Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Co-creation or Public Participation 2.0? An Assessment of Co-creation in Transport and Mobility Research

verfasst von : Jesse Pappers, Imre Keserü, Cathy Macharis

Erschienen in: Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe 2

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of co-creation in transport and mobility research. Based on the review of 5 on-going research projects and 5 papers in this field of research, we find that the term co-creation is used interchangeably with terms such as co-design and co-production. Moreover, co-creation is used as an innovation approach as well as a design method, and can focus on the process as well as the outcome. Rather than being a new method or approach, we propose a definition of co-creation that defines it as a form of public participation. This public participation 2.0 uses creative methods, emphasises innovation, and is situated on the highest rungs of Arnstein’s ladder of participation. Future research should focus on the output of co-creation in order to investigate the added value of applying co-creation in transport planning.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Co-creation of Local Mobility Solutions: Lessons from the Mobility Lab in Hamburg-Altona
Literatur
1.
Puerari, E., De Koning, J.I.J.C., Von Wirth, T., Karré, P.M., Mulder, I.J., Loorbach, D.A.: Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability 10, 1893 (2018)CrossRef
2.
Binder, C.R., Feola, G., Steinberger, J.K.: Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 30, 71–81 (2010)CrossRef
3.
Blomkamp, E.: The promise of co-design for public policy. Aust. J. Public Adm. 77, 729–743 (2018)CrossRef
4.
Banister, D.: The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008)CrossRef
5.
Bradwell, P., Marr, S.: Making the most of collaboration: an international survey of public service co-design. Demos, London, UK (2008)
6.
Arnstein, S.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35, 216–224 (1969)
7.
Sarzynski, A.: Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Climate 14, 52–67 (2015)CrossRef
8.
Schroeter, R., Scheel, O., Renn, O., Schweizer, P.-J.: Testing the value of public participation in Germany: theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 116–125 (2016)CrossRef
9.
Szyliowicz, J.S.: Decision-making, intermodal transportation, and sustainable mobility: towards a new paradigm. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 55, 185–197 (2003)CrossRef
10.
Larson, K.L., Lach, D.: Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: an assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 88, 817–830 (2008)CrossRef
11.
Transplus: Achieving sustainable transport and land use with integrated policies (2003)
12.
Choguill, M.B.G.: A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat Int. 20, 431–444 (1996)CrossRef
13.
Wilcox, D.: The Guide to Effective Participation (1994)
14.
Booth, C., Richardson, T.: Placing the public in integrated transport planning. Transp. Policy 8, 141–149 (2001)CrossRef
15.
16.
Slotterback, C.S.: Public involvement in transportation project planning and design. J. Arch. Plan. Res. 27, 144–162 (2010)
17.
Portney, K.E., Berry, J.M.: Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in U.S. cities. Urban Aff. Rev. 46, 119–139 (2010)CrossRef
18.
Bulckaen, J., Keseru, I., Macharis, C.: Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures. Res. Transp. Econ. 55, 40–49 (2016)CrossRef
19.
Rawson, R., Hooper, P.D.: The importance of stakeholder participation to sustainable airport master planning in the UK. Environ. Dev. 2, 36–47 (2012)CrossRef
20.
Ibeas, A., dell’Olio, L., Montequín, R.B.: Citizen involvement in promoting sustainable mobility. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 475–487 (2011)CrossRef
21.
Gil, A., Calado, H., Bentz, J.: Public participation in municipal transport planning processes – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1309–1319 (2011)CrossRef
22.
Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., Walker, G.: Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. J. Transp. Geogr. 10, 61–73 (2002)CrossRef
23.
De Koning, J.I.J.C., Crul, M.R.M., Wever, R.: Models of co-creation. In: ServDes 2016, Copenhagen, pp. 266–278 (2016)
24.
Roser, T., Samson, A., Humphreys, P., Cruz-Valdivieso, E.: Co-creation: new pathways to value. Promise/LSE Enterprise, London (2009)
25.
Franz, Y., Tausz, K., Thiel, S.-K.: Contextuality and co-creation matter: a qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5, 48–55 (2015)CrossRef
26.
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G.: A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 17, 1333–1357 (2015)CrossRef
27.
Samson, A., Roser, T., DeFillippi, R.: Managing your co-creation mix: co-creation ventures in distinctive contexts. Eur. Bus. Rev. 25, 20–41 (2013)CrossRef
28.
Mitchell, V., Ross, T., May, A., Sims, R., Parker, C.: Empirical investigation of the impact of using co-design methods when generating proposals for sustainable travel solutions. CoDesign 12, 205–220 (2016)CrossRef
29.
JPI Urban Europe: Transition towards sustainable and liveable urban futures: the strategic and innovation agenda of JPI Urban Europe. JPI Urban Europe (2015)
30.
31.
Cossetta, A., Palumbo, M.: The co-production of social innovation: the case of living lab. In: Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds.) Smart city: how to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space, pp. 221–235. Springer, Cham (2014)
32.
Friedrich, P., Karlsson, A., Federley, M.: Boundary conditions for successful Urban Living Labs (2013)
33.
Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Plan. Theory 8, 242–262 (2009)CrossRef
34.
Rayna, T., Striukova, L.: Open innovation 2.0: is co-creation the ultimate challenge? Int. J. Technol. Manage. 69, 38–53 (2015)CrossRef
35.
Beutel, T., Jonas, J.M., Moeslein, K.M.: Co-creation and user involvement in a living lab: an evaluation of applied methods. In: Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switserland, pp. 1453–1464 (2017)
36.
Enquist, B., Johnson, M., Gebauer, H.: Value co-creation as a determinant of success in public transport services: a study of the Swiss Federal Railway operator (SBB). Manag. Serv. Qual. 20, 511–530 (2010)CrossRef
37.
Hofmeister, T.B., Stibe, A.: Living mobility transitions towards bicycling. Designing practices through co-creation and socially influencing systems. Des. J. 20, S3305–S3316 (2017)
38.
Stewart, A.F., Zegras, P.C.: CoAXs: a Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for communicating transport impacts. Res. Transp. Econ. 59, 423–433 (2016)CrossRef
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
Metamorphosis Consortium: D2.1 General Analysis Report (2017)
45.
Cities4People: Co-Creative Prototyping: Development of practical Interventions and Prototypes in Cities-4-People (2019)
46.
Mobility Urban Values: D2.4 Guidelines on Participatory Approach and Co-design Workshops (2017)
47.
Wiegmann, M., Pappers, J., Keserü, I., Macharis, C.: Guidelines for the co-design of alternatives (2018)
48.
SUNRISE: Shared definitions of key terms (2017)
49.
50.
51.
SUNRISE: D5.4 Package of six local communication plans (2018)
52.
53.
Menny, M., Voytenko Palgan, Y., McCormick, K.: Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA 27, 68–77 (2018)CrossRef
54.
Lucas, K.: Qualitative methods in transport research: the “action research” approach. In: Transport Survey Methods: Best Practice for Decision Making (2013)CrossRef
55.
Pollitt, C., Hupe, P.: Talking about government. Public Manag. Rev. 13, 641–658 (2011)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Co-creation or Public Participation 2.0? An Assessment of Co-creation in Transport and Mobility Research
verfasst von
Jesse Pappers
Imre Keserü
Cathy Macharis
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe 2

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38027-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-38028-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38028-1_1

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise