Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Mobile Networks and Applications
Erschienen in: Mobile Networks and Applications 3/2019

02.10.2018

Applying Privacy Patterns to the Internet of Things’ (IoT) Architecture

verfasst von: Sebastian Pape, Kai Rannenberg

Erschienen in: Mobile Networks and Applications | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The concept of cloud computing relies on central large datacentres with huge amounts of computational power. The rapidly growing Internet of Things with its vast amount of data showed that this architecture produces costly, inefficient and in some cases infeasible communication. Thus, fog computing, a new architecture with distributed computational power closer to the IoT devices was developed. So far, this decentralised fog-oriented architecture has only been used for performance and resource management improvements. We show how it could also be used for improving the users’ privacy. For that purpose, we map privacy patterns to the IoT / fog computing / cloud computing architecture. Privacy patterns are software design patterns with the focus to translate “privacy-by-design” into practical advice. As a proof of concept, for each of the used privacy patterns we give an example from a smart vehicle scenario to illustrate how the patterns could improve the users’ privacy.
Vorheriger Artikel SHSec: SDN based Secure Smart Home Network Architecture for Internet of Things
Nächster Artikel Decentralised Functional Signatures

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Thien AT, Colomo-Palacios R (2016) A Systematic Literature Review of Fog Computing. Paper presented at NOKOBIT 2016, Bergen, NOKOBIT, vol. 24, no. 1, Bibsys Open Journal Systems, ISSN 1894–7719
4.
Kowatsch T, Maass TW (2012) Privacy Concerns and Acceptance of IoT Services. In: The Internet of Things 2012: New Horizons. Halifax, UK : IERC - Internet of Things European Research Cluster, S. 176–187
5.
6.
7.
Adams M (2017) Big Data and Individual Privacy in the Age of the Internet of Things. Technology Innovation Management Review 7(4):12–24CrossRef
8.
Papageorgiou A, Strigkos M, Politou E, Alepis E, Solanas A, Patsakis C (2018) Security and Privacy Analysis of Mobile Health Applications: The Alarming State of Practice. IEEE Access 6:9390–9403CrossRef
9.
Weinberg BD, Milne GR, Andonova YG, Hajjat FM (2015) Internet of Things: Convenience vs. privacy and secrecy. Business Horizons 58(6):615–624CrossRef
10.
Kristen L (2016) Walker: Surrendering information through the looking glass: Transparency, trust, and protection. J Public Policy Mark 35(1):144–158CrossRef
11.
Milne GR, Culnan MJ (2004) Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. J Interact Mark 18(3):15–29CrossRef
12.
Milne GR, Culnan MJ, Greene H (2006) A longitudinal assessment of online privacy notice readability. J Public Policy Mark 25(2):238–249CrossRef
13.
Paul N, Tesfay W, Kipker D-K, Stelter M, Pape S (2018) Assessing Privacy Policies of Internet of Things Services. In ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection - 33rd IFIP TC 11 International Conference, SEC 2018, Poznan
14.
15.
Yousefpour A, Ishigaki G, Jue JP (2017) Fog Computing: Towards Minimizing Delay in the Internet of Things. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE), Honolulu, pp. 17–24
16.
Bonomi F, Milito R, Zhu J, Addepalli S (2012) Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing, p. 13–16. ACM
17.
Bierzynski K, Escobar A, Eberl M (2017) Cloud, fog and edge: Cooperation for the future? FMEC: 62–67
18.
Sathish Kumar J, Patel DR (2014) A survey on internet of things: Security and privacy issues. International Journal of Computer Applications 90.11
19.
Martinez-Balleste A, Perez-Martinez PA, Solanas A (2013) The pursuit of citizens' privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible. IEEE Commun Mag 51(6):136–141CrossRef
20.
Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Inf Syst Res 17(1):61–80CrossRef
21.
Fred D (1989) Davis: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–339CrossRef
22.
Kozlov D, Veijalainen J, Ali Y (2012) Security and privacy threats in IoT architectures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets '12). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, 256–262
23.
Lee K, Kim D, Ha D, Rajput U, Oh H (2015) On security and privacy issues of fog computing supported Internet of Things environment. In: Network of the Future (NOF), 2015 6th International Conference on the, pp. 1–3. IEEE
24.
Stojmenovic I, Wen S (2014) The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues. FedCSIS 1–8
25.
Stojmenovic I, Wen S, Huang X, Luan H (2016) An overview of Fog computing and its security issues. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 28(10):2991–3005CrossRef
26.
Lu R, Liang X, Li X, Lin X, Shen X (2012) Eppa: An efficient and privacy-preserving aggregation scheme for secure smart grid communications. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions 23(9):1621–1631CrossRef
27.
Ni J, Zhang K, Lin X, Shen X (2017) Securing fog computing for internet of things applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
28.
Tayeb S, Latifi S, Kim Y (2017) A survey on IoT communication and computation frameworks: An industrial perspective. In: Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2017 IEEE 7th Annual, pp. 1–6. IEEE
29.
Sadeghi A-R, Wachsmann C, Waidner M (2015) Security and privacy challenges in industrial Internet of Things. Design Automation Conf. (DAC), 2015 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE, pp. 1–12
30.
31.
Rahman LF, Ozcelebi T, Lukkien JJ (2016) Choosing your IoT programming framework: Architectural aspects. In: Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on, pp. 293–300. IEEE
32.
Graf C, Wolkerstorfer P, Geven A, Tscheligi M (2010) A pattern collection for privacy enhancing technology. In: The 2nd Int. Conf. on Pervasive Patterns and Applications (PATTERNS 2010), pp. 21–26
33.
Yoder J, Baraclow J (1997) Architectural Patterns for Enabling Application Security. Pattern Languages of Programs
34.
35.
Schumacher M (2002) Security Patterns and Security Standards - With Selected Security Patterns for Anonymity and Privacy. European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP)
36.
37.
Schümmer T (2004) The Public Privacy – Patterns for Filtering Personal Information in Collaborative Systems. CHI
38.
Romanosky S, Acquisti A, Hong J, Cranor LF, Friedman B (2006) Privacy patterns for online interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Pattern languages of programs. ACM, p. 12
39.
Doty N, Gupta M (2013) Privacy design patterns and anti-patterns. In: Trustbusters Workshop at the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
40.
41.
Paillier P (1999) Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, pp. 223–238. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
42.
43.
Dierks T (2008) The transport layer security (TLS) protocol version 1.2, RFC 5246
44.
Okay FY, Ozdemir S (2018) A secure data aggregation protocol for fog computing based smart grids. 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG 2018), Doha, pp. 1–6
45.
Rannenberg K (2016) Opportunities and Risks Associated with Collecting and Making Usable Additional Data. Autonomous Driving. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 497–517
46.
SAE (2014) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road-motor vehicle automated deriving systems, J3016, SAE International Standard
Metadaten
Titel
Applying Privacy Patterns to the Internet of Things’ (IoT) Architecture
verfasst von
Sebastian Pape
Kai Rannenberg
Publikationsdatum
02.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Mobile Networks and Applications / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1383-469X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8153
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1148-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Mobile Networks and Applications 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Crowdsourcing Analysis in 5G IoT: Cybersecurity Threats and Mitigation

OriginalPaper

Loading Aware Green Power Control (LAGPC) for the Mitigation of Co-Tier Downlink Interference for Femtocell in the Future 5G Networks

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of the Effect of Variations in Vehicle Velocity and Channel Bandwidth on an Image-Streaming System in Vehicular Networks

OriginalPaper

Home Healthcare Matching Service System Using the Internet of Things

OriginalPaper

Identity-Based User Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol for Multi-Server Environment with Anonymity

OriginalPaper

Collaboration IoT-Based RBAC with Trust Evaluation Algorithm Model for Massive IoT Integrated Application

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise