Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
From Sustainable Information System with a Farandole of Models to Services Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Collaborative Requirements Engineering: Bridging the Gulfs Between Worlds

verfasst von : Alistair Sutcliffe

Erschienen in: Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A method engineering approach is described for managing communication in RE processes based on Clark’s theory of common ground. The common ground framework is used to evaluate the affordances of different RE representations such as scenarios, storyboards and models. The contribution that representations make to RE activities is reviewed to suggest heuristics for selecting appropriate representations to develop mutual understanding of RE issues between different stakeholders. A meta-model for RE activities is proposed that describes the process of communication and developing mutual understanding driven from abstract and concrete views of the problem domain. The meta-model is applied to management of RE sessions from a method engineering perspective. Application of the framework is illustrated with a case study of health informatics application.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Method Engineering: A Service-Oriented Approach
Literatur
1.
Baddeley AD (1986) Working memory. Oxford University, Oxford
2.
Beck K (1999) Extreme programming explained: embracing change. Addison-Wesley, New York
3.
Brennan SE, Clark HH (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice of conversation. J Exp Psychol: Learning, Memory Cognition 22(6):1482–1493CrossRef
4.
Chantree F, Nuseibeh B, De Roeck A, Willis A (2006) Identifying nocuous ambiguities in natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of 14th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’06), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
5.
6.
Conklin J, Begeman ML (1988) gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Trans Office Info Systems 64:303–331CrossRef
7.
Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Quarter 11(3):355–366CrossRef
8.
Damian D, Marczak S, Kwan I (2007) Collaboration patterns and the impact of distance on awareness in requirements-centred social networks. In: Proceedings of 15th IEEE internationalrequirements engineering conference RE’07, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
9.
Green TRG, Petre M (1996) Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a cognitive dimensions framework. J Visual Languages Computing 7:131–174CrossRef
10.
Hauser J, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Rev 5:63–73
11.
Jarke M, Pohl K, Jacobs S, Bubenko J, Assenova P, Holm P, Wangler B, Rolland C, Plihon V, Schmitt JR, Sutcliffe AG, Jones S, Maiden NAM, Till D, Vassiliou Y, Constantopoulos P, Spanoudakis G (1993) Requirements engineering: an integrated view of representation, process, and domain. In: Proceedings of the 4th European software engineering conference. LNCS, vol 717. Springer, Berlin
12.
Karlsson J, Ryan K (1997) A cost value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Softw 14(5):67–74CrossRef
13.
MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti V, Moran TP (1991) Questions, options and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6(3/4):201–250CrossRef
14.
Mitchell P (1997) Introduction to theory of mind: children, autism and apes. Arnold, London
15.
Monk AF, Watts LA (2000) Peripheral participation in video mediated communication. Int J Human-Computer Studies 52:933–958CrossRef
16.
Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of international conference on software engineering (ICSE-2000), ACM, New York
17.
Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2):139–178CrossRef
18.
Potts C (1999) ScenIC: a strategy for inquiry-driven requirements determination. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
19.
Ralyte J, Deneckère R, Rolland C (2003) Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAISE’03). LNCS, vol 2681. Springer, Berlin
20.
Rescher N (1969) Introduction to value theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21.
Robertson S, Robertson J (1999) Mastering the requirements process. Addison Wesley, Harlow
22.
Rolland C (1998) A comprehensive view of process engineering. In: Proceedings of international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAISE). LNCS, vol 1413. Springer, Berlin
23.
Rolland C, Ben Achour C (1998) Guiding the construction of textual use case specifications. Data Knowl Eng J 25(1–2):125–160MATHCrossRef
24.
Rolland C, Proix C (1992) A natural language approach for requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference (CAiSE ‘92). LNCS, vol 593. Springer, Berlin
25.
Rolland C, Prakash N, Benjamen A (1999) A multi-model view of process modelling. Reqs Eng 4(4):169–187CrossRef
26.
Rolland C, Salinesi C, Etien A (2004) Eliciting gaps in requirements change. Reqs Eng 9(1):1–15CrossRef
27.
Rolland C, Souveyet C, Ben Achour C (1998) Guiding goal modeling using scenarios. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(12):1055–1071CrossRef
28.
Rolland C, Ben Achour C, Cauvet C, Ralyte J, Sutcliffe AG, Maiden NAM, Jarke M, Haumer P, Pohl K, Dubois E, Heymans P (1998) A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Reqs Eng 3(1):23–47
29.
Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, Chichester
30.
Sutcliffe AG (1995) Requirements rationales: integrating approaches to requirements analysis. In: Designing interactive systems: DIS 95 conference proceedings, ACM Press, New York
31.
32.
Sutcliffe AG (2003) Scenario-based requirements engineering. In Proceedings of IEEE joint international conference on requirements engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
33.
Sutcliffe AG, Ryan M (1997) Assessing the usability and efficiency of design rationale. In: Proceedings of human computer interaction INTERACT-97. IFIP/Chapman and Hall, London
34.
Sutcliffe AG, Fickas S, Sohlberg M (2005) Personal and contextual requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of 13th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
35.
Sutcliffe AG, Maiden NAM, Minocha S, Manuel D (1998) Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(12):1072–1088CrossRef
36.
Thew S, Sutcliffe AG (2008) Value-based requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of 16th IEEE requirements engineering conference, RE’08, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA
37.
Van Lamsweerde A (2000) Requirements engineering in the year 00: a research perspective. In: Proceedings of 22nd international conference on software engineering, ACM, New York
38.
Van Lamsweerde A, Letier E (2000) Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(10):978–1005CrossRef
39.
Yu E (1997) Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of Third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos CA
Metadaten
Titel
Collaborative Requirements Engineering: Bridging the Gulfs Between Worlds
verfasst von
Alistair Sutcliffe
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12543-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-12544-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12544-7_20

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise