nach oben

Thermal Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.03.2019 | ENERGY SAVING, NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

Assessment of the Performance of a Nuclear–Hydrogen Power Generation System

verfasst von: R. Z. Aminov, A. N. Bairamov, M. V. Garievskii

Erschienen in: Thermal Engineering | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The article deals with the assessment of the performance and competitiveness of a nuclear power plant (NPP) combined with a hydrogen power plant compared with a gas-turbine power plant (GTPP) and a pumped-storage hydroelectric power station (PSPS) to satisfy the peak electrical demand in a power system in terms of the peak electric power prime costs. The structure of installed capacities of various interconnected power systems is shown considering the increase in the capacity levels in the immediate future. The necessity of curtailing the load of the power-generating units during the periods of the nighttime off-peak demand is justified. For this purpose, the efficiency of curtailing the load of the power-generating units of various types is analyzed under variable electric loads. As an example, the power-generating units of an NPP equipped with a VVER-1200 reactor, a 300-MW condensation electric power plant, and a PGU-450 combined-cycle gas turbine are considered. The increase in the electric power prime cost serves as the efficiency criterion. To provide the NPP with the base load, variants of combining the NPP with a hydrogen power plant with steam–hydrogen superheating of the live steam upstream from the high-pressure cylinder of the primary turbine and the high-pressure cylinder of the auxiliary steam turbine accompanied by ejection of the heating reheat steam are presented. The forecasted prices of fuel gas and nuclear fuels, as well as of the nighttime electric power for 2020 and in the long term until 2035, are taken into account. It is shown that the employment of GTPPs results in an additional increase in the expenditures caused by curtailing the load of the NPP at nighttime and appears to be inefficient in some cases. The expenditures on the substituted power are accounted for in comparison with the pumped-storage power station in the hydrogen power plant variant. It is shown that the pumped-storage power stations can compete in the foreseeable future with the hydrogen power plants in terms of peak electric power prime costs at minimum specific capital investments of approximately 660 $/kW. In the long term, due to a considerable increase in the nighttime electricity cost, the pumped-storage power stations will not be able to compete with the hydrogen power plants.

Vorheriger Artikel Model for Early Detection of Emergency Conditions in Power Plant Equipment Based on Machine Learning Methods

Nächster Artikel Numerical Simulation of the Processes of Formation of a Welded Joint with a Pulsed ND:YAG Laser Welding of ZR–1%NB Alloy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Performance Indicators of the Unified Power System / Interconnected Power System, System Operator of the Unified Power System. http://so-ups.ru/index.php? id=ees_gen_consump_hour.

Report on the Functioning of the Unified Power System of Russia in 2017. https://so-ups.ru/fileadmin/files/company/reports/disclosure/2018/ups_rep2017.pdf.

Scheme and Program of Development of the Unified Power System of Russia for 2016–2022 (2016).

N. G. Shul’ginov, A. V. Il’enko, V. I. Chemodanov, and R. K. Adamokov, “Prospects of development of the Unified Power System of Russia,” Elektr. Stn., No. 2, 2–7 (2015).

V. Yu. Sinyugin, V. I. Magruk, and V. G. Rodionov, Hydro-Accumulating Power Plants in Modern Electric Energy Generation (ENAS, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

R. Z. Aminov, A. F. Shkret, and M. V. Garievskii, “Estimation of lifespan and economy parameters of steam-turbine power units in thermal power plants using varying regimes,” Therm. Eng. 63, 551–557 (2016). doi https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516080012 CrossRef

F. Birol, Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas: World Energy Outlook Special Report on Unconventional Gas (Int. Energy Agency, 2012).

Evolution of Global Energy Markets and Its Consequences for Russia, Ed. by A. A. Makarov, L. M. Grigor’ev, and T. A. Mitrova (Inst. Energ. Issled. Ross. Akad. Nauk — Anal. Tsentr pri Pravitel’stve RF, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

R. Z. Aminov, A. F. Shkret, and M. V. Garievskii, “Thermal and nuclear power plants: Competitiveness in the new economic conditions,” Therm. Eng. 64, 319–328 (2017). doi https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517050019 CrossRef

10.

Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period up to 2035, (Minist. Energ. Ross. Fed., Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].

11.

R. Z. Aminov, V. A. Khrustalev, A. S. Dukhovenskii, and A. I. Osadchii, NPPs with VVER: Modes, Characteristics, Effectiveness (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

12.

N. M. Kuznetsov, A. A. Kanaev, and I. Z. Kopp, Power Equipment of NPP Units, 2nd ed. (Mashinostroenie, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

13.

Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear Energy (Int. At. Energy Agency, Vienna, 2013).

14.

Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier and Its Production by Nuclear Power (Int. At. Energy Agency, Vienna, 1999).

15.

C. W. Forsberg and G. Haratyk, “Nuclear wind hydrogen systems for variable electricity and hydrogen production,” Presented at Int. Congr. on Energy 2011: Hydrogen Production and Storage, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annyal Meeting 2011, Minneapolis, MN, Oct. 16–21, 2011. https://www.aiche.org/academy/ videos/conference-presentations/nuclear-wind-hydrogen-systems-variable-electricity-and-hydrogen-production.

16.

C. W. Forsberg, “Is hydrogen the future of nuclear energy?,” in Proc. 2007 Int. Topical Meeting on the Safety and Technology of Nuclear Hydrogen Production, Control and Management, Boston, MA, June 24–28, 2007 (Am. Nucl. Soc., La Grange Park, IL, 2007). http://www.350.me.uk/TR/Hansen/Forsberg01.pdf.

17.

C. W. Forsberg, “Hydrogen futures and technologies,” in Proc. Rohsenow Symp. on Future Trends in Heat Transfer, Cambridge, MA, May 16, 2003 (Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2003). https://dspace. mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/7303/FORSBERG. pdf?sequence=1.

18.

R. Z. Aminov and A. N. Bairamov, “Performance evaluation of hydrogen production based on off-peak electric energy of the nuclear power plant,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 21617–21625 (2017).CrossRef

19.

R. Z. Aminov, A. I. Schastlivtsev, and A. N. Bairamov, “On the issue of investigating the kinetics of processes in dissociated water steam,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 20843–20848 (2017).CrossRef

20.

R. Z. Aminov and A. N. Egorov, “Method for assessing the thermodynamic efficiency of additional heat supply in wet-steam cycles of nuclear power plants,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Probl. Energ., No. 11–12, 20–29 (2011).

21.

E. E. Shpil’rain, S. P. Malyshenko, and G. G. Kuleshov, Introduction to Hydrogen Power Engineering (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

22.

S. P. Malyshenko, “Studies and developments of the Joint Institute of High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the field of hydrogen power engineering technologies,” Mezhdunar. Nauchn. Zh. Al’tern. Energ. Ekol., No. 3, 10–34 (2011).

23.

R. Z. Aminov, A. N. Bairamov, and O. V. Shatskova, “Assessment of the efficiency of hydrogen cycles on the basis of off-peak electric energy produced at a nuclear power station,” Therm. Eng. 56, 940–945 (2009).CrossRef

24.

E. E. Shpil’rain, Yu. A. Sarutov, and O. S. Popel’, “Using hydrogen in power engineering and energy-technology complexes,” At.-Vodorodnaya Energ. Tekhnol., No. 4, 5–22 (1982).

25.

S. P. Malyshenko, O. V. Nazarova, and Yu. A. Sarutov, “Some thermodynamic and techno-economic aspects of the use hydrogen as energy carrier in power engineering,” At.-Vodorodnaya Energ. Tekhnol., No. 7, 105–126 (1986).

26.

R. Z. Aminov and A. N. Bairamov, RF Patent No. 2427048, MPK7 F 22B 1/26, G 21D5/16, F 01K3/18, Byull. Izobret., No. 23 (2011).

27.

R. Z. Aminov and A. N. Bairamov, Combining Hydrogen Energy Cycles with Nuclear Power Plants (Nauka, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

28.

R. Z. Aminov and V. E. Yurin, “Nuclear power plant safety improvement based on hydrogen technologies,” Nucl. Energy Technol., No. 1, 77–81 (2015).

29.

A. N. Bairamov, “Evaluation of the operating resource of the most loaded rotor element of the additional steam turbine with steam-hydrogen overheat of the working fluid at a nuclear power station,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 891, 012252 (2017).

30.

V. G. Semenov, V. S. Dubenets, G. G. Ol’khovskii, V. V. Chervakov, L. A. Tutykhin, O. V. Danilenko, P. A. Berezinets, A. B. Roskin, V. A. Malafeev, N. L. Boryuk, V. A. Oparin, S. I. Korotchenko, and M. A. Larina, Gas Turbine Power Generation Units and Power Generation Units Based on Gas-Piston and Diesel Dual-Fuel Engines. Analytical Report (Moscow, 2004). http://www.rosteplo.ru/Tech_stat/stat_shablon.php? id=787.

31.

A. N. Bairamov, “Technical and economic aspects of the underground placement of metal storage tanks for hydrogen and oxygen in a hydrogen energy complex,” Tr. Akademenergo, No. 2, 79–86 (2014).

32.

A. A. Makarov, F. V. Veselov, A. S. Makarova, T. V. Novikova, and T. G. Pankrushina, “Strategic prospects of the electric power industry of Russia,” Therm. Eng. 64, 817–828 (2017). doi https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517110064 CrossRef

33.

O. V. Marchenko and S. V. Solomin, “The analysis of hydrogen production efficiency with application of wind turbines and its use in autonomous energy system,” Al’tern. Energ. Ekol., No. 3, 112–118 (2007).

34.

A. N. Bairamov, RF Patent No. 2579849, MPK7 B 01D 53/00, B03C 1/02, C01B 3/50, Byull. Izobret., No. 10 (2016).

Titel: Assessment of the Performance of a Nuclear–Hydrogen Power Generation System
verfasst von: R. Z. Aminov
A. N. Bairamov
M. V. Garievskii
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2019
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Thermal Engineering / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0040-6015
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-6301
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519030017

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Evaluation of the Corrosion State of Equipment of the First Circuit of Transport Nuclear Reactors Using the Parameters of Water Chemistry

Model for Early Detection of Emergency Conditions in Power Plant Equipment Based on Machine Learning Methods

Operating Experience with Fire Resistant Turbine Control Fluid at Ramin Power Plant

Experimental Investigation of the Stability Limits for a Low-Emission, Two-Stage Combustor

Numerical Simulation of the Processes of Formation of a Welded Joint with a Pulsed ND:YAG Laser Welding of ZR–1%NB Alloy

Methods for Beneficiation of Ash and Slag Waste from Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plants and Ways for Their Commercial Use (a Review)

Premium Partner