2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
‘Bend to Our Objectives’: ‘Torture Porn’ as Press Discourse
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Critics’ judgments directly shape the meanings of ‘torture porn’. As Newman (1996: 134) notes, it is ‘usually film critics’ who label films, and this is certainly true of ‘torture porn’, a term that was coined and propagated by journalists. The press’s responses to torture porn are culturally powerful, gaining gravitas from the mode of dissemination. Not only are such evaluations inter/nationally distributed, but the news context also situates such commentary in a context that intimates factuality. That context lends an impression of authority to print press reviews that other forms of criticism — such as internet-distributed opinion pieces and fan responses — do not necessarily share. Ergo, it is vital to grasp how torture porn has been represented in the press in order to explicate what ‘torture porn’ means.