nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. China–US Economic Cooperation as Antidote to Strategic Conflict

verfasst von : Jonathan Luckhurst

Erschienen in: G20 Since the Global Crisis

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Relations between the US and Chinese governments are crucially relevant to G20 cooperation. They are the two largest national economies in the world with the most important bilateral economic ties, and therefore prospects for cooperation or strategic confrontation between them are vital for the forum and broader international relations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel G20 Significance for Members and Non-members

Nächstes Kapitel Strategic Competition Probably Won’t Prevent G20 Cooperation

I am grateful to Ralph Carter of Texas Christian University for his helpful suggestion to clarify this point.

This reform was obstructed by opposition to the required legislation in the US Congress, but the Obama Administration continued to support it (Wee et al. 2014).

Accuracy of the value-added data and the Chinese balance-of-trade statistics has been questioned. However, there is clear evidence that the growth of China’s trade surplus with the USA has slowed since 2008.

Also see discussion in Schirm 2011, 1–2.

Ikenberry (2011, 302–309) claims that increased influence of leading developing states in multilateral security and economic fora would likely be a feature of any future “post-hegemonic liberal international order”.

The famous Chinese phrase attributed to Deng is “tao guang yang hui”.

See Finnemore and Sikkink (1998) for discussion of how international norms influence domestic policymaking. Also cf. Acharya (2004) on how localization of international norms to suit local circumstances tends to increase their effects on domestic policymaking. Normative shifts can occur both ways, not just from international actors influencing domestic politics; also norm entrepreneurs in the domestic politics of one country can succeed in influencing international norms, as the German green movement did during the 1980s.

Personal communication, 2014.

Also see discussion in Chen and Wang 2011.

Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.CrossRef

Acharya, A. (2014). Power shift or paradigm shift? China’s rise and Asia’s emerging security order. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 158–173.CrossRef

Adler, E. (1997). Imagined (security) communities: Cognitive regions in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26, 249–277.CrossRef

Anderlini, J. (2013). China trade data raises accuracy worries. Financial Times, April 10, from: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/c50f3068-a180-11e2-bae1-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2b1TratrW. Accessed September 19, 2015.

APEC. (2014). Annex A - The Beijing roadmap for APEC’s contribution to the realization of the FTAAP. Leaders’ Declarations, official APEC website. Weblink: http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2014/2014_aelm/2014_aelm_annexa.aspx. Accessed December 17, 2014.

Arakaki, R. (2013). Mitt Romney’s tough-on-China rhetoric and the 2012 presidential campaign. Asian Politics and Policy, 5(1), 151–154.CrossRef

Ba, A. (2006). Who’s socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 157–179.CrossRef

BBC. (2014). Denmark challenges Russia and Canada over North Pole. BBC News Website, December 15, from: www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30481309. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Bendini, R., & Troszczynska van Genderen, W. (2012). The EU constrained by the G20 in Los Cabos. Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies, European Parliament. Policy Briefing. June. Weblink: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/briefing_note/join/2012/491427/EXPO-AFET_SP(2012)491427_EN.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2014.

Blank, S. (2011). Toward a new Chinese order in Asia: Russia’s failure. The National Bureau of Asian Research. Special report 26, March.

Brewster, D. (2010). An Indian sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean. Security Challenges, 6(3), 1–20.

Brzezinski, Z. (2009). The group of two that could change the world. Financial Times(January 13).

Bureau of International Information Programs. (2012). Secretary Clinton on 40 years of U.S.-China relations, March 7. Weblink: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2012/03/201203081765.html#axzz2zjurdQhg. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Bureau of International Information Programs. (2013). Chinese President Xi, President Obama at G20 Summit, September 6. Weblink: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2013/09/20130906282306.html#axzz2zjurdQhg. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Buzan, B. (2010). China in international society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3, 5–36.CrossRef

Calmes, J., & Myers, S. (2013). Obama and Xi tackle Cybersecurity as talks begin in California. New York Times, from: www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/us/politics/obama-and-xi-open-informal-meetings-in-california.html. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Checkel, J. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826.CrossRef

Checkel, J. (2014). Mechanisms, process and the study of international Institutions. WZB discussion paper, No. SP IV 2014–104.

Chellaney, B. (2014). Japan’s Obama problem. Project Syndicate. January 8, from: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/brahma-chellaney-explains-why-america-s-response-to-china-s-new-air-defense-identification-zone-has-japanese-leaders-worried. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Chen, D., & Wang, J. (2011). Lying low no more? China’s new thinking on the Tao Guang Yang Hui strategy. China: An International Journal, 9(2), 195–216.

Chin, G. (2012). Responding to the global financial crisis: The evolution of Asian regionalism and economic globalization. ADBI. Working paper series, no. 343, January.

China Daily. (2009). China: US dollar to remain dominance for yrs. China Daily, July 6, from: www.chinadaily.com.cn/2009sed/2009-07/06/content_8468917.htm. Accessed September 19, 2015.

China Daily. (2013). Xi, Obama stress economic ties. June 10, from: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2013xivisit/2013-06/10/content_16601593.htm. Accessed March 14, 2014.

China Daily USA. (2013). China, US ‘ready to engage’ on TPP talks. November 1, from: http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-11/01/content_17075452.htm. Accessed March 14, 2014.

China Daily. (2014). Full text of agreement on climate change between China and US. China Daily. November 12, from: www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2014apec/2014-11/12/content_18903285.htm. Accessed September 19, 2015.

China Daily USA. (2014). Obama’s trip not to ‘contain’ China. April 22, from: http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/2014-04/22/content_17455559.htm. Accessed April 29, 2014.

Christoffersen, G. (2010). Russia’s breakthrough into the Asia-Pacific: China’s role. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 10(1), 61–91.CrossRef

Clinton, H., & Geithner, T. (2009). A new strategic and economic dialogue with China. Wall Street Journal. July 27, from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204886304574308753825396372.html. Accessed June 13, 2014.

CNN. (2012). Obama stresses economic roles with China’s expected new leader. February 15, from: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/14/world/asia/china-us-vp-visit/. Accessed March 14, 2014.

CNN. (2013). CNN international [television broadcast]. April 3. Atlanta: Cable News Network.

Coates, B., Horton, D., & McNamee, L. (2012). China: Prospects for export-driven growth. Economic Roundup, Issue 4. Australian Government, the Treasury. Weblink: http://www.treasury.gov.au/PublicationsAndMedia/Publications/2012/Economic-Roundup-Issue-4/HTML/article4. Accessed April 24, 2013.

Cooper, A. (2010). The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’ for the world. International Affairs, 86(3), 741–757.CrossRef

Cooper, A., & Farooq, A. (2013). BRICS and the privileging of informality in global governance. Global Policy, 4(4), 428–433.CrossRef

Cooper, A., & Thakur, R. (2013). The group of twenty (G20). New York: Routledge.

Denyer, S. and Harlan, C. (2013). China sends warplanes to new air defense zone after U.S., Japan, S. Korea incursions. Washington Post. November 28, from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/japan-south-korea-military-jets-cross-through-china-air-defense-id-zone/2013/11/28/6285d350-5816-11e3-bdbf097ab2a3dc2b_story.html. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Donnelly, S. (2013). A business perspective on a China – US bilateral investment treaty. Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 90. March 4.

Drezner, D. (2012). The irony of global economic governance: The system worked. International Institutions and Global Governance Program - The Council on Foreign Relations. Working paper. October.

Dyer, G. (2010). Brazil and India add to pressure on China. Financial Times, April 21, from: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1d692fd2-4d1c-11df-baf3-00144feab49a.html. Accessed August 12, 2014.

Farrell, H., & Quiggin, J. (2012). Consensus, dissensus and economic ideas: The rise and fall of Keynesianism during the economic crisis. Center for the Study of Development Strategies, from: http://www.henryfarrell.net/Keynes.pdf. Accessed on July 5, 2012.

Featherstone, K. (2011). The Greek sovereign debt crisis and EMU: A failing state in a skewed regime. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(2), 193–217.CrossRef

Ferdinand, P., & Wang, J. (2013). China and the IMF: From mimicry towards pragmatic international institutional pluralism. International Affairs, 89(4), 895–910.CrossRef

Finnemore, M. (2014). Dynamics of global governance: Building on what we know? International Studies Quarterly, 58, 21–24.CrossRef

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRef

Fountain, H., & Schwartz, J. (2014). Climate accord relies on environmental policies now in place. New York Times. November 12, from: www.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/world/climate-pact-by-us-and-china-relies-on-policies-now-largely-in-place.html?_r=0. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Friedberg, A. (2005). The future of U.S.—China relations. Is conflict inevitable? International Security, 30(2), 7–45.CrossRef

G20. (2009a). London summit – Leaders’ statement 2 April 2009. G20 Leader Forum, April 2, from: g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/London_Declaration_0.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Garrett, G. (2010). G2 in G20: China, the United States and the world after the global financial crisis. Global Policy, 1(1), 29–39.CrossRef

Glaser, B., & Medeiros, E. (2007). The changing ecology of foreign policy-making in China: The ascension and demise of the theory of peaceful rise. The China Quarterly, 190, 291–310.CrossRef

Glosny, M. (2010). China and the BRICS: A real (but Limited) partnership in a unipolar world. Polity, 42(1), 100–129.CrossRef

Grimes, W. (2011). The Asian monetary fund reborn? Implications of Chiang Mai initiative multilateralization. Asia Policy, 11, 79–104.

Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 491–517.CrossRef

Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: Ideals, realities and deficiencies. Cambridge: Polity.

Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200.CrossRef

Hopf, T. (2010). The logic of habit in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561.CrossRef

Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

IMF Diversity Council (2007). IMF diversity annual report 2007. Washington, DC: IMF.

IMF Diversity Council (2013). IMF Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report 2013. Washington, DC: IMF.

James, H. (2011). International order after the financial crisis. International Affairs, 87(3), 525–537.CrossRef

Johnston, A. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 487–515.CrossRef

Johnston, A. I. (2008). Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnston, A. I. (2013). How new and assertive is China’s new assertiveness? International Security, 37(4), 7–48.CrossRef

Keating, J. (2012). What happens after you label a country a currency manipulator? Foreign Policy. October 17. Weblink: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/10/17/what_happens_after_you_label_a_country_a_currency_manipulator. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Kelley, J. (2004). International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International Organization, 58(2004), 425–457.

Keohane, R., & Martin, L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51.CrossRef

Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753.CrossRef

Krugman, P. (2012). End this depression now! New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Lake, D. (2010). Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 587–613.CrossRef

Lakshmanan, I. (2009). Clinton urges China to keep buying U.S. treasury securities. Bloomberg. February 22, from: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=apSqGtcNsqSY. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Landler, M. (2014). On a trip that avoids Beijing, Obama keeps his eye on China. New York Times. April 26. Accessed from: www.nytimes.com/2014/4/27/world/asia/on-a-trip-that-avoids-beijing-obamas-eyes-remain-on-china.html

Lange, J. (2014). U.S. sees hurdles to China joining Pacific trade pact. Reuters. January 23, from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/23/us-usa-china-trade-idUSBREA0M1LV20140123. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Lawder, D., & Wroughton, L. (2013). Obama seeks authority for IMF voting reforms. Reuters. March 6, from: www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/06/us-imf-usa-id92501M20130306. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Lieberthal, K. (2011). The American pivot to Asia. Foreign Policy (December 21).

Lim, D., & Vreeland, J. (2013). Regional organizations and international politics: Japanese influence over the Asian Development Bank and the UN Security Council. World Politics, 65, 34–72.CrossRef

Luckhurst, J. (2012). The G20 and ad hoc embedded liberalism: Economic governance amid crisis and dissensus. Politics & Policy, 40(5), 740–782.CrossRef

Luckhurst, J. (2013). Building cooperation between the BRICS and leading industrialized states. Latin American Policy, 4(2), 251–268.CrossRef

Luckhurst, J. (2015). Latin America in the G20: Insiders or outsiders? Latin American Policy, 6(1), 19–40.CrossRef

Malik, M. (2011). China and India: Great power rivals. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.

Manyin, M., et al. (2012). Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama administration’s ‘rebalancing’ toward Asia. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, No. R42448, March.

Mattoo, A., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2013). Measuring trade in value added when production is fragmented across countries: An overview. In W. Mattoo, Z. Wang, & S.-J. Wei (Eds.), Trade in value added: Developing new measures of cross-border trade (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.

Maurer, A., & Degain, C. (2010). Globalization and trade flows: What you see is not what you get! Staff Working Paper ERSD-2010-12. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

McKinnon, R., & Schnabl, G. (2014). China’s exchange rate and financial repression: The conflicted emergence of the Renminbi as an international currency. CESifo, Working paper no. 4649.

Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.CrossRef

Mearsheimer, J. (2010). China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3, 381–396.CrossRef

Morrison, W. (2009). China and the global financial crisis: Implications for the United States. Congressional research service report for congress. No. RS22984. April 2.

Morrison, W. (2011). China—U.S. trade issues. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, No. RL33536. August 29.

Nye, J. (2010). American and Chinese power after the financial crisis. The Washington Quarterly, 33(4), 143–153.CrossRef

Nye, J. (2013). BRICS without mortar. Project Syndicate, from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-brics-will-not-work-by-joseph-s–nye. Accessed April 23, 2013.

People’s Daily. (2012). G20 summit starts, Chinese president expected to speak on growth. People’s Daily. June 19, from: http://english.people.com.cn/90883/7850379.html. Accessed June 10, 2014.

Petri, P., Plummer, M., & Zhai, F. (2011). The trans-Pacific partnership and Asia-Pacific integration: A quantitative assessment. East—West Center Working Papers, 119, October.

Pettis, M. (2013). The great rebalancing: Trade, conflict, and the perilous road ahead for the world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Prasad, E., & Sorkin, I. (2009). Assessing the G-20 stimulus plans: A deeper look. Brookings Institution. March. Weblink: http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2009/03/g20-stimulus-prasad. Accessed June 12, 2014.

Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.CrossRef

Rodrik, D. (2013). What the world needs from the BRICS. Project Syndicate. April 10, from: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-brics-and-global-economic-leadership-by-dani-rodrik#0ATec7bLFT24jkKk.99. Retrieved April 21, 2013.

Rudd, K. (2009). The global financial crisis (pp. 20–29). Australian Politics, Society & Culture: The Monthly.

Sachs, G. (2011). The BRICs remain in the fast lane. BRICs Monthly, 11(6).

Schirm, S. (2011). The G20, emerging powers, and transatlantic relations. Paper Series. Washington, DC: Transatlantic Academy.

Sevastopulo, D. (2013). China air zone divides US and its allies. Financial Times. December 2, from: www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7927a56e-5b47-11e3-a2ba-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3mXLgnOWi. Accessed September 19, 2005.

Shambaugh, D. (2013). China goes global: The partial power. New York: Oxford University Press.

State Council Information Office. (2009). China’s national defense in 2008. Chinese Government’s official web portal, from: http://www.gov.cn/english/official/2009-01/20/content_1210227_2.htm. Accessed April 23, 2013.

Swaine, M. (2010). Perceptions of an Assertive China. China Leadership Monitor, No. 32, May, from:

Tiezzi, S. (2014). Small but positive signs at Western Pacific Naval Symposium. The diplomat. http://thediplomat.com/2014/04/small-but-positive-signs-at-western-pacific-naval-symposium/. Accessed 24 Apr 2014.

U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2012). Report to congress on international economic and exchange rate policies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury. May 25. Weblink: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/exchange-rate-policies/Documents/Foreign%20Exchange%20Report%20May%202012.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2014.

U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2013). U.S. – China strategic and economic dialogue. U.S. Department of the Treasury Website, from: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/Pages/china.aspx. Accessed March 14, 2014.

U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2014). Report to congress on international economic and exchange rate policies. U.S. Department of the Treasury. April 15, from: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/exchange-rate-policies/Documents/2014-4-15_FX%20REPORT%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2014.

Wee, S.-L., Daniel, F., Lee, V., & Yukhananov, A. (2014). China urges IMF to give more power to emerging markets. Reuters. January 15, from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/15/us-china-imf-idUSBREA0E1PT20140115. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Welch, D. (2013). What’s an ADIZ? Why the United States, Japan and China get it wrong. Foreign Affairs. December 9, from: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/east-asia/2013-12-09/whats-adiz. Accessed September 19, 2015.

White House. (2012). Remarks by President Obama at press conference after G20 summit. White House. June 19, from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2012/06/19/president-obama-holds-press-conference-g20-summit#transcript. Accessed June 10, 2014.

Widmaier, W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–759.CrossRef

Wilson, S., & Wan, W. (2013). Obama, Xi summit could help define U.S.-China relationship for years to come. Washington Post. June 5, from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-xi-summit-could-help-define-us-china-relationship-for-years-to-come/2013/06/05/d8ddef76-cd27-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html. Accessed September 19, 2015.

Woods, N. (2010). Global governance after the financial crisis: A new multilateralism or the last gasp of the great powers? Global Polity, 1(1), 51–63.CrossRef

Xinhuanet. (2013). Commentary: Xi-Obama summit opens new chapter in China–U.S. relations. June 10, from: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-06/10/c_132444854_2.htm. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Zoellick, R. (2005). Whither China: From membership to responsibility? Remarks to National Committee on U.S.-China Relations. New York: U.S. Department of State Archive. September 21, 2005. Weblink: http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Zoellick, R., & Lin, J. (2009). Recovery: A job for China and the U.S. Washington Post. March 6, from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/05/AR2009030502887.html. Accessed March 14, 2014.

Titel: China–US Economic Cooperation as Antidote to Strategic Conflict
verfasst von: Jonathan Luckhurst
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan US
Buch: G20 Since the Global Crisis
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55145-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-55147-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55147-4_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partner