Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 2/2013

01.11.2013

But Who Are Those “Most People” That Can Be Trusted? Evaluating the Radius of Trust Across 29 European Societies

verfasst von: Tim Reeskens

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As comparative research has repeatedly demonstrated that societies where people trust each other more easily are better able to generate a series of positive externalities, the study of generalized trust has taken pandemic forms. However, critical voices have warned that the levels of trust (the intensity to cooperate) are conceptually different from the radius of trust (with whom you would cooperate) (Fukuyama in Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York, 1995). In this article, the classic trust question, i.e. whether “most people can be trusted or whether you cannot be too careful,” is brought in relation with tolerance towards cultural minorities, people with deviant behavior, and political extremists, as surveyed in the 2008 wave of the European Values Study. The results point to a hierarchy in social tolerance, furthermore indicating that while ‘trusters’ are more inclusive towards cultural minorities and people with deviant behavior, they are not substantially more tolerant towards extremist political voices compared to ‘distrusters’. Also, the radius of trust is context dependent, with especially economic modernization determining how wide the radius of trust is. We relate the findings of this study with recent research outcomes and implications for trust research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
As is evident, a number of these studies run into endogeneity: e.g. Uslaner (2002) argues that people trust each other less in more unequal societies. However, in a more recent study, Bergh and Bjørnskov (2011) qualify this thesis by arguing that trust also leads to more generous welfare states. This dilemma to a large extent reflects the schism in social capital literature, i.e. the distinction between the society-centered approach towards trust, with individual-level trust having macro-level externalities (e.g. Putnam 1993); in contrast with the institution-centered approach towards trust, with macro-level contexts facilitating the conditions in which trust can flourish (e.g. Hooghe and Stolle 2003).
 
2
Putnam (1993) described social capital as “the features of social organization like networks, trust and reciprocity that facilitate cooperation.” While networks refer to the structural features of social organization, trust and reciprocity has been classified as cultural dimensions of social capital.
 
3
While the original work of Fukuyama (1995) made reference to Confucian religion, as this paper will make analyze the European Values Study, this religious tradition becomes redundant.
 
4
The factor analysis on the ‘Social Distance Scale’ (see Table 1) revealed a different factor solution when the 18 other, predominantly post-Soviet societies like Azerbaijan and Armenia, were included in the analysis. To give but one example, people with AIDS were loading on the ‘deviant behavior scale,’ while this link is not made in the sample of selected countries.
 
5
These countries are Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Switzerland (CH), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Germany (DE), Denmark (DK), Estonia (EE), Spain (ES), Finland (FI), France (FR), United Kingdom (GB), Greece (GR), Hungary (HU), Ireland (IE), Iceland (IS), Italy (IT), Lithuania (LT), Latvia (LV), Malta (MT), Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Sweden (SE), Slovenia (SI), and Slovak Republic (SK). Luxembourg is removed from the data file because it features as an outlier in many structural indicators, including gdp per capita. For each country in our analysis, a representative sample of approximately 1,500 respondents was questioned. For more information, check http://​www.​europeanvaluesst​udy.​eu.
 
6
In the master questionnaire of the EVS, also “Christians” have been taken up as group. However, as a number of countries have not questioned permissive attitudes regarding having Christians as neighbors, we opted to leave this category out.
 
7
Other methods to construct these scales have also been tested, like for instance means scales that represent the number of social groups within one of the three discovered scales the respondent has listed. The results are similar for the various scaling techniques. Nevertheless, to abstract as much as unique variance of the several indicators, factor scales were preferred above additive or means scales.
 
8
Only controlling for the country clustering, i.e. not taking related individual-level controls into account, reveals no difference between ‘trusters’ and ‘distrusters,’ which means that the association between trust and extreme political opinions is suppressed by controls.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.CrossRef Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Historical trust levels predict the current size of the welfare state. Kyklos, 64(1), 1–19.CrossRef Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Historical trust levels predict the current size of the welfare state. Kyklos, 64(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bjørnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 1–21.CrossRef Bjørnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 1–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRef Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in “Most People”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 786–807. Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in “Most People”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 786–807.
Zurück zum Zitat EVS Foundation/Tilburg University. (2010). European Values Study 2008, 4th wave, integrated dataset. Cologne: GESIS. EVS Foundation/Tilburg University. (2010). European Values Study 2008, 4th wave, integrated dataset. Cologne: GESIS.
Zurück zum Zitat Freitag, M., & Traunmüller, R. (2009). Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularized and generalized trust. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 782–803.CrossRef Freitag, M., & Traunmüller, R. (2009). Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularized and generalized trust. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 782–803.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press. Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.CrossRef Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22(1), 23–37.CrossRef Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social capital and development: The coming agenda. SAIS Review, 22(1), 23–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gesthuizen, M., van der Meer, T., & Scheepers, P. (2009). Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe. Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 121–142. Gesthuizen, M., van der Meer, T., & Scheepers, P. (2009). Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe. Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 121–142.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3–39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3–39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Studies, 359, 1435–1446. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Studies, 359, 1435–1446.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2003). Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2003). Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D., & Trappers, A. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe. A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 198–223.CrossRef Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D., & Trappers, A. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe. A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 198–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization. Cultural, economic, and political changes in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization. Cultural, economic, and political changes in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? The conditional effects of immigration-generated diversity on trust, membership, and participation across 19 Countries, 1981–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 319–347. Kesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? The conditional effects of immigration-generated diversity on trust, membership, and participation across 19 Countries, 1981–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 319–347.
Zurück zum Zitat Knack, S. J., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. Knack, S. J., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339–365.CrossRef Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Letki, N. (2008). Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in british neighborhoods. Political Studies, 56(1), 99–126.CrossRef Letki, N. (2008). Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in british neighborhoods. Political Studies, 56(1), 99–126.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRef McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Messick, D., & Kramer, R. (2001). Trust as a form of shallow morality. In K. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 89–117). New York: Russell Sage. Messick, D., & Kramer, R. (2001). Trust as a form of shallow morality. In K. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 89–117). New York: Russell Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism. Popular Evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418–451.CrossRef Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism. Popular Evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.CrossRef Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newton, K. (2007). Social and political trust. In R. J. Dalton & H. P. Kingemann (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 342–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Newton, K. (2007). Social and political trust. In R. J. Dalton & H. P. Kingemann (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 342–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris, P. (2009). Democracy crossnational data. Release 3.0. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Norris, P. (2009). Democracy crossnational data. Release 3.0. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Zurück zum Zitat Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Modern traditions in civic Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Modern traditions in civic Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of american community life. New York: Simon & Schuster. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of american community life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum. Diversity and community in the twentieth- first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRef Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum. Diversity and community in the twentieth- first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust. Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462. Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust. Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European social survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515–532.CrossRef Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European social survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515–532.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rokeach, M., Smith, P. W., & Evans, R. I. (1960). Two kinds of prejudice or one. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), The open and the closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems (pp. 132–168). New York: Basic Books. Rokeach, M., Smith, P. W., & Evans, R. I. (1960). Two kinds of prejudice or one. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), The open and the closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems (pp. 132–168). New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose, R. (1994). Postcommunism and the problem of trust. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 18–30.CrossRef Rose, R. (1994). Postcommunism and the problem of trust. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 18–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 690–695.CrossRef Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 690–695.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital. An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–467.CrossRef Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital. An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–467.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sturgis, P., & Smith, P. (2010). Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: What kind of trust are we measuring? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 74–92.CrossRef Sturgis, P., & Smith, P. (2010). Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: What kind of trust are we measuring? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 74–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian, S. V., Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (2001). Does the state you live in make a difference? A multilevel analysis of self-related health in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 53(1), 9–19. Subramanian, S. V., Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (2001). Does the state you live in make a difference? A multilevel analysis of self-related health in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 53(1), 9–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust. A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust. A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolsma, J., van der Meer, T., & Gesthuizen, M. (2009). The impact of neighborhood and municipality characteristics on social cohesion in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 44(3), 309–336.CrossRef Tolsma, J., van der Meer, T., & Gesthuizen, M. (2009). The impact of neighborhood and municipality characteristics on social cohesion in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 44(3), 309–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Traunmüller, R. (2011). Moral communities? Religion as a source of social trust in a multilevel analysis of 97 German regions. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 346–363.CrossRef Traunmüller, R. (2011). Moral communities? Religion as a source of social trust in a multilevel analysis of 97 German regions. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 346–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Welch, M. R., Sikkink, D., & Loveland, M. T. (2007). The radius of trust: Religion, social embeddedness and trust in strangers. Social Forces, 86(1), 23–46.CrossRef Welch, M. R., Sikkink, D., & Loveland, M. T. (2007). The radius of trust: Religion, social embeddedness and trust in strangers. Social Forces, 86(1), 23–46.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
But Who Are Those “Most People” That Can Be Trusted? Evaluating the Radius of Trust Across 29 European Societies
verfasst von
Tim Reeskens
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0169-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Social Indicators Research 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner