nach oben

Demography

Erschienen in:

01.08.2011

Cohabitation History, Marriage, and Wealth Accumulation

verfasst von: Jonathan Vespa, Matthew A. Painter II

Erschienen in: Demography | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study extends research on the relationship between wealth accumulation and union experiences, such as marriage and cohabitation. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, we explore the wealth trajectories of married individuals in light of their premarital cohabitation histories. Over time, marriage positively correlates with wealth accumulation. Most married persons with a premarital cohabitation history have wealth trajectories that are indistinguishable from those without cohabitation experience, with one exception: individuals who marry their one and only cohabiting partner experience a wealth premium that is twice as large as that for married individuals who never cohabited prior to marrying. Results remain robust over time despite cohabiters’ selection out of marriage, yet vary by race/ethnicity. We conclude that relationship history may shape long-term wealth accumulation, and contrary to existing literature, individuals who marry their only cohabiting partners experience a beneficial marital outcome. It is therefore important to understand the diversity of cohabitation experiences among the married.

Vorheriger Artikel The Evolution of Family Complexity from the Perspective of Nonmarital Children

Nächster Artikel Divorced Fathers’ Proximity and Children’s Long-Run Outcomes: Evidence From Norwegian Registry Data

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

NLSY79 did not collect wealth data until 1985. Compared with post-1985 marriages, respondents in pre-1985 marriages grew up in less-educated and lower-income households. At marriage, they were younger, had less cohabitation experience, and were less likely to have had a nonmarital birth. They also had lower incomes and were less likely to own a home or to have more than a high school education. Excluding these marriages likely biases results upward because it omits marriages with lower wealth potential.

Missing data reduced the sample size slightly. Experiments with multiple imputation did not change the results.

White refers to non-Hispanic white; black, to non-Hispanic black.

We adjust for inflation to 2004 dollars, using the Consumer Price Index.

In a supplemental analysis of the directly married and spousal cohabiters, we examined respondent’s age at union formation rather than age at marriage to better account for cohabiters’ longer coresidence with their partner. Results were equivalent, so we present results using age at marriage with the full sample.

Results were robust when we substituted respondent’s education for the household-level measure.

We also interacted gender with cohabitation histories and marital duration because of gendered differences in wealth. None of the interactions was significant. For parsimony, we excluded them from the final models.

Cohabitation also varies among ethnicities. Puerto Ricans are more accepting of cohabitation and cohabit more often than Mexican Americans (Oropesa 1996). In supplemental analyses, we examined Mexicans and Mexican Americans, the largest Hispanic groups in the data. Results remained unchanged from the pooled Hispanic model.

In additional analyses, we included the square of marital duration for blacks and Hispanics. These terms were not significant, so we estimated a linear specification.

We include these cohabitation histories because their wealth patterns significantly differ from their respective directly married peers. For this reason, we include only black directly married persons. The figure does account for the curvilinear results of spousal cohabitation among whites. Because the squared term is small, the curvature is not particularly pronounced during the first 10 years of marriage.

Avellar, S., & Smock, P. J. (2005). The economic consequences of the dissolution of cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 315–327.CrossRef

Avery, R. B., & Rendall, M. S. (2002). Lifetime inheritances of three generations of whites and blacks. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1300–1346.CrossRef

Brown, S. (2000). Union transitions among cohabiters: The role of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833–846.CrossRef

Brown, S., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668–678.CrossRef

Brown, S., van Hook, J., & Glick, J. (2006). Generational differences in cohabitation and marriage in the U.S. (Working Paper 06–03). Bowling Green, OH: Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University.

Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.CrossRef

Campbell, L. A., & Kaufman, R. (2006). Racial differences in household wealth: Beyond black and white. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 131–152.CrossRef

Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237–261.CrossRef

Clogg, C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293.CrossRef

Cohen, P. N. (2002). Cohabitation and the declining marriage premium for men. Work and Occupations, 29, 346–363.CrossRef

Conley, D. (1999). Being black, living in the red. Berkeley: University of California Press.

DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2005). How do cohabiting couples with children spend their money? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 286–295.CrossRef

Dush, C. M. K., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R. (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Change across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 539–549.CrossRef

Gale, W. G., & Scholz, J. K. (1994). Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 145–160.

Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.CrossRef

Grinstein-Weiss, M., Hun Yeo, Y., Zhan, M., & Charles, P. (2008). Asset holding and net worth among households with children: Differences by household type. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 62–78.CrossRef

Hao, L. (1996). Family structure, private transfers, and the economic well-being of families with children. Social Forces, 75, 269–292.CrossRef

Heimdal, K. R. (2008). Investing in the relationship: Financial arrangements and kin relations among cohabiting and married couples (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

Heimdal, K. R., & Houseknecht, S. H. (2003). Cohabiting and married couples’ income organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 525–538.CrossRef

Hirschl, T. A., Altobelli, J., & Rank, M. (2003). Does marriage increase the odds of affluence? Exploring the life course probabilities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 927–938.CrossRef

Holden, K. C., & Kuo, D. H. (1996). Complex marital histories and economic well-being: The continuing legacy of divorce and widowhood as the HRS cohort approaches retirement. Gerontologist, 36, 383–390.CrossRef

Keister, L. A. (2003). Religion and wealth: The role of religious affiliation and participation in early adult asset accumulation. Social Forces, 82, 173–205.CrossRef

Keister, L. A. (2005). Getting rich: America’s new rich and how they got that way. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kenney, C. (2004). Cohabiting couple, filing jointly? Resource pooling and U.S. poverty policies. Family Relations, 53, 237–247.

Kennickell, A. B. (2006). A rolling tide: Changes in the distribution of wealth in the U.S., 1989–2001. In E. N. Wolff (Ed.), International perspectives on household wealth (pp. 19–88). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Krivo, L. J., & Kaufman, R. L. (2004). Housing and wealth inequality: Racial-ethnic differences in home equity in the United States. Demography, 41, 585–605.CrossRef

Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878.CrossRef

Light, A. (2004). Gender differences in the marriage and cohabitation income premium. Demography, 41, 263–284.CrossRef

Lino, M. (2008). Expenditures on children by families, 2007 (Miscellaneous Publication No. 1528–2007). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.

Manning, W. D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 217–223.CrossRef

Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 1065–1087.CrossRef

Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., & Majumdar, D. (2004). The relative stability of marital and cohabiting unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 125–159.CrossRef

McNamee, S. J., & Miller, R. K., Jr. (1998). Inheritance and stratification. In R. K. Miller Jr. & S. J. McNamee (Eds.), Inheritance and wealth in America (pp. 193–213). New York: Plenum Press.

Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915–929.CrossRef

Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (2006). Black wealth/white wealth. New York: Routledge.

O’Neill, J. (2003). The gender gap in wages, circa 2000. American Economic Review, 93, 309–314.CrossRef

Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabitation and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.

Oropesa, R. S. (1996). Normative beliefs about marriage and cohabitation: A comparison of non-Latino, Whites, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 49–62.CrossRef

Phillips, J. A., & Sweeney, M. M. (2005). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among white, black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 295–313.CrossRef

Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28.CrossRef

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505.CrossRef

Schmidt, L., & Sevak, P. (2006). Gender, marriage, and asset accumulation in the United States. Feminist Economics, 12, 139–166.CrossRef

Schoen, R., Landale, N. S., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44, 807–820.CrossRef

Shapiro, T. M. (2004). The hidden cost of being African American. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.CrossRef

Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.CrossRef

Stratton, L. S. (2002). Examining the wage differential for married and cohabiting men. Economic Inquiry, 40, 199–212.CrossRef

Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 444–455.CrossRef

Teachman, J., & Polonko, K. (1990). Cohabitation and marital stability in the United States. Social Forces, 69, 207–220.CrossRef

Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

van Lange, P., Rusbult, C. E., Drigostas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.CrossRef

Ventura, S. J., & Bachrach, C. A. (2000). Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1940–99. National Vital Statistics Reports, 48(16). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage. New York: Doubleday.

Warren, T., Rowlingson, K., & Whyley, C. (2001). Female finances: Gender wage gaps and gender assets gaps. Work, Employment and Society, 15, 465–488.CrossRef

Wildsmith, E., & Raley, R. K. (2006). Race-ethnic differences in nonmarital fertility: A focus on Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 491–508.CrossRef

Wilmoth, J., & Koso, G. (2002). Does marital history matter? Marital status and wealth outcomes among pre-retirement adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 254–268.CrossRef

Winkler, A. E. (1997). Economic decision-making by cohabiters. Findings regarding income pooling. Applied Economics, 29, 1079–1090.CrossRef

Wolff, E. N. (2002). The stagnating fortunes of the middle class. In E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller Jr., & J. Paul (Eds.), Should differences in income and wealth matter? (pp. 55–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wolff, E. N. (2007). Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze (Working Paper No. 502). Annondale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.

Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.CrossRef

Yamokoski, A., & Keister, L. A. (2006). The wealth of single women: Marital status and parenthood in the asset accumulation of young baby boomers in the United States. Feminist Economics, 12(1–2), 167–194.CrossRef

Titel: Cohabitation History, Marriage, and Wealth Accumulation
verfasst von: Jonathan Vespa
Matthew A. Painter II
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Demography / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0070-3370
Elektronische ISSN: 1533-7790
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0043-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

The Black Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Historical Trends and Racial Comparisons

The Impact of College Education on Fertility: Evidence for Heterogeneous Effects

Probabilistic Projections of the Total Fertility Rate for All Countries

Tempo and the TFR

Moderate Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Mortality

Life Shocks and Crime: A Test of the “Turning Point” Hypothesis