Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Optical and Quantum Electronics 4/2024

Open Access 01.04.2024

Applications of two kinds of Kudryashov methods for time fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation and its stability analysis

verfasst von: Duygu Tetik, Arzu Akbulut, Nisa Çelik

Erschienen in: Optical and Quantum Electronics | Ausgabe 4/2024

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this study, the beta time fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation used to describe the behavior of gas diffusion in a homogeneous medium is discussed. Generalized Kudryashov and modified Kudryashov procedures were used to discovered solitons of the equation. These methods can be easily applied and offer different solutions checked to other methods in the literature. At the same time, these two methods use symbolic calculations to better understand various nonlinear wave models and offer a powerful and effective mathematical approach. The solutions created in this article are different from those in the literature and will guide those working in the field of physics and engineering to better understand this model. Figures of the results were made values different from each other. The stability of the equations in applications has been demonstrated by testing the stability feature on some solutions obtained using the features of the Hamilton system. This work demonstrates the power and effectiveness of the methods discussed in applying many different forms of fractional-order nonlinear equations. The results obtained in this paper are original to our research and have the potential to be helpful in the fields of mathematical engineering and physics.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Many problems exist in different fields of study such as wave propagation, fluid mechanics, mechanical engineering, dynamical systems, chemistry, image processing, plasma physics, hydrodynamics, finance, biology, optics and other fields of engineering and science. Some scientists have proposed and researched nonlinear fractional partial differential equations (NFPDEs) (Zubair et al. 2018; Raza et al. 2019; Hosseini et al. 2020). Suggested numerous different definitions have been presented in the study (Yang et al. 2019; Park et al. 2020). Lately, investigators have begun to view a deficit at most of the fractional derivative definitions (Samko et al. 1993; Kilbas et al. 2006). Since fractional differential equations are an important field in plasma physics, mathematical physics, mathematical biology, nonlinear optics, applied mathematics, and quantum field theory, the solutions of these equations, along with their soliton-type solutions, have become very important. Fractional derivatives have an important place in the study of real-world problems so there is a different types of fractional derivatives for example Caputo fractional derivative, conformable derivative, modified Riemann-Liouville derivative, Riemann-Liouville derivative, beta derivative and many others. The universe is filled with events nonlinear and inner behaviors of this nonlinear are modeled for samples next to nonlinear alongside differential equations of fractional order as well as whole number order (Miller and Ross 1993; Hassani et al. 2020). It is thought that fractional-order equations analyze the intricate properties of complicated physical phenomena that occur in many fields of study on a small scale (Gomez-Aguilar et al. 2018; Bonyah et al. 2018). Later, scientists searched deeply to find approximate and suitable solutions nonlinear evolution equations, and as a result of their research, many methods have been developed recently to solve nonlinear evolution equations due to the differing opinions of scientists. On the instant, Seadawy handled the extended auxiliary equation procedure (Seadawy 2017), Duran et al. were interested in the modified \(\left( 1/G^{\prime }\right)\)-expansion practice (Duran et al. 2021a), Jianming et al. investigated the Backlund transformation procedure (Jianming et al. 2011), Yokus analyzed the extended finite difference procedure (Yokus 2018), Ablowitz and Clarkson handled the inverse scattering transformation practice (Ablowitz and Clarkson 1991), Duran et al. investigated the Bernoulli sub-equation function method (Duran et al. 2021b), Helal and Mehana investigated the Adomian decomposition practice (Helal and Mehana 2006), Al-Mdallal and Syam were interested in the sine–cosine procedure (Al-Mdallal and Syam 2007), Das and Ghosh paid attention to the \(\left( G^{\prime }/G\right)\) -expansion procedure (Das and Ghosh 2019), Islam and Akter handled the rational fractional \(\left( D_{\xi }^{\alpha }G/G\right)\)-expansion practice (Islam and Akter 2020), Mohyud-Din et al. handled the variational iteration practice (Mohyud-Din et al. 2009), Hashemi and Mirzazadeh were interested in the Lie symmetry practice (Hashemi and Mirzazadeh 2023), Wazwaz analyzed the sine-cosine procedure (Wazwaz 2004), Bekir investigated the \((G^{\prime }/G)\)-expansion procedure (Bekir 2008), Arshed et al. were interested in the first integral practice (Arshed et al. 2020), Biswas et al. handled the modified simple equation method (Biswas et al. 2018), Celik analyzed the F expansion practice (Çelik 2021), Kudryashov acquired the exact solutions of the Fisher model by the Kudryashov method (Kudryashov 2012), Kudryashov handled the first integral method (Kudryashov 2020), Kudryashov explored the general projective Riccati equations and the enhanced Kudryashov’s methods (Kudryashov 