nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

15.09.2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Circular economy pattern of livestock manure management in Longyou, China

verfasst von: Xiangbo Xu, Zhong Ma, Yuqiao Chen, Xiaoming Gu, Qingyang Liu, Yutao Wang, Mingxing Sun, Dunhu Chang

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The development of biogas programs in rural China has led to great economic, social, ecological and environmental benefits. The focus of this study was the identification of the benefit relationship for various stakeholders via the evaluation of relevant policies, an analysis of the costs and benefits and an estimation of the environmental benefits of the livestock manure utilization in a biogas power generation company (BPGC) in Zhejiang province. The results demonstrated that the net present value (NPV) of the project was 8.85 million dollar, and the internal rate of return (IRR) was 36%. Compared to current projects, the BPGC had a higher investment potentiality. The annual environmental benefits of chemical oxygen demand and NH₃–N reduction are 2.61 million dollar and 0.21 million dollar, respectively. The environmental benefits of the reduction of greenhouse gas emission is 1.54 million dollar/a. When the environmental benefits were considered in the cost–benefit analysis, the NPV of the project was 42.01 million dollar, and the IRR was 123.98%, and the BPGC exhibited significant social benefits. The government took advantage of a public–private partnership model to reach a common balance of benefits among government, enterprise, hog farms and the residents.

Vorheriger Artikel Morphology, pore size distribution, and nutrient characteristics in biochars under different pyrolysis temperatures and atmospheres

Nächster Artikel Potential recyclable materials derived from riverine litter at log boom Sungai Batu in Kuala Lumpur

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) (2014) China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

Livestock Yearbook Editing Committee (LYEC) (2000) China livestock yearbook. China Agricultural Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

Livestock Yearbook Editing Committee (LYEC) (2011) China livestock yearbook. China Agricultural Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

Ministry of Agriculture (CMA) (1999) Chinese organic fertilizer resources. China Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

The Chinese environmental bulletin (2004). State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), Beijing (in Chinese)

Ongley ED, Zhang X, Yu T (2010) Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution assessment in china. Environ Pollut 158(5):1159–1168. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.047 CrossRef

The first national pollution census bulletin (2010). National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Beijing (in Chinese)

Liu B, Liu H, Zhang B, Bi J (2013) Modeling nutrient release in the tai lake basin of china: source identification and policy implications. Environ Manage 51(3):724–737. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9999-y CrossRef

Demirel B, Göl NP, Onay TT (2013) Erratum to: evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 15(3):409–409. doi:10.1007/s10163-013-0142-9 CrossRef

10.

Zhang H, Luo Y, Wu L, Huang Y, Christie P (2015) Residues and potential ecological risks of veterinary antibiotics in manures and composts associated with protected vegetable farming. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(8):5908–5918. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3731-9 CrossRef

11.

Sungur A, Soylak M, Yilmaz S, Ozcan H (2016) Heavy metal mobility and potential availability in animal manure: using a sequential extraction procedure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18(3):563–572. doi:10.1007/s10163-015-0352-4 CrossRef

12.

Li F, Cheng S, Yu H, Yang D (2016) Waste from livestock and poultry breeding and its potential assessment of biogas energy in rural China. J Clean Product 126:451–460. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.104 CrossRef

13.

Galka A (2004) Using a cleaner production preventive strategy for the reduction of the negative environmental impacts of agricultural production—using cattle husbandry as a case study. J Clean Product 12(5):513–516. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00108-2 CrossRef

14.

Choi YS, Sang KC, Kim SJ, Han SY, Du SJ, Yoon TH et al (2017) Development of combined plant of biogas and bio solid-refuse-fuel from swine manure slurry. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. doi:10.1007/s10163-017-0594-4

15.

Fujino J, Morita A, Matsuoka Y, Sawayama S (2005) Vision for utilization of livestock residue as bioenergy resource in Japan. Biomass Bioenerg 29(5):367–374. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.06.017 CrossRef

16.

Skoulou V, Zabaniotou A (2007) Investigation of agricultural and animal wastes in Greece and their allocation to potential application for energy production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(8):1698–1719. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.011 CrossRef

17.

Tsai WT, Lin CI (2009) Overview analysis of bioenergy from livestock manure management in Taiwan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2682–2688. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.018 CrossRef

18.

Bidart C, Fröhling M, Schultmann F (2014) Livestock manure and crop residue for energy generation: macro-assessment at a national scale. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38(5):537–550. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.005 CrossRef

19.

Nhu TT, Dewulf J, Serruys P, Huysveld S, Nguyen CV, Sorgeloos P, Schaubroecka T (2015) Resource usage of integrated pig-biogas-fish system: partitioning and substitution within attributional life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 102:27–38. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.011 CrossRef

20.

Wang XJ, Lu XG, Yang GH, Feng YZ, Ren GX, Han XH (2016) Development process and probable future transformations of rural biogas in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:703–712. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.097 CrossRef

21.

Lee Y, Oa SW (2016) Resource-recovery processes from animal waste as best available technology. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18(2):201–207. doi:10.1007/s10163-015-0422-7 CrossRef

22.

Petersen SO, Sommer SG, Béline F, Burton C, Dach J, Dourmad JY et al (2007) Recycling of livestock manure in a entire-farm perspective. Livest Sci 112(3):180–191. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.001 CrossRef

23.

Walla C, Schneeberger W (2008) The optimal size for biogas plants. Biomass Bioenerg 32(6):551–557. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009 CrossRef

24.

Gebrezgabher SA, Meuwissen MPM, Prins BAM, Lansink AGJMO (2010) Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion—a case of Green power biogas plant in The Netherlands. Njas Wagening J Life Sci 57(2):109–115. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.006 CrossRef

25.

Smyth BM, Smyth H, Murphy JD (2010) Can grass biomethane be an economically viable biofuel for the farmer and the consumer? Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4(5):519–537. doi:10.1002/bbb.238 CrossRef

26.

Lantz M (2012) The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden—a comparison of different CHP technologies. Appl Energy 98(1):502–511. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.015 CrossRef

27.

Zheng CH, Yi L, Bluemling B, Mol APJ, Chen JN (2014) Environmental potentials of policy instruments to mitigate nutrient emissions in Chinese livestock production. Sci Total Environ 502C:149–156. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.004

28.

Pan D, Zhou G, Zhang N, Zhang L (2016) Farmers’ preferences for livestock pollution control policy in china: a choice experiment method. J Clean Product 131:572–582. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.133 CrossRef

29.

Chen Y, Wang SJ, Chungchou T, Zhang CJ (2016) Assessment of subsidies to minimize environmental pollution by Intensive Hog Feeding Operation (IHFO). J Clean Product 112:2529–2535. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.090 CrossRef

30.

Brown BB, Yiridoe EK, Gordon R (2007) Impact of single versus multiple policy options on the economic feasibility of biogas energy production: swine and dairy operations in Nova Scotia. Energy Policy 35(9):4597–4610. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.023 CrossRef

31.

Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

32.

Sun B, Zhang L, Yang L, Zhang F, Norse D, Zhu Z (2012) Agricultural non-point source pollution in china: causes and mitigation measures. J Hum Environ 41(4):370–379. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0249-6 CrossRef

33.

Sunstein CR (2004) Cost-Benefit analysis and the environment. Soc Sci Electron Publ 115(2):195–221. doi:10.1007/BF01888891

34.

Sgroi F, Foderà M, Trapani AMD, Tudisca S, Testa R (2015) Cost-benefit analysis: a comparison between conventional and organic olive growing in the Mediterranean Area. Ecol Eng 82:542–546. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.043 CrossRef

35.

Xiong XO, Li YX, Li W, Lin CY, Han W, Yang M (2010) Copper content in animal manures and potential risk of soil copper pollution with animal manure use in agriculture. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(11):985–990. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.005 CrossRef

36.

Wu X, Wu F, Tong X, Wu J, Sun L, Peng X (2015) Emergy and greenhouse gas assessment of a sustainable, integrated agricultural model (SIAM) for plant, animal and biogas production: analysis of the ecological recycle of wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 96:40–50. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.010 CrossRef

37.

State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2002) The pollution investigation and prevention countermeasures of Chinese scale livestock and poultry breeding. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

38.

Yan TZ, Du HY, Xia W, Cheng B, Zheng F (2009) Poultry and animal feces pollution situation and countermeasures in Anhui province (in Chinese). Agro-Environ Dev 26(2):58–62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4944.2009.02.018

39.

Zhang XM, Dong YH, Wang H, Shen D (2007) Pollution of livestock and poultry feces in jiangsu and countermeasures (in Chinese). Soils 39(5):708–712. doi:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2007.05.020

40.

ACM0010 (2006) Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reductions from manure management systems [EB/OL]. http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/index.html

41.

IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories Agriculture, forestry and other land use, vol 4. IGES, Japan

42.

State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2004) The pollution coefficient table of livestock and poultry breeding. http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/zj/wj/200910/t20091022_172271.htm. Accessed 6 Mar 2016

43.

National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2009) Chinese regional power grid baseline emission factor. http://qhs.ndrc.gov.cn/qjfzjz/200907/t20090703_289357.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2016

44.

Wang Z, Xiao ZY, Dai Y (2009) CDM project of large-scaled animal farms in arid region and estimation of greenhouse gas mitigation (in Chinese). J Ecol Rural Environ 25(4):1–7. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2009.04.001

45.

Ma RH, Ding YF, Nan GL, Ma ZH (2008) Economic evaluation of scale pig farm methane project based on the clean development mechanism (in Chinese). Chin J Anim Sci 44(17):50–52

46.

Hong YZ, Lin B, Dai YW, Yu JH (2010) Economic benefits evaluation of large-scale pig farm biogas project based on sensitivity analysis (in Chinese). Chin Agric Sci Bull 26(14):388–391

47.

Wang XL, Chen YQ, Peng S, Gao WS, Feng Q, Xia W (2014) Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA. J Clean Product 65(4):234–245. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001 CrossRef

48.

Chen Y, Hu W, Feng Y, Sweeney S (2014) Status and prospects of rural biogas development in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39(6):679–685. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.119 CrossRef

49.

Rasheed R, Khan N, Yasar A, Su YH, Tabinda AB (2016) Design and cost-benefit analysis of a novel anaerobic industrial bioenergy plant in Pakistan. Renew Energy 90:242–247. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.008 CrossRef

50.

He Z, Peng J (2015) Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig-breeding with different size in sichuan province of China. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 34(5):1488–1496. doi:10.1002/ep.12139 CrossRef

51.

Sorda G, Sunak Y, Madlener R (2013) An agent-based spatial simulation to evaluate the promotion of electricity from agricultural biogas plants in Germany. Ecol Econ 89(3):43–60. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.022 CrossRef

52.

Rupf GV, Bahri PA, Boer KD, Mchenry MP (2015) Barriers and opportunities of biogas dissemination in Sub-Saharan Africa and lessons learned from Rwanda, Tanzania, China, India, and Nepal. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:468–476. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.107 CrossRef

53.

Wang HL, Fan M, Luo CL, Xi XP, Shi JM, Sun LY (2014) Case study on carbon dioxide reduction of biogas power generation in large-scale pig farm (in Chinese). Jiangxi Sci 32(5):674–678. doi:10.13990/j.issn1001-3679.2014.05.021

54.

Stürmer B, Schmid E, Eder MW (2011) Impacts of biogas plant performance factors on total substrate costs. Biomass Bioenerg 35(4):1552–1560. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.030 CrossRef

55.

Wang XL, Li ZJ, Long P, Yan LL, Gao WS, Chen YQ, Sui P (2016) Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting. Resour Conserv Recycl 117:114–124. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.009 CrossRef

56.

León E, Martín M (2016) Optimal production of power in a combined cycle from manure based biogas. Energy Convers Manage 114:89–99. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.002 CrossRef

Titel: Circular economy pattern of livestock manure management in Longyou, China
verfasst von: Xiangbo Xu
Zhong Ma
Yuqiao Chen
Xiaoming Gu
Qingyang Liu
Yutao Wang
Mingxing Sun
Dunhu Chang
Publikationsdatum: 15.09.2017
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0667-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Waste to energy: power generation potential of putrescible wastes by anaerobic digestion process at Hyderabad, Pakistan

Synthesis and characterization of drinking water treatment plant sludge-incorporated Portland cement

Preparation and characterization of high surface area activated carbon from pine wood sawdust by fast activation with H3PO4 in a spouted bed

Influence of population, income and electricity consumption on per capita municipal solid waste generation in São Paulo State, Brazil

The development of landfill operation and management in Indonesia

Landfill leachate enhances fermentative hydrogen production from glucose and sugarcane processing derivatives