nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Board Diversity, Risk Management and Efficiency Evaluation: Evidence from European Listed Manufacturing Companies

verfasst von : Simona Alfiero, Massimo Cane, Ruggiero Doronzo, Alfredo Esposito

Erschienen in: The Future of Risk Management, Volume II

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Board diversity can influence the management of different kinds of risks affecting performance. Our research analyzes the relationship between corporate efficiency and board diversity in 451 European listed manufacturing companies for the year 2015. In particular, we investigate the effects on profitability efficiency and risk management of gender inclusion (women and foreigners on boards). In order to assess the profitability efficiency, we rely on a non-oriented, slack-based model for Data Envelopment Analysis, and a logistic regression analysis to identify the effect of diversity management variables. The results demonstrate that the increased presence of women is associated with a higher probability for greater relative efficiency in countries without mandatory gender regulation. The increased presence of foreigners, however, is associated with a lower probability of above-average efficiency.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel A Nonlinear Approach to Assess the Risk–Reward Ratio Using the Machine Learning Technique

Nächstes Kapitel An Examination of Factors Affecting Excess Liquidity, Evidence from Islamic Banks in Malaysia

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.CrossRef

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

Adler, R. D. (2001). Women in the executive suite correlate to high profits. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 30–32.

Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.CrossRef

Akpan, E. O., & Amran, N. A. (2014). Board characteristics and company performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81–89.CrossRef

Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.

Avkiran, N. K. (2011). Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science, 39(3), 323–334.CrossRef

Bajary, P., Fox, J., & Kyoo, K. (2009). The random coefficients logit model is identified (NBER Working Paper No. 14934).

Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.CrossRef

Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 169–175.CrossRef

Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–231.CrossRef

Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3(1), 105–125.CrossRef

Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101.CrossRef

Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRef

Carroll, A. B. (1996). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRef

Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRef

Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.CrossRef

Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 277–300.CrossRef

Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1998). The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

Dahya, J., & McConnell, J. J. (2007). Board composition, corporate performance, and the Cadbury committee recommendation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 535–564.CrossRef

Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control Journal, 8(2), 1–38.

Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 288–304.CrossRef

De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210.CrossRef

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.CrossRef

Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRef

Eulerich, M., Velte, P., & Van Uum, C. (2014). The impact of management board diversity on corporate performance—An empirical analysis for the German two-tier system (November 8, 2013). Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM), 12, 25–39.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

Färe, R., & Lovell, C. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1), 150–162.CrossRef

Farrell, M. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.CrossRef

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2004). Context, behavior, and evolution: Challenges in research on boards and governance. International Studies of Management & Organization, 34(2), 11–36.CrossRef

Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de contabilidad, 13(1), 53–88.CrossRef

Heidrick & Struggles. (2014). Towards dynamic governance 2014: European Corporate Governance Report.

Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–134.CrossRef

Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.CrossRef

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.CrossRef

Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(1), 35.CrossRef

Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.CrossRef

Jafari, M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., & Biglari, V. (2011). Effective risk management and company’s performance: Investment in innovations and intellectual capital using behavioral and practical approach. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 3(15), 780–786.

Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 58(2), 319–333.

Jensen, M. C. (2000). Value maximization and the corporate objective function. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 37–58). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205.CrossRef

Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284–291.CrossRef

Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRef

Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., Erkut, S., & Hooper, M. J. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance (pp. 2–4). Boston: Wellesley Centers for Women.

Loden, M., & Rosener, J. B. (1991). Workforce America!: Managing employee diversity as a vital resource. Homewood: McGraw-Hill.

Luo, X. (2003). Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 627–635.CrossRef

Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Research notes. Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553–563.

Macey, J. R. (1998). Fiduciary duties as residual claims: Obligations to nonshareholder constituencies from a theory of the firm perspective. Cornell Law Review, 84, 1266.

Mallin, C. (2004). Corporate governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.CrossRef

Mohammed, H. K., & Knápková, A. (2016). The impact of total risk management on company’s performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 271–277.CrossRef

Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut.

Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 321–334.CrossRef

Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.CrossRef

Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.CrossRef

Peng, M. W., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. (2003). Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 348–360.CrossRef

Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579–586.CrossRef

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.CrossRef

Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Age, 390(0.5428), 1–26.

Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.

Rose, C. (2007a). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRef

Rose, J. M. (2007b). Corporate directors and social responsibility: Ethics versus shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(3), 319–331.CrossRef

Rose, P. (2007c). The corporate governance industry. Journal of Corporation Law, 32(4), 887.

Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–372.

Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1313–1320.CrossRef

Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRef

Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.CrossRef

Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRef

Tosi, H. L., Jr. (2008). Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(2), 153–169.CrossRef

Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(5), 656–674.CrossRef

Ujunwa, A., Okoyeuzu, C., & Nwakoby, I. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Revista de Management Comparat International, 13(4), 605.

Van den Berghe, L. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461–478.CrossRef

Van Der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 218–234.CrossRef

Vani Kant, B. (2001). Logit and Probit. London: Sage.

Voordeckers, W., Van Gils, A., & Van den Heuvel, J. (2007). Board composition in small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(1), 137–156.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & Stanton, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management, 5(2), 229–236.

Titel: Board Diversity, Risk Management and Efficiency Evaluation: Evidence from European Listed Manufacturing Companies
verfasst von: Simona Alfiero
Massimo Cane
Ruggiero Doronzo
Alfredo Esposito
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Future of Risk Management, Volume II
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16525-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-16526-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16526-0_9