Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Canada

verfasst von : Joost Blom

Erschienen in: Private International Law Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have not been embodied in legislation in Canada. Rather, in recent years the federal government has promoted best practices in CSR. These efforts have focused particularly on mining and other extractive industries, because Canadian companies in this sector conduct, through subsidiary entities, very extensive operations in other countries. Law-making activity in the area of CSR and private international law has been most intense, not in the federal or provincial legislatures, but in the courts. A number of important cases have involved lawsuits brought in Canada against Canadian companies, in which foreign claimants seek to recover compensation for environmental and social harm caused by the operations of these companies’ subsidiaries abroad. The jurisdiction of Canadian courts to hear such cases has been upheld, but no case has yet progressed to a decision on liability. As well, courts have considered questions of choice of law in relation to failures to uphold CSR principle in foreign operations. They have also dealt with the enforcement of judgments, granted by a foreign court against a foreign company, against the assets of a Canadian subsidiary of the foreign judgment debtor. The challenges faced by the claimants in this body of cross-border litigation have to do both with Canadian private international law and with the Canadian rules about the legal responsibility of shareholder corporations for wrongs committed by corporations that they wholly or partly own.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Constitution Act, 1867, s 92(11).
 
2
This is not an express federal power but has been held to be an implicit complement to the provincial incorporation power in s 92(11) of the Constitution Act, 1867. Because the provinces’ authority is expressly limited to incorporating companies with provincial objects, the incorporation of companies with objects beyond those of one province has been held to fall under the residual federal power to make laws for “peace, order and good government of Canada” under the Constitution Act, 1867, s 91. Federally incorporated companies have the constitutionally protected right to do business throughout Canada. Provincially incorporated companies do not, but in fact are usually able to do so because their capacity as a legal person created in one province is recognized in the other provinces. Their right to carry on business in a province other than the one in which they were incorporated is sometimes subject to a registration or licensing requirement.
 
3
Canadian Western Bank v Alberta, 2007 SCC 22, [2007] 2 SCR 3 at para 117.
 
4
Constitution Act, 1867, s 92(13); Citizens Insurance Co. of Canada v. Parsons (1881), LR 7 App Cas 95 (JCPC).
 
5
Constitution Act, 1867, s 91(15).
 
6
Ibid, s 91(21).
 
7
Such as the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, SC 1998, c 34. See below under Q5(a).
 
8
Kerr et al. (2009), p. 5.
 
9
Ibid, loc cit.
 
10
Ibid, at 6.
 
11
Ibid, at 6–8.
 
12
Ibid, at 9–29.
 
13
Canada (Global Affairs), Responsible Business Conduct Abroad.
 
14
Canada (Global Affairs), Canada’s Enhanced CSR Strategy.
 
15
Canada (Global Affairs), Advancing Canada’s Approach on Responsible Business Conduct Abroad.
 
16
Ibid, under “Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (Ombudsperson)”. The mandate of the Extractive Sector CSR Counsellor’s office, a predecessor agency, has been terminated as of May 2018: Canada (Global Affairs), Office of the Extractive Sector CSR Counsellor.
 
17
See also Canada (Natural Resources), CSR Checklist. This, too, cites at p. 5 the broad definition used by Global Affairs and adds that CSR “is an industry response to managing social risk”.
 
18
Canada (Government), Corporate Social Responsibility.
 
19
Canada (Government), Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide.
 
20
Ibid, under the heading, “1.2 CSR Defined.”
 
21
Ibid., under the heading, “1.3.1 Why is CSR Important?”
 
22
Canada (Global Affairs), Canada’s National Contact Point.
 
23
Ibid.
 
24
Ibid.
 
25
Canada (Global Affairs), Procedures Guide for NCP.
 
26
Ibid, para 5.1.
 
27
Ibid, para 5.2.
 
28
Ibid, para 6.1–6.3.
 
29
Ibid, para 3.4.
 
30
Ibid, para 3.5.
 
31
Ibid, para 11.3.
 
32
Ibid, para 12.3.
 
33
Ibid, para. 12.4.
 
34
Ibid.
 
35
Conway (2015), p. 749.
 
36
Canada (Global Affairs), Responsible Business Conduct Abroad – Questions and Answers, under “How will the Ombudsperson be different from the Canadian National Contact Point (NCP)?”.
 
37
Ibid, under “How is the appointment of an Ombudsperson considered an improvement to Canada’s approach on CSR abroad?”.
 
38
Canada (Global Affairs), 2017 NCP Annual Report.
 
39
Ibid, under “6. NCP Cases, Endeavour Mining Corporation and a Labour Union in Mali”.
 
40
Ibid. None of the other three cases referred to led to facilitated dialogue or mediation.
 
41
Canada (Global Affairs), 2015 NCP Annual Report.
 
42
Canada (Global Affairs), Canada’s Enhanced CSR Strategy. The page references below are to the PDF version of the text. For an assessment of the strategy, see Idemudiah and Kwakyewah (2018).
 
43
Ibid p. 6. The department notes that the Guiding Principles were co-sponsored by Canada.
 
44
Ibid p. 7. The Guidance was published by the OECD in 2011.
 
45
Ibid p. 3.
 
46
These are taken from Canada (Global Affairs), Canada’s Enhanced CSR Strategy (executive summary).
 
47
The Counsellor’s mandate was terminated in May 2018 because of the creation of the office of the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise; see above under Q2.1(c), and Canada (Global Affairs Canada), Office of the Extractive Sector CSR Counsellor.
 
48
Duggan et al. (2014–2015), pp. 179–180. The reference to human rights is to the UN Guiding Principles’ Principle 2, which requires home states to “set out clearly the expectation that all business enterprises domiciled within their territory and/or jurisdiction respect human rights throughout their operations.” Principle 13 states the requirements of this responsibility in terms of avoiding, and preventing or mitigating, “adverse human rights impacts”.
 
49
Ibid p. 178.
 
50
Ibid pp. 192–193 [part IV]. The authors do, however, criticize the new policy and procedures for lacking any assurance that outcomes of the facilitated dialogue or mediation accord with internationally recognized rights (p. 193).
 
51
I have used StdsCC to distinguish the Standards Council from the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC).
 
52
Standards Council of Canada, New National Standard of Canada Guides Organizations.
 
53
Standards Council of Canada, About the Standards Council. The legislation governing the StdsCC is the Standards Council of Canada Act, RSC 1985, c S-16.
 
54
Standards Council of Canada Act, ibid, s 4(2)(e).
 
55
Ibid, s 4(2)(l).
 
56
Ibid, s 4(3.1).
 
57
CSA Group, About CSA Group.
 
58
CSA Group, CAN/CSA-ISO 26000:16.
 
59
Standards Council of Canada, National Standards Development.
 
60
Alectra Utilities, ISO 26000.
 
61
CIBC Mellon, CIBC Mellon aligns to ISO 26000.
 
62
Fujitsu Canada, Implementing CSR Activities Utilizing ISO 26000.
 
63
Canada (Natural Resources), CSR Abtroad. The same source lists eight mining or petroleum companies, including the two mentioned, as adhering to the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System Standard.
 
64
Das v George Weston Ltd, 2017 ONSC 4129, para 133; see para 220(d) of the allegations quoted there, made against one of the defendants.
 
65
A Canadian commentator who has written on the shortcomings of “private regulation,” as exemplified by, among other things, the movement to develop consensus standards for CSR, is Bakan (2015).
 
66
SC 1998, c 34.
 
67
Ibid, s 3(1). Falsifying or concealing records for the purpose of bribing a foreign public official is a distinct offence under s 4(1).
 
68
Blyschak (2014). The impact of similar laws abroad is considered by Podgorny and Musgrove (2014).
 
69
Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, SC 1998, c 34, s 5(1). In R v Karigar, 2017 ONCA 576, the issue was whether a participant in a conspiracy to bribe officials in India had committed the offence in Canada. The conclusion was that he had, based on the fact that his activities had a real and substantial connection with Canada and so the offence was committed there, even if the offence might also have been committed in the United States or in India. His conviction was the first in a contested prosecution under the act: R v Karigar, 2014 ONSC 3093. A foreign national who was a party to a conspiracy that amounted to an offence in Canada was not subject to the Canadian court’s jurisdiction: see Chowdhury v Canada, 2014 ONSC 2635. See also R v Barra and Govindia, 2018 ONSC 2659, which held that the Ontario court had criminal jurisdiction in respect of two defendants who were charged in connection with the same conspiracy as that which was the subject of R v Karigar, ibid.
 
70
R v Griffiths Energy International, [2013] AJ No 412 (LexisNexis) ($9 million); R v Niko Resources Ltd, [2011] AJ No 1586 (LexisNexis) ($9.5 million). Both were convictions after guilty pleas. A smaller-scale offence is seen in R v Watts, [2005] AJ No 568 (LexisNexis).
 
71
Enacted by SC 2014, c 39, s 376.
 
72
Ibid, s 6.
 
73
Ibid, s 2, “payment”.
 
74
Ibid, loc cit. No additional categories have yet been added by regulation.
 
75
See Podgorny and Musgrove (2014), pp. 169–172.
 
76
Kerr et al. (2009), pp. 421–447. Legislation is beginning to recognize the need for special legislation for corporations whose primary goal is other than profit. See, for example, Business Corporations Act, SBC 2002, c 57, Part 2.2 – Community Contribution Companies.
 
77
For a comparison of the Canadian legal framework to that of the United States, see Kuras (2000).
 
78
2004 SCC 68, [2004] 3 SCR 461. See Francis (2005).
 
79
Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985, c C-44, s 122(1).
 
80
Peoples Department Stores Inc v Wise, 2004 SCC 68, [2004] 3 SCR 461, para 42.
 
81
Ibid, para 43.
 
82
Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985, c C-44, s 241(2).
 
83
Ibid, s 238, “complainant”.
 
84
Peoples Department Stores Inc v Wise, 2004 SCC 68, [2004] 3 SCR 461, para 67.
 
85
“[T]he Peoples decision now opens the door to direct claims being made by creditors against directors and officers for negligence, the ramifications of which may not have been fully considered.” Francis (2005), p. 181.
 
86
2008 SCC 69, [2008] 3 SCR 560.
 
87
Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985, c C-44, s 241(2), discussed earlier in this section.
 
88
BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69, [2008] 3 SCR 560, para 36.
 
89
Ibid, para 30 (emphasis in the original).
 
90
Ibid, para 56.
 
91
Ibid, para 66.
 
92
Ibid, para 84; see also para 112 (“within the range of reasonable choices that they could have made in weighing conflicting interests”).
 
93
Ibid, para 100.
 
94
Ibid, para 103.
 
95
Ibid, para 104.
 
96
Ibid, para 113.
 
97
Waitzer and Jaswal (2009), p. 480.
 
98
Ibid, pp. 481–494.
 
99
Ibid, p. 495 (citations omitted). A similar assessment is Bradley (2009).
 
100
Posyniak (2012). That the BCE case leaves a gap when it comes to giving stakeholders effective remedies is also the conclusion of VanDuzer (2010).
 
101
Conway (2015), p. 741.
 
102
In Canadian common law an exception is made when the parties agree to limit or exclude their rights to sue a third party such as an employee. Notwithstanding the general rule of privity, the third party can invoke the contractual provision as a defence: London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd, [1992] 3 SCR 299; Fraser River Pile & Dredge Ltd v Can-Dive Services Ltd, [1999] 3 SCR 108. But the rule of privity remains in place in other respects.
 
