Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
NeuroIS Knowledge Discovery Approach to Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injury Survival Rates: A Semantic Data Analysis Regression Feasibility Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Cognitive Differences and Their Impact on Information Perception: An Empirical Study Combining Survey and Eye Tracking Data

verfasst von : Lisa Falschlunger, Horst Treiblmaier, Othmar Lehner, Elisabeth Grabmann

Erschienen in: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research shows that the quality of managerial decision making is dependent on both the availability and the interpretation of information. Visualizations are widely used to transform raw data into a more understandable format and to compress the constantly growing amount of information being produced. However, research in this area is highly fragmented and results are contradicting. A possible explanation for inconsistent results is the neglect of individual characteristics such as experience, working memory capacity, or cultural background. We propose a preliminary model based on an extensive literature review on cognition theory that sheds light on potential individual antecedents of information processing efficiency. Our preliminary results based on eye tracking, automated span tasks, as well as survey data show that domain expertise, spatial ability and long term orientation exert a significant influence on this cognitive construct.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Measuring Cognitive Load During Process Model Creation
Nächstes Kapitel Using fMRI to Explain the Effect of Dual-Task Interference on Security Behavior
Literatur
1.
Dilla, W., Janvrin, D.J., Raschke, R.: Interactive data visualization: new directions for accounting information systems research. J. Inf. Syst. 24(2), 1–37 (2010)
2.
Edmunds, A., Morris, A.: The problem of information overload in business organizations: a review of the literature. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 20(1), 17–28 (2000)CrossRef
3.
Eppler, M.J., Mengis, J.: The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf. Soc. 20, 35–344 (2004)CrossRef
4.
Lurie, N.H., Mason, C.H.: Visual representation: implications for decision making. J. Mark. 71(1), 160–177 (2007)CrossRef
5.
Tortosa-Edo, V., López-Navarro, M.A., Llorens-Monzonís, J., Rodríguez-Artola, R.M.: The antecendent role of personal environment values in the relationships among trust in companies, information processing and risk perception. J. Risk Res. 17(8), 1019–1035 (2014)CrossRef
6.
Al-Kassab, J., Ouertani, Z.M., Schiuma, G., Neely, A.: Information visualization to support management decisions. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 13(2), 407–428 (2014)CrossRef
7.
Parsons, P., Sedig, K.: Adjustable properties of visual representations: improving the quality of human-information interaction. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(3), 455–482 (2014)CrossRef
8.
Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Exploring the role of individual differences in information visualization. In: Proceedings of AVI 2008, pp. 199–206. ACM (2008)
9.
Barat, A.H.: Human perception and knowledge organization: visual imagery. Libr. Hi Tech. 25(3), 338–351 (2007)CrossRef
10.
Galletta, D., Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 63–84 (1991)CrossRef
11.
Porat, T., Oron-Gilad, T., Meyer, J.: Task-dependent processing of tables and graphs. Behav. Inf. Technol. 28(3), 293–307 (2009)CrossRef
12.
So, S., Smith, M.: Multivariate decision accuracy and the presentation of accounting information. Acc. Forum 28(3), 283–305 (2004)CrossRef
13.
Dilla, W.N., Janvrin, D.J.: Voluntary disclosure in annual reports: the association between magnitude and direction of change in corporate financial performance and graph use. Acc. Horiz. 24(2), 257–278 (2010)CrossRef
14.
Parush, A., Hod, A., Shtub, A.: Impact of visualization type and contextual factors on performance with enterprise resource planning systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 52(1), 133–142 (2007)CrossRef
15.
Peck, E.M., Yuksel, B.R., Harrison, L., Ottley, A., Remco, C.: Position paper: towards a 3-dimensional model of individual cognitive differences. In: Proceedings of BELIV 2012, pp. 1–6. ACM (2012)
16.
Yigitbasioglu, O.M., Valcu, O.: A review of dashboards in performance management: implications for design and research. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 13(1), 41–59 (2012)CrossRef
17.
Ziemkiewicz, C., Kosara, R.: Beyond bertin: seeing the forest despite the trees. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 30(5), 7–11 (2010)CrossRef
18.
Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956)CrossRef
19.
Lord, R.G., Maher, K.J.: Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Acad. Manage. Rev. 15(1), 9–28 (1990)
20.
Anderson, E.W., Potter, K.C., Matzen, L.E., Shepherd, J.F., Preston, G.A., Silva, C.T.: A user study of visualization effectiveness using EEG and cognitive load. In: Eurographics/IEEE Symposium on Visualization 2011 vol. 30, issue 3, pp. 791–800 (2011)
21.
Mostyn, G.R.: Cognitive load theory: what it is, why it’s important for accounting construction and research. Issues Acc. Educ. 27(1), 227–245 (2012)CrossRef
22.
Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decis. Sci. 22(2), 219–240 (1991)CrossRef
23.
Hill, W.Y., Milner, M.M.: Guidelines for graphical displays in financial reporting. Acc. Educ. 12(2), 135–157 (2003)CrossRef
24.
Kuang, X., Zhang, H., Zhao, S., McGuffin, M.J.: Tracing tuples across dimensions: a ccomparison of scatterplots and parallel coordinate plots. Comput. Graph. Forum 31(3), 1365–1374 (2012)CrossRef
25.
Speier, C., Vessey, I., Valacich, J.S.: The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and computer-supported decision-making performance. Decis. Sci. 34(4), 771–797 (2003)CrossRef
26.
Hard, N.J., Vanecek, M.T.: The implications of task and format on the use of financial information. J. Inf. Syst. 5(2), 35–49 (1991)
27.
Wood, R.E.: Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37, 60–82 (1986)CrossRef
28.
Speier, C.: The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(11), 1115–1131 (2006)CrossRef
29.
Gelman, A., Unwin, A.: InfoVis and statistical graphics: different goals, different looks. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 22(1), 2–28 (2013)CrossRef
30.
Hahn, U.: Experiential limitation in judgment and decision. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6(2), 229–244 (2014)CrossRef
31.
Kook, N., Parente, R., Verville, J.: Can hofstede’s model explain national differences in perceived information overload? a look at data from the US and New Zealand. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 51(1), 33–49 (2008)CrossRef
32.
Goldberg, J., Helfman, J.: Eye tracking on visualizations: progressive extraction of scanning strategies. In: Huang, W. (ed.) Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, pp. 337–372. Springer (2014)
33.
Renshaw, J.A., Finlay, J.E., Tyfa, D., Ward, R.D.: Designing for visual influence: an eye tracking study of the usability of graphical management information. In: Proceedings of Interact 2003, pp. 144–151. ACM (2003)
34.
Redick, T.S., Broadway, J.M., Meier, M.E., Kuriakose, N.U., Kane, M.J., Engle, R.W.: Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 28(3), 164–171 (2012)CrossRef
35.
Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn. Sage Publications (2001)
36.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publishing (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Cognitive Differences and Their Impact on Information Perception: An Empirical Study Combining Survey and Eye Tracking Data
verfasst von
Lisa Falschlunger
Horst Treiblmaier
Othmar Lehner
Elisabeth Grabmann
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18701-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-18702-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18702-0_18

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise