nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Background Knowledge in Schema Matching: Strategy vs. Data

verfasst von : Jan Portisch, Michael Hladik, Heiko Paulheim

Erschienen in: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2021

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The use of external background knowledge can be beneficial for the task of matching schemas or ontologies automatically. In this paper, we exploit six general-purpose knowledge graphs as sources of background knowledge for the matching task. The background sources are evaluated by applying three different exploitation strategies. We find that explicit strategies still outperform latent ones and that the choice of the strategy has a greater impact on the final alignment than the actual background dataset on which the strategy is applied. While we could not identify a universally superior resource, BabelNet achieved consistently good results. Our best matcher configuration with BabelNet performs very competitively when compared to other matching systems even though no dataset-specific optimizations were made.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Using Compositional Embeddings for Fact Checking

Nächstes Kapitel A Graph-Based Approach for Inferring Semantic Descriptions of Wikipedia Tables

http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/.

The size of the external resource is not relevant within the matching process since all similarity functions applied here are lookup-based. When training an embedding with the external resource, the size of the resource affects scalability; however, the training is a one-time process – once the vectors are available, they can be reused in all other matching tasks.

https://github.com/dwslab/melt/.

https://dwslab.github.io/melt/matcher-development/with-background-knowledge.

Unfortunately, there is no RDF version of the latest BabelNet version.

https://web.archive.org/web/20190806080601/https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary/.

http://kaiko.getalp.org/about-dbnary/download/.

http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/417880315.

http://webisa.webdatacommons.org/.

http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/about/.

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page.

https://databus.dbpedia.org/.

For example, symposium and conference are mutual hypernyms of each other in WebIsALOD.

http://kgvec2go.org/.

https://github.com/janothan/bk-strategy-vs-data-supplements/.

This may seem odd at first. However, lower recall values are due to the Hungarian optimization method to obtain a 1:1 alignment, which, in that case, extracts more false positives.

Annane, A., Bellahsene, Z., Azouaou, F., Jonquet, C.: Selection and combination of heterogeneous mappings to enhance biomedical ontology matching. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 19–33. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_2CrossRef

Bodenreider, O., Hayamizu, T.F., Ringwald, M., de Coronado, S., Zhang, S.: Of mice and men: aligning mouse and human anatomies. In: AMIA 2005 (2005)

Cheatham, M., Hitzler, P.: Conference v2.0: an uncertain version of the OAEI conference benchmark. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8797, pp. 33–48. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_3CrossRef

Chen, X., Xia, W., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Cross, V.V.: Extending an ontology alignment system with bioportal: a preliminary analysis. In: ISWC 2014 Posters & Demonstrations Track. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1272, pp. 313–316 (2014)

Euzenat, J.: Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0CrossRefMATH

Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Matching strategies. In: Ontology Matching, pp. 149–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0_7CrossRefMATH

Faria, D., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., Cruz, I.F., Couto, F.M.: Automatic background knowledge selection for matching biomedical ontologies. PloS One 9(11) (2014)

Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech, and Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

Groß, A., Hartung, M., Kirsten, T., Rahm, E.: Mapping composition for matching large life science ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Ontology. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 833 (2011)

10.

Hartung, M., Gross, A., Kirsten, T., Rahm, E.: Effective composition of mappings for matching biomedical ontologies. In: Simperl, E., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7540, pp. 176–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46641-4_13CrossRef

11.

Hearst, M.A.: Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 1992, Nantes, France, 23–28 August 1992, pp. 539–545 (1992)

12.

Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: WikiMatch - Using Wikipedia for ontology matching. In: OM@ISWC 2012, vol. 946, pp. 37–48 (2012)

13.

Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: WebIsALOD: providing hypernymy relations extracted from the web as linked open data. In: d’Amato, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10588, pp. 111–119. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_11CrossRef

14.

Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: DOME results for OAEI 2018. In: OM@ISWC 2018, pp. 144–151 (2018)

15.

Hertling, S., Portisch, J., Paulheim, H.: MELT - matching EvaLuation toolkit. In: Acosta, M., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Maleshkova, M., Pellegrini, T., Sack, H., Sure-Vetter, Y. (eds.) SEMANTiCS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11702, pp. 231–245. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33220-4_17CrossRef

16.

Hertling, S., Portisch, J., Paulheim, H.: Supervised ontology and instance matching with MELT. In: OM@ISWC 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2788, pp. 60–71 (2020). CEUR-WS.org

17.

Kachroudi, M., Diallo, G., Yahia, S.B.: KEPLER at OAEI 2018. In: OM@ISWC 2018, pp. 173–178 (2018)

18.

Kazemi, S.M., et al.: Relational representation learning for dynamic (knowledge) graphs: a survey. CoRR abs/1905.11485 (2019)

19.

Kuhn, H.W.: The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logistics Q. 2(1–2), 83–97 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRef

20.

Le, Q.V., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

21.

Lehmann, J., et al.: DBpedia - a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semant. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)CrossRef

22.

Lin, F., Krizhanovsky, A.: Multilingual ontology matching based on Wiktionary data accessible via SPARQL endpoint. In: RCDL 2011. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 803, pp. 1–8 (2011)

23.

Lütke, A.: AnyGraphMatcher submission to the OAEI knowledge graph challenge 2019. In: OM@ISWC 2019 (2019)

24.

McCrae, J., et al.: Interchanging lexical resources on the Semantic Web. Lang. Resour. Eval. 46(4), 701–719 (2012)CrossRef

25.

Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

26.

Mohammadi, M., Atashin, A.A., Hofman, W., Tan, Y.: Comparison of ontology alignment systems across single matching task via the Mcnemar’s test. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 12(4), 51:1–51:18 (2018)

27.

Monych, M., Portisch, J., Hladik, M., Paulheim, H.: DESKMatcher. In: OM@ISWC 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2788, pp. 181–186 (2020)

28.

Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: BabelNet: the automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artif. Intell. 193, 217–250 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef

29.

Paulheim, H.: WeSeE-match results for OEAI 2012. In: OM@ISWC 2012 (2012)

30.

Portisch, J., Hladik, M., Paulheim, H.: Evaluating ontology matchers on real-world financial services data models. In: Posters & Demos of SEMANTiCS 2019 (2019)

31.

Portisch, J., Hladik, M., Paulheim, H.: Alod2vec matcher results for OAEI 2020. In: Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Hassanzadeh, O., Trojahn, C. (eds.) OM@ISWC 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2788, pp. 147–153 (2020)

32.

Portisch, J., Hladik, M., Paulheim, H.: KGvec2go - knowledge graph embeddings as a service. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Marseille, France (2020)

33.

Portisch, J., Hladik, M., Paulheim, H.: Rdf2Vec light - a lightweight approach for knowledge graph embeddings. In: ISWC 2020 Demos and Industry Tracks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2721, pp. 79–84 (2020)

34.

Portisch, J., Paulheim, H.: Wiktionary matcher results for OAEI 2020. In: OM@ISWC 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2788, pp. 225–232 (2020)

35.

Quix, C., Roy, P., Kensche, D.: Automatic selection of background knowledge for ontology matching. In: SWIM 2011, p. 5. ACM (2011)

36.

Ristoski, P., Rosati, J., Noia, T.D., Leone, R.D., Paulheim, H.: Rdf2vec: RDF graph embeddings and their applications. Semant. Web 10(4), 721–752 (2019)CrossRef

37.

Seitner, J., et al.: A large database of hypernymy relations extracted from the web. In: LREC 2016 (2016)

38.

Sérasset, G.: DBnary: Wiktionary as a lemon-based multilingual lexical resource in RDF. Semant. Web 6(4), 355–361 (2015)CrossRef

39.

Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2013)CrossRef

40.

Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)CrossRef

Titel: Background Knowledge in Schema Matching: Strategy vs. Data
verfasst von: Jan Portisch
Michael Hladik
Heiko Paulheim
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2021
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88360-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-88361-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner