Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Flexible Multibody Pantograph Model for the Analysis of the Catenary–Pantograph Contact Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2011 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Assessment of Antagonistic Muscle Forces During Forearm Flexion/Extension

verfasst von : Maxime Raison, Christine Detrembleur, Paul Fisette, Jean-Claude Samin

Erschienen in: Multibody Dynamics

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Today, the accurate assessment of muscle forces performed by the human body in motion is still expected for many clinical applications and studies. However, as most of the joints are overactuated by several muscles, any non-invasive muscle force quantification needs to solve a redundancy problem. Consequently, the aim of this study is to propose a non-invasive method to assess muscle forces in the human body during motion, using a multibody model-based optimization process that attempts to solve the agonistic and antagonistic muscle overactuation. The main originality of the proposed method is the cautious using of Electromyographic (EMG) data information, known by all to be noisy-corrupted, via a protocol divided into two main steps:
1.
Muscle force static calibration,
 
2.
Muscle force dynamical quantification.
 
In this chapter, the process is applied to a benchmark case: the force quantification of the elbow flexor and extensor muscle sets of subjects engaged in weightlifting and performing cycles of forearm flexion/extension. A statistical validation of this method shows a good inter-test reproducibility and a very good correlation between a. the net joint torques resulting from the obtained muscle forces and b. the net joint torques given by inverse dynamics.Consequently, since the method is able to consider measured information on the actual muscle activation, it becomes a promising alternative to methods based on preset strategies, usually presented in literature, such as the strategy that maximizes endurance defined by Crowninshield et al.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Real-Time Simulation of Extended Vehicle Drivetrain Dynamics
Nächstes Kapitel Computing Time Reduction Possibilities in Multibody Dynamics
Fußnoten
1
momentarily blocked.
 
Literatur
1.
Amarantini D (2003) Estimation des Efforts Musculaires Partir des Donnes Priphriques: Application l’Analyse de la Coordination Pluri-Articulaire. Thesis of the Universit Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
2.
Anderson FC, Pandy MG (2001) Dynamic optimization of human walking. J Biomech Eng 123(5):381–390CrossRef
3.
Bao H, Willems PY (1999) On the kinematic modelling and the parameter estimation of the human shoulder. J Biomech 32:943–950CrossRef
4.
Blajer W, Czaplicki A (2001) Modeling and inverse simulation of somersaults on the trampoline. J Biomech 34(12):1619–1629CrossRef
5.
Bouisset S (2002) Biomécanique et physiologie du mouvement. Abrégés, Editions Masson, Paris, France
6.
Bouisset S, Le Bozec S, Ribreau C (2002) Postural dynamics in maximal isometric ramp efforts. Biol Cybern 87(3):211–219MATHCrossRef
7.
8.
Buchanan TS, Lloyd DG, Besier TF (2004) Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces moments and movements measurements of neural command. J Appl Biomech 20:367–395
9.
Cappozzo A, Leo T, Pedotti A (1975) A general computing method for the analysis of human locomotion. J Biomech 8:307–320CrossRef
10.
Challis JH, Kerwin DG (1996) Quantification of the uncertainties in resultant joint moments computed in a dynamic activity. J Sports Sci 14:219–231CrossRef
11.
Chenut X, Fisette P, Samin JC (2002) Recursive formalism with a minimal dynamic parametrization for the identification and simulation of multibody systems. Application to the Human Body. Multibody Syst Dyn 8:117–140MATHCrossRef
12.
Chze L, Fregly BJ, Dimnet J (1995) A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. J Biomech 28:879–884CrossRef
13.
Crowninshield RD, Brand RA (1981) A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech 14(11):793–801CrossRef
14.
Debril JF, Pudlo P, El Menceur M, Gorce P, Lepoutre FX (2007) Human articulation efforts estimation in the automobile vehicle accessibility movement – A pilot study. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on digital human modeling, computer science, Beijing, China, 22–27 July
15.
De Groote F, Pipeleers G, Demeulenaere B, Jonckers I, Spaepen P, Swevers J, De Schutter J (2006) A convex optimization approach to dynamic musculoskeletal analysis. In: Proceedings CD of the 6th national congress on theoretical and applied mechanics, Ghent, Belgium, 29–30 May
16.
De Groote F, Pipeleers G, Jonkers I, Demeulenaere B, Swevers J, De Schutter J (2007) Physiology based inverse dynamic analysis of normal and hemiparetic gait. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual meeting of ESMAC, gait & posture 26(S17), Athens, Greece, 24–29 September
17.
De Jalón G, Bayo E (1993) Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems: the real-time challenge. Springer, New York
18.
De Leva P (1996) Adjustments to zatsiorsky-seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 29(9):1223–1230CrossRef
19.
Denoth J, Gruber K, Ruder H, Keppler M (1984) Forces and torques during sport activities with high accelerations. Perren SM, Scnheider E (eds) Biomechanics current interdisciplinary research. Martinuis Nijhoff Publishers, Dodrecht, Netherlands, pp 663–668
20.
Dul J, Johnson GE, Shiavi R, Townsend MA (1984) Muscular synergism II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. J Biomech 17(9):675–84
21.
Epstein M, Herzog W (1998) Theoretical models of skeletal muscle. Wiley, Chichester, England
22.
Gergersen CS, Hull ML (2003) Non-driving intersegmental knee moments in cycling computed using a model that includes three-dimensional kinematics of the shank/foot and the effect of simplifying assumptions. J Biomech 36:803–813CrossRef
23.
He J, Levine WS, Loeb GE (1991) Feedback gains for correcting small perturbations to standing posture. IEEE T Automat Contr 36:322–332MATHCrossRef
24.
Holzbaur KRS, Murray WM, Delp SL (2005) A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann Biomed Eng 33(6): 829–840CrossRef
25.
Lloyd DG, Bessier TF (2003) An emg-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moment in vivo. J Biomech 36:765–776CrossRef
26.
Nigg BM, Herzog W (eds) (1999) Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system, 2nd edn. Chichester, England, and Wiley, New York
27.
Penrod DD, Davy DT, Singh DP (1974) An optimization approach to tendon force analysis. J Biomech 7:123–129CrossRef
28.
Pérez M, Ausejo S, Pargada J, Suescun A, Celigeta JT (2003) Application of multibody system analysis for the evaluation of the driver’s discomfort. In: Proceedings of the multibody dynamics, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–4 July
29.
Raasch CC, Zajac FE, Ma B, Levine WS (1997) Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling. J Biomech 30(6):595–602CrossRef
30.
Raison M, Aubin CE, Detrembleur C, Fisette P, Samin JC (2008) Quantification of intervertebral efforts during walking: comparison between a healthy and a scoliotic subject. Stud Health Tech Informat 140:61–64
31.
Raison M, Detrembleur C, Fisette P, Samin JC, Willems PY (2005) Determination of joint kinematics and dynamics in the human body: application to a subject getting up from a seat. In: Proceedings of Eccomas thematic conference on advances in computational multibody dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 21–24 June
32.
Raison M, Detrembleur C, Fisette P, Samin JC, Willems PY (2006) Estimation of human muscular efforts using a model based optimization method. In: Proceedings CD of the 7th national congress on theoretical and applied mechanics, Mons, Belgium, 29–30 May
33.
Raison M, Gaudez C, Le Bozec S, Willems PY (2007) Determination of joint efforts in the human body during maximum ramp pushing efforts. J Biomech 40(3):627–33CrossRef
34.
Samin JC, Fisette P (2003) Symbolic modeling of multibody systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, NetherlandsMATH
35.
Seireg A, Arvikar RJ (1973) A mathematical model for evaluation of force in lower extremities of the musculo-skeletal system. J Biomech 6:313–326CrossRef
36.
Silva M, Ambrósio J (2004) Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait Posture 19(1):35–49CrossRef
37.
Silva M, Ambrósio J, Pereira M (1997) A multibody approach to the vehicle and occupant integrated simulation. Int J Crashworthines 2(1):73–90CrossRef
38.
Thelen DG (2003) Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. Trans ASME 125:70–77
39.
Umberger BR, Gerritsen KGM, Martin PE (2003) A model of human energy expenditure. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 6(2):99–111CrossRef
40.
Venture G, Yamane K, Nakamura Y (2005) Identifying musculo-tendon parameters of human body based on the musculo-skeletal dynamics computation and Hill-Stroeve muscle model. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Tsukuba, Japan, 5–7 December
41.
Weber W, Weber E (1836) Mechanik der Menschlichen Gehwerkzauge, Gottingen. Gottinger, Germany
42.
Willems PY (ed) (1979) Introduction la mcanique. Masson, Paris, France
43.
Winters JM (1990) Hill-based muscle models: a systems engineering perspective. Winters JM, Woo SLY (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York
44.
Winters JM (1995) An improved muscle-reflex actuator for use in large-scale neuromusculoskeletal models. Ann Biomed Eng 23:359–374CrossRef
45.
Zacher I (2004) Strength Based Discomfort Model of Posture and Movement. In: Proceedings of the SAE international digital human modelling conference, Rochester, Michigan, USA, 15–17 June
46.
Zajac FE (1989) Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17(4):359–411
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of Antagonistic Muscle Forces During Forearm Flexion/Extension
verfasst von
Maxime Raison
Christine Detrembleur
Paul Fisette
Jean-Claude Samin
Copyright-Jahr
2011
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Multibody Dynamics

Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9970-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-90-481-9971-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9971-6_11

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise