nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

01.02.2024 | Research Paper

Comparing Subjective Well-being Longitudinally: Measurement Invariance of the Personal Wellbeing Index Across Time

verfasst von: Lei Liu, Jian-min Sun, Zheyuan Wang

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 1-2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is commonly used as an instrument for measuring subjective well-being, and longitudinal comparisons of PWI scores are increasingly being used to monitor well-being trends within a nation. The aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal invariance of the PWI, as well as the latent mean differences across time, provided that scalar invariance was established. Using data from a sample of Chinese adults (N = 774), we conducted longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis to explore the measurement invariance of the PWI across a three-year period (with one assessment per year). We utilized a four-step approach (configural, metric, scalar, and residual) to evaluate the levels of invariance. The results indicated that the PWI demonstrated full scalar invariance and partial residual invariance over time, with noninvariant residual variances observed for Item 1 and Item 5. In addition, the latent factor means were significantly different between time points, with PWI scores showing an increase over time. Overall, our study provides empirical evidence that the PWI has satisfactory psychometric properties for longitudinal invariance, which allows for cross-time comparisons of subjective well-being. These findings have important implications for using the PWI as a tool to assess progress within a nation and evaluate the effectiveness of policies aimed at enhancing subjective well-being.

Nächster Artikel One (Financial Well-Being) Model Fits All? Testing the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-Being Scale Across Nine Countries

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alcantara, S. C., González-Carrasco, M., Montserrat, C., Viñas, F., Casas, F., & Abreu, D. P. (2017). Peer violence in the school environment and its relationship with subjective well-being and perceived social support among children and adolescents in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1507–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9786-1.CrossRef

Anglim, J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2015). Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the temporal dynamics of subjective well-being: A 10 year longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.08.003.CrossRef

Barbosa-Leiker, C., Kostick, M., Lei, M., McPherson, S., Roper, V., Hoekstra, T., & Wright, B. (2013). Measurement invariance of the perceived stress scale and latent mean differences across gender and time. Stress and Health, 29(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2463.CrossRef

Bedin, L. M., & Sarriera, J. C. (2015). A comparative study of the subjective well-being of parents and adolescents considering gender, age and social class. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0589-7.CrossRef

Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Lin, M., & Margraf, J. (2019). Happiness, life satisfaction and positive mental health: Investigating reciprocal effects over four years in a Chinese student sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.11.012.CrossRef

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.CrossRef

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.CrossRef

Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.2.117.CrossRef

Capic, T., Li, N., & Cummins, R. A. (2018). Confirmation of subjective wellbeing set-points: Foundational for subjective social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 137, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1585-5.CrossRef

Chan, M. H. M., Gerhardt, M., & Feng, X. (2019). Measurement invariance across age groups and over 20 years’ time of the negative and positive affect scale (NAPAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000529.CrossRef

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80001-4.CrossRef

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRef

Cummins, R. A. (2018). Subjective wellbeing as a social indicator. Social Indicators Research, 135, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1496-x.CrossRef

Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024704320683.CrossRef

Davey, G., Chen, Z., & Lau, A. (2009). Peace in a thatched hut—that is happiness’: Subjective wellbeing among peasants in rural China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9078-x.CrossRef

Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137.CrossRef

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.CrossRef

Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541.CrossRef

Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12136.CrossRef

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6.CrossRef

Dimitrov, V. D. (2006). Comparing groups of latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 26, 429–439.

Edwards, M. C., & Wirth, R. J. (2009). Measurement and the study of change. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911163.CrossRef

Esnaola, I., Benito, M., Antonio-Agirre, I., Axpe, I., & Lorenzo, M. (2019). Longitudinal measurement invariance of the satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescence. Quality of Life Research, 28(10), 2831–2837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02224-7.CrossRef

Gasper, D. (2005). Subjective and objective well-being in relation to economic inputs: Puzzles and responses. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760500130309.CrossRef

González-Carrasco, M., Vaqué, C., Malo, S., Crous, G., Casas, F., & Figuer, C. (2019). A qualitative longitudinal study on the well-being of children and adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 12(2), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9534-7.CrossRef

Goodwin, B. C., Browne, M., Hing, N., & Russell, A. M. (2017). Applying a revised two-factor model of impulsivity to predict health behaviour and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.029.CrossRef

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

International Wellbeing Group (2013). Personal wellbeing index: 5th edition Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.

Jovanović, V., Cummins, R. A., Weinberg, M., Kaliterna, L., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2019). Personal wellbeing index: A cross-cultural measurement invariance study across four countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(3), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9966-2.CrossRef

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236.CrossRef

Kushlev, K., Radosic, N., & Diener, E. (2022). Subjective well-being and prosociality around the globe: Happy people give more of their time and money to others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211043379.CrossRef

Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cut-off criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919.CrossRef

Lau, A. L., Cummins, R. A., & Mcpherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z.CrossRef

Le, H., Jiang, Z., & Radford, K. (2021). Leader-member exchange and subjective well-being: The moderating role of metacognitive cultural intelligence. Personnel Review, 50(3), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2020-0065.CrossRef

Lee, C. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Sleep duration and psychological well-being among new zealanders. Sleep Health, 5(6), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2019.06.008.CrossRef

Li, J., & Raine, J. W. (2014). The time trend of life satisfaction in China. Social Indicators Research, 116, 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0300-4.CrossRef

Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J. Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075.CrossRef

Mclntyre, E., Saliba, A., & McKenzie, K. (2020). Subjective wellbeing in the Indian general population: A validation study of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Quality of Life Research, 29, 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02375-7.CrossRef

Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.CrossRef

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825.CrossRef

Nielsen, I., Smyth, R., & Zhai, Q. (2010). Subjective well-being of China’s off-farm migrants. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9142-9.CrossRef

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.CrossRef

Richardson, B., Tyszkiewicz, M. D. F., Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2016). The psychometric equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index for normally functioning and homeostatically defeated Australian adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9613-0.CrossRef

Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., Forjaz, M. J., Prieto‐Flores, M. E., Rojo‐Perez, F., Fernandez‐Mayoralas, G., & Martinez‐Martin, P. (2012). Health status and well‐being of older adults living in the community and in residential care settings: Are differences influenced by age? Aging & Mental Health, 16(7), 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.684664.CrossRef

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.CrossRef

Sayler, M. F., Boazman, J., Natesan, P., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2015). Subjective well-being of gifted American college students: An examination of psychometric properties of the PWI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215597748.CrossRef

Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., & Zhai, Q. (2010). Personal well-being in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 95(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9457-2.CrossRef

Somaraju, A. V., Nye, C. D., & Olenick, J. (2022). A review of measurement equivalence in organizational research: What’s old, what’s new, what’s next? Organizational Research Methods, 25(4), 741–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211056524.CrossRef

Spurk, D., Abele, A. E., & Volmer, J. (2011). The career satisfaction scale: Longitudinal measurement invariance and latent growth analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02028.x.CrossRef

Tait, J. L., Duckham, R. L., Milte, C. M., Main, L. C., & Daly, R. M. (2019). Associations between inflammatory and neurological markers with quality of life and well-being in older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 125, 110662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110662.CrossRef

Tang, J., Xu, Y., Ma, W., & Gao, S. (2021). Does participation in poverty alleviation programmes increase subjective well-being? Results from a survey of rural residents in Shanxi, China. Habitat International, 118, 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102455.CrossRef

Tenney, E. R., Poole, J. M., & Diener, E. (2016). Does positivity enhance work performance? Why, when, and what we don’t know. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.002.CrossRef

Thomas, E. F., Amiot, C. E., Louis, W. R., & Goddard, A. (2017). Collective self-determination: How the agent of help promotes pride, well-being, and support for intergroup helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217695553.CrossRef

Tomyn, A. J., Tyszkiewicz, M. D. F., & Cummins, R. A. (2013). The personal wellbeing index: Psychometric equivalence for adults and school children. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9964-9.CrossRef

Tomyn, A. J., Tyszkiewicz, M. D. F., & Norrish, J. M. (2014). The psychometric equivalence of the personal wellbeing index school-children for indigenous and non-indigenous Australian adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9415-1.CrossRef

Tomyn, A. J., Stokes, M. A., Cummins, R. A., & Dias, P. C. (2020). A rasch analysis of the personal well-being index in school children. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 43(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278718819219.CrossRef

Torbet, S., Proeve, M., & Roberts, R. M. (2019). Self-compassion: A protective factor for parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Mindfulness, 10(12), 2492–2506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01224-5.CrossRef

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

Voukelatou, V., Gabrielli, L., Miliou, I., Cresci, S., Sharma, R., Tesconi, M., & Pappalardo, L. (2021). Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 11(4), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2.CrossRef

Weinberg, M. K., Seton, C., & Cameron, N. (2018). The measurement of subjective wellbeing: Item-order effects in the personal wellbeing index—adult. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1.CrossRef

Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.CrossRef

Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.002.CrossRef

Xing, Z., & Huang, L. (2014). The relationship between age and subjective well-being: Evidence from five capital cities in mainland China. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0396-6.CrossRef

Zager Kocjan, G., Jose, P. E., Sočan, G., & Avsec, A. (2021). Measurement invariance of the subjective happiness scale across countries, gender, Age, and Time. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121993558.CrossRef

Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J. P., Cieciuch, J., Adams, B. G., Osin, E. N., Ardi, R., … & Maltby, J. (2017). Measurement invariance of Personal Well-being index (PWI-8) across 26 countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9795-0.CrossRef

Zhang, Y., Sun, J. M., Shaffer, M. A., & Lin, C. H. (2022). High commitment work systems and employee well-being: The roles of workplace friendship and task interdependence. Human Resource Management, 61(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22093.CrossRef

Zhou, Y., Huang, X., Shen, Y., & Tian, L. (2023). Does targeted poverty alleviation policy lead to happy life? Evidence from rural China. China Economic Review, 81, 102037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102037.CrossRef

Titel: Comparing Subjective Well-being Longitudinally: Measurement Invariance of the Personal Wellbeing Index Across Time
verfasst von: Lei Liu
Jian-min Sun
Zheyuan Wang
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 1-2/2024
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00719-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2024

Longitudinal Effect of Gratitude on Prosocial Behavior among Young Adults: Evidence from the Bi-factor Model of Gratitude

In My Grasp or out of My Hands? Belief About Where Life Satisfaction Comes from Predicts Motivation to Seek it

One (Financial Well-Being) Model Fits All? Testing the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-Being Scale Across Nine Countries

Feeling Important, Feeling Well. The Association Between Mattering and Well-being: A Meta-analysis Study

Aristotelian Flourishing and Contemporary Philosophical Theories of Wellbeing

To Evaluate the Age–Happiness Relationship, Look Beyond Statistical Significance