Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Responsibilities and Challenges of Product Owners at Spotify - An Exploratory Case Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Are Software Developers Just Users of Development Tools? Assessing Developer Experience of a Graphical User Interface Designer

verfasst von : Kati Kuusinen

Erschienen in: Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Software developers use software products to design and develop new software products for others to use. Research has introduced a concept of developer experience inspired by the concept of user experience but appreciating also the special characteristics of software development context. It is unclear what the experiential components of developer experience are and how it can be measured. In this paper we address developer experience of Vaadin Designer, a graphical user interface designer tool in terms of user experience, intrinsic motivation, and flow state experience. We surveyed 18 developers using AttrakDiff, flow state scale, intrinsic motivation inventory and our own DEXI scale and compare those responses to developers’ overall user experience assessment using Mann-Whitney U test. We found significant differences in motivational and flow state factors between groups who assessed the overall user experience either bad or good. Based on our results we discuss the factors that construe developer experience.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Demon Hunt - The Role of Endsley’s Demons of Situation Awareness in Maritime Accidents
Nächstes Kapitel A Conceptual UX-Aware Model of Requirements
Literatur
1.
Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., Sharp, H.: Motivation in software engineering: A systematic literature review. IST 50, 860–878 (2008)
2.
Capretz, L.F., Ahmed, F.: Making sense of software development and personality types. IT professional 12(1), 6–13 (2010)CrossRef
3.
Coplien, J.O., Bjørnvig, G.: Lean Architecture: For Agile Software Development. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)
4.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience, vol. 41. HarperPerennial, New York (1991)
5.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., LeFevre, J.: Optimal experience in work and leisure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56(5), 815–822 (1989)CrossRef
6.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J.: Flow. In: Elliot, A.: Handbook of Competence and Motivation. The Guilford Press, New York pp. 598–698 (2005)
7.
Deci, E., Ryan, R.M.: Self-Determination Theory. Handbook of Theories Of Social Psychology. SAGE, Los Angeles (2012). ISBN 9780857029607
8.
Fagerholm, F.: Software developer experience: Case studies in lean-agile and open-source environments. Doctoral Thesis. Series of publications A, report A-2015-7. University of Helsinki (2015). ISBN 978-951-51-1747-2
9.
Fagerholm, F., Münch, J.: Developer experience: concept and definition. In: Proceeding International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 73–77. IEEE Press (2012)
10.
Ferreira, J., Sharp, H., Robinson, H.: User experience design and agile development: managing cooperation through articulation work. Softw. Pract. Experience 41(9), 963–974 (2011). WileyCrossRef
11.
Ferreira, J., Sharp, H., Robinson, H.: Values and assumptions shaping agile development and user experience design in practice. In: Martin, A., Wang, X., Whitworth, E., Sillitti, A. (eds.) XP 2010. LNBIP, vol. 48, pp. 178–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRef
12.
Franca, A.C.C., Gouveia, T.B., Santos, P.C.F., Santana, C.A., da Silva, F.Q.B.: Motivation in software engineering: a systematic review update. In: Proceeding Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), pp. 154–163 (2011)
13.
Gass, O., Meth, H., Maedche, A.: PaaS characteristics for productive software development: an evaluation framework. IEEE Internet Comput. 18(1), 56–64 (2014)CrossRef
14.
Graziotin, D., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: Software developers, moods, emotions, and performance. IEEE Softw. 31(4), 24–27 (2014)CrossRef
15.
Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness and usability in interactive products. In: Proceeding HCI. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 319–349 (2004)
16.
Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceeding of 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11–15. ACM (2008)
17.
Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products–facets of user experience. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 353–362 (2010)CrossRef
18.
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRef
19.
ISO 9241. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardisation, Genève (1998)
20.
Jackson, S.A., Martin, A.J., Eklund, R.C.: Long and short measures of flow: the construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. JSEP 30(5), 561 (2008)CrossRef
21.
Khan, I.A., Brinkman, W.-P., Hierons, R.M.: Do moods affect programmers’ debug performance? Cogn. Technol. Work 13(4), 245–258 (2011)CrossRef
22.
Kuusinen, K.: BoB - A framework for organizing within-iteration UX work in agile development. In: Cockton, G., Larusdottir, M.K., Gregory, P., Cajander, Å. (eds) Integrating User Centred Design in Agile Development
23.
Kuusinen, K.: Integrating UX work in agile enterprise software development. Doctoral thesis, Publication 1339, Tampere University of Technology (2015)
24.
Kuusinen, K., Mikkonen, T.: On designing UX for mobile enterprise apps. In: Proceeding Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) 2014, pp. 221–228 (2015)
25.
Kuusinen, K., Mikkonen, T., Pakarinen, S.: Agile user experience development in a large software organization: good expertise but limited impact. In: Winckler, M., Forbrig, P., Bernhaupt, R. (eds.) HCSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7623, pp. 94–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRef
26.
Kuusinen, K., Petrie, H., Fagerholm, F., Mikkonen, T.: Flow, intrinsic motivation, and developer experience in software engineering. In: Sharp, H., Hall, T. (eds.) XP 2016. LNBIP, vol. 251, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRef
27.
Kuusinen, K., Väätäjä, H., Mikkonen, T., Väänänen, K.: Towards understanding how agile teams predict user experience. In: Cockton, G., Larusdottir, M.K., Gregory, P., Cajander, Å.: (eds) Integrating User Centred Design in Agile Development
28.
Lallemand, C., Gronier, G., Koenig, V.: User experience: a concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 35–48 (2015)CrossRef
29.
Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceeding of CHI 2009, pp. 719–728 ACM (2009)
30.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T., Tammen, V.V.: Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 60, 48–58 (1989)CrossRef
31.
Myers, B., Hudson, S.E., Pausch, R.: Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 7(1), 3–28 (2000)CrossRef
32.
Olsen Jr., D.R., Klemmer, S.R.: The future of user interface design tools. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2134–2135. ACM (2005)
33.
Reichheld, F.F.: The one number you need to grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(12), 46–55 (2003)
34.
Ryan, R.M.: Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43, 450–461 (1982)CrossRef
35.
Sharp, H., Baddoo, N., Beecham, S., Hall, T., Robinson, H.: Models of motivation in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 219–233 (2009)CrossRef
36.
Shaw, T.: The emotions of systems developers: an empirical study of affective events theory. In: Proceeding Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in a Networked Environment, SIGMIS CPR 2004, pp. 124–126. ACM (2004)
37.
Sundberg, H.-R.: The importance of user experience related factors in new product development – Comparing the views of designers and users of industrial products. In: 23rd Nordic Academy of Management Conference, 12–14 August 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark (2015)
38.
Metadaten
Titel
Are Software Developers Just Users of Development Tools? Assessing Developer Experience of a Graphical User Interface Designer
verfasst von
Kati Kuusinen
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44901-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-44902-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_14