nach oben

Erschienen in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Behavioral Decision Theories that Explain Decision-Making Processes

verfasst von : Professor Kazuhisa Takemura

Erschienen in: Behavioral Decision Theory

Verlag: Springer Japan

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This article will explain various behavioral decision theories related to decision-making processes. As explained last time, decision strategies for decision-making take numerous forms. The selection of decision strategies is affected by such condition factors as the number of alternatives and the number of attributes. Numerous models have been proposed to explain the psychological processes related to such a selection of decision strategies. This chapter will introduce some models that are useful to explain decision-making processes. It ends with some speculation about the future of modern behavioral decision theories while referring to their relation with fields related to neuroscience, such as neuroeconomics, that have been developed in recent years.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Decision-Making Process

Nächstes Kapitel Behavioral Decision Theory and Good Decision Making

Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 231–309). New York: Random House.

Adelbratt, T., & Montgomery, H. (1980). Attractiveness of decision rules. Acta Psychologica, 45, 177–185.CrossRef

Aristotle (1971). Nikomakosu Rinrigaku [Trans. by S. Takada (Ed.), Nichomachean ethics]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

Bach, D. R., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). Neural activity associated with the passive prediction of ambiguity and risk for aversive events. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(6), 1648–1656.CrossRef

Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.CrossRef

Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.CrossRef

Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449.

Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.CrossRef

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473–5481.

Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189–2202.CrossRef

Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215–225.CrossRef

Brandstätter, E., Giggerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 113, 409–432.CrossRef

Busemeyer, J. R., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). Computational models of decision making. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision (pp. 133–154). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRef

Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459.CrossRef

De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.CrossRef

Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel (Reprinted, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999).

Fujii, S., & Takemura, K. (2001). Fuehina no hosoku to randamu koyo riron ni motozuku ippan taio hosoku no rironteki setsumei [Theoretical explanation of generalized matching law based on fechner law and random utility theory]. Paper presented at the 65th Conference of the Japanese Psychological Association, 580.

Fujii, S., & Takemura, K. (2002). Fechner law and random utility hypothesis leads the matching law. Paper presented at Society for Judgment and Decision Making. Kansas City, MO, USA.

Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62–88). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT.

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gonzalez, C., Dana, J., Koshino, H., & Just, M. (2005). The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 1–20.

Hernstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.CrossRef

Hernstein, R. J., & Vaughan, W., Jr. (1980). Melioration and behavioral allocation. In J. E. R. Staddon (Ed.), Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior (pp. 143–176). New York: Academic.CrossRef

Hirota, S., Masuda, S., & Sakagami, T. (2002). Shinrigaku ga egaku risuku no sekai: Kodoteki ishikettei nyumon [The world of risk drawn by psychology: An introduction to behavioral decision-making]. Tokyo: Keio University Press.

Hisatomi, T., Isobe, A., Oniwa, T., Matsui, Y., Ui, M., Takahashi, N., & Takemura, K. (2005). Anshin to fuan no shakai shinri (IV): Ishikettei sutairu to shinrai tono kanrensei [Social psychology of security and insecurity (IV): Relevance between decision-making style and trust]. Paper presented at the 46th Conference of the Japanese Society of Social Psychology (pp. 230–231).

Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310, 1680–1683.CrossRef

Huettel, S. A., Stowe, C. J., Gordon, E. M., Warner, B. T., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49, 765–775.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.CrossRef

Knuston, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 147–156.CrossRef

Kobashi, Y. (1988). Ninchi kagaku sensho 18 kettei wo shien suru [Selected works in cognitive science 18: Support decisions]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

Krain, A. L., Wilson, A. M., Arbuckle, R., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2006). Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: A meta-analysis of decision-making. Neuro Image, 32, 477–484.

Levy, I., Snell, J., Nelson, A. J., Rustichini, A., & Glimcher, P. W. (2010). Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1036–1047.CrossRef

Loewenstein, G., Rick, S., & Cohen, J. (2008). Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 647–672.CrossRef

Mazur, J. E. (1998). Learning and behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall [Translated into Japanese by Iso, H., Sakagami, T., & Kawai, N. (1999). Meiza No Gakushu To Kodo Japanese Second ed. Hiheisha].

Montgomery, H. (1983). Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. In P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, & A. Vari (Eds.), Analyzing and aiding decision processes (pp. 343–369). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRef

Montgomery, H. (1993). The search for a dominance structure in decision making: Examining the evidence. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 182–187). Norwood: Ablex.

Mori, K., Tsuzuki, T., & Kusumi, T. (2001). Konekushonisuto moderu to shinrigaku: Nou no shimyureshon ni yoru kokoro no rikai [Connectionist model and psychology: Understanding mind through brain simulation]. Kyoto: Kitaohji Shobo.

Nakamura, K. (2004). Kosoku kenyaku hyurisutikku no shinrigakuteki datosei wo meguru jisshoteki, gainenteki giron no doko [Trends in empirical and conceptual argument on the psychological propriety of fast and frugal heuristics]. Japanese Psychological Review, 47, 453–477.

Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (2004). Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision (pp. 110–132). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRef

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Payne, J. W., Johnson, E. J., Bettman, J. R., & Coupey, E. (1990). Understanding contingent choice: A computer simulation approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20, 303.CrossRef

Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., & Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33–45.CrossRef

Roe, R., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multi-alternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision-making. Psychological Review, 108, 370–392.CrossRef

Sakagami, T. (1994). Fukakujitsusei wo meguru dobutsu kodo kenkyu [Study of animal behavior concerning uncertainty]. Japanese Psychological Review, 37, 294–323.

Sakagami, T. (1997). Kodo keizaigaku to sentaku riron [Behavioral economics and selection theory]. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11, 88–108.

Sanfey, A. G. (2007a). Decision neuroscience: New directions in studies of judgment and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 151–155.CrossRef

Sanfey, A. G. (2007b). Social decision making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318, 598–602.CrossRef

Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins [Translated into Japanese by Mizuho, N. (2004). Naze Erabu Tabi Ni Kokai Surunoka: ‘Sentaku No Jiyu’ No Otoshiana. Tokyo: Random House Kodansha].

Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making process in administrative organization. New York: McMillan.

Takemura, K. (1985). Ishikettei sutorateji jikko ni okeru meta ninchi katei moderu [Metacognition process model in the implementation of decision-making strategy]. Doshisha Psychological Review, 32, 16–22.

Takemura, K. (1996a). Ishikettei to sono shien [Decision-making and its support]. In S. Ichikawa (Ed.), Ninchi shinrigaku 4kan shiko [Cognition psychology, vol. 4: Thoughts (pp. 81–105). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

Takemura, K. (1996b). Ishikettei no shinri: Sono katei no tankyu [Psychology of decision-making: Inquiry into its process]. Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan.

Takemura, K. (1998). Ishi kettei no shinri [Psychology of decision-making]. Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan.

Takemura, K. (2009). Ishikettei to shinkei keizaigaku [Decision-making and neuroeconomics]. Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 38, 35–42.

Takemura, K. & Fujii, S. (2004). Interpretation of matching law: From the assumptions of Luce choice axiom, Fechner law, and random utility maximization. Paper presented at the 35th European Mathematical Psychology Group Meeting, Ghent Belgium.

Takemura, K., Ideno, T., Ohkubo, S., & Matsui, H. (2008a). Shinkei keizai gaku to zentoyo [Neuroeconomics and frontal lobe]. Bunshi seishin igaku [Japanese Journal of Molecular Psychiatry], 8(38), 122.

Takemura, K., et al. (2008b). Shinkei keizaigaku to zentoyo [Neuroeconomics and the frontal lobe]. Bunshi Seishin Igaku, 8, 119–124.

Thurstone, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.CrossRef

Tsuzuki, T., & Asakawa, S. (2003). Ninchi kagaku to konekushonisuto moderu [Cognitive science and the connectionist model]. Cognitive Studies, 10, 2–8.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRef

Vaughan, W., Jr. (1981). Melioration, matching, and maximization. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 141–149.CrossRef

Titel: Behavioral Decision Theories that Explain Decision-Making Processes
verfasst von: Professor Kazuhisa Takemura
Verlag: Springer Japan
Buch: Behavioral Decision Theory
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54579-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-4-431-54580-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54580-4_12

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner