nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Community-Based, Co-management for Governing Small-Scale Fisheries of the Pacific: A Solomon Islands’ Case Study

verfasst von : Philippa Cohen, Louisa Evans, Hugh Govan

Erschienen in: Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The discourse on solutions to address small-scale fisheries concerns in the Pacific tends to focus heavily on community-based forms of co-management. Decentralizing governance to the community level permits responsiveness and specificity to local dynamics, not possible through hierarchical governance. It also allows for proper recognition of the (often legally backed) customary rights of local resource owners, common throughout the Pacific. Partnerships between communities and governments, NGOs or research organizations draw together knowledge, expertise and institutions to develop and implement co-management arrangements. In exploring Solomon Islands as a case study we find that interactions between community-based, co-management (a form of co-governance), and self-governance (particularly customary institutions) are fundamental for contextualizing and ‘fitting’ management to the community level – and that this helps to account for the exceptionally high social and ecological diversity and complexity of Solomon Islands. Community-based, co-management represents a hybrid of traditional and contemporary, local and higher level images, instruments and actions. Interactions between community-based, co-management and hierarchical governance can bolster and inform local management and governance solutions. This is particularly true (and necessary) for pressures (e.g., population growth and commercial, export-orientated exploitation) that extend beyond the local scale or have not before been encountered by customary institutions. While these relations can increase governability, they can also be contradictory and undermining, particularly when objectives are dynamic and differ across scales. Finding the ‘best mix’ of governance modes and responses is a moving and elusive target. Nonetheless, we conclude that while community-based, co-management is an appropriate and fitting mode for increasing the governability of Pacific small-scale fisheries in some contexts, in its current form it alone is not up to the task of realizing fisheries sustainability objectives. We recommend that small-scale fisheries policy more explicitly seeks, and tests, new forms of governance interactions amidst the diversity and complexity of Pacific small-scale fisheries.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Assessing Governability of Small-Scale Fisheries

Nächstes Kapitel Governance and Governability: The Small-Scale Purse Seine Fishery in Pulau Rote, Eastern Indonesia

Kastom is the pidgin English word for ‘custom’; referring generally to cultural norms and institutions.

The Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security focuses on six countries (Solomon Islands, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste) based on their exceptionally high marine biodiversity.

Adams, T. (2012, May/August). The characteristics of Pacific Island small-scale fisheries. SPC Fisheries Newsletter, 138, 37–43.

Apia Policy. (2008). Pacific islands regional coastal fisheries management policy and strategic actions (Apia policy) (2008–2013). Noumea: Secretariat of the Pacific Community.

Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18(1), 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002.CrossRef

Aswani, S., & Ruddle, K. (2013). Design of realistic hybrid marine resource management programs in Oceania. Pacific Science, 67(3), 461–476. doi:10.2984/67.3.11.CrossRef

Aswani, S., Christie, P., Muthiga, N. A., Mahon, R., Primavera, J. H., Cramer, L. A., Barbier, E. B., Granek, E. F., Kennedy, C. J., Wolanski, E., & Hacker, S. (2012). The way forward with ecosystem-based management in tropical contexts: Reconciling with existing management systems. Marine Policy, 36(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.02.014.CrossRef

AusAID. (2008). Making land work: Reconciling customary land and development in the Pacific. Canberra: AusAID Pacific Land Program.

Bell, J., Kronen, M., Vunisea, A., Nash, W. J., Keeble, G., Demmke, D., & Andréfouët, S. (2009). Planning the use of fish for food security in the Pacific. Marine Policy, 33, 64–76.CrossRef

Béné, C., Belal, E., Baba, M. O., Ovie, S., Raji, A., Malasha, I., Njaya, F., Na Andi, M., Russell, A., & Neiland, A. (2009). Power struggle, dispute and alliance over local resources: Analyzing ‘democratic’ decentralization of natural resources through the lenses of Africa inland fisheries. World Development, 37(12), 1935–1950. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.003.CrossRef

Béné, C., Hersoug, B., & Allison, E. H. (2010). Not by rent alone: Analyzing the pro-poor functions of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Development Policy Review, 28(3), 325–358.CrossRef

Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.CrossRef

Carrier, J. G. (1987). Marine tenure and conservation in Papua New Guinea: Problems in interpretation. In B. J. McCay & M. Acheson (Eds.), The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources (pp. 142–167). Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2013). Assessing governability – What’s next. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications (MARE publication series, Vol. 7, pp. 335–349). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRef

Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., & Kooiman, J. (2013). Governability – New directions in fisheries governance. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications (MARE publication series, Vol. 7, pp. 335–349). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Cinner, J. E., & Aswani, S. (2007). Integrating customary management into marine conservation. Biological Conservation, 140, 201–216.CrossRef

Cinner, J. E., McClanahan, T. R., MacNeil, M. A., Graham, N. A. J., Daw, T. M., Mukminin, A., Feary, D. A., Rabearisoa, A. L., Wamukota, A., Jiddawi, N., Campbell, S. J., Baird, A. H., Januchowski-Hartley, F. A., Hamed, S., Lahari, R., Morove, T., & Kuange, J. (2012). Co-management of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(14), 5219–5222. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121215109.CrossRef

Cohen, P. J., & Alexander, T. J. (2013). Catch rates, composition and fish size from reefs managed with periodically-harvested closures. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073383.CrossRef

Cohen, P. J., & Foale, S. J. (2013). Sustaining small-scale fisheries with periodically harvested marine reserves. Marine Policy, 37, 278–287. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.010.CrossRef

Cohen, P., & Steenbergen, D. (2015). Social dimensions of local fisheries co-management in the Coral Triangle. doi:10.1017/S0376892914000423.

Cohen, P., Evans, L., & Mills, M. (2012). Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conservation Letters, 5, 376–386. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00255.x.CrossRef

Cohen, P., Cinner, J., & Foale, S. (2013). Fishing dynamics associated with periodically-harvested marine closures. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1702–1713. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.010

Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2001). Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications, 11(2), 584–600.

Evans, L., Cherrett, N., & Pemsl, D. (2011). Assessing the impact of fisheries co-management interventions in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(8), 1938–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.010.CrossRef

Fabinyi, M., Evans, L., & Foale, S. J. (2014). Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: Insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 28.CrossRef

Foale, S., Cohen, P., Januchowski-Hartley, S., Wenger, A., & Macintyre, M. (2011). Tenure and taboos: Origins and implications for fisheries in the Pacific. Fish and Fisheries, 12, 357–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00395.x.CrossRef

Foale, S., Adhuri, D., Aliño, P., Allison, E., Andrew, N., Cohen, P., Evans, L., Fabinyi, M., Fidelman, P., Gregory, C., Stacey, N., Tanzer, J., & Weeratunge, N. (2013). Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 174–183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.033

Friedman, K., Eriksson, H., Tardy, E., & Pakoa, K. (2011). Management of sea cucumber stocks: Patterns of vulnerability and recovery of sea cucumber stocks impacted by fishing. Fish and Fisheries, 12(1), 75–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00384.x.CrossRef

Gillett, R. (2009). Fisheries in the economies of Pacific Island countries and territories Pacific studies series. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank.

Gillett, R., & Cartwright, I. (2010). The future of Pacific Island fisheries. New Caledonia: Secretariat of the Pacific Community.

Govan, H., Tawake, A., Tabunakawai, K., Jenkins, A., Lasgorceix, A., Schwarz, A.-M., et al. (2009). Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific: Meeting nature conservation and sustainable livelihood targets through wide-spread implementation of LMMAs. Suva: Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme/Worldwide Fund for Nature/WorldFish-Reefbase/Coral Reef Initiative of the South Pacific.

Govan, H., Kinch, J., & Brjosniovschi, A. (2013a). Strategic review of inshore fisheries policies and strategies in Melanesia – Fiji, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu – Part II: Country reports. Report to the Secretariat of the Pacific Community for the Melanesian Spearhead Group (33pp.). Noumea: Secretariat of the Pacific Community.

Govan, H., Schwarz, A.-M., Harohau, D., Oeta, J., Orirana, G., & Ratner, B. D. (2013b). Solomon Islands: Essential aspects of governance for aquatic agricultural systems in Malaita Hub. Vol. Project Report AAA-2013-19. CGIAR.

Green, A., Lokani, P., Atu, W., Ramohia, P., Thomas, P., & Almany, J. (2006). Solomon Islands marine assessment: Technical report of survey conducted May 13 to June 17, 2004. Brisbane: The Nature Conservancy.

Harmon, D., & Loh, J. (2004). A global index of biocultural diversity. Discussion paper for the international congress on ethnobiology. University of Kent.

Hviding, E. (1988). Marine tenure and resource development in Marovo Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Bergen: Centre for Development Studies, University of Bergen.

Hviding, E. (1998). Contextual flexibility: Present status and future of customary marine tenure in Solomon Islands. Ocean and Coastal Management, 40(2–3), 253–269.CrossRef

Jentoft, S. (2007). In the power of power: The understated aspect of fisheries and coastal management. Human Organization, 66(4), 426–437.CrossRef

Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.CrossRef

Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D. S., & Thomson, K. T. (2009). Fisheries co-management and legal pluralism: How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.CrossRef

Johannes, R. E. (1982). Traditional conservation methods and protected marine areas in Oceania. Ambio, 11, 258–261.

Johannes, R. E. (2002). The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 317–340.CrossRef

Jupiter, S. D., Cohen, P. J., Weeks, R., Tawake, A., & Govan, H. (2014). Locally-managed marine areas: Multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pacific Conservation Biology, 20(2), 165–179.

Kooiman, J., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Governance and governability. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, & R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life; interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 325–349). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRef

Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

Kronen, M., & Vunisea, A. (2009). Fishing impact and food security – Gender differences in finfisheries across Pacific Island countries and cultural groups. SPC Women in Fisheries Information Bulletin, 19, 3–10.

Lane, M. B. (2006). Towards integrated coastal management in Solomon Islands: Identifying strategic issues for governance reform. Ocean and Coastal Management, 49(7–8), 421–441. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.03.011.CrossRef

Léopold, M., Beckensteiner, J., Kaltavara, J., Raubani, J., & Caillon, S. (2013). Community-based management of near-shore fisheries in Vanuatu: What works? Marine Policy, 42, 167–176.CrossRef

Macintyre, M. A., & Foale, S. J. (2007). Land and marine tenure, ownership and new forms of entitlement on Lihir: Changing notions of property in the context of a goldmining project. Human Organization, 66(1), 49–59.CrossRef

MFMR. (2008). Solomon Islands national strategy for the management of inshore fisheries and marine resources. Honiara: Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Pinca, S., Vunisea, A., Lasi, F., Friedman, K., Kronen, M., Awira, R., Boblin, P., Tardy, E., Chapman, L., & Magron, F. (2009). Solomon Islands country report: Profiles and results from survey work at Ngella, Marau, Rarumana, Chubikopi. Noumea: Pacific Regional Oceanic and Coastal Fisheries Development Programme (PROCFish/C/CoFish).

Polunin, N. V. C. (1984). Do traditional marine “reserves” conserve? A view of Indonesian and New Guinean evidence. In K. Ruddle & T. Akimichi (Eds.), Maritime institutions in the Western Pacific (pp. 267–283). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.

Pomeroy, R. S. (1995). Community-based and co-management institutions for sustainable coastal fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 27(3), 143–162. doi:10.1016/0964-5691(95)00042-9.CrossRef

Pomeroy, R. S., & Berkes, F. (1997). Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, 21(5), 465–480. doi:10.1016/s0308-597x(97)00017-1.CrossRef

Ratner, B. D., Cohen, P., Barman, B., Mam, K., Nagoli, J., & Allison, E. H. (2013). Governance of aquatic agricultural systems; analyzing representation, power and accountability. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 59.CrossRef

Ruddle, K. (1994). External forces and change in traditional community-based fishery management systems in the Asia-Pacific Region. Maritime Anthropological Studies, 6, 1–37.

Ruddle, K. (1998). The context of policy design for existing community-based fisheries management systems in the Pacific Islands. Ocean and Coastal Management, 40(2–3), 105–126.CrossRef

Sen, S., & Nielsen, J. R. (1996). Fisheries co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Policy, 20(5), 405–418.CrossRef

Siry, H. S. (2006). Decentralized coastal zone in Malaysia and Indonesia: A comparative perspective. Coastal Management, 34(3), 267–286.CrossRef

Skewes, T. (1990). Marine resource profiles: Solomon Islands. Honiara: Forum Fisheries Agency.

Solomon Islands Government. (2009). Solomon Islands national plan of action; Coral Triangle Initiative on coral reefs, fisheries and food security. Honiara: Ministry of Environment Conservation and Meteorology.

Veron, J., Devantier, L. M., Turak, E., Green, A. L., Kininmonth, S., Stafford-Smith, M., & Petersen, N. A. (2009). Delineating the coral triangle. Galaxea, Journal of Coral Reef Studies, 11(2), 91–100.CrossRef

White, G. (2004). Indigenizing local governance: Chiefs, church, and state in a Solomon Islands society. Honolulu: East-west Center.

World Bank. (2000). Voices from the village: A comparative study of coastal resource management in the Pacific Islands (Pacific Islands Discussion Paper Series No 9 East Asia and the Pacific Region 22247, p. 85). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Titel: Community-Based, Co-management for Governing Small-Scale Fisheries of the Pacific: A Solomon Islands’ Case Study
verfasst von: Philippa Cohen
Louisa Evans
Hugh Govan
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17033-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-17034-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"