nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

01.04.2016

Business process compliance checking – applying and evaluating a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models in the financial sector

verfasst von: Jörg Becker, Patrick Delfmann, Hanns-Alexander Dietrich, Matthias Steinhorst, Mathias Eggert

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Given the strong increase in regulatory requirements for business processes the management of business process compliance becomes a more and more regarded field in IS research. Several methods have been developed to support compliance checking of conceptual models. However, their focus on distinct modeling languages and mostly linear (i.e., predecessor-successor related) compliance rules may hinder widespread adoption and application in practice. Furthermore, hardly any of them has been evaluated in a real-world setting. We address this issue by applying a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models to business process compliance checking in the financial sector. It consists of a model query language, a search algorithm and a corresponding modelling tool prototype. It is (1) applicable for all graph-based conceptual modeling languages and (2) for different kinds of compliance rules. Furthermore, based on an applicability check, we (3) evaluate the approach in a financial industry project setting against its relevance for decision support of audit and compliance management tasks.

Vorheriger Artikel Computationally efficient ontology selection in software requirement planning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdullah, N. S., Indulska, M., & Shazia, S. (2009). A study of compliance management in information systems research. In Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).

Abdullah, N. S., Sadiq, S., & Indulska, M. (2010). Emerging Challenges in Information Systems Research for Regulatory Compliance Management. In B. Pernici (Ed.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Vol. 6051, pp. 251–265). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_21

Accorsi, R., Lowis, L., & Sato, Y. (2011). Automated certification for compliant cloud-based business processes. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 3(3), 145–154. doi:10.1007/s12599-011-0155-7.CrossRef

Arbab, F., Kokash, N., & Meng, S. (2009). Towards Using Reo for Compliance-Aware Business Process Modeling. In T. Margaria & B. Steffen (Eds.), Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (Vol. 17, pp. 108–123). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88479-8_9

Awad, A. (2007). BPMN-Q: A Language to Query Business Processes (Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures Concepts and Applications Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l Workshop EMISA 2007 (Vol. 119, pp. 115–128)). Germany: St. Goar.

Awad, A., Decker, G., & Weske, M. (2008). Efficient Compliance Checking Using BPMN-Q and Temporal Logic. In M. Dumas, M. Reichert, & M.-C. Shan (Eds.), Business Process Management (Vol. 5240, pp. 326–341). Milan: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_24.CrossRef

Awad, A., & Sakr, S. (2010). Querying Graph-Based Repositories of Business Process Models. In M. Yoshikawa, X. Meng, T. Yumoto, Q. Ma, L. Sun, & C. Watanabe (Eds.), Database Systems for Advanced Applications (Vol. 6193, pp. 33–44). Tsukuba: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRef

Awad, A., Smirnov, S., & Weske, M. (2009). Towards Resolving Compliance Violations in Business Process Models (In S. Sadiq, M. Indulska, M. zur Muehlen, E. Dubois, & P. Johannesson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRCIS’09)). Amsterdam: The Netherlands.

Awad, A., & Weske, M. (2009). Visualization of compliance violation in business process models. In S. Rinderle-Ma, S. Sadiq, & F. Leymann (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (Vol. 43, pp. 182–193). Ulm: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_17.CrossRef

Becker, J., Bergener, P., Delfmann, P., & Weiß, B. (2011). Modeling and Checking Business Process Compliance Rules in the Financial Sector. In D. F. Galletta & T.-P. Liang (Eds.), Proc. of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).

Becker, J., Breuker, D., Weiß, B., & Winkelmann, A. (2010). Exploring the Status Quo of Business Process Modelling Languages in the Banking Sector – An Empirical Insight into The Usage of Methods in Banks (In Proc. of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS)). Australia: Brisbane.

Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Eggert, M., & Schwittay, S. (2012a). Generalizability and applicability of model-based business process compliance-checking approaches – A state-of-the-art analysis and research roadmap. Business Research, 5(2), 221–247.CrossRef

Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., & Lis, L. (2009). A Generic Set Theory-based Pattern Matching Approach for the Analysis of Conceptual Models. In A. H. F. Laender, S. Castano, U. Dayal, F. Casati, & J. P. M. de Oliverira (Eds.), Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009 (Vol. 5829, pp. 41–54). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_6.CrossRef

Becker, J., Eggert, M., & Schwittay, S. (2012). How to Evaluate the Practical Relevance of Business Process Compliance Checking Approaches? In D. C. Mattfeld & S. Robra-Bissantz (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012 (pp. 849–861).

Becker, A., Gruber, W., & Wohlert, D. (2006). Handbuch Marisk: Mindestanforderungen an Das Risiko-Management in Der Bankpraxis. Frankfurt: Knapp.

Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (2004). Handelsinformationssysteme. Frankfurt: Redline Wirtschaft.

Boella, G., Janssen, M., Hulstijn, J., Humphreys, L., & van der Torre, L. (2013). Managing legal interpretation in regulatory compliance. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL’13 (pp. 23–32). New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2514601.2514605.CrossRef

Bräuer, S., Delfmann, P., Dietrich, H.-A., & Steinhorst, M. (2013). Using a Generic Model Query Approach to Allow for Process Model Compliance Checking–An Algorithmic Perspective. In R. Alt & B. Franczyk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI) 2013 (pp. 1245–1259). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.

Buhl, H. U., Fridgen, G., Müller, G., & Röglinger, M. (2012). Business and information systems engineering : A complementary approach to information systems – what we can learn from the past and may conclude from present reflection on the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 236–253.

Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., & Ruiz-Cortés, A. (2010). Hints on how to face business process compliance. Ac-tas de los Talleres de las Jornadas de Ingeniería del Software y Bases de Datos, 4(4), 26–32.

Caldwell, F. (2009). The Worldwide Economic Crisis Will Bring Real-Time Reporting for Risk Management. Stamford: Gartner Research, Gartner, Inc.

Caldwell, F., Bace, J., & Lotto, R. (2009). U.S. Financial System Regulatory Overhaul Brings More Scrutiny. Stamford: Gartner Research, Gartner, Inc.

Davis, A. M. (1993). Software Requirements: Objects, Functions, and States. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.CrossRef

Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., & Lis, Ł. (2009). Unified Enterprise Knowledge Representation with Conceptual Models - Capturing Corporate Language in Naming Conventions (Proc. of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)). Arizona: Phoenix.

Delfmann, P., Steinhorst, M., Dietrich, H.-A., & Becker, J. (2014). The generic model query language GMQL - conceptual specification, implementation, and runtime evaluation. Information Systems. doi:10.1016/j.is.2014.06.003.

Diestel, R. (2010). Graph Theory. Springer.

Dietrich, H.-A., Breuker, D., Steinhorst, M., Delfmann, P., & Becker, J. (2013). Developing graphical model editors for meta-modelling tools – requirements, conceptualisation, and implementation. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 8(2), 42–78.CrossRef

Dietrich, H.-A., Steinhorst, M., Becker, J., & Delfmann, P. (2011). Fast Pattern Matching in Conceptual Models - Evaluating and Extending a Generic Approach. In M. Nüttgens, O. Thomas, & B. Weber (Eds.), Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2011) (Vol. 190, pp. 79–92). GI.

Dijkman, R. M., La Rosa, M., & Reijers, H. A. (2012). Managing large collections of business process models - current techniques and challenges. Computers in Industry, 63(2), 91–97. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2011.12.003.CrossRef

El Kharbili, M., de Medeiros, A. K. A., Stein, S., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2008). Business Process Compliance Checking: Current State and Future Challenges. In P. Loos, M. Nüttgens, K. Turowsk, & D. Werth (Eds.), MobIS 2008 (Vol. 141, pp. 107–113). Saarbrücken, Germany: GI.

Elgammal, A., Türetken, O., van den Heuvel, W.-J., & Papazoglou, M. P. (2010). Root-Cause Analysis of Design-Time Compliance Violations on the Basis of Property Patterns. In P. P. Maglio, M. Weske, J. Yang, & M. Fantinato (Eds.), ICSOC (Vol. 6470, pp. 17–31).

Foerster, A., Engels, G., Schattkowsky, T., Van Der Straeten, R., & Forster, A. (2007). Verification of Business Process Quality Constraints Based on Visual Process Patterns. In First Joint IEEE/IFIP Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE’07) (pp. 197–208). Washington: IEEE. doi:10.1109/TASE.2007.56.CrossRef

Foerster, A., Engels, G., & Schattkowsky, T. (2005). Activity Diagram Patterns for Modeling Quality Constraints in Business Processes. In L. Briand & C. Williams (Eds.), Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (Vol. 3713, pp. 2–16). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11557432_2

Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley Professional.

Ghose, A., & Koliadis, G. (2007). Auditing Business Process Compliance. In B. Krämer, K.-J. Lin, & P. Narasimhan (Eds.), Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2007 (Vol. 4749, pp. 169–180). Vienna: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74974-5.CrossRef

Goedertier, S., & Vanthienen, J. (2006). Designing Compliant Business Processes with Obligations and Permissions. In J. Eder & S. Dustdar (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (Vol. 4103, pp. 5–14). Vienna: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11837862_2.CrossRef

Governatori, G., & Milosevic, Z. (2006). A formal analysis of a business contract language. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 15(4), 659–685. doi:10.1142/S0218843006001529.CrossRef

Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z., & Sadiq, S. (2006). Compliance Checking Between Business Processes and Business Contracts. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (pp. 221–232). Washington: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/EDOC.2006.22.

Governatori, G., & Rotolo, A. (2010). A Conceptually Rich Model of Business Process Compliance. In Proceedings of the Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (pp. 3–12). Darlinghurst: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

Höfferer, P. (2007). Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In H. Österle, J. Schelp, & R. Winter (Eds.), Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 1620–1631). St. Gallen, Switzerland: University of St. Gallen.

Hoffmann, J., Weber, I., & Governatori, G. (2009). On compliance checking for clausal constraints in annotated process models. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 155–177. doi:10.1007/s10796-009-9179-7.CrossRef

Knuplesch, D., Ly, L. T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Pfeifer, H., & Dadam, P. (2010). On Enabling Data-Aware Compliance Checking of Business Process Models. In Conceptual Modeling – ER 2010 (Vol. 6412, pp. 332–346). Vancouver: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_24.

Kokash, N., & Arbab, F. (2009). Formal Behavioral Modeling and Compliance Analysis for Service-Oriented Systems. In F. S. Boer, M. M. Bonsangue, & E. Madelaine (Eds.), Formal Methods for Components and Objects (Vol. 5751, pp. 21–41). Sophia Antipolis: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04167-9_2.CrossRef

Kotonya, G., & Sommerville, I. (1998). Requirements Engineering - Processes and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

Kumar, A., & Liu, R. (2008). A Rule-Based Framework Using Role Patterns for Business Process Compliance. In N. Bassiliades, G. Governatori, & A. Paschke (Eds.), Rule Representation, Interchange and Reasoning on the Web (Vol. 5321, pp. 58–72). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88808-6_9

Küster, J. M., Ryndina, K., & Gall, H. (2007). Generation of Business Process Models for Object Life Cycle Compliance. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Business Process Management (Vol. 4714, pp. 165–181). Brisbane: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_13.CrossRef

Liu, Y., Müller, S., & Xu, K. (2007). A static compliance-checking framework for business process models. IBM Systems Journal, 46(2), 335–361. doi:10.1147/sj.462.0335.CrossRef

Lu, R., Sadiq, S., & Governatori, G. (2008a). Measurement of compliance distance in business processes. Information Systems Management, 25(4), 344–355. doi:10.1080/10580530802384613.CrossRef

Lu, R., Sadiq, S., & Governatori, G. (2008b). Compliance Aware Business Process Design. In A. ter Hofstede, B. Benatallah, & H.-Y. Paik (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (Vol. 4928, pp. 120–131). Brisbane: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_14.CrossRef

Ly, L. T., Göser, K., Rinderle-Ma, S., & Dadam, P. (2008a). Compliance of Semantic Constraints - A Requirements Analysis for Process Management Systems. In Proc. 1st Int’l Workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance - Applications in Information Systems (GRCIS’08).

Ly, L. T., Rinderle, S., & Dadam, P. (2008b). Integration and verification of semantic constraints in adaptive process management systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 64(1), 3–23. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2007.06.007.

Ly, L. T., Rinderle, S., & Dadam, P. (2006). Semantic Correctness in Adaptive Process Management Systems. In S. Dustdar, J. L. Fiadeiro, & A. P. Sheth (Eds.), Business Process Management (Vol. 4102, pp. 193–208). Vienna: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11841760_14.

Ly, L. T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., & Dadam, P. (2012). On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 195–219. doi:10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9.CrossRef

Ly, L. T., Rinderle-Ma, S., & Dadam, P. (2010). Design and Verification of Instantiable Compliance Rule Graphs in Process-Aware Information Systems. In B. Pernici (Ed.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Vol. 6051, pp. 9–23). Hammamet: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_3.CrossRef

Mendling, J. (2007). Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPC Business Process Models (Doctoral dissertation). WU Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.

Monakova, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Moser, S., & Schäfers, K. (2009). Verifying Business Rules Using an SMT Solver for BPEL Processes. In W. Abramowicz, L. Maciaszek, R. Kowalczyk, & A. Speck (Eds.), Business process, servicescomputing and intelligent service management (Vol. 147, pp. 81–94). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI).

Müller, J. (2010). Strukturbasierte Verifikation von BPMN-Modellen (Doctoral dissertation). Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.

OASIS. (2007). Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.pdf

Object Management Group. (2005). Unified Modeling Language Infrastructure. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/Infrastructure/PDF/

Object Management Group. (2011). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF

Opromolla, G. (2009). Facing the financial crisis: Bank of Italy’s implementing regulation on hedge funds. Journal of Investment Compliance, 10(2), 41–44. doi:10.1108/15285810910971274.CrossRef

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information System, 24(3), 45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.CrossRef

Peterson, J. L. (1977). Petri nets. ACM Computing Surveys, 9(3), 223–252. doi:10.1145/356698.356702.CrossRef

Raduescu, C., Tan, H. M., Jayaganesh, M., Bandara, W., zur Muehlen, M., & Lippe, S. (2006). A framework of issues in large process modeling projects. In Proc. of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Göteborg, Sweden.

Rinderle-Ma, S., Ly, L. T., & Dadam, P. (2008). Business process compliance. EMISA Forum, 28(2), 24–29.

Rosemann, M., & Vessey, I. (2008). Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: The role of applicability checks. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 1–22.

Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., & Namiri, K. (2007). Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Business Process Management (Vol. 4714, pp. 149–164). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_12

Scheer, A.-W. (2000). ARIS - Business Process Modeling (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Schleicher, D., Anstett, T., Leymann, F., & Schumm, D. (2010). Compliant Business Process Design Using Refinement Layers. In R. Meersman, T. Dillon, & P. Herrero (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2010 (Vol. 6426, pp. 114–131). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16934-2_11

Schumm, D., Turetken, O., Kokash, N., Elgammal, A., Leymann, F., & Van Den Heuvel, W.-J. (2010). Business Process Compliance Through Reusable Units of Compliant Processes. In F. Daniel & F. M. Facca (Eds.), Current Trends in Web Engineering (Vol. 6385, pp. 325–337). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Thomas, O., & Fellmann, M. (2009). Semantic process modeling – design and implementation of an ontology-based representation of business processes. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 1(6), 438–451. doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0078-8.CrossRef

Tosatto, S. C., Governatori, G., Kelsen, P., & van der Torre, L. (2012). Business Process Compliance is Hard (pp. 1–14).

Tosatto, S. C., Kharbili, M. El, Governatori, G., Kelsen, P., Ma, Q., & van der Torre, L. (2013). Algorithms for Basic Compliance Problems. In IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (pp. 2–7). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICSTW.2013.6

Van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013). Business process management: A comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013, 1–37. doi:10.1155/2013/507984.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.CrossRef

Wang, J., Jin, T., Wong, R. K., & Wen, L. (2013). Querying business process model repositories. World Wide Web, 17(3), 427–454. doi:10.1007/s11280-013-0210-z.CrossRef

Weiß, B., & Winkelmann, A. (2011). A Metamodel Based Perspective on the Adaptation of a Semantic Business Process Modeling Language to the Financial Sector. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.16

Wolter, C., & Meinel, C. (2010). An approach to capture authorisation requirements in business processes. Requirements Engineering, 15(4), 359–373. doi:10.1007/s00766-010-0103-y.CrossRef

Wolter, C., Miseldine, P., & Meinel, C. (2009). Verification of Business Process Entailment Constraints Using SPIN. In F. Massacci, S. Redwine Jr., & N. Zannone (Eds.), Engineering Secure Software and Systems (Vol. 5429, pp. 1–15). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00199-4_1

Worzberger, R., Kurpick, T., & Heer, T. (2008a). Checking Correctness and Compliance of Integrated Process Models. In Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, 2008. SYNASC’08. 10th International Symposium on (pp. 576–583). doi:10.1109/SYNASC.2008.10

Worzberger, R., Kurpick, T., & Heer, T. (2008b). On Correctness, Compliance and Consistency of Process Models. In Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2008. WETICE’08. IEEE 17th (pp. 251–252). doi:10.1109/WETICE.2008.9

Zoet, M., Welke, R., Versendaal, J., & Ravesteyn, P. (2009). Aligning Risk Management and Compliance Considerations with Business Process Development. In T. Noia & F. Buccafurri (Eds.), E-Commerce and Web Technologies (Vol. 5692, pp. 157–168). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03964-5_16

Titel: Business process compliance checking – applying and evaluating a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models in the financial sector
verfasst von: Jörg Becker
Patrick Delfmann
Hanns-Alexander Dietrich
Matthias Steinhorst
Mathias Eggert
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9529-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Advanced analytics for the automation of medical systematic reviews

Consumer adoption of RFID-enabled services. Applying an extended UTAUT model

Computationally efficient ontology selection in software requirement planning

Engineering of web services for internet of things applications

Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts

A study on the antecedents of healthcare information protection intention