nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

22.09.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Characterization of raw swine waste and effluents treated anaerobically: parameters for Brazilian environmental regulation construction aiming agricultural use

verfasst von: Sarah Mello Leite Moretti, Edna Ivani Bertoncini, Cassio Hamilton Abreu-Junior

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In Brazil, swine raw waste from pig stall cleaning (SRW) represents an important water and nutrients sources for crops. However, treatment systems have been searched for to reduce its contaminant loads, making swine effluent agricultural use possible. Therefore, the study purpose was to evaluate agricultural use potential of swine effluents from anaerobic treatment system, considering current legislations. SRW was sieved and treated in anaerobic digester, with hydraulic retention times (HRT) equal to 100, 130, 30, 180 and 210 days. Treated effluent from digester (SEB) was diluted with water (SED) (1:50, v:v), simulating effluent characteristics from a complete treatment system. Chemical, physico-chemical, and microbiological parameters were determined in effluents. There were reductions of 80 to 90% in organic load, P, Ca, Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn and Mg contents. There were fecal coliforms and Salmonella spp. elimination. Nevertheless, there was other coliform bacteria growth. SEB presented EC, N-NH₄⁺, and Na values higher than standards for agricultural use. Cu and Zn contents of SEB were reduced only when HRT were higher than 100 days. Thus, treated swine effluent use should be regulated by agricultural and environmental criteria established by future legislation, considering most pollutants elements, such as N, Na and pathogens.

Vorheriger Artikel Elution control of radioactive cesium in MSWI fly ash using water repellent treatment

Nächster Artikel Enhanced phosphate removal by thermally pretreated waste oyster shells

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Brazilian Association of Animal Protein—ABPA (2018) Annual Report 2018. ABPA, São Paulo

Choudhary M, Bailey LD, Grant CA (1996) Review of the use of swine manure in crop production: effects on yield and composition and on soil and water quality. Waste Manag Res 14:581–595

Lorimor J, Powers W, Sutton A (2004) Manure characteristics. Manure Management Systems Series. MWPS, Iowa

Jha R, Berrocoso JFD (2016) Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 212:18–26

Novaes W (2001) Agrarian development dilemmas (in Portuguese). Estudos Avançados 15:51–60

Mateo-Sagasta J, Zadeh SM, Turral H (2017) Water pollution from agriculture: a global review. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

Meade G, Pierce K, O’Doherty JB, Mueller C, Lanigan G, Cabe MC, T, (2011) Ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions following land application of high and low nitrogen pig manures to winter wheat at three growth stages. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:208–217

Petersen SO, Sommer SG (2011) Ammonia and nitrous oxide interactions: roles of manure organic matter management. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:503–513

Congreves KA, Grant BB, Dutta B, Smith WN, Chantigny MH, Rochette P, Desjardins RL (2016) Predicting ammonia volatilization after field application of swine slurry: DNDC model development. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219:179–189

10.

Karr JD, Showers WJ, Gilliam W, Andres AS (2001) Tracing nitrate transport and environmental impact from intensive swine farming using delta nitrogen-15. J Environ Qual 30:1163–1175

11.

Karimi R, Akinremi W, Flaten D (2017) Cropping system and type of pig manure affect nitrate-nitrogen leaching in sandy loam soil. J Environ Qual 46:785–792

12.

Brooks JP, Adeli A, MClaughlin MR (2014) Microbial ecology, bacterial pathogens, and antibiotic resistant genes in swine manure wastewater as influenced by three swine managements systems. Water Res 57:96–103

13.

Ceretta CA, Girotto E, Lourenzi CR, Trentin G, Vieira RCB, Burnetto G (2010) Nutrient transfer by runoff under no tillage in a soil treated with successive applications of pig slurry. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:689–699

14.

Tiecher TL, Ceretta CA, Comin JJ, Girotto E, Miotto A, Moraes MP, Benedet L, Ferreira PAA, Lorenzi CR, Couto RR, Brunetto G (2013) Forms and accumulation of copper and zinc in a Sandy typic hapludalf soil after long-term application of pig slurry and deep litter. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 37:812–824

15.

Xu Y, Yu W, Ma Q, Zhou H (2013) Accumulation of copper and zinc in soil and plant within ten-year application of different pig manure rates. Plant Soil Environ 59:492–499

16.

Mallmann FJK, Santos DR, Bender MA, Gubiani E, Veiga M, Minella JPG, Vanoort F, Simunek J (2017) Modeling zinc and copper movement in an oxisol under long-term pig slurry amendments. Vadose Zone J 16:1–14

17.

Jacela JY, Derouchey M, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, Renter DR, Dritz SS (2010) Feed additives for swine: fact sheets—high dietary levels of copper and zinc for young pigs, and phytase. J Swine Health Prod 18:87–91

18.

Perdomo CC, Lima GJMMD, Nones K (2001) Pig production and environment (in Portuguese). Seminário Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Suinocultura, Gramado

19.

Moral R, Perezes-Murcia MD, Perez-Espinosa A, Moreno-Caselles J, Paredes C, Rufete B (2008) Salinity, organic content, micronutrients and heavy metals in pig slurries from South-eastern Spain. Waste Manag 28:367–371

20.

Lima GJMM, Scapini LB, Tevernari FC (2012) Comparison of nutritional requirements for castrated male pigs recommended by the Brazilian Tables (2011) and NRC (2012) (in Portuguese). Embrapa Swine & Poultry, Concórdia

21.

Bertoncini EI (2016) São Paulo's Agency develops pilot model to reuse pig manure (in Portuguese). Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Brasília

22.

Bertoncini EI (2012) The experiences of water reuse in rural areas (in Portuguese). Symposium of committees of the hydrographic basins of Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí rivers, São Pedro

23.

Lyberatos G, Skiadas IV (1999) Modelling of anaerobic digestion—a review. Glob Nest J 1:63–76

24.

Abdelgadir A, Chen X, Liu J, Xie X, Zhang J, Zhang K, Wang H, Liu N (2014) Characteristics, process parameters, and inner components of anaerobic reactors. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/841573CrossRef

25.

Garrido MG, Martínez SM, Cano AF, Yanardag AB, Arocena JM (2014) Soil fertility status and nutrients provided to spring barley (Hordeum distichon L.) by pig slurry. Chil J Agric Res 74:73–82

26.

Shcelegel AJ, Assefa Y, Bond HD, Haag L, Stone LR (2017) Changes in soil nutrients after 10 years of cattle manure and swine effluent application. Soil Till Res 172:48–58

27.

Schlegel AJ, Assefa Y, Bond HD, Wetter SM, Stone LY (2015) Corn response to long-term applications of cattle manure, swine effluent, and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy J 107:1701–1710

28.

Water Resource National Council—CNRH (2005) Resolution Nº 54 of November 28 (2005) Establishes modalities, guidelines and general criteria for direct reuse no potable of water and provides other measures (in Portuguese). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília

29.

Environmental Company of São Paulo State—CETESB (2015) Technical Norma P4.231: vinasse—criteria and procedures for application to agricultural soil (in Portuguese). CETESB, São Paulo

30.

Environmental Company of São Paulo State—CETESB (2010b) Technical Norm P4.002: effluents and sludge from the citrus industry—criteria and procedures for application to agricultural soil (in Portuguese). CETESB, São Paulo

31.

Environmental Company of São Paulo State—CETESB (2006). Technical Instruction Nº 31: application of reuse water from domestic sewage treatment plant in agriculture (in Portuguese). CETESB, São Paulo

32.

Eaton EA, Leonore S, Clesceri EWR, Arnold EA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA; AWWA; WEF, Washington

33.

Kempers AJ, Zweers A (1986) Ammonium determination in soil extracts by the salicylate methods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 17:715–723

34.

Yang JE, Skogley E, Schaff B, Kim J (1998) A simple spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in water, resin on soil extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1108–1111

35.

United States Environmental Protection—USEPA (2012) Guidelines establishing test procedures for the analysis of pollutants; analytical methods for biological pollutants in wastewater and sewage sludge: final rule. USEPA, Washington

36.

São Paulo (1976) Legislative Assembly. Decree No. 8468 of September 8, 1976. Approves the Regulation of Law No. 997 of May 31, 1976, which provides for the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution (in Portuguese). Diário Oficial do Estado, São Paulo

37.

Vivan M, Kunz A, Stolberg J, Perdomo C, Tchio VH (2010) Efficiency of biodigester and stabilization pond interaction in removal of swine manure pollutants (in Portuguese). Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 14:320–325

38.

Viancelli A, Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, Kich JD, Canal CW, Coldebella A, Esteves PA, Barardi CRM (2013) Performance of two swine manure treatments systems on chemical composition and on reduction of pathogens. Chemosphere 90:1539–1544

39.

Fernandes GW, Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, Szogi A, Vanotti A, Flores EMM, Dressler VL (2012) Chemical phosphorus removal: a clear strategy for piggery wastewater management in Brazil. Environ Technol 33:1677–1683

40.

Duda RM, Oliveira RA (2011) Treatment of swine wastewater in UASB reactor and anaerobic filter in series followed of trickling filter (in Portuguese). Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental 16:91–100

41.

Amaral AC, Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, Justi KC (2014) Zinc and copper distribution in swine wastewater treated by anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manag 141:132–137

42.

Szögi AA, Vanotti MB (2016) Decline of phosphorus, copper and zinc in anaerobic swine lagoon receiving pretreated influent. Sci Agric 73:417–423

43.

Meng X, Yu D, Wei Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Liu J, Wang Y (2018) Endogenous ternary pH buffer system with ammonia-carbonates-VFAs in high solid anaerobic digestion of swine manure: an alternative for alleviating ammonia inhibition? Process Biochem 69:144–152

44.

Mudhoo A, Kumar S (2013) Effects of heavy metals as stress factors on anaerobic digestion processes and biogas production from biomass. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:1383–1398

45.

National Research Council—NRC (2012) Nutrient requirements of swine. The National Academy Press, Washington

46.

Oliveira PAV (2002) Generation and management of swine manure (in Portuguese). In: Training in sustainable environmental practices, EMBRAPA, Concórdia

47.

Orrico Júnior MAP, Orrico ACA, Junior JL (2009) Anaerobic biodigestion of swine manure with and without separation of the solid fraction in different hydraulic retention times (in Portuguese). Engenharia Agrícola 29:474–482

48.

Carrington EG, Harman A, Pike EB (1982) Inactivation of Salmonella during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. J Appl Bacteriol 53:331–334

49.

World Health Organization—WHO (2000) Guidelines for the microbiological quality of treated wastewater used in agriculture: recommendations for revising WHO guidelines. Bull World Health Organ 78:1104–1106

50.

Environmental National Council—CONAMA (2005) Resolution Nº 357 of May 17, 2005: provides for water bodies classification and environmental guidelines for its classification, establishes conditions and standards for effluents discharge and provides other measures (in Portuguese). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília

51.

Unites States Environmental Protection—USEPA (2012) Guidelines for water reuse. USEPA, Washington

52.

Sato MI, Hachich EM, Menegon-Junior N, Melo AMJ, Coelho MCLS, di Bari M, Ramos SR (2008) Technical report—monitoring of Escherichia coli and thermotolerant coliforms at points in the network of evaluation of the quality of internal waters of the State of São Paulo (in Portuguese). CETESB, São Paulo

53.

Bilotta P, Kunz A (2013) Swine manure post-treatment technologies for pathogenic microorganisms inactivation. Eng Agríc 33:422–431

54.

Smith SR, Lang NL, Cheung KHM, Spanoudaki K (2005) Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manag 25:417–425

55.

Massé D, Gilbert Y, Topp E (2011) Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour Technol 102:641–646

56.

Larsen HE, Munch B, Schlundt J (1994) Use indicators for monitoring the reduction of pathogens in animal waste treated in biogas plants. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 5–6:544–555

57.

Higins MJ, Chen YC, Murtgy SN, Hendrickson D, Farrel J, Schafer P (2007) Reactivation and growth of non-culturable indicator bacteria in anaerobically digested biosolids after centrifuge dewatering. Water Res 41:665–673

58.

Luo J, Angelidaki I (2014) Analysis of bacterial communities and bacterial pathogens in a biogas plant by the combination of ethidium monoazide, PCR and Ion Torrent sequencing. Water Res 60:156–163

59.

Environmental Company of São Paulo State—CETESB (2010) Board Decision No. 388/2010/P of December 21, 2010: approval of premises and guidelines for the application of waste and effluents in agricultural soil in the São Paulo State (in Portuguese). Diário Oficial do Estado, Poder Executivo, Section 1:59–60

60.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations—FAO (1985) Water quality for agriculture. FAO, Rome

61.

Feigin A, Ravina I, Shalhevet J (1991) Irrigation with treated sewage effluent: management for environmental protection. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

62.

Gonçalves RAB, Folegatti MV, Gloaguen TV, Libardi PL, Montes CR, Lucas Y, Dias CTS, Melfi AJ (2007) Hydraulic conductivity of a soil irrigated whit treated sewage effluent. Geoderma 139:241–248

63.

Kessler NHC, Sampaio SC, Sorace M, Lucas SD, Palma D (2014) Swine wastewater associated with mineral fertilization on corn crop (Zea mays.). Eng Agríc 34:554–566

64.

Smith CJ, Oster JD, Sposito D (2015) Potassium and magnesium in irrigation water quality assessment. Agric Water Manag 157:59–64

65.

Possignolo NV, Bertoncini EI, Vitti AC (2017) Decomposition of the organic matter of natural and concentrated vinasse in sandy and clayey soils. Water Sci Technol 75:728–738

Titel: Characterization of raw swine waste and effluents treated anaerobically: parameters for Brazilian environmental regulation construction aiming agricultural use
verfasst von: Sarah Mello Leite Moretti
Edna Ivani Bertoncini
Cassio Hamilton Abreu-Junior
Publikationsdatum: 22.09.2020
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01115-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Preparation sequences and pretreatment optimization of alkali-activated red mud and blast furnace slag-based materials

Characterization of different types of electronic waste: heavy metal, precious metal and rare earth element content by comparing different digestıon methods

A novel humidity regulating material hydrothermally synthetized from concrete waste

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) and alumina recovery from waste artificial marble powder pyrolysis

Appraising different models for predicting biomethane potential: the case of avocado oil processing by-products

Deep learning of grasping detection for a robot used in sorting construction and demolition waste