103
This was stated in so many words in Peoples Department Stores Inc v Wise, 2004 SCC 68, [2004] 3 SCR 461, para 57: “[I]f breach of the standard of care, causation and damages are established, creditors [in making a claim against directors] can resort to art. 1457 [of the Civil Code of Québec] to have their rights vindicated.” Art. 1457 is the general provision for extra-contractual liability. Para 1 of that provision says, “Every person has a duty to abide by the rules of conduct which lie upon him, according to the circumstances, usage or law, so as not to cause injury to another.” That was held (Peoples, para 58) to incorporate by reference the statutory duty of care on directors in the Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985, c C-44, s 122(1)(b).
 
104
The currently most authoritative exposition of the duty of care methodology is Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 79, [2001] 3 SCR 537.
 
105
CQLR, c CCQ-1991 {CcQ]; see Annex III.
 
106
Ibid. Art 1607 reads, “The creditor is entitled to damages for bodily, moral or material injury which is an immediate and direct consequence of the debtor’s default.”
 
107
Grenon and Bélanger-Hardy (2008), pp. 387–392 (direct injury and “another”), 418–424 (causation); Baudouin and Deslauriers (1998), pp. 157–170 (direct injury and “another”), 341–373 (causation).
 
108
2013 ONSC 1414, 116 OR (3d) 674.
 
109
Different subsidiaries had operated the mine at different times.
 
110
Choc v Hudbay Minerals Inc, 2013 ONSC 1414, 116 OR (3d) 674, para 43.
 
111
Ibid, p. 49.
 
112
Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 SCR 1022. Ontario law would also apply even if the tort was held to be committed in Guatemala, if the law of Guatemala was not proved.
 
113
Choc v Hudbay Minerals Inc, 2013 ONSC 1414, 116 OR (3d) 674, para 63–65.
 
114
Ibid, para 70.
 
115
2011 ONCA 191, 332 DLR (4th) 118.
 
116
Ibid, para 40–71.
 
117
Ibid, para 78.
 
118
Ibid, para 74–92.
 
119
2018 ONCA 1053, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38529 (8 August 2019).
 
120
In addition to the negligence claims there was a breach of fiduciary duty claim against Loblaws. This is technically not a tort claim because fiduciary obligations originated in the courts of Chancery in England, but for practical purposes here it can be regarded as a tort claim.
 
121
Limitation statutes are characterized as substantive in Canadian law: Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 SCR 1022.
 
122
Das v George Weston Ltd, 2017 ONSC 4129, para 525, 533.
 
123
Ibid, para 528.
 
124
Ibid, para 531.
 
125
In the course of doing so, Loblaws executives did visit Bangladesh and the New Wave premises; ibid, para 47.
 
126
Arbitration is governed by statute in each province. Both the common law and the civil law of Quebec traditionally refused to give arbitration agreements unquestioned effect, because of the policy against “ousting the jurisdiction” of a court. However, following international trends, statutes in the provinces now accept not only the legality but also the binding nature of arbitration agreements. For Quebec, see Civil Code of Québec, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3148.
 
127
SBC 2003, c 28 (in force 4 May 2006) [CJPTA (BC)].
 
128
Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act, SS 1997, c C-41.1 (in force 1 March 2004); Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act, SNS 2003 (2d Sess), c 2 (in force 1 June 2008). Yukon Territory has enacted it but not brought it into force: Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act, SY 2000, c 7. See Black et al. (2012).
 
129
CQLR, c CCQ-1991 {CcQ].
 
130
Walker (2005).
 
131
Pitel and Rafferty (2016).
 
132
Emanuelli (2006).
 
133
Goldstein and Groffier (1998).
 
134
CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 3(d).
 
135
Ibid, s 7.
 
136
The leading case on this ground of jurisdiction over a corporation is Chevron Corp v Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42, [2015] 3 SCR 69.
 
137
Ibid, para 78–89.
 
138
CcQ, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3148(1).
 
139
Ibid, art 307.
 
140
Ibid, art 3148(2). Residence is not a criterion that applies to a legal person because it is defined in art 77 as “the place where he [the person] ordinarily resides”.
 
141
Morguard Investments Ltd v De Savoye, [1990] 3 SCR 1077; Hunt v T & N plc, [1993] 4 SCR 289.
 
142
E.g., Best v Palacios, 2016 NBCA 59 (one accident in New Brunswick, the other in Massachusetts, USA).
 
143
CcQ, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3139.
 
144
Goldstein and Groffier (1998), pp. 336–338.
 
145
Obiter remarks were made about it in Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30, [2016] 1 SCR 851, para 33. These were criticized by the dissenting judge as an unnecessary pronouncement on the meaning of a provision of Quebec law that was not at issue in the case, which was an appeal from Ontario: ibid, para 120.
 
146
Walker (2005), § 11.2c. Ontario has already passed implementing legislation that will take effect when Canada becomes a party to the convention with application to Ontario: International Choice of Court Agreements Convention Act, 2017, SO 2017, c 2.
 
147
CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 3(c).
 
148
Walker (2005), § 11.2b; Pitel and Rafferty (2016), pp. 66–71.
 
149
CcQ, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3148(4).
 
150
Ibid, art 3148(3). These grounds were said to satisfy the constitutional requirement of a “real and substantial connection” with Quebec in Spar Aerospace Ltd v American Mobile Satellite Corp, 2002 SCC 78, [2002] 4 SCR 205.
 
151
Emanuelli (2006), p. 103.
 
152
Spar Aerospace Ltd v American Mobile Satellite Corp, 2002 SCC 78, [2002] 4 SCR 205 (both financial loss and loss of reputation pleaded).
 
153
CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 10(g) (presumed real and substantial connection). For the non-CJPTA provinces, the leading decisions on “tort committed in the province” are Moran v Pyle National (Canada) Ltd, [1975] 1 SCR 393 (products liability); Breeden v Black, 2011 SCC 19, [2012] 1 SCR 666 (defamation).
 
154
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, [2012] 1 SCR 572, para 89.
 
155
Below, under Q17.
 
156
It was mentioned several times in Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, [2012] 1 SCR 572, para 59, 82, and 86, only to emphasize the court was giving no opinion on it. Some lower courts have assumed it to be part of the common law: see, for example, Cook v 1293037 Alberta Ltd, 2016 ONCA 836; Forsythe v Westfall, 2015 ONCA 810, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 36716 (10 March 2016): West Van Inc v Daisley, 2014 ONCA 232, 119 OR (3d) 481; Ibrahim v Robinson, 2015 ONCA 21, 124 OR (3d) 106. However, no significant case has held that it applied. It was an alternative ground for jurisdiction in Obégi Chemicals LLC v Kilani, 2011 ONSC 1636.
 
157
2012 QCCA 117, [2012] RJQ 153, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 34733 (1 November 2012). A first instance decision, also finding the provision was not satisfied, was Droit de la famille — 14994, 2014 QCCS 1893.
 
158
As is required if an action is brought against a non-resident corporation based on its having an establishment in Quebec: above, under Q12(a).
 
159
Some first instance decisions are Sekela v Cordos, 2015 BCSC 732; Aleong v Aleong, 2013 BCSC 1428; Luu v Wang, 2013 BCSC 454; Lamothe v Lamothe, 2014 NSSC 137.
 
160
Josephson v Balfour Recreation Commission, 2010 BCSC 603, 10 BCLR (5th) 39, leave to appeal to BCCA granted, 2010 BCCA 339. It is understood that the appeal was discontinued.
 
161
The claims by the Eritrean plaintiffs in Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd, 2017 BCCA 401, 419 DLR (4th) 631, leave to appeal to SCC granted, 37919 (14 June 2018), might well have been ones that “could not reasonably be required” to be brought in Eritrea, but the defendant was a British Columbia corporation, which removed any jurisdictional difficulty as far as jurisdiction simpliciter (jurisdiction as a matter of law, as distinct from discretion) was concerned.
 
162
2015 SCC 42, [2015] 3 SCR 69.
 
163
Yaiguaje v Chevron Corp, 2018 ONCA 472, 423 DLR (4th) 687, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38183 (4 April 2019).
 
164
That is, a court that is regarded under Canadian private international law as having jurisdiction in respect of the claim; see below, under Q20.
 
165
See Dashwood (2007, 2012).
 
166
The forum non conveniens provisions in the CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 11, were identified with the common law principles relating to forum non conveniens in Teck Cominco Metals Ltd v Lloyd’s Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11, [2009] 1 SCR 321.
 
167
See the discussion of this provision in Spar Aerospace Ltd v American Mobile Satellite Corp, 2002 SCC 78, [2002] 4 SCR 205.
 
168
2017 BCCA 39, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37492 (8 June 2017).
 
169
CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 7(a).
 
170
“Chambers judge” is one of the terms used in some Canadian provinces for a judge dealing with pre-trial matters. In other provinces it is “motion judge”.
 
171
On this factor the court noted that the plaintiffs had not failed to pursue their rights in Guatemala, since they had joined their civil claims to a criminal proceeding there against Rotondo, the security manager, but the proceeding was suspended indefinitely when Rotondo fled to Peru: Garcia v Tahoe Resources Inc, 2017 BCCA 39, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37492 (8 June 2017), para 91–94.
 
172
Ibid, para 127–130.
 
173
Ibid, para 113.
 
174
Ibid, para 124.
 
175
Ibid, para 130.
 
176
2017 BCCA 401, 419 DLR (4th) 631, leave to appeal to SCC granted, 37919 (14 June 2018).
 
177
CJPTA (BC), SBC 2003, c 28, s 11.
 
178
2018 ONCA 1053, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38529 (8 August 2019).
 
179
Under Q8(c).
 
180
Das v George Weston Ltd, 2017 ONSC 4129, para 164–166.
 
181
Under Q8(c).
 
182
See below under Q17.
 
183
2010 QCCA 1455, aff’ng 2009 QCCS 4151, [2009] RJQ 2579 (sub nom Bil’in (Village Council) v Green Park International Inc).
 
184
2002 SCC 78, [2002] 4 SCR 205.
 
185
No 500-06-000034-971 (14 August 1998), 1998 CanLII 9780 (Que CS).
 
186
Ibid, para 88.
 
187
For Quebec, see CcQ, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3083(2).
 
188
Ibid, art 3111(1).
 
189
Ibid, art 3112.
 
190
Ibid, art 3113.
 
191
Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 SCR 1022.
 
192
Ibid, 1049–1050.
 
193
The Supreme Court itself has suggested, obiter, that the tort of libel could be governed, not by the lex loci delicti, which is the law of each jurisdiction where the defamatory material is published, but by the law of the jurisdiction where the most substantial harm is done to the plaintiff’s reputation: Éditions Écosociété Inc v Banro Corp, 2012 SCC 18, [2012] 1 SCR 636, para 56–61 (a case in which the alleged libel concerned the Banro company’s mining activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo). In Haaretz.comv Goldhar, 2018 SCC 28, 423 DLR (4th) 419, which held that jurisdiction should be declined on forum non conveniens grounds in a case of Internet libel, the three dissenting judges held that the “most substantial harm” test should not be adopted in Canada, two of the six majority judges held that it should, and the other four held that the case did not call for that issue to be decided.
 
194
Das v George Weston Ltd, 2018 ONCA 1053, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38529 (8 August 2019). See above, under Q8(c).
 
195
The same conclusion applied to the breach of fiduciary duty claim, which the motion judge regarded as “just a disguised negligence claim”: 2017 ONSC 4109, para 269.
 
196
2018 ONCA 1053, para 85–91.
 
197
Ibid, para 86.
 
198
Ibid, paras 100–126 (limitation), 127–216 (tort law). The Court of Appeal considered the latter point because, for a small subset of the plaintiff class, the limitation defence did not apply.
 
199
Ibid.
 
200
2017 ONSC 4109, para 291–295.
 
201
Ibid, para 296.
 
202
Ibid, para 298; 2018 ONCA 1053, para 94–95.
 
203
Beals v Saldanha, 2003 SCC 72, [2003] 3 SCR 416.
 
204
Ibid.
 
205
CcQ, CQLR, c CCQ-1991, art 3155(3) (contravention of the fundamental principles of procedure), 3155(5) (outcome of a foreign decision is manifestly inconsistent with public order as understood in international relations).
 
206
Ibid, art 3156. It also provides that even if service did comply with the stipulated law, the Québec authority may refuse recognition or enforcement if the judgment debtor proves that he or she was unable to acquaint him- or herself with the act instituting the proceedings or was not given sufficient time to offer a defence.
 
207
As that is defined in Huntington v Attrill, [1893] AC 150 (PC (Ont)).
 
208
See above under Q12(h).
 
209
Chevron Corp v Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42, [2015] 3 SCR 69.
 
210
Yaiguaje v Chevron Corp, 2018 ONCA 472, 423 DLR (4th) 687, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38183 (4 April 2019).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bakan J (2015) The invisible hand of law: private regulation and the rule of law. Cornell Int Law J 48:279–300 Bakan J (2015) The invisible hand of law: private regulation and the rule of law. Cornell Int Law J 48:279–300
Zurück zum Zitat Baudouin JL, Deslauriers P (1998) La responsabilité civile, 5ème éd. Yvon Blais, Cowansville QC Baudouin JL, Deslauriers P (1998) La responsabilité civile, 5ème éd. Yvon Blais, Cowansville QC
Zurück zum Zitat Black V, Pitel SGA, Sobkin M (2012) Statutory jurisdiction: an analysis of the court jurisdiction and proceedings transfer act. Carswell, Toronto Black V, Pitel SGA, Sobkin M (2012) Statutory jurisdiction: an analysis of the court jurisdiction and proceedings transfer act. Carswell, Toronto
Zurück zum Zitat Blyschak P (2014) Corporate liability for foreign corrupt practices under Canadian law. McGill Law J 59:655–705CrossRef Blyschak P (2014) Corporate liability for foreign corrupt practices under Canadian law. McGill Law J 59:655–705CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley SP (2009) BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders: the new fiduciary duties of fair treatment, statutory compliance and good corporate citizenship? Ottawa Law Rev 41:325–349 Bradley SP (2009) BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders: the new fiduciary duties of fair treatment, statutory compliance and good corporate citizenship? Ottawa Law Rev 41:325–349
Zurück zum Zitat Conway M (2015) A new duty of care? Tort liability from voluntary human rights due diligence in global supply chains. Queen’s Law J 40:741–784 Conway M (2015) A new duty of care? Tort liability from voluntary human rights due diligence in global supply chains. Queen’s Law J 40:741–784
Zurück zum Zitat Dashwood HS (2007) Canadian mining companies and corporate social responsibility: weighing the impact of global norms. Can J Polit Sci 40:129–156CrossRef Dashwood HS (2007) Canadian mining companies and corporate social responsibility: weighing the impact of global norms. Can J Polit Sci 40:129–156CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dashwood HS (2012) The rise of corporate social responsibility: mining and the spread of global norms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Dashwood HS (2012) The rise of corporate social responsibility: mining and the spread of global norms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duggan A, Ziegel JS, Girgis J (2014–2015) Canada’s enhanced CSR strategy: human rights due diligence and access to justice for victims of extraterritorial corporate human rights abuses. Can Bus Law J 56:167–207 Duggan A, Ziegel JS, Girgis J (2014–2015) Canada’s enhanced CSR strategy: human rights due diligence and access to justice for victims of extraterritorial corporate human rights abuses. Can Bus Law J 56:167–207
Zurück zum Zitat Emanuelli C (2006) Droit international privé Québécois, 2e éd. Wilson & Lafleur, Montréal Emanuelli C (2006) Droit international privé Québécois, 2e éd. Wilson & Lafleur, Montréal
Zurück zum Zitat Francis C (2005) Peoples Department Stores v Wise: the expanded scope of directors’ and officers’ fiduciary duties and duties of care. Can Bus Law J 41:175–183 Francis C (2005) Peoples Department Stores v Wise: the expanded scope of directors’ and officers’ fiduciary duties and duties of care. Can Bus Law J 41:175–183
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein G, Groffier E (1998) Droit international privé (2 vol). Yvon Blais, Montréal Goldstein G, Groffier E (1998) Droit international privé (2 vol). Yvon Blais, Montréal
Zurück zum Zitat Grenon A, Bélanger-Hardy L (2008) Elements of Quebec civil law: a comparison with the common law of Canada. Thompson Carswell, Toronto Grenon A, Bélanger-Hardy L (2008) Elements of Quebec civil law: a comparison with the common law of Canada. Thompson Carswell, Toronto
Zurück zum Zitat Kerr M, Janda R, Pitts C (2009) Corporate social responsibility: a legal analysis. LexisNexis, Markham ON Kerr M, Janda R, Pitts C (2009) Corporate social responsibility: a legal analysis. LexisNexis, Markham ON
Zurück zum Zitat Kuras RO (2000) Corporate social responsibility: a Canada-U.S. comparative analysis. Man Law J 28:303–319 Kuras RO (2000) Corporate social responsibility: a Canada-U.S. comparative analysis. Man Law J 28:303–319
Zurück zum Zitat Pitel SGA, Rafferty NS (2016) Conflict of laws, 2nd edn. Irwin Law, Toronto Pitel SGA, Rafferty NS (2016) Conflict of laws, 2nd edn. Irwin Law, Toronto
Zurück zum Zitat Podgorny M, Musgrove JB (2014) Foreign corrupt practices laws: implications for the Canadian natural resources sector. Asper Rev Int Bus Trade Law 14:161–187 Podgorny M, Musgrove JB (2014) Foreign corrupt practices laws: implications for the Canadian natural resources sector. Asper Rev Int Bus Trade Law 14:161–187
Zurück zum Zitat Posyniak T (2012) Realizing a “Pious Wish” of Peoples and BCE: enforcement of pluralist theory and corporate environmental responsibility. J Environ Law Pract 23:69–103 Posyniak T (2012) Realizing a “Pious Wish” of Peoples and BCE: enforcement of pluralist theory and corporate environmental responsibility. J Environ Law Pract 23:69–103
Zurück zum Zitat VanDuzer JA (2010) BCE v. 1976 Debentureholders: the Supreme Court hits and misses in its most important corporate law decision since peoples. UBC Law Rev 43:205–258 VanDuzer JA (2010) BCE v. 1976 Debentureholders: the Supreme Court hits and misses in its most important corporate law decision since peoples. UBC Law Rev 43:205–258
Zurück zum Zitat Waitzer E, Jaswal J (2009) Peoples, BCE and the good corporate “citizen”. Osgoode Hall Law J 41:439–496 Waitzer E, Jaswal J (2009) Peoples, BCE and the good corporate “citizen”. Osgoode Hall Law J 41:439–496
Zurück zum Zitat Walker J (2005) Castel & Walker: Canadian conflict of laws, 6th edn. LexisNexis, Toronto Walker J (2005) Castel & Walker: Canadian conflict of laws, 6th edn. LexisNexis, Toronto
Metadaten
Titel
Canada
verfasst von
Joost Blom
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35187-8_5

Premium Partner