, 757–783 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.04.018CrossRef

40.

W. Sikorski, Acoustic Emission. BoD—Books on Demand, (2012)

41.

C. Grosse, M. Ohtsu, (eds.), Acoustic Emission Testing. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69972-9

42.

M. Ohtsu, M. Enoki, Y. Mizutani, M. Shigeishi, Principles of the acoustic emission (AE) method and signal processing, in Practical Acoustic Emission Testing, ed. T. J. Society for Non-Destructive Inspect (Springer Japan, Tokyo, 2016), pp. 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55072-3_2

43.

H. Nakamura et al., Practical acoustic emission testing. (Springer, 2016)

44.

J.A. Krautkraemer, Optimal depletion with resource amenities and a backstop technology. Resourc. Energy 8(2), 133–149 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(86)90014-9CrossRef

45.

T.M. Proctor, An improved piezoelectric acoustic emission transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(5), 1163–1168 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387763CrossRef

46.

T.M. Proctor Jr., More recent improvements on the NBS conical transducer. J. Acoust. Emiss. 5, 134–142 (1986)

47.

M.A. Hamstad, An examination of piezoelectric polymers as wideband acoustic emission displacement sensors, in Proc. Progress in Acoustic Emission VII. The Japanese Society for Nondestructive Inspection, (Sopporo, Japan, 1994), pp. 79–86

48.

Y. Bar-Cohen, T. Xue, S.-S. Lih, Polymer piezoelectric transducers for ultrasonic NDE (1996), https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/handle/2014/26470. Accessed 25 Jan. 2021

49.

C. U. Grosse, L.M. Linzer, Signal-based AE analysis, in Acoustic Emission Testing, C. Grosse and M. Ohtsu, Eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 53–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69972-9_5

50.

S.D. Glaser, G.G. Weiss, L.R. Johnson, Body waves recorded inside an elastic half-space by an embedded, wideband velocity sensor. J Acoust Soc Am 104(3), 1404–1412 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424350CrossRef

51.

N.N. Hsu, B. FR, Characterization and calibration of acoustic emission sensors. 1981.

52.

H. Hatano, E. Mori, Acoustic-emission transducer and its absolute calibration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59(2), 344–349 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380869CrossRef

53.

G.C. McLaskey, S.D. Glaser, Acoustic emission sensor calibration for absolute source measurements. J Nondestruct Eval 31(2), 157–168 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-012-0131-2CrossRef

54.

N. Godin, P. Reynaud, G. Fantozzi, Challenges and limitations in the identification of acoustic emission signature of damage mechanisms in composites materials. Appl. Sci. 8(8), 1267 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081267CrossRef

55.

E. Tsangouri, G. Karaiskos, D.G. Aggelis, A. Deraemaeker, D. Van Hemelrijck, Crack sealing and damage recovery monitoring of a concrete healing system using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Struct. Health Monit. 14(5), 462–474 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921715596219CrossRef

56.

D.G. Aggelis, A.C. Mpalaskas, T.E. Matikas, Investigation of different fracture modes in cement-based materials by acoustic emission. Cem. Concr. Res. 48, 1–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.02.002CrossRef

57.

RILEM Technical Committee (Masayasu Ohtsu), Recommendation of RILEM TC 212-ACD: acoustic emission and related NDE techniques for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete*: Test method for classification of active cracks in concrete structures by acoustic emission. Mater. Struct. 43(9), 1187–1189, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9640-6

58.

D.G. Aggelis, N.-M. Barkoula, T.E. Matikas, A.S. Paipetis, Acoustic structural health monitoring of composite materials: damage identification and evaluation in cross ply laminates using acoustic emission and ultrasonics. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72(10), 1127–1133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.10.011CrossRef

59.

V. Salinas, Y. Vargas, J. Ruzzante, L. Gaete, Localization algorithm for acoustic emission. Phys. Procedia 3(1), 863–871 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.01.111CrossRef

60.

A. Refahi Oskouei, A. Zucchelli, M. Ahmadi, G. Minak, An integrated approach based on acoustic emission and mechanical information to evaluate the delamination fracture toughness at mode I in composite laminate. Mater. Design 32(3), 1444–1455, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.048

61.

ASTM E1316–17A, Standard terminology for nondestructive examinations. (ASTM International, 2017)

62.

S. Küttenbaum, S. Feistkorn, T. Braml, A. Taffe, S. Maack, Methods to quantify the utility of NDT in bridge reassessment. in European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 127, eds. P. Rizzo and A. Milazzo, (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021), pp. 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_40

63.

V. Panchal, Pumps and valves: NDT flaw detection. World Pumps 2014(5), 34–40 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(14)70111-7CrossRef

64.

M.V. Felice, Z. Fan, Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: a review. Ultrasonics 88, 26–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.003CrossRef

65.

M. Wevers, K. Lambrighs, Applications of acoustic emission for SHM: a review. in Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, eds. C. Boller, F.-K. Chang, and Y. Fujino, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2008), p. shm011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061626.shm011

66.

M. Surgeon, M. Wevers, Modal analysis of acoustic emission signals from CFRP laminates. NDT E Int. 32(6), 311–322 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00077-2CrossRef

67.

M. Wevers, Listening to the sound of materials: acoustic emission for the analysis of material behaviour. NDT E Int. 30(2), 99–106 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00051-5CrossRef

68.

M. Bourchak, I. Farrow, I. Bond, C. Rowland, F. Menan, Acoustic emission energy as a fatigue damage parameter for CFRP composites. Int. J. Fatigue 29(3), 457–470 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.009CrossRef

69.

G. Kim, M.-K. Seo, N. Choi, Y.-I. Kim, K.-B. Kim, Comparison of PZT, PZT based 1–3 composite and PMN–PT acoustic emission sensors for glass fiber reinforced plastics. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20(6), 1007–1015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00055-7CrossRef

70.

J. Tang, S. Soua, C. Mares, T.-H. Gan, An experimental study of acoustic emission methodology for in service condition monitoring of wind turbine blades. Renew. Energy 99, 170–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.048CrossRef

71.

M. Saeedifar, M. Ahmadi Najafabadi, J. Yousefi, R. Mohammadi, H. Hosseini Toudeshky, G. Minak, Delamination analysis in composite laminates by means of acoustic emission and bi-linear/tri-linear Cohesive Zone Modeling. Comp. Struct. 161, 505–512, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.020

72.

D. Kouroussis, A. Anastassopoulos, P. Vionis, V. Kolovos, Unsupervised pattern recognition of acoustic emission from full scale testing of a wind turbine blade. J. Acoust. Emiss. 18, 217, 2000.

73.

D. Xu, P.F. Liu, Z.P. Chen, J.X. Leng, L. Jiao, Achieving robust damage mode identification of adhesive composite joints for wind turbine blade using acoustic emission and machine learning. Comp. Struct. 236, p. 111840, 2020.

74.

C.Q. Gómez Muñoz, F.P. García Márquez, A. Arcos Jiménez, M. Papelias, A heuristic method for detecting and locating faults employing electromagnetic acoustic transducers. 2015

75.

N. Angelopoulos, M. Papaelias, Automatic statistical analysis of acoustic emission data sets. in Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring Techniques for Renewable Energy Industrial Assets, (Elsevier, 2020), pp. 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101094-5.00011-3

76.

J. Tang, S. Soua, C. Mares, T.-H. Gan, A pattern recognition approach to acoustic emission data originating from fatigue of wind turbine blades. Sensors 17(11), 2507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112507CrossRef

77.

M.J. Blanch, A.G. Dutton, Acoustic emission monitoring of field tests of an operating wind turbine. Key Eng. Mater. 245, 475–482 (2003)CrossRef

78.

N. Tsopelas, D. Kourousis, I. Ladis, A. Anastasopulos, D. J. Lekou, F. Mouzakis, Health monitoring of operating wind turbine blades with acoustic emission. Emerging technologies in non-destructive testing V. (Taylor and Francis, London, 2012), pp. 347–352

79.

P.J. Schubel, R.J. Crossley, E.K.G. Boateng, J.R. Hutchinson, Review of structural health and cure monitoring techniques for large wind turbine blades. Renew Energy 51, 113–123 (2013)CrossRef

80.

M.A. Rumsey, W. Musial, Application of acoustic emission nondestructive testing during wind turbine blade tests. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 123(4), 270 (2001)CrossRef

81.

B.-H. Han, D.-J. Yoon, Y.-H. Huh, Y.-S. Lee, Damage assessment of wind turbine blade under static loading test using acoustic emission. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 25(5), 621–630 (2014)CrossRef

82.

D. Zarouchas, D. van Hemelrijck, Mechanical characterization and damage assessment of thick adhesives for wind turbine blades using acoustic emission and digital image correlation techniques. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28(14–15), 1500–1516 (2014)CrossRef

83.

D.-J. Yoon, B.-H. Han, Quantitative damage assessment of hybrid composite wind turbine blades by energy based acoustic emission source location. 2014

84.

J. Tang, S. Rafael, S. Soua, C. Mares, T.-H. Gan, Structural health monitoring methodology for wind turbine blades using acoustic emission. Proc. Cond. Nondestr. Eval. 20(6), 2014

85.

A. Bravo, L. Toubal, D. Koffi, F. Erchiqui, Damage characterization of bio and green polyethylene–birch composites under creep and cyclic testing with multivariable acoustic emissions. Materials 8(11), 7322–7341 (2015)CrossRef

86.

H.M. Akil, I.M. De Rosa, C. Santulli, F. Sarasini, Flexural behaviour of pultruded jute/glass and kenaf/glass hybrid composites monitored using acoustic emission. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527(12), 2942–2950 (2010)CrossRef

87.

P.J. Novo, J.F. Silva, J.P. Nunes, A.T. Marques, Pultrusion of fibre reinforced thermoplastic pre-impregnated materials. Compos. B Eng. 89, 328–339 (2016)CrossRef

88.

F. Aymerich, W.J. Staszewski, Impact damage detection in composite laminates using nonlinear acoustics. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 41(9), 1084–1092 (2010)CrossRef

89.

M.N. Noorsuhada, An overview on fatigue damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission technique. Constr. Build. Mater. 112, 424–439 (2016)CrossRef

90.

P. Liu et al., Damage mode identification of composite wind turbine blade under accelerated fatigue loads using acoustic emission and machine learning. Struct. Health Monit. 19(4), 1092–1103 (2020)CrossRef

91.

Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, G. Yang, R. Zhang, Identification of engine foreign object impact based on acoustic emission and radical basis function neural network. in 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT), (Harbin, China, 2019), pp. 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEICT.2019.8846291

92.

Ł. Doliński, M. Krawczuk, A. Żak, Damage detection in the wind turbine blade using root mean square and experimental modal parameters, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures, ed. M. A. Wahab, (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020), pp. 728–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8331-1_57

93.

Z. Liu, X. Wang, L. Zhang, Fault diagnosis of industrial wind turbine blade bearing using acoustic emission analysis. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69(9), 6630–6639 (2020)CrossRef

94.

R. Fuentes, R.S. Dwyer-Joyce, M.B. Marshall, J. Wheals, E.J. Cross, Detection of sub-surface damage in wind turbine bearings using acoustic emissions and probabilistic modelling. Renew Energy 147, 776–797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.019CrossRef

95.

R. Marks, C. Gillam, A. Clarke, J. Armstrong, R. Pullin, Damage detection in a composite wind turbine blade using 3D scanning laser vibrometry. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 231(16), 3024–3041 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406216679612CrossRef

96.

P.B. Wilkinson, D.A. Gunn, S. Holyoake, B.A.J. Dashwood, C.R. Brett, J.G. Rees, Low frequency acoustic and ultrasound waves to characterise layered media. NDT E Int. 96, 35–46 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.005CrossRef

97.

P. Poozesh, K. Aizawa, C. Niezrecki, J. Baqersad, M. Inalpolat, G. Heilmann, Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades using acoustic microphone array. Struct. Health Monit. 16(4), 471–485 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716676871CrossRef

98.

G. Ramirez, Use of acoustic emission to evaluate residual strength in FRP pipes after impact damage. Res. Nondestr. Eval. 23(4), 207–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2012.674177CrossRef

99.

A. Vary, K.J. Bowles, An ultrasonic-acoustic technique for nondestructive evaluation of fiber composite quality. Polym. Eng. Sci. 19(5), 373–376 (1979)CrossRef

100.

A. Vary, R.F. Lark, Correlation of fiber composite tensile strength with the ultrasonic stress wave factor. J. Test. Eval. 7(4), 185–191 (1979)CrossRef

101.

A. Aguilera, J.P. Davim, eds., Research Developments in Wood Engineering and Technology. (IGI Global, 2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4554-7

102.

P.F. Liu, J. Yang, B. Wang, Z.F. Zhou, J.Y. Zheng, A study on the intralaminar damage and interlaminar delamination of carbon fiber composite laminates under three-point bending using acoustic emission. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 15(1), 101–121 (2015)CrossRef

103.

T.H. Loutas, V. Kostopoulos, Health monitoring of carbon/carbon, woven reinforced composites. Damage assessment by using advanced signal processing techniques. Part I: acoustic emission monitoring and damage mechanisms evolution. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69(2), 265–272 (2009)CrossRef

104.

R. Russell-Floyd, M.G. Phillips, A critical assessment of acousto-ultrasonics as a method of nondestructive examination for carbon-fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates. NDT Int. 21(4), 247–257 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-9126(88)90338-0CrossRef

105.

C. Zhou, M. Hong, Z. Su, Q. Wang, L. Cheng, Evaluation of fatigue cracks using nonlinearities of acousto-ultrasonic waves acquired by an active sensor network. Smart Mater. Struct. 22(1), 015018 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/1/015018CrossRef

106.

J. Feiteira, E. Tsangouri, E. Gruyaert, C. Lors, G. Louis, N. De Belie, Monitoring crack movement in polymer-based self-healing concrete through digital image correlation, acoustic emission analysis and SEM in-situ loading. Mater. Des. 115, 238–246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.050CrossRef

107.

E. Tsangouri, K. Van Tittelboom, D. Van Hemelrijck, N. De Belie, Visualization of the healing process on reinforced concrete beams by application of Digital Image Correlation (DIC). WIT Trans. Eng. Sci. 77, 283–294 (2013)CrossRef

108.

M. Fabian, C.U. Grosse, Efficiency of self-healing agents for cementitious materials characterized by NDT

109.

E. Tsangouri, G. Karaiskos, A. Deraemaeker, D. Van Hemelrijck, D. Aggelis, Assessment of acoustic emission localization accuracy on damaged and healed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 129, 163–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.104CrossRef

110.

R.B. Heslehurst, Defects and damage in composite materials and structures. (CRC press, 2014)

111.

M.E. Ibrahim, Nondestructive evaluation of thick-section composites and sandwich structures: a review. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 64, 36–48 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.010CrossRef

112.

A. Ledeczi, T. Hay, P. Volgyesi, D.R. Hay, A. Nadas, S. Jayaraman, Wireless acoustic emission sensor network for structural monitoring. IEEE Sensors J. 9(11), 1370–1377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2019315CrossRef

113.

S. Masmoudi, A. El Mahi, S. Turki, Use of piezoelectric as acoustic emission sensor for in situ monitoring of composite structures. Compos. B Eng. 80, 307–320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.003CrossRef

114.

W. Hufenbach, R. Böhm, M. Thieme, T. Tyczynski, Damage monitoring in pressure vessels and pipelines based on wireless sensor networks. Proc Eng 10, 340–345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.058CrossRef

115.

A. Behnia, H.K. Chai, T. Shiotani, Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 282–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.103CrossRef

116.

C. Huang, K. Wang, L. Nie, L.V. Wang, M.A. Anastasio, Full-wave iterative image reconstruction in photoacoustic tomography with acoustically inhomogeneous media. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32(6), 1097–1110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2254496CrossRef

117.

Y. Kobayashi, T. Shiotani, Computerized AE Tomography, in Innovative AE and NDT Techniques for On-Site Measurement of Concrete and Masonry Structures, vol. 20, ed. M. Ohtsu, (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7606-6_4

118.

J.E. Batey, G.W. Hembree, Nondestructive Examination (NDE). (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.861981_ch20

119.

S. Markalous, S. Tenbohlen, K. Feser, Detection and location of partial discharges in power transformers using acoustic and electromagnetic signals. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insul. 15(6), 1576–1583 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2008.4712660CrossRef

120.

H. Dunegan, A. Green, Factors affecting acoustic emission response from materials. in Acoustic Emission, eds. R. Liptai, D. Harris, and C. Tatro, (ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959, 1972), pp. 100–100–14. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP35383S

Titel: Application of Acoustic Emission for the Inspection of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials
verfasst von: Shuncong Zhong
Walter Nsengiyumva
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Structures
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0847-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-19-0848-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0848-4_7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht