Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Interactive, digital mapping technology is providing new pedagogical possibilities for children and their families, as well as new methodological opportunities for education researchers. Our paper reports on an example of this novel terrain we call “Community Technology Mapping” (CTM). CTM was a designed task that was part of a larger ethnographic study of children and families’ digital media and technology practices in and around their homes. CTM incorporated interactive digital mapping technology with a structured interview protocol as a pedagogical context for young people and a methodological tool for researchers. As a pedagogical context for computer-supported collaborative learning, CTM supported young people to see and reflect on their everyday technological practices as temporally and spatially organized across scales of human interaction. As a methodological tool, CTM allowed researchers to see families’ place-based and on-the-move activities that were outside the more naturalistic observations of home-based technology use. Our analysis of CTM draws upon video recordings and screen captures of young people’s reflections on and live mappings of places they typically used technology and engaged with media. We found that children developed strategies with the mapping technology to make places visible, make them coherent, and make them mobile. These strategies produced a “cascade of inscriptions” within the CTM task for mapping new mobilities of digital, daily life. We argue that interactive digital mapping technologies not only support researchers to ask new questions about the spatiotemporal aspects of learning phenomena, but also contribute to a new genre of place-based, digital literacies- locative literacy- for learners to navigate.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Barker, J., Kraftl, P., Horton, J., & Tucker, F. (2009). The road less travelled- new directions in children’s and young people’s mobilities. Mobilities, 4(1), 1–10. CrossRef
Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. CrossRef
Bingham, N., & Thrift, N. (2000). Some new instructions for travelers: The geography of Bruno Latour & Michael Serres. In Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking Spaces. New York: Routledge.
Bowker, J., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory methods and practice. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE: Los Angeles. CrossRef
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge.
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. CrossRef
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. CrossRef
Cole, M. (2006). The fifth dimension: An after-school program built on diversity. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5(4), 69–99.
Crampton, J. W. (2010). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Wiley-Blackwell.
Cress, U., Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2015). The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 109–116.
diSessa, A. A. (1997). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ellegård, K., & Hägerstrand, T. (1977). Activity organization and the generation of daily travel: Two future alternatives. Economic Geography, 53(2), 126–152. CrossRef
Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357. CrossRef
Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2012). New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 544–559. CrossRef
Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466. CrossRef
Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t show nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139–174. CrossRef
Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Erstad, O. (2011). The learning lives of digital youth-beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25–43. CrossRef
Farman, J. (2010). Mapping the digital empire: Google Earth and the process of postmodern cartography. New Media & Society, 12(6), 869–888. CrossRef
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1998). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Thinking, 14, 1.
Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of acceleration. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, E., Takeuchi, L. M., & Wartella, E. (Eds.). (2017). Children and families in the digital age: Learning together in a media saturated culture. New York: Routledge.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction Publishers.
Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1–29. CrossRef
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23. CrossRef
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes. Semiotica, 191(1), 257–286.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2013). Nurturing. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlick (Eds.), Fast-forward Family: Home, work, and relationships in middle-class America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gordon, E., Elwood, S. & Mitchell, K. (2016). Critical spatial learning: Participatory mapping, spatial histories, and youth civic engagement. Children’s Geographies, 14(5), 558–572.
Graesch, A. P. (2013). At home. In E. Ochs & T. Kremer-Sadlick (Eds.), Fast-forward family: Home, work and relationships in middle-class America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hall, R. & Stevens, R. (2016). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A.A. diSessa, M. Levin, and N.J.S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences. New York: Routledge.
Hall, R., Ma, J. Y., & Nemirovsky, R. (2015). Rescaling bodies in/as representational instruments in GPS drawing. In V. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Hart, R. (1977). Children’s experience of place: A developmental study. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Higgins, S. E., Mercier, E., Burd, E., & Hatch, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 515–538. CrossRef
Hontvedt, M., & Arnseth, H. C. (2013). On the bridge to learn: Analysing the social organization of nautical instruction in a ship simulator. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 89–112. CrossRef
Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25, 152–174. CrossRef
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/Standards-Resources/iste-standards_students-2016_one-sheet_final.pdf?sfvrsn=0.23432948779836327.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Boston: MIT press.
Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine: CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Jenson, O. B., Sheller, M., & Wind, S. (2015). Together and apart: Affective ambiences and negotiation in families’ everyday life and mobility. Mobilities, 10(3), 363–382. CrossRef
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(10), 39–103. CrossRef
Kerdeman, D. (2003). Challenging self-understanding as a focus of teaching and learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 293–308. CrossRef
Kimiko, R., & Agogino, A. (2013). Off the paved paths: Exploring nature with a mobile augmented reality learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 5(2), 21–49. CrossRef
Kingston, R. (2010). Mind over matter?: History and the spatial turn. Cultural and Social History, 7(1), 111–121. CrossRef
Lammes, S. (2016). Digital mapping interfaces: From immutable mobiles to mutable images. New Media & Society, 1–15.
Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. In H. Kuklick (Ed.), Knowledge and society studies in the sociology of culture past and present. Jai Press, 6, 1–40.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Ch. 6, Centres of calculation, 215–257.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1999). Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. In Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics & culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. CrossRef
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290. CrossRef
Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ma, J. (2016). Designing disruptions for productive hybridity: The case of walking scale geometry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 335–371. CrossRef
Ma, J. Y., & Munter, C. (2014). The spatial production of learning opportunities in skateboard parks. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(3), 238–258. CrossRef
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states (interdependent relationships in ecosystems). Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/.
November, V., Camacho-Hubner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 581–599. CrossRef
Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google Earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145–152. CrossRef
Phillips, N. C. (2013). Investigating adolescents’ interpretations and reproductions of thematic maps and map argument performances in the media. (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University).
Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2013). Saturated and situated: Expanding the meaning of media in the routines of everyday life. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 677–691. CrossRef
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacci, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Radinsky, J. (2017). Data on the move. Talk presented at Learning on the Move Workshop. Nashville, TN.
Roschelle, J. & Pea, R. (2002). To unlock the learning value of wireless mobile devices, understand coupling. Proceedings of the IEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. Växjö, Sweden.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem-solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. CrossRef
Rudwick, M. (1976). The emergence of a visual language for geological science, 1760–1840. History of Science, 14, 149–195. CrossRef
Santo, C. A., Ferguson, N., & Trippel, A. (2010). Engaging urban youth through technology: The youth neighborhood mapping initiative. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(1), 52–65. CrossRef
Shapiro, B., Hall, R., & Heiberger, L. (2015). Assembling American roots music: Visitors’ micro-curation and engagement in museum gallery spaces. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago, IL.
Shapiro, B., Hall, R., & Owens, D. A. (2017). Developing & using interaction geography in a museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 377–399. CrossRef
Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2014). CSCL artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 237–245. CrossRef
Star, S. L. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 28(1), 26–56. CrossRef
Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. CrossRef
Stevens, R. (2000). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 373–401. CrossRef
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–150). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Takeuchi, L., & Stevens, R. (2011). The new co-viewing: Designing for learning through joint media engagement. A report of The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop and LIFE Center.
Tate, W. F. (2008). Geography of opportunity: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397-411. CrossRef
Taylor, K. H. (2017). Learning along lines: Locative literacies for reading and writing the city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 533–574. CrossRef
Taylor, K.H. & Phillips, N. (2017). Place-making. In K. Peppler, (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Out-of-school Learning Time. New York: SAGE.
Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1–2), 65–93. CrossRef
Taylor, K. H., & Silvis, D. (2017). Mobile city science: Technology-supported collaborative learning at community scale. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2017). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Taylor, K.H., Takeuchi, L. & Stevens, R. (2017a). Mapping the daily media round: Novel methods for understanding families’ mobile technology use. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–15.
Taylor, K. H., Silvis, D., & Stevens, R. (2017b). Collecting and connecting: Intergenerational learning with digital media. In E. Gee, L. M. Takeuchi, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Children and families in the digital age: Learning together in a media saturated culture. New York: Routledge.
Twenge, J. "Have smartphones destroyed a generation?" The Atlantic, Sept. 2017, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/has-the-smartphone-destroyed-a-generation/534198/.
Umphress, J., & Sherin, B. (2015). The body as viewfinder: Using wearable cameras in learning research. In V. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Verhoeff, N. (2012). Mobile screens: The visual regime of navigation. Amsterdam University Press.
Vertesi, J. (2008). Mind the gap: The London underground and the users’ representations of urban spaces. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 7–33. CrossRef
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, M. W. (2011). ‘Training the eye’: Formation of the geocoding subject. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 04. CrossRef
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 519–541. CrossRef
Zahn, C., Krauskopf, K., Hesse, F. W., & Pea, R. (2012). How to improve collaborative learning with video tools in the classroom? Social vs. cognitive guidance for student teams. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 259–284. CrossRef
- Community technology mapping: inscribing places when “everything is on the move”
Katie Headrick Taylor
- Springer US
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com