Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Human Studies 2/2020

30.07.2019 | Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Beyond an Instrumental View of Violence: On Sartre’s Discussion of Violence in Notebooks for an Ethics

verfasst von: Ciprian Jeler

Erschienen in: Human Studies | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper argues that Jean-Paul Sartre’s discussion of violence from his Notebooks for an ethics constitutes an attempt to go beyond an instrumental view of violence. An “instrumental view of violence” essentially assumes that violent behavior is a form of pragmatic behavior whose distinguishing feature consists in the kind of means one employs for reaching one’s goals (violent behavior resorting to means that are harmful for others, whereas non-violent behavior does not). For his part, Sartre attempts to provide a stronger demarcation between violent and pragmatic behaviors. First, violent behavior is, for Sartre, not necessarily characterized by the use of particular means, but by a particular manner of using means, one that involves a certain “forcing” or “straining” of the means. Second, I argue that, according to Sartre, in contrast with pragmatic behavior, violent behavior involves a modification of one’s attitude towards one’s goals. Three such modified attitudes with respect to one’s goals are detailed here, namely the non-productive attitude (the assumption that the goal is not to be produced or that it is not to be produced by means that are under our control), the counter-productive attitude (the exacerbation of one’s proximate goal at the expense of more distant goals) and the anti-productive attitude (the active refusal of one’s previously set goal). Moreover, I show that Sartre’s view that violence involves the “straining” of one’s means is undergirded by his idea that violent behavior presupposes the modification of one’s attitude with respect to one’s goals.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Recall that the Notebooks for an Ethics (written in 1947–1948) have not been published by Sartre himself and have only appeared in book form posthumously in 1983.
 
2
“Violence is by nature instrumental; like all means, it always stands in need of guidance and justification through the end it pursues” (Arendt 1970: 51).
 
3
This point is almost certainly inspired by Sartre’s considerations about “destruction” at the beginning of Being and Nothingness, but also goes somewhat further than those considerations. In Being and Nothingness, he had argued that natural events (geological, storms) only “modify the distribution of masses of beings” and they cannot be said to destroy directly; and, he continues, “In order for destruction to exist, there must first be a relation of man to being—i.e., a transcendence; and within the limits of this relation, it is necessary that man apprehend one being as destructible” (Sartre 1993: 8). Thus, in order for destruction to take place, it must be experienced as such (by a human being, Sartre says). In the quotation from the Notebooks given above, Sartre similarly states that there is violence only when “the form that is opposed to you is destructible”; but here the fact that a given object or entity is “destructible” does not only mean that it is experienced as fragile by a human being, but also that its usefulness is established by “human lawfulness,” i.e., by the laws of normal usage within a given society.
 
4
This would be the case, for example, when the violent agent purposely destroys someone’s property: it is the owner that is targeted by this thrashing, her/his interests get harmed, even though the destructive behavior only deals with inanimate objects. This kind of case has already been taken into account in the literature on violence (e.g., Audi 1971).
 
5
Sartre (1992: 183) states this in the Notebooks by saying that, as opposed to a pragmatic attitude in which the goal is “somefthing to be done,” in violent behavior the goal becomes “something to be rejoined”.
 
6
Let me briefly note that creative acts are sometimes also interpreted as “disclosing” something that is already assumed as present. However, in my view, this interpretation is metaphorical only and, on closer inspection, the attitudes towards their goals of creative and violent agents appear very different. When we say that a sculptor looking at a stone block “sees” the sculpture that is concealed therein, we are merely saying that there are particularities of the stone (color, texture etc.) that seem, to the sculptor, appropriate for rendering a particular subject. But the statue will still have to be produced by the sculptor and for this production s/he will have to use the appropriate means: the statue thus remains a goal in the usual sense of the term and the sculptor’s entire work is guided by her/his idea of the future form. And the stone block is not an obstacle that needs to be eliminated in order to reveal the sculpture; on the contrary, it is something that the sculptor needs to “work with” in order to properly render the intended subject.
 
7
This connection between lying and violence is also sensible, at around the same time, in What is literature? (Sartre 1949: 288f.; see also Bell 1996).
 
8
Note that not all cases in which a person uses an intermediary to carry out an act fall into this category. Neither God, nor hazard are simple intermediaries here, given that they belong to a different, metaphysical causal order, one that is, precisely, beyond our control.
 
9
For lack of space, I will not make a full-fledged defense of this claim here, but I will quickly point to two examples in its support. The passionate anti-Semite from Anti-Semite and Jew is said to “wish to exist all at once and right away” (Sartre 1995: 13) and “to choose for his personality the permanence of rock [la permanence minérale]” (Sartre 1995: 19); about 1 year later, the violent agent from the Notebooks is said to “want everything and want it immediately” (Sartre 1992: 173) and to turn herself/himself, in her/his relationship with the other, “into stone,” that is “to mimic the most elementary object in the other’s eyes (…): being a mineral object” (Sartre 1992: 214).
 
10
Consequently, criticizing violence on grounds of its unpredictability is not so straightforward, as has been nicely pointed out by Gines (2014) precisely against Arendt’s views from her 1970 essay On Violence.
 
11
By this I do not deny that violence may be (or become) goalless. More on this below.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company. Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRef Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Audi, R. (1971). On the meaning and justification of violence. In J. Shaffer (Ed.), Violence (pp. 45–99). New York: David McKay Company Inc. Audi, R. (1971). On the meaning and justification of violence. In J. Shaffer (Ed.), Violence (pp. 45–99). New York: David McKay Company Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, L. (1996). Violence, oppression, and regulative ideas. Man and World,29(1), 71–78.CrossRef Bell, L. (1996). Violence, oppression, and regulative ideas. Man and World,29(1), 71–78.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin, W. (1989). Critique of violence. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), Reflections. Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings (pp. 277–300). New York: Schocken Books. Benjamin, W. (1989). Critique of violence. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), Reflections. Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings (pp. 277–300). New York: Schocken Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergson, H. (1998 [1907]). Creative evolution. Mineola: Dover Publications. Bergson, H. (1998 [1907]). Creative evolution. Mineola: Dover Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundations of authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). London: Routledge. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundations of authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodd, J. (2017). Phenomenological reflexions on violence. London: Routledge.CrossRef Dodd, J. (2017). Phenomenological reflexions on violence. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gines, K. T. (2014). Arendt’s violence/power distinction and Sartre’s violence/counter-violence distinction: The phenomenology of violence in colonial and post-colonial context. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Phenomenologies of violence (pp. 123–144). Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRef Gines, K. T. (2014). Arendt’s violence/power distinction and Sartre’s violence/counter-violence distinction: The phenomenology of violence in colonial and post-colonial context. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Phenomenologies of violence (pp. 123–144). Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Santoni, R. E. (2003). Sartre on violence: Curiously ambivalent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Santoni, R. E. (2003). Sartre on violence: Curiously ambivalent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1949). What is literature?. New York: Philosophical Library. Sartre, J.-P. (1949). What is literature?. New York: Philosophical Library.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1950). Baudelaire. New York: New Directions Books. Sartre, J.-P. (1950). Baudelaire. New York: New Directions Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1964). The words. New York: George Braziller Inc. Sartre, J.-P. (1964). The words. New York: George Braziller Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1992). Notebooks for an ethics. London and Chicago: Chicago University Press. Sartre, J.-P. (1992). Notebooks for an ethics. London and Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1993). Being and nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press. Sartre, J.-P. (1993). Being and nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartre, J.-P. (1995 [1946]). Anti-Semite and Jew. New York: Schocken Books. Sartre, J.-P. (1995 [1946]). Anti-Semite and Jew. New York: Schocken Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Staudigl, M. (2011). Le sujet violent. Contribution à une phénoménologie de la violence. In K. Novotny, A. Schnell, & L. Tengelyi (Eds.), La phénoménologie comme philosophie première (pp. 265–280). Amiens/Prague: Mémoires des Annales de Phénoménologie/Filosofia. Staudigl, M. (2011). Le sujet violent. Contribution à une phénoménologie de la violence. In K. Novotny, A. Schnell, & L. Tengelyi (Eds.), La phénoménologie comme philosophie première (pp. 265–280). Amiens/Prague: Mémoires des Annales de Phénoménologie/Filosofia.
Zurück zum Zitat Staudigl, M. (2013). Towards a relational phenomenology of violence. Human Studies,36(1), 43–66.CrossRef Staudigl, M. (2013). Towards a relational phenomenology of violence. Human Studies,36(1), 43–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Staudigl, M. (2014). Introduction: Topics, problems, and potentials of a phenomenological analysis of violence. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Phenomenologies of violence (pp. 123–144). Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRef Staudigl, M. (2014). Introduction: Topics, problems, and potentials of a phenomenological analysis of violence. In M. Staudigl (Ed.), Phenomenologies of violence (pp. 123–144). Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waldenfels, B. (2011). Apories de la violence. In S. Camilleri & C. Perrin (Eds.), Epreuves de la vie et souffrances d’existence. Regards phénoménologiques (pp. 157–176). Argenteuil: Le Cercle Herméneutique Editeur. Waldenfels, B. (2011). Apories de la violence. In S. Camilleri & C. Perrin (Eds.), Epreuves de la vie et souffrances d’existence. Regards phénoménologiques (pp. 157–176). Argenteuil: Le Cercle Herméneutique Editeur.
Zurück zum Zitat Wieviorka, M. (2003). Violence and the subject. Thesis Eleven,73(1), 42–50.CrossRef Wieviorka, M. (2003). Violence and the subject. Thesis Eleven,73(1), 42–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence. A new approach. London: Sage. Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence. A new approach. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Wormser, G. (2006). Vers une morale phénoménologique? Violence et éthique dans les Cahiers pour une morale. In G. Wormser (Ed.), Jean-Paul Sartre, violence et éthique. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme. Wormser, G. (2006). Vers une morale phénoménologique? Violence et éthique dans les Cahiers pour une morale. In G. Wormser (Ed.), Jean-Paul Sartre, violence et éthique. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Metadaten
Titel
Beyond an Instrumental View of Violence: On Sartre’s Discussion of Violence in Notebooks for an Ethics
verfasst von
Ciprian Jeler
Publikationsdatum
30.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Human Studies / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-8548
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-851X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09522-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Human Studies 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner