Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Software and Systems Modeling
Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling 2/2014

01.05.2014 | Theme Section Paper

Change patterns

Co-evolving requirements and architecture

verfasst von: Koen Yskout, Riccardo Scandariato, Wouter Joosen

Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Change, such as in the requirements or the assumptions of a system, has a far-reaching impact across several software artifacts. This paper argues that patterns of co-evolution (or change patterns) can be observed between intertwined pairs of artifacts, like the requirements specification and the architectural design. The paper introduces change patterns as a precise framework to systematically capture and handle change. The approach is based on model-driven engineering concepts and is accompanied by a tool-supported process. Changing trust assumptions are presented as an example of security-related evolution, and are used to illustrate the approach. The approach is empirically validated by means of a controlled experiment involving 12 subjects, and a case study involving an industrial partner.
Vorheriger Artikel Introduction to the SoSyM theme issue on models and evolution
Nächster Artikel Evolution styles: foundations and models for software architecture evolution

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
This name refers to the anticipated change, and is used interchangeably with the situation after change.
 
2
By default, the different arguments of a pattern in VIATRA are bound injectively, i.e., always mapped to distinct elements, unless the pattern is declared using the ‘shareable’ keyword.
 
3
The material for replicating this experiment can be found on the change patterns website [38].
 
Literatur
1.
Barais, O., Le Meur, A.-F., Duchien, L., Lawall, J.L.: Software architecture evolution. In: Mens, T., Demeyer, S. (eds.) Software Evolution, pp. 262. Springer, Berlin (2008)
2.
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
3.
Bergmann, G., Horváth, Á., Ráth, I., Varró, D., Balogh, A., Balogh, Z., Ökrös, A.: Incremental evaluation of model queries over emf models. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2010), Norway. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6394, pp. 76–90. Springer, Berlin (2010)
4.
Bézivin, J.: Model driven engineering: an emerging technical space. In: Lämmel, R., Saraiva, J., Visser, J. (eds.) International Summer School on Generative and Transformational Techniques in Software Engineering (GTTSE 2005), Portugal. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4143, pp. 36–64. Springer, Berlin (2006)
5.
Carver, J., Jaccheri, L., Morasca, S.: A checklist for integrating student empirical studies with research and teaching goals. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(1), 35–59 (2010)CrossRef
6.
Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E.S.K.: Dealing with change: An approach using non-functional requirements. Requir. Eng. 1(4), 238–260 (1996)CrossRef
7.
Compagna, L., Khoury, P.E., Krausová, A., Massacci, F., Zannone, N.: How to integrate legal requirements into a requirements engineering methodology for the development of security and privacy patterns. Artif. Intell. Law 17(1), 1–30 (2009)CrossRef
8.
Côté, I., Heisel, M., Wentzlaff, I.: Pattern-based exploration of design alternatives for the evolution of software architectures. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 16(3/4), 341–365 (2007)CrossRef
9.
Ecklund, E.F., Delcambre, L.M.L., Freiling, M.J.: Change cases: Use cases that identify future requirements. In: Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA 1996). ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 31, pp. 342–358. ACM, New York (1996)
10.
11.
Ernst, N.A., Mylopoulos, J., Wang, Y.: Requirements evolution and what (research) to do about it. In: Lyytinen, K., Loucopoulos, P., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, B., Aalst, W., Mylopoulos, J. Rosemann, M., Shaw, M.J., Szyperski, C. (eds.) Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 14, pp. 186–214. Springer, Berlin (2009)
12.
European Commission. Seventh Framework Programme, FP7 ICT CALL 3: Objective ICT-2007.8.6: FET Proactive 6.
13.
Garlan, D., Barnes, J.M., Schmerl, B.R., Celiku, O.: Evolution styles: foundations and tool support for software architecture evolution. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture and European Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA/ECSA 2009), pp. 131–140. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2009)
14.
Garlan, D., Schmerl, B.R.: Ævol: A tool for defining and planning architecture evolution. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2009), pp. 591–594. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2009)
15.
Giorgini, P., Massacci, F., Zannone, N.: Security and trust requirements engineering. In: Aldini, A., Gorrieri, R., Martinelli, F. (eds.) Foundations of Security Analysis and Design III (FOSAD 2005 Tutorial Lectures). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3655, pp. 237–272. Springer, Berlin (2005)
16.
Haley, C.B., Laney, R.C., Moffett, J.D., Nuseibeh, B.: Security requirements engineering: a framework for representation and analysis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(1), 133–153 (2008)CrossRef
17.
Han, J.: Supporting impact analysis and change propagation in software engineering environments. In: International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP 1997), pp. 172–182 (1997)
18.
Heyman, T., Yskout, K., Scandariato, R., Schmidt, H., Yu, Y.: The security twin peaks. In: Erlingsson, Ú, Wieringa, R., Zannone, N. (eds.) International Symposium on Engineering Secure Software and Systems (ESSoS 2011). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6542, pp. 167–180. Springer, Berlin (2011)
19.
Kindler, E., Wagner, R.: Triple graph grammars: Concepts, extensions, implementations, and application scenarios. Technical Report tr-ri-07-284, Software Engineering Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (2007)
20.
Mens, T., Wermelinger, M., Ducasse, S., Demeyer, S., Hirschfeld, R., Jazayeri, M.: Challenges in software evolution. In: International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE 2005), pp. 13–22. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2005)
21.
Nhlabatsi, A., Nuseibeh, B., Yu, Y.: Security requirements engineering for evolving software systems: a survey. Int. J. Secure Softw. Eng. 1, 54–73 (2009)CrossRef
22.
Nuseibeh, B.: Weaving together requirements and architectures. IEEE Comput. 34(2), 115–117 (2001)CrossRef
23.
24.
25.
26.
Ráth, I., Varró, G., Varró, D.: Change-driven model transformations. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2009). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5795, pp. 342–356. Springer, Berlin (2009)
27.
Runeson, P.: Using students as experiment subjects—an analysis on graduate and freshmen student data. In: International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2003) (2003)
28.
Schürr, A.: Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Mayr, E.W., Schmidt, G., Tinhofer, G. (eds.) International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 1994). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 903, pp. 151–163. Springer, Berlin (1995)
29.
Schürr, A., Klar, F.: 15 years of triple graph grammars. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R. , Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) International Conference on Graph Transformations (ICGT 2008). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5214, pp. 411–425. Springer, Berlin (2008)
30.
31.
Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)
32.
Tamzalit, D., Mens, T.: Guiding architectural restructuring through architectural styles. In: Sterritt, R., Eames, B., Sprinkle, J. (eds.) International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS 2010), pp. 69–78. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2010)
33.
34.
Tichy, W.: Hints for reviewing empirical work in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 5(4), 309–312 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNet
35.
36.
37.
Yskout, K., Ben David, O.-N., Scandariato, R., Baudry, B.: Requirements-driven runtime reconfiguration for security. In: Moschitti, A., Scandariato, R., (eds.) International Workshop on Eternal Systems (EternalS 2011). Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 255. Springer, Berlin (2012)
38.
Metadaten
Titel
Change patterns
Co-evolving requirements and architecture
verfasst von
Koen Yskout
Riccardo Scandariato
Wouter Joosen
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Software and Systems Modeling / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1619-1366
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-1374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0276-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Software and Systems Modeling 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Theme Section Paper

Modeling and enforcing secure object flows in process-driven SOAs: an integrated model-driven approach

Theme Section Paper

Model-driven engineering of middleware-based ubiquitous services

Theme Section Paper

Unique identification of elements in evolving software models

Regular Paper

Automatic data collection for enterprise architecture models

Theme Section Paper

Extracting models from source code in software modernization

Regular Paper

Automated resolution of connector architectures using constraint solving (ARCAS method)