Anzeige
Erschienen in:
30.09.2020 | Original Article
Bidirectional long short-term memory for surgical skill classification of temporally segmented tasks
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2020
EinloggenAktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Abstract
Purpose
The majority of historical surgical skill research typically analyzes holistic summary task-level metrics to create a skill classification for a performance. Recent advances in machine learning allow time series classification at the sub-task level, allowing predictions on segments of tasks, which could improve task-level technical skill assessment.
Methods
A bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) network was used with 8-s windows of multidimensional time-series data from the Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills dataset. The network was trained on experts and novices from four common surgical tasks. Stratified cross-validation with regularization was used to avoid overfitting. The misclassified cases were re-submitted for surgical technical skill assessment to crowds using Amazon Mechanical Turk to re-evaluate and to analyze the level of agreement with previous scores.
Results
Performance was best for the suturing task, with 96.88% accuracy at predicting whether a performance was an expert or novice, with 1 misclassification, when compared to previously obtained crowd evaluations. When compared with expert surgeon ratings, the LSTM predictions resulted in a Spearman coefficient of 0.89 for suturing tasks. When crowds re-evaluated misclassified performances, it was found that for all 5 misclassified cases from peg transfer and suturing tasks, the crowds agreed more with our LSTM model than with the previously obtained crowd scores.
Conclusion
The technique presented shows results not incomparable with labels which would be obtained from crowd-sourced labels of surgical tasks. However, these results bring about questions of the reliability of crowd sourced labels in videos of surgical tasks. We, as a research community, should take a closer look at crowd labeling with higher scrutiny, systematically look at biases, and quantify label noise.