Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computing
Erschienen in: Computing 8/2014

01.08.2014

Comparing PaaS offerings in light of SaaS development

A comparison of PaaS platforms based on a practical case study

verfasst von: Stefan Walraven, Eddy Truyen, Wouter Joosen

Erschienen in: Computing | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Software vendors increasingly aim to apply the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) delivery model instead of the traditional on-premise model. Platforms-as-a-Service (PaaS), such as Google App Engine and Windows Azure, deliver a computing platform and solution stack as a service, but they also aim to facilitate the development of cloud applications (SaaS). Such PaaS offerings should enable third parties to build and deliver multi-tenant SaaS applications while shielding the complexity of the underpinning middleware and infrastructure. This paper compares, on the basis of a practical case study, three different and representative PaaS platforms with respect to their support for SaaS application development. We have reengineered an on-premise enterprise application into a SaaS application and we have subsequently deployed it in three PaaS-based cloud environments. We have investigated the following qualities of the PaaS platforms from the perspective of SaaS development: portability of the application code base, available support for creating and managing multi-tenant-aware applications, and quality of the tool support.
Nächster Artikel A middleware platform for the dynamic evolution of distributed component-based systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
2
This is a generic observation, early practitioners of parallel computing shared similar and essential concerns.
 
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
Andrikopoulos V, Binz T, Leymann F, Strauch S (2013) How to adapt applications for the cloud environment. Computing 95(6):493–535
5.
6.
Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz RH, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson DA, Rabkin A, Stoica I, Zaharia M (2009) Above the clouds: a berkeley view of cloud computing. Tech. Rep. 28, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
7.
Aulbach S, Grust T, Jacobs D, Kemper A, Rittinger J (2008) Multi-tenant databases for software as a service: schema-mapping techniques. In: SIGMOD ’08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. ACM, New York, pp 1195–1206
8.
Aulbach S, Jacobs D, Kemper A, Seibold M (2009) A comparison of flexible schemas for software as a service. In: SIGMOD ’09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. ACM, New York, pp 881–888
9.
Azeez A, Perera S, Gamage D, Linton R, Siriwardana P, Leelaratne D, Weerawarana S, Fremantle P (2010) Multi-tenant SOA middleware for cloud computing. IEEE international conference on cloud computing. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 458–465
10.
Baker J, Bond C, Corbett JC, Furman JJ, Khorlin A, Larson J, Léon JM, Li Y, Lloyd A, Yushprakh V (2011) Megastore: providing scalable, highly available storage for interactive services. In: CIDR ’11: Proceedings on conference on innovative data, systems research
11.
Bezemer CP, Zaidman A, Platzbeecker B, Hurkmans T, Hart A (2010) Enabling multi-tenancy: an industrial experience report. In: ICSM ’10: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on software, Maintenance, pp 1–8
12.
Bezemer CP, Zaidman A (2010) Challenges of reengineering into multi-tenant SaaS applications. Software Engineering Research Group (SERG) 12, TU Delft
13.
Bhuyan LN, Agrawal DP (1984) Generalized hypercube and hyperbus structures for a computer network. IEEE Trans Comput C-33(4):323–333
14.
Bozman J, Chen G (2010) Cloud computing: the need for portability and interoperability. IDC Analyze the Future, Sponsored by Red Hat, Inc
15.
Chang F, Dean J, Ghemawat S, Hsieh WC, Wallach DA, Burrows M, Chandra T, Fikes A, Gruber RE (2008) Bigtable: a distributed storage system for structured data. ACM Trans Comput Syst 26(2): 1–4CrossRefMATH
16.
17.
Chen PPS (1976) The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans Database Syst 1(1):9–36CrossRef
18.
Chohan N, Bunch C, Pang S, Krintz C, Mostafa N, Soman S, Wolski R (2010) AppScale: scalable and open AppEngine application development and deployment. CloudComp ’09: First international conference on cloud computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–70
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Garen K (2007) Software portability: weighing options. Making choices. CPA J 77(11):10–12
30.
Giessmann A, Stanoevska-Slabeva K (2012) Platform as a service: a conjoint study on consumers’ preferences. In: ICIS ’12: 33rd international conference on information systems. Association for Information Systems (AIS)
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Guo CJ, Sun W, Huang Y, Wang ZH, Gao B (2007) A framework for native multi-tenancy application development and management. In: CEC/EEE ’07: 9th IEEE international conference on E-commerce technology and 4th IEEE international conference on enterprise computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services. pp 551–558
37.
38.
39.
Hiranandani S, Kennedy K, Tseng CW (1992) Compiling Fortran D for MIMD distributed-memory machines. Commun ACM 35(8):66–80CrossRef
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Mietzner R, Leymann F, Papazoglou MP (2008) Defining composite configurable SaaS application packages using SCA, variability descriptors and multi-tenancy patterns. In: ICIW ’08: third international conference on internet and web applications and services, pp 156–161
51.
Mooney JD (1990) Strategies for supporting application portability. Computer 23(11):59–70CrossRef
52.
53.
54.
55.
Nurmi D, Wolski R, Grzegorczyk C, Obertelli G, Soman S, Youseff L, Zagorodnov D (2009) The eucalyptus open-source cloud-computing system. CCGRID ’09: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/ACM international symposium on cluster computing and the grid. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 124–131
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
Paraiso F, Haderer N, Merle P, Rouvoy R, Seinturier L (2012) A federated multi-cloud PaaS infrastructure. In: CLOUD ’12: IEEE 5th international conference on cloud, computing, pp 392–399
61.
Petcu D ((2011)) Portability and interoperability between clouds: challenges and case study. In: Abramowicz W, Llorente I, Surridge M, Zisman A, Vayssiè J (eds) ServiceWave ’11: towards a service-based internet. Springer, Berlin, pp 62–74
62.
Prodan R, Ostermann S (2009) A survey and taxonomy of infrastructure as a service and web hosting cloud providers. In: 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on grid, computing, pp 17–25
63.
64.
Reese G (2009) Cloud application architectures. Theory in practice. O’Reilly
65.
Rimal BP, Choi E, Lumb I (2009) A taxonomy and survey of cloud computing systems. In: NCM ’09: 5th international joint conference on INC, IMS and IDC, pp 44–51
66.
Rosenberg J, Mateos A (2010) The cloud at your service. Manning Pubs Co Series, Manning Publications, Greenwich
67.
68.
69.
70.
Schubert L, Jeffery K, Neidecker-Lutz B (2010) The future of cloud computing: opportunities for European cloud computing beyond 2010. Expert Group Report, Public Version 1.0, European Commission, Information Society and, Media
71.
Shroff G, Agarwal P, Devanbu P (2009) InstantApps: a WYSIWYG model driven interpreter for web applications. In: ICSE-companion ’09: 31st international conference on software engineering—companion volume, pp 417–418
72.
Shroff G (2008) Dev 2.0: model driven development in the cloud. In: SIGSOFT ’08/FSE-16: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering. ACM, New York, pp 283–283
73.
Shroff G (2010) Enterprise cloud computing: technology, architecture, applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
74.
Siegel HJ (1979) Interconnection networks for SIMD machines. Computer 12(6):57–65CrossRef
75.
Singh JP, Weber WD, Gupta A (1992) SPLASH: Stanford parallel applications for shared-memory. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 20(1):5–44CrossRef
76.
Snir M, Otto SW, Walker DW, Dongarra J, Huss-Lederman S (1995) MPI: the complete reference. MIT Press, Cambridge
77.
Sotomayor B, Montero RS, Llorente IM, Foster I (2009) Virtual infrastructure management in private and hybrid clouds. IEEE Internet Comput 13(5):14–22CrossRef
78.
Sun W, Zhang X, Guo CJ, Sun P, Su H (2008) Software as a service: configuration and customization perspectives. In: SERVICES-2 ’08: IEEE congress on services Part II, pp 18–25
79.
Vaquero LM, Rodero-Merino L, Caceres J, Lindner M (2009) A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 39(1):50–55CrossRef
80.
81.
Walraven S, Truyen E, Joosen W (2011) A middleware layer for flexible and cost-efficient multi-tenant applications. Middleware ’11: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IFIP/USENIX international conference on middleware. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–389
82.
Weissman CD, Bobrowski S (2009) The design of the force.com multitenant internet application development platform. In: SIGMOD ’09: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD international conference on management of data. ACM, New York, pp 889–896
83.
84.
Metadaten
Titel
Comparing PaaS offerings in light of SaaS development
A comparison of PaaS platforms based on a practical case study
verfasst von
Stefan Walraven
Eddy Truyen
Wouter Joosen
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Computing / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0010-485X
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-5057
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-013-0346-9