2023), Wang et al. applied the semi-inverse method to fractal (2 + 1)-Dimensional Zakharov–Kuznetsov model (Wang 2023a; Wang and Xu 2023; Wang et al. 2023a), Alquran applied the Maclaurin series to nonlinear equations (Alquran 2023a), Alquran applied the rational sine-cosine approach to second fourth-order Wazwaz equation (Alquran 2023b), Jaradat and Alquran applied the Kudryashov expansion method to (2 + 1)-dimensional two-mode Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation (Jaradat and Alquran 2020), Ghanbari applied the algorithm of the new method to the Oskolkov and the Oskolkov–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burgers equations (Ghanbari 2021a), Ghanbari and Gómez–Aguilar applied the generalized exponential rational function procedure to the nonlinear Radhakrishnan–Kundu–Lakshmanan model (Ghanbari and Gómez-Aguilar 2019a), Sadaf et al. applied the \(\left( \frac{G^{\prime }}{G}, \frac{1}{G}\right)\)-expansion method to CI equation (Sadaf et al. 2023a), Mahmood et al. applied the modified Khater method to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation (Mahmood et al. 2023), Akram et al. applied the extended \(\left( \frac{G^{\prime }}{G^{2}}\right)\)-expansion method to the higher order nonlinear Schrödinger equation (Akram et al. 2023a, 2023b, c) and so on (Wang 2023b, c, d, e, f; Wang and Shi 2022; Wang et al. 2023b, c; Ali et al. 2019; Jaradat et al. 2018; Jaradat and Alquran 2022; Ghanbari 2022; Ghanbari and Gómez-Aguilar 2019b; Ghanbari and Baleanu 2019, 2020, 2023a, 2023b; Khater and Ghanbari 2021; Ghanbari 2019, 2021b; Ghanbari et al. 2018; Ghanbari and Akgül 2020; Ghanbari and Kuo 2019; Tian et al. 2022; Sadaf et al. 2023b.
The Chaffee–Infante (CI) model, which is useful for studying the diffusion formation of a gas in a uniform medium, is very important. Therefore, it has an important role in the field of mathematics and physics (Raza et al. 2021). The CI equation was first studied by Nathaniel Chafee and Ettore Infante. The most interesting aspect is a bifurcation in the system parameter that indicates the steepness of the potential. The CI model is very important in many areas, for example; such as ion-acoustic waves in plasma, fluid dynamics, plasma physics, sound waves, and electromagnetic waves Sriskandarajah and Smiley (1996). This model is the standard representation of endless-dimensional gradient systems in which the structure of the spherical attractor can be exactly characterized (Caraballo et al. 2007). The appropriate derivative time-fractional CI equation is as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\partial ^{\beta }u}{\partial t^{\beta }}\right) _{x}-\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial x^{2}}-\alpha u^{3}+\alpha u\right) _{x}+\theta \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial y^{2}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(1)
where \(\alpha\) represents the coefficient of diffusion and \(\theta\) represent degradation coefficient. The diffusion of a gas in a homogeneous medium is an important phenomenon in a physical context and the CI model provides a useful model to study such phenomena.
Scientists analyzed the (2 + 1) CI equation using many different solution methods, for example, Sakthivel and Chun applied the exp-function approach (Sakthivel and Chun 2010), Riaz et al. applied Lie symmetry analysis (Riaz et al. 2021), Mao applied the trial equation practice (Mao 2018), Qiang et al. applied the undetermined coefficient procedure (Qiang et al. 2013), Akbar et al. applied the first integral practice (Akbar et al. 2019), and Arshed et al. utilized the sinh-Gordon expansion practice (Arshed et al. 2023).
The beta derivative
Fractional derivatives are very important in scientific study fields. For this reason, fractional derivatives have been studied in depth and many definitions have been found, for example; Grunwald–Letnikov, Riemann–Liouville, the Caputo, modified Riemann–Liouville, and Atangana–Baleanu derivatives (Samko et al. 1993; Kilbas et al. 2006). In this paper, the beta derivative will be hadled. The most important property of this derivative is that the chain rule is applicable. Thus, we can reduce nonlinear differential equations to ordinary differential equations with the help of wave transformations. The beta derivative satisfies several properties that were as limitation for the fractional derivatives and has been used to model some physical problems. Basic definitions of the beta derivative are given as follows:
Definition
Let \(\ \psi \left( t\right)\) be a function defined for all non-negative t. The \(\beta\) derivative of \(T^{\beta }\left( \psi \left( t\right) \right)\) of order \(\beta\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} T^{\beta }\left( \psi \left( t\right) \right) =\underset{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}{\lim }\frac{\psi \left( t+\varepsilon \left( t+\frac{1}{ \Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{1-\beta }\right) -\psi \left( t\right) }{\varepsilon }, \end{aligned}$$
where \(T^{\beta }\left( \psi \left( t\right) \right) =\frac{d^{\beta }\psi \left( t\right) }{dt^{\beta }}\) and \(0<\beta \le 1\)
Some rules are given for \(\beta\) derivative by the following theorem.
Theorem
Let \(\psi \left( t\right)\) and \(\varphi \left( t\right)\) be \(\beta\) -differentiable functions for all \(t>0\) and \(\beta \epsilon (0,1] .\) Some basic properties are discussed as follows:
1.
\(T^{\beta }(a_{1}\psi (t)+a_{2}\varphi (t))=a_{1}T^{\beta }(\psi (t))+a_{2}T^{\beta }(\varphi (t)),\forall a_{1},a_{2}\in R\)
 
2.
\(T^{\beta }(\psi (t)\varphi (t))=\varphi (t)T^{\beta }(\psi (t))+\psi (t)T^{\beta }(\varphi (t)),\)
 
3.
\(T^{\beta }(\frac{\psi (t)}{\varphi (t)})=\frac{\varphi (t)T^{\beta }(\psi (t))-\psi (t)T^{\beta }(\varphi (t))}{\varphi (t)^{2}},\)
 
4.
\(T^{\beta }(\psi (t))=\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{1-\beta }\frac{d\psi \left( t\right) }{dt}\) (Atangana et al. 2016).
 
The main procedure of this article is to find exact solutions to the CI model. The methods are explained in the second section. In chapter 3, the methods are applied to the CI equation. The stability test was applied to the exact solutions found in Sect. 4. In chapter 5, the exact solution graphs of the equation are given.

2 Methods

Think that nonlinear time fractional conformable differential equation as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi \left( u_{t}^{\beta },u_{x},u_{xx},\left( u_{x}\right) _{t}^{\beta },u_{yy},\ldots \right) =0, \end{aligned}$$
(2)
where u is a variable depending on x and t, \(\beta\) represents beta fractional order derivative. The wave transformation will be used as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u\left( x,y,t\right) =U\left( \xi \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(3)
where
$$\begin{aligned} \xi =x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) } \right) ^{\beta }. \end{aligned}$$
(4)
If we utilize the wave transformation to Eq. (2), the nonlinear ordinary differential equation is obtained as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} \Psi \left( U,U^{\prime },U^{\prime \prime },U^{\prime \prime \prime },\ldots \right) =0. \end{aligned}$$
(5)

2.1 The generalized Kudryashov procedure

We choose the solution for \(U(\xi )\) as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} U(\xi )=\ \frac{{{\sum \nolimits _{i=0}^{n} }}a_{i}\Omega ^{i}\left( \xi \right) }{\sum \nolimits _{j=0}^{m}b_{j}\Omega ^{j}\left( \xi \right) }, \end{aligned}$$
(6)
here \(a_{i},b_{j}\left( i=0,1,\ldots ,n,j=0,1,\ldots ,m\right)\) are constants and \(a_{n},b_{m}\) should be different from zero. \(\Omega \left( \xi \right)\) provides the following differential equation:
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\Omega }{d\xi }=\Omega ^{2}\left( \xi \right) -\Omega \left( \xi \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(7)
the solution of the Eq. (7) is given by:
$$\begin{aligned} \Omega \left( \xi \right) =\frac{1}{1+\chi e^{\xi }}. \end{aligned}$$
(8)
where \(\chi\) is the integral constant. Positive integers n and m are calculated by the homogeneous balancing principle, using the order of the highest-order derivative term and the degree of the highest-order nonlinear term. Expression (6) is written into equation (5) using (7) and the polynomial \(\Omega \left( \xi \right) ^{i-j}(i,j=1,2,3,\ldots )\) is obtained. An algebraic equation system is found by setting all coefficients of this polynomial dependent on \(\Omega \left( \xi \right)\) equal to zero. The obtained algebraic equation system is solved according to the coefficients \(a_{i},b_{j},v,\alpha\) and the solutions of equation (5) are obtained. The exact solutions of equation (2) are obtained by writing \(\xi =x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\) to the solutions of equation (5) (Akbulut 2023; Akbar et al. 2021; Akbulut and Kaplan 2021).

2.2 The modifed Kudryashov procedure

We choose the solution for \(U(\xi )\) as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} U(\xi )=\ \underset{i=0}{\overset{n}{\sum }}a_{i}\left( \Omega \left( \xi \right) \right) ^{i}, \end{aligned}$$
(9)
where \(a_{i}\left( i=0,1,\ldots ,n\right)\) are constants and there should be \(a_{n}\ne 0\). \(\Omega \left( \xi \right)\) provides the following ordinary differential equation:
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\Omega }{d\xi }=\left( \Omega ^{2}\left( \xi \right) -\Omega \left( \xi \right) \right) \ln \omega \end{aligned}$$
(10)
the solution of the Eq. (10) is given by:
$$\begin{aligned} \Omega \left( \xi \right) =\frac{1}{1+\chi \omega ^{\xi }}. \end{aligned}$$
(11)
where \(\chi\) is the integral constant. n is calculated by the homogeneous balancing principle, using the order of the highest-order derivative term and the degree of the highest-order nonlinear term. Expression (9) is written into equation (5) using (10) and the polynomial \(\Omega \left( \xi \right) ^{i}(i=1,2,3,\ldots )\) is obtained. An algebraic equation system is found by setting all coefficients of this polynomial dependent on \(\Omega \left( \xi \right)\) equal to zero. This algebraic equation system is solved according to the coefficients \(a_{n},v,\alpha\) and the solutions of equation (5) are obtained. The exact solutions of equation (2) are obtained by putting \(\xi =x+y- \frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\) to the solutions of equation (5) (Akbulut 2023; Akbulut et al. 2022).
Remark
The solutions we found here are special cases of the solutions we found with the generalized Kudryashov method.
Remark
Our methods are different from the other methods in the literature because of the selected auxiliary equations are different.

3 Application of the methods

In this part, the given methods will be applied to Eq. (1). If we apply (4) to Eq. (1), the following ODE is obtained:
$$\begin{aligned} U^{\prime \prime }+\left( v-\theta \right) U^{\prime }+\alpha U\left( 1-U^{2}\right) =0 \end{aligned}$$
(12)

3.1 Generalized Kudryashov method

Balancing the highest power nonlineer term \(U^{3}\) and the highest order derivative \(U^{\prime }\), \(m=1\) and \(n=2\) are obtained. Thus, using (6) the solution of (12) can be given as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} U(\xi )=\frac{a_{0}+a_{1}\Omega +a_{2}\Omega ^{2}}{b_{0}+b_{1}\Omega } \end{aligned}$$
(13)
We substitute Eq. (13) in Eq. (12) and find a polynomial equation by substituting solution (7) for the result and set the coefficients \(a_{0},a_{1},a_{2},b_{0},b_{1},v,\alpha\) equal to zero and the following system of equations is obtained:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} -\alpha a_{0}^{3}+\alpha a_{0}b_{0}^{2}=0, \\ -b_{1}b_{0}a_{0}-b_{1}\theta a_{0}b_{0}+2b_{1}\alpha a_{0}b_{0}+b_{1}va_{0}b_{0} \\ -va_{1}b_{0}^{2}+\theta a_{1}b_{0}^{2}+b_{0}^{2}a_{1}+\alpha a_{1}b_{0}^{2}-3\alpha a_{0}^{2}a_{1}=0, \\ -b_{1}^{2}\theta a_{0}+b_{1}^{2}va_{0}+b_{1}^{2}a_{0}+b_{1}^{2}\alpha a_{0}+3b_{1}b_{0}a_{0}+b_{1}\theta a_{1}b_{0}-b_{1}va_{1}b_{0} \\ +2b_{1}\alpha a_{1}b_{0}-b_{1}va_{0}b_{0}+b_{1}\theta a_{0}b_{0}-b_{1}b_{0}a_{1}-3\alpha a_{0}a_{1}^{2}+\alpha a_{2}b_{0}^{2} \\ -3\alpha a_{0}^{2}a_{2}+4b_{0}^{2}a_{2}-2va_{2}b_{0}^{2}-\theta a_{1}b_{0}^{2}-3b_{0}^{2}a_{1}+va_{1}b_{0}^{2}+2\theta a_{2}b_{0}^{2}=0, \\ -b_{1}^{2}a_{0}+b_{1}^{2}\theta a_{0}+b_{1}^{2}\alpha a_{1}-b_{1}^{2}va_{0}+3b_{0}a_{2}b_{1}-2b_{1}b_{0}a_{0}+2b_{1}\alpha a_{2}b_{0}-b_{1}\theta a_{1}b_{0}+b_{1}va_{1}b_{0} \\ +3b_{1}\theta a_{2}b_{0}+b_{1}b_{0}a_{1}-3b_{1}va_{2}b_{0}-6\alpha a_{0}a_{1}a_{2}+2va_{2}b_{0}^{2}-10b_{0}^{2}a_{2}-\alpha a_{1}^{3}+2b_{0}^{2}a_{1}-2\theta a_{2}b_{0}^{2}=0, \\ 2a_{2}b_{1}^{2}-\alpha a_{2}^{3}=0, \\ -3a_{2}b_{1}^{2}-b_{1}^{2}\theta a_{2}+b_{1}^{2}va_{2}+6b_{0}a_{2}b_{1}-3\alpha a_{1}a_{2}^{2}=0, \\ b_{1}^{2}\theta a_{2}-b_{1}^{2}va_{2}+b_{1}^{2}\alpha a_{2}+a_{2}b_{1}^{2}-3b_{1}\theta a_{2}b_{0}+3b_{1}va_{2}b_{0} \\ -9b_{0}a_{2}b_{1}+6b_{0}^{2}a_{2}-3\alpha a_{0}a_{2}^{2}-3\alpha a_{1}^{2}a_{2}=0. \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
By solving these algebric equations system for \(a_{0},a_{1},a_{2},b_{0},b_{1},v\) and \(\alpha ,\) we obtain the following cases:
Set1
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=0,a_{1}=0,a_{2}=\frac{b_{1}}{2},b_{0}=-\frac{b_{1}}{2} ,b_{1}=b_{1},v=6+\theta ,\alpha =8\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(14)
Substituting (14) into (3) without ignoring (13), we have the exact solution as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{1}\left( x,y,t\right) =-\frac{1}{-1+A^{2}e^{2\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta } \left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(15)
Set2
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=0,a_{1}=-\frac{a_{2}}{2},a_{2}=a_{2},b_{0}=0,b_{1}=-\frac{a_{2} }{2},v=\theta ,\alpha =\frac{1}{2}\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(16)
Substituting (16) into (3) without ignoring (13), we have the exact solution as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{2}\left( x,y,t\right) =\frac{-1+Ae^{\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+ \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}{ 1+Ae^{\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(17)
Set3
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=0,a_{1}=\sqrt{2}b_{1}i,a_{2}=-\sqrt{2}b_{1}i,b_{0}=-\frac{b_{1} }{2},b_{1}=b_{1},v=\theta ,\alpha =-1\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(18)
Substituting (18) into (3) without ignoring (13), we have the exact solution as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{3}\left( x,y,t\right) =\frac{-2i\sqrt{2}Ae^{\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta } \left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}{ -1+A^{2}e^{2\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(19)
Set4
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=-\frac{b_{1}}{2},a_{1}=b_{1},a_{2}=-\frac{b_{1}}{2},b_{0}=- \frac{b_{1}}{2},b_{1}=b_{1},v=-6+\theta ,\alpha =8\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(20)
Substituting (20) into (3) without ignoring (13), we have the exact solution as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{4}\left( x,y,t\right) =\frac{A^{2}e^{2\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+ \frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}{ -1+A^{2}e^{2\left( x+y-\frac{v}{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }} \end{aligned}$$
(21)

3.2 The modified Kudryashov method

Balancing the highest power nonlineer term \(U^{3}\) and the highest order derivative \(U^{\prime \prime }\), we obtain \(n=1.\) Using the method, the exact solution can be given as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} U(\xi )=a_{0}+a_{1}\Omega \end{aligned}$$
(22)
We substitute Eq. (22) in (12), and find a polynomial equation by substituting solution (10) for the result and set the coefficients \(a_{0},a_{1},v,\alpha\) equal to zero and we get the following system of equations:
$$\begin{aligned} & - \alpha a_{0}^{3} + \alpha a_{0} = 0, \\ & - 3\alpha a_{0}^{2} a_{1} + a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)^{2} - a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)v + a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)\theta + \alpha a_{1} = 0, \\ & - 3a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)^{2} - a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)\theta - 3\alpha a_{0} a_{1}^{2} + a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)v = 0, \\ & 2a_{1} \ln \left( \omega \right)^{2} - \alpha a_{1}^{3} = 0. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(23)
By solving these algebric equations system for \(a_{0},a_{1},v\) and \(\alpha ,\) the following cases are obtained.
Set1
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=0,a_{1}=\pm 1,v=3\ln \left( \omega \right) +\theta ,\alpha =2\ln \left( \omega \right) ^{2}\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(24)
If we substitute (24) into (22), the exact solutions are obtained as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{1,2}\left( x,y,t\right) =\pm \frac{1}{1+A\omega ^{\left( x+y-\frac{v}{ \beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(25)
Set2
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=\pm 1,a_{1}=\mp 2,v=\theta ,\alpha =\frac{1}{2}\ln \left( \omega \right) ^{2}\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(26)
If we substitute (26) into (22), the exact solutions are obtained as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{3,4}\left( x,y,t\right) =\pm 1\mp \frac{2}{1+A\omega ^{\left( x+y-\frac{v }{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(27)
Set3
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ a_{0}=\pm 1,a_{1}=\mp 1,v=-3\ln \left( \omega \right) +\theta ,\alpha =2\ln \left( \omega \right) ^{2}\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(28)
If we substitute (28) into (22), the exact solutions are obtained as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} u_{5,6}\left( x,y,t\right) =\pm 1\mp \frac{1}{1+A\omega ^{\left( x+y-\frac{v }{\beta }\left( t+\frac{1}{\Gamma \left( \beta \right) }\right) ^{\beta }\right) }}. \end{aligned}$$
(29)

4 Figures of the results

In this part, plots of some results are given for arbitrary constants. Plots are given as three-dimensional, two-dimensional, and contour plots.
Figure 1 represents dark wave. Also, Fig. 1d is given to see how the solution changes for different values of \(\beta\).
Figure 2 represents soliton wave. Also, Fig. 2d is given to see how the solution changes for different values of \(\beta\).
Figure 3 represents kink wave. Also, Fig. 3d is given to see how the solution changes for different values of \(\beta\).
Figure 4 represents dark wave. Also, Fig. 4d is given to see how the solution changes for different values of \(\beta\).

5 Stability properties

Stability analysis is an important research area for nonlinear evolution equations. It helps to study how a system responds to external influences and how it behaves over time. The stability property obtained using the properties of the Hamilton system is tested on some solutions to show the usability of the model in applications. In this part of the study, the stability features of the solutions obtained for Set 5 and Set 6 are examined with the help of the properties of the Hamilton system.
The momentum in the Hamiltonian system
$$\begin{aligned} M_{H}=\frac{1}{2}\int _{-\epsilon }^{\epsilon }F^{2}\left( \xi \right) d\xi , \end{aligned}$$
where \(F\left( \xi \right)\) is the solution of the model and the essential circumstance for stability is formulated in the next form
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial M}{\partial v}\mid _{v=v_{0}}>0, \end{aligned}$$
where \(v_{0}\) are optional constants (Yue et al. 2020a, b).
(17) in solution
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \theta =1,A=1,\beta =1,y=0\right\} \end{aligned}$$
by using custom parameters their values
$$\begin{aligned} M=2+\frac{4e^{-3}}{1+e^{-3}}-\frac{4e^{-1}}{e^{-1}+1}+\ln \left( e^{-2}\right) -4\ln \left( e^{-1}+1\right) +2\ln \left( 1+e^{-3}\right) +2\ln \left( 1+e\right) \end{aligned}$$
thus, the obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial M}{\partial v}\mid _{v=1}=0.584589133>0. \end{aligned}$$
(27) in solution
$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \theta =1,\omega =2,A=1,\beta =1,y=0\right\} \end{aligned}$$
by using custom parameters their values
$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \left( \frac{2}{v}+\frac{2^{2+2v}}{v\ln \left( 2\right) \left( 2^{2v}+2\right) }-\frac{2^{3+2v}}{v\ln \left( 2\right) \left( 2^{1+2v}+1\right) }+\frac{\ln \left( 2^{-v}\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) v^{2}}-\frac{\ln \left( 2^{v}\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) v^{2}}\right. \\{} & {} \quad \left. -\frac{2\ln \left( 2^{2v}+2\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) ^{2}v^{2}} +\frac{2\ln \left( 2^{1+2v}+1\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) ^{2}v^{2}}\right) _{v=1} \\{} & {} M=1-\frac{2\ln \left( 6\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) ^{2}}-\frac{8}{9\ln \left( 2\right) }+\frac{\ln \left( \frac{1}{2}\right) }{ \ln \left( 2\right) }+\frac{2\ln \left( 9\right) }{\ln \left( 2\right) ^{2}} \end{aligned}$$
thus, the obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial M}{\partial v}\mid _{v=1}=0.405449408>0. \end{aligned}$$
As a result, this solution is stable. The same steps are applied to the next solutions obtained, and the stability feature of each is determined.

6 Conclusion

In this study, solutions of the local temporal fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation were obtained by generalized Kudryashov and modified Kudryashov methods. These two methods can be easily applied and offer different solutions compared to other methods in the literature. Since the methods are powerful and effective, the procedures used can be applied to different nonlinear differential equations. The generalized Kudryashov method produced four solutions, and the modified Kudryashov method produced 6 solutions. The resulting solutions are hyperbolic and rational functions. The obtained solutions were examined by stability test. As a result, the solutions are stable. 3D and 2D contour drawings were drawn for some families, and in these drawings, the graphs of soliton, kink, and dark solution were obtained. Maple software program was used to check the accuracy of the results. The CI equation provides a useful model for studying the diffusion of a gas in a uniform medium. In addition, ion-acoustic waves in plasma also play an important role in various scientific and technological fields, including fluid dynamics, plasma physics, signal processing through optical cables, sound waves, and electromagnetic waves. The results obtained have the potential to be useful in the fields of physics, mathematics and engineering.

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that no funds were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ablowitz, M.J., Clarkson, P.A.: Soliton, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991)CrossRef Ablowitz, M.J., Clarkson, P.A.: Soliton, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akbar, M.A., Ali, N.H.M., Hussain, J.: Optical soliton solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation and the dimensionless form of the Zakharov equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 1–18 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef Akbar, M.A., Ali, N.H.M., Hussain, J.: Optical soliton solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation and the dimensionless form of the Zakharov equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 1–18 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akbar, M.A., Akinyemi, L., Yao, S.W., Jhangeer, A., Rezazadeh, H., Khater, M.M.A., Ahmad, H., Inc, M.: Soliton solutions to the Boussinesq equation through sine-Gordon method and Kudryashov method. Res. Phys. 25, 104228 (2021) Akbar, M.A., Akinyemi, L., Yao, S.W., Jhangeer, A., Rezazadeh, H., Khater, M.M.A., Ahmad, H., Inc, M.: Soliton solutions to the Boussinesq equation through sine-Gordon method and Kudryashov method. Res. Phys. 25, 104228 (2021)
Zurück zum Zitat Akbulut, A., Arnous, A.H., Hashemi, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M.: Solitary waves for the generalized nonlinear wave equation in (3+1) dimensions with gas bubbles using the Nnucci’s reduction, enhanced and modified Kudryashov algorithms. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2022) Akbulut, A., Arnous, A.H., Hashemi, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M.: Solitary waves for the generalized nonlinear wave equation in (3+1) dimensions with gas bubbles using the Nnucci’s reduction, enhanced and modified Kudryashov algorithms. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. (2022)
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Mdallal, Q.M., Syam, M.I.: Sine-Cosine method for finding the soliton solutions of the generalized fifth-order nonlinear equation. Chaos Solitons Fract. 33(5), 1610–1617 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Al-Mdallal, Q.M., Syam, M.I.: Sine-Cosine method for finding the soliton solutions of the generalized fifth-order nonlinear equation. Chaos Solitons Fract. 33(5), 1610–1617 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arshed, S., Akram, G., Sadaf, M., Bilal Riaz, M., Wojciechowski, A.: Solitary wave behavior of (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation. PLoS ONE 18(1), e027696 (2023)CrossRef Arshed, S., Akram, G., Sadaf, M., Bilal Riaz, M., Wojciechowski, A.: Solitary wave behavior of (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation. PLoS ONE 18(1), e027696 (2023)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atangana, A., Baleanu, D., Alsaedi, A.: Analysis of time-fractional Hunter–Saxton equation: a model of neumatic liquid crystal. Open Phys. 14(1), 145–149 (2016)CrossRef Atangana, A., Baleanu, D., Alsaedi, A.: Analysis of time-fractional Hunter–Saxton equation: a model of neumatic liquid crystal. Open Phys. 14(1), 145–149 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bekir, A.: Application of the \((G^{\prime }/G)\)-expansion method for nonlinear evolution equations. Phys. Lett. A 372(19), 3400–3406 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Bekir, A.: Application of the \((G^{\prime }/G)\)-expansion method for nonlinear evolution equations. Phys. Lett. A 372(19), 3400–3406 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biswas, A., Yildirim, Y., Yasar, E., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S.P., Belic, M.: Optical solitons for Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model by modified simple equation method. Optik 160, 24–32 (2018)ADSCrossRef Biswas, A., Yildirim, Y., Yasar, E., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S.P., Belic, M.: Optical solitons for Lakshmanan–Porsezian–Daniel model by modified simple equation method. Optik 160, 24–32 (2018)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bonyah, E., Gomez-Aguilar, J.F., Abu, A.: Stability analysis and optimal control of a fractional human African trypanosomiasis model. Chaos Soliton Fract. 117, 150–160 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Bonyah, E., Gomez-Aguilar, J.F., Abu, A.: Stability analysis and optimal control of a fractional human African trypanosomiasis model. Chaos Soliton Fract. 117, 150–160 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caraballo, T., Crauel, H., Langa, J., Robinson, J.: The effect of noise on the Chafee–Infante equation: a nonlinear case study. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 135(2), 373–82 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef Caraballo, T., Crauel, H., Langa, J., Robinson, J.: The effect of noise on the Chafee–Infante equation: a nonlinear case study. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 135(2), 373–82 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Çelik, N.: Exact solutions of magneto-electro-elastic rod model with F expansion method. BEU J. Sci. 10(2), 375–392 (2021) Çelik, N.: Exact solutions of magneto-electro-elastic rod model with F expansion method. BEU J. Sci. 10(2), 375–392 (2021)
Zurück zum Zitat Das, A., Ghosh, N.: Bifurcation of traveling waves and exact solutions of Kadomtsev–Petviashvili modified equal width equation with fractional temporal evolution. Comput. Appl. Math. 38(1), 9 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef Das, A., Ghosh, N.: Bifurcation of traveling waves and exact solutions of Kadomtsev–Petviashvili modified equal width equation with fractional temporal evolution. Comput. Appl. Math. 38(1), 9 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duran, S., Yokus, A., Durur, H., Kaya, D.: Refraction simulation of internal solitary waves for the fractional Benjamin–Ono equation in fluid dynamics. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35(26), 2150363 (2021a)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Duran, S., Yokus, A., Durur, H., Kaya, D.: Refraction simulation of internal solitary waves for the fractional Benjamin–Ono equation in fluid dynamics. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35(26), 2150363 (2021a)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duran, S., Yokus, S.A., Durur, H.: Surface wave behavior and refraction simulation on the ocean for the fractional Ostrovsky–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35(31), 2150477 (2021b)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Duran, S., Yokus, S.A., Durur, H.: Surface wave behavior and refraction simulation on the ocean for the fractional Ostrovsky–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35(31), 2150477 (2021b)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghanbari, B., Kuo, C.K.: New exact wave solutions of the variable-coefficient (1+1)-dimensional Benjamin–Bona–Mahony and (2+1)-dimensional asymmetric Nizhnik–Novikov–Veselov equations via the generalized exponential rational function method. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(7), 334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12632-0CrossRef Ghanbari, B., Kuo, C.K.: New exact wave solutions of the variable-coefficient (1+1)-dimensional Benjamin–Bona–Mahony and (2+1)-dimensional asymmetric Nizhnik–Novikov–Veselov equations via the generalized exponential rational function method. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(7), 334 (2019). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1140/​epjp/​i2019-12632-0CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez-Aguilar, J.F., Ghanbari, B., Bonyah, E.: On the new fractional operator and application to nonlinear bloch system. Int. Workshop Math. Model Appl. Anal. Comput. 2018, 137–154 (2018) Gomez-Aguilar, J.F., Ghanbari, B., Bonyah, E.: On the new fractional operator and application to nonlinear bloch system. Int. Workshop Math. Model Appl. Anal. Comput. 2018, 137–154 (2018)
Zurück zum Zitat Hashemi, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M.: Optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation using Lie symmetry method. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 281, 170816 (2023)CrossRef Hashemi, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M.: Optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation using Lie symmetry method. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 281, 170816 (2023)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hassani, H., Machado, J.T., Naraghirad, E., Sadeghi, B.: Solving nonlinear systems of fractional-order partial differential equations using an optimization technique based on generalized polynomials. Comput. Appl. Math. 39, 1–19 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef Hassani, H., Machado, J.T., Naraghirad, E., Sadeghi, B.: Solving nonlinear systems of fractional-order partial differential equations using an optimization technique based on generalized polynomials. Comput. Appl. Math. 39, 1–19 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helal, M.A., Mehana, M.S.: A comparison between two different methods for solving Modified KdV Burgers equation. Chaos Solitons Fract. 28, 320–326 (2006)ADSCrossRef Helal, M.A., Mehana, M.S.: A comparison between two different methods for solving Modified KdV Burgers equation. Chaos Solitons Fract. 28, 320–326 (2006)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseini, K., Osman, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M., Rabie, F.: Investigation of different wave structures to the generalized third-order nonlinear Schr ödinger equation. Optik 206, 164259 (2020)ADSCrossRef Hosseini, K., Osman, M.S., Mirzazadeh, M., Rabie, F.: Investigation of different wave structures to the generalized third-order nonlinear Schr ödinger equation. Optik 206, 164259 (2020)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jianming, L., Jie, D., Wenjun, Y.: Backlund transformation and new exact solutions of the Sharma–Tasso–Olver equation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2011, 935710 (2011)CrossRef Jianming, L., Jie, D., Wenjun, Y.: Backlund transformation and new exact solutions of the Sharma–Tasso–Olver equation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2011, 935710 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kilbas, A., Srivastava, M.H., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) Kilbas, A., Srivastava, M.H., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Zurück zum Zitat Kudryashov, N.A.: One method for finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17(6), 2248–2253 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Kudryashov, N.A.: One method for finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17(6), 2248–2253 (2012)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kudryashov, N.A.: First integrals and general solution of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 386, 125407 (2020)MathSciNet Kudryashov, N.A.: First integrals and general solution of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 386, 125407 (2020)MathSciNet
Zurück zum Zitat Kudryashov, N.A.: Optical solitons of the perturbation Fokas–Lenells equation by two different integration procedures. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 273, 170382 (2023)CrossRef Kudryashov, N.A.: Optical solitons of the perturbation Fokas–Lenells equation by two different integration procedures. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 273, 170382 (2023)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mao, Y.: Exact solutions to (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation. Pramana 91(1), 9 (2018)ADSCrossRef Mao, Y.: Exact solutions to (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation. Pramana 91(1), 9 (2018)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, K.S., Ross, B.: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1993) Miller, K.S., Ross, B.: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1993)
Zurück zum Zitat Mohyud-Din, S.T., Noor, M.A., Noor, K.I.: Modified variational iteration method for solving Sine-Gordon equations. World Appl. Sci. J. 6, 999–1004 (2009) Mohyud-Din, S.T., Noor, M.A., Noor, K.I.: Modified variational iteration method for solving Sine-Gordon equations. World Appl. Sci. J. 6, 999–1004 (2009)
Zurück zum Zitat Park, C., Khater, M.M.A., Abdel-Aty, A.H., Attifa, R.A.M., Rezazadeh, H., Zidan, A.M., Mohamed, A.B.A.: Dynamical analysis of the nonlinear complex fractional emerging telecommunication model with higher-order dispersive cubic-quintic. Alex. Eng. J. 59, 1425–1433 (2020)CrossRef Park, C., Khater, M.M.A., Abdel-Aty, A.H., Attifa, R.A.M., Rezazadeh, H., Zidan, A.M., Mohamed, A.B.A.: Dynamical analysis of the nonlinear complex fractional emerging telecommunication model with higher-order dispersive cubic-quintic. Alex. Eng. J. 59, 1425–1433 (2020)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qiang, L., Yun, Z., Yuanzheng, W.: Qualitative analysis and travelling wave solutions for the Chaffee–Infante equation. Rep. Math. Phys. 71(2), 177–93 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef Qiang, L., Yun, Z., Yuanzheng, W.: Qualitative analysis and travelling wave solutions for the Chaffee–Infante equation. Rep. Math. Phys. 71(2), 177–93 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raza, N., Aslam, M.R., Rezazadeh, H.: Analytical study of resonant optical solitons with variable coefficients in Kerr and non-Kerr law media. Opt. Quant. Electron. 51, 59 (2019)CrossRef Raza, N., Aslam, M.R., Rezazadeh, H.: Analytical study of resonant optical solitons with variable coefficients in Kerr and non-Kerr law media. Opt. Quant. Electron. 51, 59 (2019)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raza, N., Rafiq, M.H., Kaplan, M., Kumar, S., Chu, Y.M.: The unified method for abundant soliton solutions of local time fractional nonlinear evolution equations. Res. Phys. 22, 103979 (2021) Raza, N., Rafiq, M.H., Kaplan, M., Kumar, S., Chu, Y.M.: The unified method for abundant soliton solutions of local time fractional nonlinear evolution equations. Res. Phys. 22, 103979 (2021)
Zurück zum Zitat Riaz, M.B., Atangana, A., Jhangeer, A., Junaid-U-Rehman, M.: Some exact explicit solutions and conservation laws of Chaffee–Infante equation by Lie symmetry analysis. Phys. Scr. 96(8), 084008 (2021)ADSCrossRef Riaz, M.B., Atangana, A., Jhangeer, A., Junaid-U-Rehman, M.: Some exact explicit solutions and conservation laws of Chaffee–Infante equation by Lie symmetry analysis. Phys. Scr. 96(8), 084008 (2021)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sakthivel, R., Chun, C.: New soliton solutions of Chaffee–Infante equations using the Exp-function method. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 65(3), 197–202 (2010)ADSCrossRef Sakthivel, R., Chun, C.: New soliton solutions of Chaffee–Infante equations using the Exp-function method. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 65(3), 197–202 (2010)ADSCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samko, G., Kilbas, A.A., Marichev, O.I.: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Switzerland, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1993) Samko, G., Kilbas, A.A., Marichev, O.I.: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Switzerland, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1993)
Zurück zum Zitat Seadawy, A.R.: Traveling-wave solution of a weakly nonlinear two-dimensional higher-order Kadomtsev Petviashvili dynamical equation for dispersive shallow-water waves. Eur. Phys. J. plus. 132, 29 (2017)CrossRef Seadawy, A.R.: Traveling-wave solution of a weakly nonlinear two-dimensional higher-order Kadomtsev Petviashvili dynamical equation for dispersive shallow-water waves. Eur. Phys. J. plus. 132, 29 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sriskandarajah, K., Smiley, M.W.: The global attractor for a Chafee–Infante problem with source term. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 27(11), 1315–27 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRef Sriskandarajah, K., Smiley, M.W.: The global attractor for a Chafee–Infante problem with source term. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 27(11), 1315–27 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wazwaz, A.M.: A Sine–Cosine method for handling nonlinear wave equations. Math. Comput. Model. 40(5–6), 499–508 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRef Wazwaz, A.M.: A Sine–Cosine method for handling nonlinear wave equations. Math. Comput. Model. 40(5–6), 499–508 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, H.W., Guo, M., He, H.: Conservation laws of space-time fractional mZK equation for Rossby solitary waves with complete Coriolis force. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 20, 1–16 (2019)MathSciNet Yang, H.W., Guo, M., He, H.: Conservation laws of space-time fractional mZK equation for Rossby solitary waves with complete Coriolis force. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 20, 1–16 (2019)MathSciNet
Zurück zum Zitat Yokus, A.: Numerical solution for space and time fractional order Burger type equation. Alex. Eng. J. 57, 2085–2091 (2018)CrossRef Yokus, A.: Numerical solution for space and time fractional order Burger type equation. Alex. Eng. J. 57, 2085–2091 (2018)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zubair, A., Raza, N., Mirzazadeh, M., Liu, W., Zhou, Q.: Analytic study on optical solitons in parity-time symmetric mixed linear and nonlinear modulation lattices with non-Kerr nonlinearities. Optik 173, 249–262 (2018)ADSCrossRef Zubair, A., Raza, N., Mirzazadeh, M., Liu, W., Zhou, Q.: Analytic study on optical solitons in parity-time symmetric mixed linear and nonlinear modulation lattices with non-Kerr nonlinearities. Optik 173, 249–262 (2018)ADSCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Applications of two kinds of Kudryashov methods for time fractional (2 + 1) dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation and its stability analysis
verfasst von
Duygu Tetik
Arzu Akbulut
Nisa Çelik
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Optical and Quantum Electronics / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0306-8919
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-817X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-06271-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

Optical and Quantum Electronics 4/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt