Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Co-creation or Public Participation 2.0? An Assessment of Co-creation in Transport and Mobility Research Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Co-creation of Local Mobility Solutions: Lessons from the Mobility Lab in Hamburg-Altona

verfasst von : K. Tatum, T. Cekic, A. Landwehr, J. Noennig, J. Knieling, B. Schroeter

Erschienen in: Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe 2

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Altona Mobility Lab, part of the EU project “Cities-4-People” funded by Horizon 2020, seeks to implement locally developed mobility solutions through a dedicated co-creative approach. The Lab demonstrates the process of community building, ideation, and implementation for user-centric mobility solutions and provides an example of co-creation in implementation of neighborhood-level mobility solutions. This paper addresses key considerations of public participation and provides a model for considering challenges faced and addressed by Urban Living Labs. The analysis of the Altona Mobility Lab process demonstrates the potential successes and obstacles for the Living Lab method for the participative development of user-centric sustainable mobility solutions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Co-creation or Public Participation 2.0? An Assessment of Co-creation in Transport and Mobility Research
Nächstes Kapitel Sustainable Mobility Solutions at Neighbourhood Level: Enabling Insights, Success Stories and Solutions
Literatur
1.
Veeckman, C., Van der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 5(3), 6–17 (2015)CrossRef
2.
Scholl, C., Kemp, R.: City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Plan. 1(4), 89–102 (2016)CrossRef
3.
Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., Schliwa, G.: Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 123, 45–54 (2016)CrossRef
4.
von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Coenen, L.: Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. Eur. Plan. Stud. 54(4), 1–29 (2018)
5.
Booth, C., Richardson, T.: Placing the public in integrated transport planning. Transp. Policy 8(2), 141–149 (2001)CrossRef
6.
Gil, A., Calado, H., Bentz, J.: Public participation in municipal transport planning processes – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1309–1319 (2011)CrossRef
7.
Ballon, P., Schuurman, D.: Living labs: concepts, tools and cases. Info 17(4), 1–11 (2015)CrossRef
8.
Franz, Y., Tausz, K., Thiel, S.: Contextuality and co-creation matter: a qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 5(12), 48–55 (2015)CrossRef
9.
Juujärvi, S., Lund, V.: Enhancing early innovation in an urban living lab: lessons from Espoo, Finland. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 6(1), 17–26 (2016)CrossRef
10.
Scholl, C., de Kraker, J., Hoeflehner, T., Wlasak, P., Drage, T., Eriksen, M.: Transitioning urban experiments: reflections on doing action research with urban labs. GAIA 27(1), 78–84 (2018)CrossRef
11.
Steen, K., Van Bueren, E.: The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 7(7), 21–33 (2017)CrossRef
12.
Brodie E., Cowling E., Nissen, N., Paine, A.E., Jochum, V., Warburton, D.: Understanding Participation: A Literature Review. Pathways Through Participation (2009)
13.
Khisty, C.J.: Citizen involvement in the transportation planning process: what is and what ought to be. J. Adv. Transp. 34(1), 125–142 (2000)CrossRef
14.
Mahjabeen, Z., Shrestha, K., Dee, J.A.: Rethinking community participation in urban planning: the role of disadvantaged groups in Sydney metropolitan strategy. In: Proceedings of 32nd ANZRSAI Conference (2008)
15.
Erkul, M., Yitmen, I., Çelik, T.: Stakeholder engagement in mega transport infrastructure projects. Procedia Eng. 161, 704–710 (2016)CrossRef
16.
Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C., Stringer, L.: Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manage. 90(5), 1933–1949 (2009)CrossRef
17.
Bisschops, S., Beunen, R.: A new role for citizens’ initiatives: the difficulties in co-creating institutional change in urban planning. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 15(1), 1–16 (2018)
18.
Fiorina, M.P.: Extreme voices: a dark side of civic engagement. In: Skocpol, T., Fiorina, M.P. (eds.) Civic Engagement in American Democracy, pp. 395–426. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (1999)
19.
Hampshire, K., Hills, E., Iqbal, N.: Power relations in participatory research and community development: a case study from Northern England. Hum. Organ. 64(4), 340–349 (2005)CrossRef
20.
Fung, A.: Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm. Rev. 75(4), 513–522 (2015)CrossRef
21.
Bickerstaff, K., Walker, G.: Shared visions, unholy alliances: power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning. Urban Stud. 42(12), 2123–2144 (2005)CrossRef
22.
Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., Walker, G.: Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. J. Transp. Geogr. 10(1), 61–73 (2002)CrossRef
23.
International Association for Public Participation: Spectrum of Public Participation (2007)
24.
Stelzle, B., Noenning, J.R.: A method for the assessment of public participation in urban development. Urban Dev. Issues 61, 33–40 (2019)CrossRef
25.
Puerari, E., de Koning, J., von Wirth, T., Karré, P., Mulder, I., Loorbach, D.: Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability 10(6), 1893 (2018)CrossRef
26.
Smith, P.D., McDonough, M.H.: Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Soc. Nat. Res. 14(3), 239–249 (2001)CrossRef
27.
Rauschmayer, F., Risse, N.: A framework for the selection of participatory approaches for SEA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 25(6), 650–666 (2005)CrossRef
28.
Steelman, T.A., Ascher, W.: Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sci. 30(2), 71–90 (1997)CrossRef
29.
Blackstock, K.L., Kelly, G.J., Horsey, B.L.: Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 60(4), 726–742 (2007)CrossRef
30.
Dell’Era, C., Landoni, P.: Living lab: a methodology between user - centred design and participatory design. Creativity Innov. Manage. 23(2), 137–154 (2014)CrossRef
31.
Ståhlbröst, A.: A set of key-principles to assess the impact of living labs. Int. J. Product Dev. 17(1–2), 60–75 (2012)CrossRef
32.
Friedrich, P., Karlsson, A., Federley, M.: Report 2.1. Boundary Conditions for Successful Urban Living Labs, SubUrbanLab (2013)
33.
Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Cave, J., Millard, J., Pederson, J.K., Thaarup, R.K., Liebe, A., Wissner, M., Massink, R., Kotterink, B.: Mapping smart cities in the EU, European Parliament’s Committee on Industry. Research and Energy, Brussels (2014)
34.
Habibipour, A.: Living lab research: a state-of-the-art review and steps towards a research agenda. Research-in-progress. In: OpenLivingLab Days Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 406–421 (2018)
35.
Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D.: Evaluation perspectives and key criteria in eParticipation. In: Proceedings of the 6th Eastern European eGovernment Days (2008)
36.
van Geenhuizen, M.: A framework for the evaluation of living labs as boundary spanners in innovation. Environ. Plan. C Polit. Space 36(7), 1280–1298 (2018)CrossRef
37.
Buhr, K., Federley, M., Karlsson, A.: Urban living labs for sustainability in suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 6(1), 27–34 (2016)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Co-creation of Local Mobility Solutions: Lessons from the Mobility Lab in Hamburg-Altona
verfasst von
K. Tatum
T. Cekic
A. Landwehr
J. Noennig
J. Knieling
B. Schroeter
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe 2

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38027-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-38028-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38028-1_2

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise