Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology 3/2021

21.04.2021 | Original Paper

Artificial Intelligence Regulation: a framework for governance

verfasst von: Patricia Gomes Rêgo de Almeida, Carlos Denner dos Santos, Josivania Silva Farias

Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article develops a conceptual framework for regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI) that encompasses all stages of modern public policy-making, from the basics to a sustainable governance. Based on a vast systematic review of the literature on Artificial Intelligence Regulation (AIR) published between 2010 and 2020, a dispersed body of knowledge loosely centred around the “framework” concept was organised, described, and pictured for better understanding. The resulting integrative framework encapsulates 21 prior depictions of the policy-making process, aiming to achieve gold-standard societal values, such as fairness, freedom and long-term sustainability. This challenge of integrating the AIR literature was matched by the identification of a structural common ground among different approaches. The AIR framework results from an effort to identify and later analytically deduce synthetic, and generic tool for a country-specific, stakeholder-aware analysis of AIR matters. Theories and principles as diverse as Agile and Ethics were combined in the “AIR framework”, which provides a conceptual lens for societies to think collectively and make informed policy decisions related to what, when, and how the uses and applications of AI should be regulated. Moreover, the AIR framework serves as a theoretically sound starting point for endeavours related to AI regulation, from legislation to research and development. As we know, the (potential) impacts of AI on society are immense, and therefore the discourses, social negotiations, and applications of this technology should be guided by common grounds based on contemporary governance techniques, and social values legitimated via dialogue and scientific research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access Review, 6, 52138–52160 Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access Review, 6, 52138–52160
Zurück zum Zitat AI HLEG - High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019a). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and disciplines. Definition developed for the purpose of the AI HLEG’s deliverables. AI HLEG - High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019a). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and disciplines. Definition developed for the purpose of the AI HLEG’s deliverables.
Zurück zum Zitat AI HLEG - High-Level Expert Group on Artificial. (2019b). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. High-level expert group on artificial intelligence for the European Commission. AI HLEG - High-Level Expert Group on Artificial. (2019b). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. High-level expert group on artificial intelligence for the European Commission.
Zurück zum Zitat Amigoni, F., & Schiaffonati, V. (2018). Ethics for robots as experimental technologies. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25, 30–36 Amigoni, F., & Schiaffonati, V. (2018). Ethics for robots as experimental technologies. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25, 30–36
Zurück zum Zitat Arkin, R. C. (2011). Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 121–128. Arkin, R. C. (2011). Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, 121–128.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2018). The big red button is too late: an alternative model for the ethical evaluation of AI systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 59–69 Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2018). The big red button is too late: an alternative model for the ethical evaluation of AI systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 59–69
Zurück zum Zitat Beltran, N. (2020). Artificial intelligence in Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems: What’s the problem? Uppsala University – Department of Theology. Beltran, N. (2020). Artificial intelligence in Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems: What’s the problem? Uppsala University – Department of Theology.
Zurück zum Zitat Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2017). Norms and value based reasoning: Justifying compliance and violation. Artificial Intelligence & Law Review, 25, 29–64 Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2017). Norms and value based reasoning: Justifying compliance and violation. Artificial Intelligence & Law Review, 25, 29–64
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamins, V. R. & García I. S. (2020). Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence. Vulnerabilidad y cultura digital by Dykinson. pp 87–98. Benjamins, V. R. & García I. S. (2020). Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence. Vulnerabilidad y cultura digital by Dykinson. pp 87–98.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonnemais, V., Saurel, C., & Tessier, C. (2018). Embedded ethics: Some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 41–58 Bonnemais, V., Saurel, C., & Tessier, C. (2018). Embedded ethics: Some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 41–58
Zurück zum Zitat Buiten, C. M. (2019). Towards intelligent regulation of artificial intelligence. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10(1), 41–59 Buiten, C. M. (2019). Towards intelligent regulation of artificial intelligence. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10(1), 41–59
Zurück zum Zitat Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., Newman, P., Parry, V., Pegman, G., Rodden, T., Sorrell, T., Wallis, M., Whitby, B., & Winfield, A. (2017). Principles of robotics: Regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science, 29(2), 124–129 Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., Newman, P., Parry, V., Pegman, G., Rodden, T., Sorrell, T., Wallis, M., Whitby, B., & Winfield, A. (2017). Principles of robotics: Regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science, 29(2), 124–129
Zurück zum Zitat Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., & Tessier, C. (2018). Embedded ethics: Some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Information Technology., 20, 41 Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., & Tessier, C. (2018). Embedded ethics: Some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Information Technology., 20, 41
Zurück zum Zitat Borgesius, F. Z. (2018). Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making. Study for the Council of Europe. Borgesius, F. Z. (2018). Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making. Study for the Council of Europe.
Zurück zum Zitat Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 15–26 Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 15–26
Zurück zum Zitat Butterworth, M. (2018). The ICO and artificial intelligence: The role of fairness in the GDPR framework. Computer Law & Security Review, 34, 257–268 Butterworth, M. (2018). The ICO and artificial intelligence: The role of fairness in the GDPR framework. Computer Law & Security Review, 34, 257–268
Zurück zum Zitat Calo, M. R. (2011). Peeping hals. Artificial Intelligence Review, 175, 940–994 Calo, M. R. (2011). Peeping hals. Artificial Intelligence Review, 175, 940–994
Zurück zum Zitat Calo, M. R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563 Calo, M. R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, D. (2020). Regulation and ethics in artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies: Where are we now? Who is responsible? Can the information professional play a role? Business Information Review., 37(2), 60–68 Carter, D. (2020). Regulation and ethics in artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies: Where are we now? Who is responsible? Can the information professional play a role? Business Information Review., 37(2), 60–68
Zurück zum Zitat Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2019). Motivations and risks of machine ethics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 562–574 Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2019). Motivations and risks of machine ethics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 562–574
Zurück zum Zitat Cerka, P., Grigiene, J., & Sirbikite, G. (2015). Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(3), 376–389 Cerka, P., Grigiene, J., & Sirbikite, G. (2015). Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(3), 376–389
Zurück zum Zitat Cerka, P., Grigiene, J., & Sirbikyte, G. (2017). Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? Computer Law & Security Review, 33(5), 685–699 Cerka, P., Grigiene, J., & Sirbikyte, G. (2017). Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? Computer Law & Security Review, 33(5), 685–699
Zurück zum Zitat Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Borg, J. S, Deng, Y., & Kramer, M. (2017). Moral decision making for artificial intelligence. AAAI Publication, 31º Conference on Artificial Intelligence Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Borg, J. S, Deng, Y., & Kramer, M. (2017). Moral decision making for artificial intelligence. AAAI Publication, 31º Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, E. (2015). Ethical guidelines for a superintelligence. Artificial Intelligence Review, 220, 121–124 Davis, E. (2015). Ethical guidelines for a superintelligence. Artificial Intelligence Review, 220, 121–124
Zurück zum Zitat Dennis, L., Fisher, M., Slavkovik, M., & Webster, M. (2016). Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77, 1–14 Dennis, L., Fisher, M., Slavkovik, M., & Webster, M. (2016). Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77, 1–14
Zurück zum Zitat Donahoe, E., & Metzger, M. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and human rights. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 115–126 Donahoe, E., & Metzger, M. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and human rights. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 115–126
Zurück zum Zitat EU Parliament. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02), Official Journal of the European Union, 2012 C 326, (pp. 391). EU Parliament. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02), Official Journal of the European Union, 2012 C 326, (pp. 391).
Zurück zum Zitat Firth-Butterfield, K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: More questions than answers. Scitech Lawyer, 14, 28–31 Firth-Butterfield, K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and the Law: More questions than answers. Scitech Lawyer, 14, 28–31
Zurück zum Zitat Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A. C., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A. C., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.
Zurück zum Zitat Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1771 Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1771
Zurück zum Zitat Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 52nd, 2019. Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 52nd, 2019.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642 Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642
Zurück zum Zitat Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., & Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(5), 749–758 Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., & Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(5), 749–758
Zurück zum Zitat Hagendorff, T. (2019). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. CoRR, abs/1903.03425. Hagendorff, T. (2019). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. CoRR, abs/1903.03425.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilb, M. (2020). Toward artificial governance? The role of artificial intelligence in shaping the future or corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance. Hilb, M. (2020). Toward artificial governance? The role of artificial intelligence in shaping the future or corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society, 376 (2128). Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society, 376 (2128).
Zurück zum Zitat Holder, C., Khurana, V., Harrison, F., & Jacobs, L. (2016a). Robotics and law: Key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II). Computer Law & Security Review, 32(3), 383–402 Holder, C., Khurana, V., Harrison, F., & Jacobs, L. (2016a). Robotics and law: Key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II). Computer Law & Security Review, 32(3), 383–402
Zurück zum Zitat Holder, C., Khurana, V., Hook, J., Bacon, G., & Day, R. (2016b). Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part II of II). Computer Law Secure Review, 32, 557–576 Holder, C., Khurana, V., Hook, J., Bacon, G., & Day, R. (2016b). Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part II of II). Computer Law Secure Review, 32, 557–576
Zurück zum Zitat House of Lords. (2018). AI in the UK: Ready, willing and able? Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence, Report of Session 2017–19. 13 March 2018. House of Lords. (2018). AI in the UK: Ready, willing and able? Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence, Report of Session 2017–19. 13 March 2018.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, B. W. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Fog of Innovation: A deep-dive on governance and the liability of autonomous systems. 35 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 35 Jackson, B. W. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Fog of Innovation: A deep-dive on governance and the liability of autonomous systems. 35 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 35
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, B. W. (2020). Cybersecurity, privacy, and artificial intelligence: An examination of legal issues surrounding the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and Autonomous Network Defense, 21 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 21 Jackson, B. W. (2020). Cybersecurity, privacy, and artificial intelligence: An examination of legal issues surrounding the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and Autonomous Network Defense, 21 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 21
Zurück zum Zitat Kaal, W. A., & Vermeulen, E. P.M. (2017). How to regulate disruptive innovation: From facts to data. Jurimetrics, 57(2). Kaal, W. A., & Vermeulen, E. P.M. (2017). How to regulate disruptive innovation: From facts to data. Jurimetrics, 57(2).
Zurück zum Zitat Kozuka, S. (2019). A governance framework for the development and use of artificial intelligence: Lessons from the comparison of Japanese and European initiatives. Uniform Law Review, 24, 315–329 Kozuka, S. (2019). A governance framework for the development and use of artificial intelligence: Lessons from the comparison of Japanese and European initiatives. Uniform Law Review, 24, 315–329
Zurück zum Zitat Kunz, J. (1949). The United Nations declaration of human rights. American Journal of International Law, 43(2), 316–323 Kunz, J. (1949). The United Nations declaration of human rights. American Journal of International Law, 43(2), 316–323
Zurück zum Zitat Larsson, S. (2020). On the governance of artificial intelligence through ethics guidelines. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1–23. Larsson, S. (2020). On the governance of artificial intelligence through ethics guidelines. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1–23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenardon, J. P. A. (2017). The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence. Master Thesis. Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society. Netherlands. Lenardon, J. P. A. (2017). The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence. Master Thesis. Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology and Society. Netherlands.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamo, M. & Calo, R. (2018). Regulating Bot Speech. UCLA Law Review 2019, July 16, 2018. Lamo, M. & Calo, R. (2018). Regulating Bot Speech. UCLA Law Review 2019, July 16, 2018.
Zurück zum Zitat Leitner, C., & Stiefmueller, C. M. (2019). Disruptive technologies and the public sector: The changing dynamics of governance. In A. Baimenov & P. Liverakos (Eds.), Public service excellence in the 21st century. (pp. 238–239). Palgrave Macmillan. Leitner, C., & Stiefmueller, C. M. (2019). Disruptive technologies and the public sector: The changing dynamics of governance. In A. Baimenov & P. Liverakos (Eds.), Public service excellence in the 21st century. (pp. 238–239). Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence Review, 175, 942–949 Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence Review, 175, 942–949
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, H. (2017). Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Information Technology Journal, 19, 193–207 Liu, H. (2017). Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Information Technology Journal, 19, 193–207
Zurück zum Zitat Maluf S. (1995). Teoria Geral do Estado. 23ª ed., 205–208. Editora Saraiva. São Paulo. Maluf S. (1995). Teoria Geral do Estado. 23ª ed., 205–208. Editora Saraiva. São Paulo.
Zurück zum Zitat Mantelero, A. (2018). AI & Big Data: A blueprint for human rights, social and ethical impact assessment. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 754–772 Mantelero, A. (2018). AI & Big Data: A blueprint for human rights, social and ethical impact assessment. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 754–772
Zurück zum Zitat Millar, J. (2016). An ethics evaluation tool for automating ethical decision-making in robots and self-driving cars. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30(8), 787–809 Millar, J. (2016). An ethics evaluation tool for automating ethical decision-making in robots and self-driving cars. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30(8), 787–809
Zurück zum Zitat Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2019). Monetary Authority of Singapore. Principles to promote fairness, ethics, accountability and transparency (FEAT) in the use of artificial intelligence and data analytics in Singapore’s Financial Sector. https://www.mas.gov.sg/~/media/MAS/News%20and%20Publications/Monographs%20and%20Information%20Papers/FEAT%20 Principles%20Final.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020 Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2019). Monetary Authority of Singapore. Principles to promote fairness, ethics, accountability and transparency (FEAT) in the use of artificial intelligence and data analytics in Singapore’s Financial Sector. https://​www.​mas.​gov.​sg/​~/​media/​MAS/​News%20and%20Publications/Monographs%20and%20Information%20Papers/FEAT%20 Principles%20Final.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020
Zurück zum Zitat Nevejans, N. (2016). European civil law rules in robotics. Study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs. Policy Department Citizens’ Right and Constitutional Affairs. Nevejans, N. (2016). European civil law rules in robotics. Study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs. Policy Department Citizens’ Right and Constitutional Affairs.
Zurück zum Zitat Neznamov, A. V. (2020). Regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence advances in social science, education and humanities research, volume 420 pp 201–204. XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference 2020. Atlantatis Press. Neznamov, A. V. (2020). Regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence advances in social science, education and humanities research, volume 420 pp 201–204. XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference 2020. Atlantatis Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). ‘Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence’. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). ‘Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence’.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedro, A. P. (2014). Ética, moral, axiologia e valores: confusões e ambiguidades em torno de um conceito comum. Kriterion, vol. 55. Belo Horizonte, nº 130, Dez./2014, 483–498. Pedro, A. P. (2014). Ética, moral, axiologia e valores: confusões e ambiguidades em torno de um conceito comum. Kriterion, vol. 55. Belo Horizonte, nº 130, Dez./2014, 483–498.
Zurück zum Zitat Poel, I. V. (2016). An ethical framework for evaluating experimental technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 667–686 Poel, I. V. (2016). An ethical framework for evaluating experimental technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 667–686
Zurück zum Zitat Prakken, H. (2017). On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law. Artificial Intelligence & Law, 25, 341–363 Prakken, H. (2017). On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law. Artificial Intelligence & Law, 25, 341–363
Zurück zum Zitat Rahwan, I. (2017). Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology., 20, 5–14 Rahwan, I. (2017). Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology., 20, 5–14
Zurück zum Zitat Reed, C. (2018). How should we regulate artificial intelligence? Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society, 376, 2128 Reed, C. (2018). How should we regulate artificial intelligence? Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society, 376, 2128
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau, J. (2016). The Social Contract. (202–230). ISBN: 978911495741. London: Sovereign. Rousseau, J. (2016). The Social Contract. (202–230). ISBN: 978911495741. London: Sovereign.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach. (pp. 4–5). Prentice Hall.MATH Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach. (pp. 4–5). Prentice Hall.MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competences and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 354–398 Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competences and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 354–398
Zurück zum Zitat Schrader, D., & Ghosh, D. (2018). Proactively protecting against the singularity: Ethical decision making AI. IEEE Computer and Reliability Societies Review, 16(3), 56–63 Schrader, D., & Ghosh, D. (2018). Proactively protecting against the singularity: Ethical decision making AI. IEEE Computer and Reliability Societies Review, 16(3), 56–63
Zurück zum Zitat Smuha, N. A. (2020). Beyond a human rights-based approach to AI governance: Promise. Philosophy & Technology. Smuha, N. A. (2020). Beyond a human rights-based approach to AI governance: Promise. Philosophy & Technology.
Zurück zum Zitat Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good: An ethical framework will help to harness the potential of AI while keeping humans in control. Science Review, 361(6404), 751–752MATH Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good: An ethical framework will help to harness the potential of AI while keeping humans in control. Science Review, 361(6404), 751–752MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Tutt, A. (2017). An FDA for algorithms. Administrative Law Review, 69(83), 83–123 Tutt, A. (2017). An FDA for algorithms. Administrative Law Review, 69(83), 83–123
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations. (2011). UN guiding principles on business and human rights. (p. 2011). UN Human Rights Council. United Nations. (2011). UN guiding principles on business and human rights. (p. 2011). UN Human Rights Council.
Zurück zum Zitat Villaronga, E. F., & Heldeweg, M. (2018). Regulation, I presume? Said the robot: Towards an iterative regulatory process for robot governance. Computer Law & Security Review, 21 June, 2018. Villaronga, E. F., & Heldeweg, M. (2018). Regulation, I presume? Said the robot: Towards an iterative regulatory process for robot governance. Computer Law & Security Review, 21 June, 2018.
Zurück zum Zitat Verheij, B. (2016). Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artificial Intelligence & Law Review, 24(4), 387–407 Verheij, B. (2016). Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artificial Intelligence & Law Review, 24(4), 387–407
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung, K., Howes, A., & Pogrebna, G. (2019). AI governance by human rights-centred design, deliberation and oversight: An end to ethics washing (June 21, 2019). Forthcoming in M Dubber and F Pasquale (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of AI Ethics, Oxford University Press (2019), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3435011. Accessed 15 December 2020. Yeung, K., Howes, A., & Pogrebna, G. (2019). AI governance by human rights-centred design, deliberation and oversight: An end to ethics washing (June 21, 2019). Forthcoming in M Dubber and F Pasquale (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of AI Ethics, Oxford University Press (2019), https://​doi.​org/​10.​2139/​ssrn.​3435011. Accessed 15 December 2020.
Zurück zum Zitat Waser, M. (2015). Designing, implementing and enforcing a coherent system of laws, ethics and morals for intelligent machines (including humans). Procedia Computer Science, 71, 106–111 Waser, M. (2015). Designing, implementing and enforcing a coherent system of laws, ethics and morals for intelligent machines (including humans). Procedia Computer Science, 71, 106–111
Zurück zum Zitat Wright, S. A., & Schultz, A. (2018). The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework. Business Horizons, 61(6), 823–832 Wright, S. A., & Schultz, A. (2018). The rising tide of artificial intelligence and business automation: Developing an ethical framework. Business Horizons, 61(6), 823–832
Metadaten
Titel
Artificial Intelligence Regulation: a framework for governance
verfasst von
Patricia Gomes Rêgo de Almeida
Carlos Denner dos Santos
Josivania Silva Farias
Publikationsdatum
21.04.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Ethics and Information Technology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1388-1957
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8439
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Ethics and Information Technology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe