Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Decisions in Economics and Finance 1/2019

24.04.2019

Behavioral premium principles

Erschienen in: Decisions in Economics and Finance | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We define a premium principle under the continuous cumulative prospect theory which extends the equivalent utility principle. In prospect theory, risk attitude and loss aversion are shaped via a value function, whereas a transformation of objective probabilities, which is commonly referred as probability weighting, models probabilistic risk perception. In cumulative prospect theory, probabilities of individual outcomes are replaced by decision weights, which are differences in transformed, through the weighting function, counter-cumulative probabilities of gains and cumulative probabilities of losses, with outcomes ordered from worst to best. Empirical evidence suggests a typical inverse-S shaped function: decision makers tend to overweight small probabilities, and underweight medium and high probabilities; moreover, the probability weighting function is initially concave and then convex. We study some properties of the behavioral premium principle. We also assume an alternative framing of the outcomes; then, we discuss several applications to the pricing of insurance contracts, considering different value functions and probability weighting functions proposed in the literature, and an alternative mental accounting. Finally, we focus on the shape of the probability weighting function.
Fußnoten
1
The book of Wakker (2010) provides a thorough treatment on prospect theory.
 
2
See Quiggin (1993), p. 56.
 
3
See also Rieger and Wang (2008), Wakker (2010), and Kothiyal et al. (2011).
 
4
When there is no ambiguity, we simply use the notation \(F(x) = {\mathbb {P}}(X\le x)\) and \(S(x) = 1- F(x) = {\mathbb {P}}(X > x)\), and f for the probability density function of the random loss X.
 
5
The premium principle defined in Wang (1996) assumes an increasing and concave distortion function and maintains the second-order stochastic dominance.
 
6
See Thaler (1985), p. 202.
 
7
Time-value of money is normally disregarded when dealing with non-life insurance contracts, but may become important on a multi-year horizon.
 
8
Note that \({\mathbb {E}}_{w^+w^-} (cX) = c {\mathbb {E}}_{w^+w^-} (X)\), for \(c\ge 0\).
 
9
In general, linearity does not hold for the generalized Choquet integral. In Sect. 3.1, we discussed the case with \(w^+=w^-\). When \(w^+\ne w^-\), and \(c\in {\mathbb {R}}\), we apply the following result
$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbb {E}}_{w^+w^-}(X+c) = {\mathbb {E}}_{w^+w^-}(X) + c + \int _0^c [w^-({\mathbb {P}}(-X>s))-\overline{w}^+({\mathbb {P}}(-X>s))]\,\mathrm{{d}}s, \end{aligned}$$
where \(\overline{w}\) is the dual probability weighting function. See Kaluszka and Krzeszowiec (2012) for the proof and discussion of further properties of the generalized Choquet integral.
 
10
We have \(u(0)=0\), \(u^\prime >0\), \(u^\prime (0)=b/a\), \(u^{\prime \prime }<0\). Heilpern (2003) considers the normalized case \(a=b\).
 
11
The same result arises also when \(a=b\) and with \(W=0\).
 
12
We have \(u(0)=0\), \(u^\prime >0\), \(u^\prime (0)=b/a\), and \(u^{\prime \prime }>0\), which may be useful to model the value function in the domain of losses.
 
13
Observe that \(\int _0^c \psi (F(x))f(x)\mathrm{{d}}x = w(F(c))\).
 
14
In the literature discontinuous (neo-additive) weighting functions are also considered.
 
15
See e.g., Prelec (1998), Abdellaoui (2000), Bleichrodt and Pinto (2000), Bleichrodt et al. (2001), and Abdellaoui et al. (2007).
 
16
In the same paper, Prelec derives two other probability weighting functions: the conditionally-invariantexponential-power and the projection-invarianthyperbolic-logarithm function.
 
17
This is not the case for weighting function (25); when \(a \ne b\), both parameters controls for curvature and all parameters may influence elevation.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abdellaoui, M.: Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Manag. Sci. 46, 1497–1512 (2000)CrossRef Abdellaoui, M.: Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Manag. Sci. 46, 1497–1512 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Abdellaoui, M., Barrios, C., Wakker, P.P.: Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory. J. Econom. 138, 336–378 (2007)CrossRef Abdellaoui, M., Barrios, C., Wakker, P.P.: Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory. J. Econom. 138, 336–378 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Abdellaoui, M., L’Haridon, O., Zank, H.: Separating curvature and elevation: a parametric probability weighting function. J. Risk Uncertain. 41, 39–65 (2010)CrossRef Abdellaoui, M., L’Haridon, O., Zank, H.: Separating curvature and elevation: a parametric probability weighting function. J. Risk Uncertain. 41, 39–65 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allais, M.: Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21(4), 503–546 (1953)CrossRef Allais, M.: Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21(4), 503–546 (1953)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allais, M.: The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. The \((U, \theta )-\)Model: a general overview. In: Munier, B.R. (ed.) Risk, Decision and Rationality, pp. 231–289. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland (1988)CrossRef Allais, M.: The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. The \((U, \theta )-\)Model: a general overview. In: Munier, B.R. (ed.) Risk, Decision and Rationality, pp. 231–289. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland (1988)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Balbás, A., Garrido, J., Mayoral, S.: Properties of distortion risk measures. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 11, 385–399 (2009)CrossRef Balbás, A., Garrido, J., Mayoral, S.: Properties of distortion risk measures. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 11, 385–399 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, D.E.: Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33, 1–27 (1985)CrossRef Bell, D.E.: Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33, 1–27 (1985)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belles-Sampera, J., Merigó, J.M., Guillén, M., Santolino, M.: The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators. Insur. Math. Econ. 52(2), 411–420 (2013)CrossRef Belles-Sampera, J., Merigó, J.M., Guillén, M., Santolino, M.: The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators. Insur. Math. Econ. 52(2), 411–420 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Belles-Sampera, J., Guillén, M., Santolino, M.: The use of flexible quantile-based measures in risk assessment. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 45(6), 1670–1681 (2016)CrossRef Belles-Sampera, J., Guillén, M., Santolino, M.: The use of flexible quantile-based measures in risk assessment. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 45(6), 1670–1681 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Birnbaum, M.H., McIntosh, W.R.: Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 67, 91–110 (1996)CrossRef Birnbaum, M.H., McIntosh, W.R.: Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 67, 91–110 (1996)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.L.: A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Manag. Sci. 46, 1485–1496 (2000)CrossRef Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.L.: A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Manag. Sci. 46, 1485–1496 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.L., Wakker, P.P.: Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Manag. Sci. 47, 1498–1514 (2001)CrossRef Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.L., Wakker, P.P.: Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Manag. Sci. 47, 1498–1514 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Currim, I.S., Sarin, R.K.: Prospect versus utility. Manag. Sci. 35(1), 22–41 (1989)CrossRef Currim, I.S., Sarin, R.K.: Prospect versus utility. Manag. Sci. 35(1), 22–41 (1989)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, G.B., Satchell, S.E.: The behavioural components of risk aversion. J. Math. Psychol. 51, 1–13 (2007)CrossRef Davies, G.B., Satchell, S.E.: The behavioural components of risk aversion. J. Math. Psychol. 51, 1–13 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diecidue, E., Schmidt, U., Zank, H.: Parametric weighting functions. J. Econ. Theory 144(3), 1102–1118 (2009)CrossRef Diecidue, E., Schmidt, U., Zank, H.: Parametric weighting functions. J. Econ. Theory 144(3), 1102–1118 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber, H.U.: An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1979) Gerber, H.U.: An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1979)
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber, H.U.: On additive principles of zero utility. Insur. Math. Econ. 4, 249–251 (1985)CrossRef Gerber, H.U.: On additive principles of zero utility. Insur. Math. Econ. 4, 249–251 (1985)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein, W.M., Einhorn, H.J.: Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 94(2), 236–254 (1987)CrossRef Goldstein, W.M., Einhorn, H.J.: Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 94(2), 236–254 (1987)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez, R., Wu, G.: On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognit. Psychol. 38, 129–166 (1999)CrossRef Gonzalez, R., Wu, G.: On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognit. Psychol. 38, 129–166 (1999)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Laeven, R.J.A.: A note on additive risk measures in rank-dependent utility. Insur. Math. Econ. 47(2), 187–189 (2010)CrossRef Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Laeven, R.J.A.: A note on additive risk measures in rank-dependent utility. Insur. Math. Econ. 47(2), 187–189 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Laeven, R.J.A., Tang, Q.: A comonotonic image of independence for additive risk measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 35(3), 581–594 (2004)CrossRef Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Laeven, R.J.A., Tang, Q.: A comonotonic image of independence for additive risk measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 35(3), 581–594 (2004)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamada, M., Sherris, M.: Contingent claim pricing using probability distortion operators: methods from insurance risk pricing and their relationship to financial theory. Appl. Math. Finance 10, 19–47 (2003)CrossRef Hamada, M., Sherris, M.: Contingent claim pricing using probability distortion operators: methods from insurance risk pricing and their relationship to financial theory. Appl. Math. Finance 10, 19–47 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heilpern, S.: A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle. Insur. Math. Econ. 33(1), 67–73 (2003)CrossRef Heilpern, S.: A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle. Insur. Math. Econ. 33(1), 67–73 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hey, J.D., Orme, C.: Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 62(6), 1291–1326 (1994)CrossRef Hey, J.D., Orme, C.: Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 62(6), 1291–1326 (1994)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)CrossRef Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaluszka, M., Krzeszowiec, M.: Pricing insurance contracts under cumulative prospect theory. Insur. Math. Econ. 50(1), 159–166 (2012)CrossRef Kaluszka, M., Krzeszowiec, M.: Pricing insurance contracts under cumulative prospect theory. Insur. Math. Econ. 50(1), 159–166 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaluszka, M., Krzeszowiec, M.: On iterative premium calculation principles under cumulative prospect theory. Insur. Math. Econ. 52(3), 435–440 (2013)CrossRef Kaluszka, M., Krzeszowiec, M.: On iterative premium calculation principles under cumulative prospect theory. Insur. Math. Econ. 52(3), 435–440 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaluszka, M., Okolewski, A.: An extension of Arrow’s result on optimal reinsurance contract. J. Risk Insur. 75(2), 275–288 (2008)CrossRef Kaluszka, M., Okolewski, A.: An extension of Arrow’s result on optimal reinsurance contract. J. Risk Insur. 75(2), 275–288 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karmarkar, U.S.: Subjectively weighted utility: a descriptive extension of the expected utility model. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 21, 61–72 (1978)CrossRef Karmarkar, U.S.: Subjectively weighted utility: a descriptive extension of the expected utility model. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 21, 61–72 (1978)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karmarkar, U.S.: Subjectively weighted utility and the Allais paradox. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 24, 67–72 (1979)CrossRef Karmarkar, U.S.: Subjectively weighted utility and the Allais paradox. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 24, 67–72 (1979)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kilka, M., Weber, M.: What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Manag. Sci. 47(12), 1712–1726 (2001)CrossRef Kilka, M., Weber, M.: What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Manag. Sci. 47(12), 1712–1726 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kothiyal, A., Spinu, V., Wakker, P.P.: Prospect theory for continuous distributions: a preference foundation. J. Risk Uncertain. 42, 195–210 (2011)CrossRef Kothiyal, A., Spinu, V., Wakker, P.P.: Prospect theory for continuous distributions: a preference foundation. J. Risk Uncertain. 42, 195–210 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lattimore, P.K., Baker, J.R., Witte, A.D.: The influence of probability on risky choice: a parametric examination. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 17(3), 377–400 (1992)CrossRef Lattimore, P.K., Baker, J.R., Witte, A.D.: The influence of probability on risky choice: a parametric examination. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 17(3), 377–400 (1992)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loomes, G., Moffatt, P.G., Sugden, R.: A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risk choice. J. Risk. Uncertain. 24, 103–130 (2002)CrossRef Loomes, G., Moffatt, P.G., Sugden, R.: A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risk choice. J. Risk. Uncertain. 24, 103–130 (2002)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, D.R.: Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, London (2000) Luce, D.R.: Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, London (2000)
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, D.R.: Reduction invariance and Prelec’s weighting functions. J. Math. Psychol. 45, 167–179 (2001)CrossRef Luce, D.R.: Reduction invariance and Prelec’s weighting functions. J. Math. Psychol. 45, 167–179 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luce, D.R., Mellers, B.A., Chang, S.J.: Is choice the correct primitive? On using certainty equivalents and reference levels to predict choices among gambles. J. Risk Uncertain. 6, 115–143 (1993)CrossRef Luce, D.R., Mellers, B.A., Chang, S.J.: Is choice the correct primitive? On using certainty equivalents and reference levels to predict choices among gambles. J. Risk Uncertain. 6, 115–143 (1993)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfiffelmann, M.: Solving the St. Petersburg paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. Theory Decis. 75, 325–341 (2011)CrossRef Pfiffelmann, M.: Solving the St. Petersburg paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. Theory Decis. 75, 325–341 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prelec, D.: The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66, 497–527 (1998)CrossRef Prelec, D.: The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66, 497–527 (1998)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quiggin, J.: A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 323–343 (1982)CrossRef Quiggin, J.: A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 323–343 (1982)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Quiggin, J.: Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Springer, Netherlands (1993)CrossRef Quiggin, J.: Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Springer, Netherlands (1993)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rieger, M.O., Wang, M.: Cumulative prospect theory and the St Petrsburg paradox. J. Econ. Theory. 28, 665–679 (2006)CrossRef Rieger, M.O., Wang, M.: Cumulative prospect theory and the St Petrsburg paradox. J. Econ. Theory. 28, 665–679 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rieger, M.O., Wang, M.: Prospect theory for continuous distributions. J. Risk Uncertain. 36, 83–102 (2008)CrossRef Rieger, M.O., Wang, M.: Prospect theory for continuous distributions. J. Risk Uncertain. 36, 83–102 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Röell, A.: Risk aversion in Quiggin and Yaari’s rank-order model of choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 97, 143–159 (1987)CrossRef Röell, A.: Risk aversion in Quiggin and Yaari’s rank-order model of choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 97, 143–159 (1987)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Safra, Z., Segal, U.: Constant risk aversion. J. Econ. Theory 83, 19–42 (1998)CrossRef Safra, Z., Segal, U.: Constant risk aversion. J. Econ. Theory 83, 19–42 (1998)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–587 (1989)CrossRef Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–587 (1989)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shiller, R.J.: Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. In: Taylor, J.B., Woodford, M. (eds.) Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1C, pp. 1305–1340. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)CrossRef Shiller, R.J.: Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. In: Taylor, J.B., Woodford, M. (eds.) Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1C, pp. 1305–1340. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sung, K.C.J., Yam, S.C.P., Yung, S.P., Zhou, J.H.: Behavioral optimal insurance. Insur. Math. Econ. 49, 418–428 (2011)CrossRef Sung, K.C.J., Yam, S.C.P., Yung, S.P., Zhou, J.H.: Behavioral optimal insurance. Insur. Math. Econ. 49, 418–428 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R.H.: Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark. Sci. 4, 199–214 (1985)CrossRef Thaler, R.H.: Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark. Sci. 4, 199–214 (1985)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsanakas, A.: To split or not to split: capital allocation with convex risk measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 44, 268–277 (2009)CrossRef Tsanakas, A.: To split or not to split: capital allocation with convex risk measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 44, 268–277 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., Fox, C.R.: Weighting risk and uncertainty. Psychol. Rev. 102, 269–283 (1995)CrossRef Tversky, A., Fox, C.R.: Weighting risk and uncertainty. Psychol. Rev. 102, 269–283 (1995)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of the uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 297–323 (1992)CrossRef Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of the uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 297–323 (1992)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van der Hoek, J., Sherris, M.: A class of non-expected utility risk measures and implications for asset allocations. Insur. Math. Econ. 28(1), 69–82 (2001)CrossRef van der Hoek, J., Sherris, M.: A class of non-expected utility risk measures and implications for asset allocations. Insur. Math. Econ. 28(1), 69–82 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wakker, P.P.: Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRef Wakker, P.P.: Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walther, H.: Normal randomness expected utility, time preferences and emotional distortions. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52, 253–266 (2003)CrossRef Walther, H.: Normal randomness expected utility, time preferences and emotional distortions. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52, 253–266 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, S.S.: Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bull. 26(1), 71–92 (1996)CrossRef Wang, S.S.: Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bull. 26(1), 71–92 (1996)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, S.S.: A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. J. Risk Insur. 67(1), 15–36 (2000)CrossRef Wang, S.S.: A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. J. Risk Insur. 67(1), 15–36 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, G., Gonzalez, R.: Curvature of the probability weighting function. Manag. Sci. 42(12), 1676–1690 (1996)CrossRef Wu, G., Gonzalez, R.: Curvature of the probability weighting function. Manag. Sci. 42(12), 1676–1690 (1996)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, G., Gonzalez, R.: Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 45(1), 74–85 (1999)CrossRef Wu, G., Gonzalez, R.: Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 45(1), 74–85 (1999)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yaari, M.: The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1), 95–115 (1987)CrossRef Yaari, M.: The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1), 95–115 (1987)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Behavioral premium principles
Publikationsdatum
24.04.2019
Erschienen in
Decisions in Economics and Finance / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1593-8883
Elektronische ISSN: 1129-6569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-019-00246-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Decisions in Economics and Finance 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

S.I. : Mathematical & Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences & Finance

Variable annuities with a threshold fee: valuation, numerical implementation and comparative static analysis

Premium Partner