Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Computer Based Stylometric Analysis of Texts in Polish Language Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Cognitive Content Recommendation in Digital Knowledge Repositories – A Survey of Recent Trends

verfasst von : Andrzej M. J. Skulimowski

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the cognitive aspects of content recommendation process in large heterogeneous knowledge repositories and their applications to design algorithms of incremental learning of users’ preferences, emotions, and satisfaction. This allows the recommendation procedures to align to the present and expected cognitive states of a user, increasing the combined recommendation and repository use efficiency. The learning algorithm takes into account the results of the cognitive and neural modelling of users’ decision behaviour. Inspirations from nature used in recommendation systems differ from the usual mimicking the biological neural processes. Specifically, a cognitive knowledge recommender may follow a strategy to discover emotional patterns in user behaviour and then adjust the recommendation procedure accordingly. The knowledge of cognitive decision mechanisms helps to optimize recommendation goals. Other cognitive recommendation procedures assist users in creating consistent learning or research groups. The primary application field of the above algorithms is a large knowledge repository coupled with an innovative training platform developed within an ongoing Horizon 2020 research project.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Categorization of Multilingual Scientific Documents by a Compound Classification System
Nächstes Kapitel Supporting BPMN Process Models with UML Sequence Diagrams for Representing Time Issues and Testing Models
Literatur
1.
Adomavicius, G., Kwon, Y.O.: Multicriteria recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 847–880. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRef
2.
Aher, S.B., Lobo, L.: Combination of machine learning algorithms for recommendation of courses in e-learning system based on historical data. Knowl. Based Syst. 51, 1–14 (2013)CrossRef
3.
4.
Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F., Hernando, A., Gutierrez, A.: Recommender systems survey. Knowl. Based Syst. 46, 109–132 (2013)CrossRef
5.
Bobadilla, J., Serradilla, F., Hernando, A.: Collaborative filtering adapted to recommender systems of e-learning. Knowl. Based Syst. 22, 261–265 (2009)CrossRef
6.
Cechinel, C., Camargo, S.D.S., Sánchez-Alonso, S., Sicilia, M.A.: Towards automated evaluation of learning resources inside repositories. In: Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O.C. (eds.) Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Trends and Applications, pp. 25–46. Springer, New York (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-1-4939-0530-0_​2 CrossRef
7.
Chen, L.S., Hsu, F.H., Chen, M.C., Hsu, Y.C.: Developing recommender systems with the consideration of product profitability for sellers. Inf. Sci. 178, 1032–1048 (2008)CrossRef
8.
Chen, W., Niu, Z., Zhao, X., Li, Y.: A hybrid recommendation algorithm adapted in e-learning environments. World Wide Web 17, 271–284 (2014)CrossRef
9.
Cho, J., Kwon, K., Park, Y.: Q-rater: a collaborative reputation system based on source credibility theory. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 3751–3760 (2009)CrossRef
10.
Diaz, A., Motz, R., Rohrer, E., Tansini, L.: An ontology network for educational recommender systems. In: Santos, O., Boticario, J. (eds.) Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pp. 67–93. IGI Global, Hershey (2012). doi:10.​4018/​978-1-61350-489-5.​ch004 CrossRef
11.
12.
Fernández, A., Anjorin, M., Dackiewicz, I., Rensing, C.: Recommendations from heterogeneous sources in a technology enhanced learning ecosystem. In: Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O.C. (eds.) Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Trends and Applications, pp. 251–265. Springer, New York (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-1-4939-0530-0_​12 CrossRef
13.
Gligor, V., Wing, J.M.: Towards a theory of trust in networks of humans and computers. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J., Stajano, F. (eds.) Security Protocols 2011. LNCS, vol. 7114, pp. 223–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-25867-1_​22 CrossRef
14.
Katarya, R., Verma, O.P.: Recent developments in affective recommender systems. Phys. A 461, 182–190 (2016)CrossRef
15.
Khribi, M.K., Jemni, M., Nasraoui, O.: Automatic recommendations for e-learning personalization based on web usage mining techniques and information retrieval. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 30–42 (2009)
16.
Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Recommender Systems for Learning, p. 90. Springer, Berlin (2012)
17.
Lai, C.H., Liu, D.R.: Integrating knowledge flow mining and collaborative filtering to support document recommendation. J. Syst. Softw. 82, 2023–2037 (2009)CrossRef
18.
Liu, H., Motoda, H.: A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recogn. 40(1), 262–282 (2007)CrossRef
19.
20.
Moyano, F., Fernandez-Gago, C., Lopez, J.: A conceptual framework for trust models. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Katsikas, S., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) TrustBus 2012. LNCS, vol. 7449, pp. 93–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-32287-7_​8 CrossRef
21.
Mangina, E., Kilbride, J.: Evaluation of keyphrase extraction algorithm and tiling process for a document/resource recommender within e-learning. Comput. Educ. 50, 807–820 (2008)CrossRef
22.
Manouselis, N., Costopoulou, C.: Analysis and classification of multi-criteria recommender systems. World Wide Web Internet Web Inf. Syst. 10(4), 415–441 (2007)CrossRef
23.
Moedritscher, F.: Towards a recommender strategy for personal learning environments. In: 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2010)/5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2010), Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning. Recsystel, Procedia Computer Science, Barcelona 2010, vol. 1(2), pp. 2775–2782 (2010)
24.
Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: Profiling vs. time vs. content: what does matter for top-k publication recommendation based on twitter Profiles? In: 16th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2016), Newark, NJ, USA, pp. 171–180, 19–23 June 2016. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2910896.​2910898
25.
Porcel, C., Lopez-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A recommender system for research resources based on fuzzy linguistic modeling. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 5173–5183 (2009)CrossRef
26.
Porcel, C., Moreno, J.M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A multi-disciplinar recommender system to advice research resources in University Digital Libraries. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 12520–12528 (2009)CrossRef
27.
Pu, P., Li, C., Hu, R.: Evaluating recommender systems from the user’s perspective: survey of the state of the art. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 22(4–5), 317–355 (2012)CrossRef
28.
Rozewski, P., Kusztina, E., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zaikin, O.: Intelligent Open Learning Systems: Concepts, Models and Algorithms. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 22, p. 257. Springer, Berlin (2011)
29.
30.
Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G., Pérez-Marin, D.: Extending web-based educational systems with personalised support through user centred designed recommendations along the e-learning life cycle. Sci. Comput. Program. 88, 92–109 (2014)CrossRef
31.
Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G., Manjarrés-Riesco, A.: An approach for an affective educational recommendation model. In: Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O.C. (eds.) Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Trends and Applications, pp. 123–143. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRef
32.
Santos, O.C., Saneiro, M., Boticario, J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, C.: Towards interactive context-aware affective educational recommendations in computer assisted language learning. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 22(1–2), 27–57 (2015). doi:10.​1080/​13614568.​2015.​1058428
33.
Shi, F., Marini, J.L., Audry, E.: Towards a psycho-cognitive recommender system. In: ERM4CT 2015: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Emotion Representations and Modelling for Companion Technologies, Seattle, pp. 25–31, 9–13 November 2015. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2829966.​2829968
34.
Sielis, G.A., Mettouris, C., Tzanavari, A., Papadopoulos, G.A.: Context-aware recommendations using topic maps technology for the enhancement of the creativity process. In: Santos, O.C., Boticario, J. (eds.) Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pp. 43–66. IGI Global, Hershey (2012). doi:10.​4018/​978-1-61350-489-5.​ch003 CrossRef
35.
Skulimowski, A.M.J.: Optimal strategies for quantitative data retrieval in distributed database systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems Engineering, Hamburg, IEE Conference Publication No. 395, IEE, London, pp. 389–394, 5–9 September 1994. doi:10.​1049/​cp:​19940655
36.
Skulimowski, A.M.J.: Freedom of choice and creativity in multicriteria decision making. In: Theeramunkong, T., Kunifuji, S., Sornlertlamvanich, V., Nattee, C. (eds.) KICSS 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6746, pp. 190–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-24788-0_​18 CrossRef
37.
Skulimowski, A.M.J.: Universal intelligence, creativity, and trust in emerging global expert systems. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7895, pp. 582–592. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-38610-7_​53 CrossRef
38.
39.
Skulimowski, A.M.J.: Impact of future intelligent information technologies on the methodology of scientific research. In: Proceedings 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Nadi, Fiji, IEEE CPS, pp. 238–247, 7–10 December 2016. doi:10.​1109/​CIT.​2016.​118
40.
Skulimowski, A.M.J., Badecka, I., Czerni, M., Klamka, J., Kluz, D., Ligęza, A., Okoń-Horodyńska, E., Pukocz, P., Rotter, P., Szymlak, E., Tadeusiewicz, R., Wisła, R.: Trends and Scenarios of Selected Information Society Technologies. Advances in Decision Sciences and Futures Studies, vol. 1, p. 634. Progress & Business Publishers, Kraków (2016)
41.
Skulimowski, A.M.J., Rotter, P., Tadeusiewicz, R.: Technological evolution models of neurocognitive and vision systems in medicine: prospects and scenarios for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) until 2025 [in Polish]. In: Skulimowski, A.M.J. (ed.) Scenarios and Development Trends of Selected Information Society Technologies until 2025. Final Report. Progress & Business Publishers, Kraków, pp. 234–255 (2013). http://​www.​ict.​foresight.​pl
42.
Tang, T.Y., Daniel, B.K., Romero, C.: Special issue on recommender systems for and in social and online learning environments. Expert Syst. 32(2), 261–263 (2015)CrossRef
43.
Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Bernabé-Moreno, J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: REFORE: a recommender system for researchers based on bibliometrics. Appl. Soft Comput. 30, 778–791 (2015)CrossRef
44.
Van Maanen, L., Van Rijn, H., van Grootel, M., Kemna, S., Klomp, M., Scholtens, E.: Personal publication assistant: abstract recommendations by a cognitive model. Cogn. Syst. Res. 11, 120–129 (2010)CrossRef
45.
Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M.: Trust Networks for Recommender Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefMATH
46.
Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Xavier, O., Wolpers, M., Drachsler, H., Bosnic, I., Duval, E.: Context-aware recommender systems for learning: a survey and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 5(4), 318–335 (2012)CrossRef
47.
Vesin, B., Milicevic, A.K., Ivanovic, M., Budimac, Z.: Applying recommender systems and adaptive hypermedia for e-learning personalization. Comput. Inform. 32(3), 629–659 (2013)
48.
Zaikin, O., Tadeusiewicz, R., Różewski, P., Busk Kofoed, L., Malinowska, M., Żyławski, A.: Teachers’ and students’ motivation model as a strategy for open distance learning processes. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 64(4), 943–955 (2016). doi:10.​1515/​bpasts-2016-0103
49.
Zapata, A., Menendez, V.H., Prieto, M.E., Romero, C.: A framework for recommendation in learning object repositories: an example of application in civil engineering. Adv. Eng. Softw. 56, 1–14 (2013)CrossRef
50.
Zhou, M., Xu, Y.: Challenges to use recommender systems to enhance meta-cognitive functioning in online learners. In: Santos, O., Boticario, J. (eds.) Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pp. 282–301. IGI Global, Hershey (2012)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cognitive Content Recommendation in Digital Knowledge Repositories – A Survey of Recent Trends
verfasst von
Andrzej M. J. Skulimowski
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59059-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-59060-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59060-8_52

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise