Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Development of an Innovative Controlled Drying Technology for the Recovery of Waste from the Wine Chain from a Circular Economy Perspective Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

37. Comparison and Contrast Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Innovation

verfasst von : Atifa Amin, Maria Claudia Lucchetti, Laura Di Pietro

Erschienen in: Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Noteworthy issues encountered by the business world have been nailed through corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social innovation (CSI). Nevertheless, several issues remain to be addressed through comparative studies and the integration of both concepts. However, research comparing both concepts has not been comprehensively examined. This article explores how CSR and CSI are executed in integrating diverse key components of an organization and how they vary in practice. A systematic literature review was conducted to provide a comprehensive comparison. Thirty articles were systematically selected and thematically analyzed. The significance of CSR and CSI practices shows that CSR is business-oriented with organizational goals; in contrast, CSI collaborates with various social aspects. This article contributes to a true historical account of CSR and CSI visions from evolution to organizational implementation with comparison and contrast based on the literature.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Circular Bioeconomy: An Analysis of Operational Principles and Limits
Nächstes Kapitel Transition to Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment: Connections with Social Responsibility Tools
Literatur
Amran A, Yon LC, Kiumarsi S et al (2021) Intellectual human capital, corporate social innovation, and sustainable development: a conceptual framework. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 15(1):75–99CrossRef
Andrianova O, Yeletskikh T (2012) Societal marketing: integration of European experiences into business practices in Belarus. Int J Emerg Mark 7(2):107–131CrossRef
Bennett EE, McWhorter RR (2019) Social movement learning and social innovation: empathy, agency, and the design of solutions to unmet social needs. Adv Dev Hum Resour 21(2):224–249CrossRef
Benneworth P, Cunha J (2015) Universities’ contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory practice. Eur J Innov Manag 18(4):508–527CrossRef
Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press, Iowa
Carmeli A, McKay AS, Kaufman JC (2014) Emotional intelligence and creativity: the mediating role of generosity and vigor. J Creat Behav 48(4):290–309CrossRef
Carroll AB (1979) A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505CrossRef
Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility a review of concepts, research, and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):85–105CrossRef
Carvalho JMS (2022) Modelling (social) intra/entrepreneurship process. Emerg Sci J 6(1):14–36CrossRef
Chen CY, Chou YL, Lee CS (2021) Social innovation, employee value cocreation, and organizational citizenship behaviour in a sport-related social enterprise: mediating effect of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability 13(22):12582CrossRef
Comin LC, Aguiar CC, Sehnem S et al (2020) Sustainable business models: a literature review. Benchmarking 27(7):2028–2047CrossRef
Denyer D, Tranfield D (2009) Producing a systematic review. In: The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods. Sage, London, pp 671–689
Fobbe L, Hilletofth P (2021) The role of stakeholder interaction in sustainable business models. A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 327:129510CrossRef
Gul A, Zaheer A, Jan Z et al (2015) Integration of strategic corporate social responsibility with other key anchors of success. Eur J Bus Manag 7(17):2222–2839
Harazin P, Kósi K (2013) Social challenges: social innovation through social responsibility. Period Polytech Soc Manag Sci 21(1):27–38CrossRef
Herrera MEB (2015) Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. J Bus Res 68(7):1468–1474CrossRef
Huang J, Xie P, Zeng Y et al (2021) The effect of corporate social responsibility on the technology innovation of high-growth business organizations. Sustainability 13(13):7286CrossRef
Iizuka, M. (2013). Innovation systems framework: still useful in the new global context? UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. UNU-MERIT Working Papers No. 005:1–19
Jali MN, Abas Z, Ariffin AS (2017) Corporate social responsibility and corporate social innovation: a conceptual understanding. SHS Web Conf 34:01001CrossRef
Kapoor S (2019) Entrepreneurship for economic and social empowerment of women: a case study of self help credit program in Nithari Village, Noida, India. Australasian Account Bus Fin J 13(2):123–142CrossRef
Krey N, Picot-Coupey K, Cliquet G (2022) Shopping mall retailing: a bibliometric analysis and systematic assessment of Chebat’s contributions. J Retail Consum Serv 64:102702CrossRef
Laville JL (2010) The solidarity economy: an international movement. RCCS Annu Rev 2:1–41
Linnenluecke MK, Marrone M, Singh AK (2020) Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust J Manag 45(2):175–194CrossRef
Mattera M, Baena V (2015) The key to carving out a high corporate reputation based on innovation: corporate social responsibility. Soc Responsib J 11(2):221–241CrossRef
Mirvis P, Googins B (2017) The new business of business: innovating for a better world. Giving thoughts, conference board, pp 1–19
Mirvis P, Googins S (2018) Engaging employees as social innovators. Calif Manag Rev 60(4):25–50CrossRef
Mirvis P, Herrera MEB, Googins B et al (2016) Corporate social innovation: how firms learn to innovate for the greater good. J Bus Res 69(11):5014–5021CrossRef
Moulaert F, Martinelli F, Swyngedouw E et al (2005) Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Stud 42(11):1969–1990CrossRef
Nguyen HT, Hoang TG, Luu H (2020) Corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: opportunities and innovation experienced by multinational corporation subsidiaries. Soc Responsib J 16(6):771–792CrossRef
Panagopoulos NG, Rapp AA, Vlachos PA (2016) I think they think we are good citizens: meta-perceptions as antecedents of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Bus Res 69(8):2781–2790CrossRef
Rabbani MR, Bashar A, Nawaz N et al (2021) Exploring the role of Islamic fintech in combating the aftershocks of covid-19: the open social innovation of the Islamic financial system. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 7(2):136CrossRef
Roszkowska-Menkes MT (2018) Integrating strategic CSR and open innovation. Towards a conceptual framework. Soc Responsib J 14(4):950–966CrossRef
Santos MJ (2014) Theoretical contributions towards rethinking corporate social responsibility. Manag Res 12(3):288–307
Shin H, Cho CH, Brivot M et al (2022) The moral relationality of professionalism discourses: the case of corporate social responsibility practitioners in South Korea. Bus Soc 61(4):886–923CrossRef
Shu C, Hashmi HBA, Xiao Z et al (2021) How do Islamic values influence CSR? A systematic literature review of studies from 1995–2020. J Bus Ethics 181, 0123456789
Van Der Have RP, Rubalcaba L (2016) Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Res Policy 45(9):1923–1935CrossRef
Weisenfeld U (2012) Corporate social responsibility in innovation: insights from two cases of Syngenta’s activities in genetically modified organisms. Creat Innov Manag 21(2):199–211CrossRef
Williams JD, Bone SA, Christensen GL (2020) Profiting from protecting small business borrowers: take that to the bank! Rutgers Bus Rev 5(2):226–235
Yang TK, Yan MR (2020) The corporate shared value for sustainable development: an ecosystem perspective. Sustainability 12(6):1–16CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison and Contrast Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Innovation
verfasst von
Atifa Amin
Maria Claudia Lucchetti
Laura Di Pietro
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Buch
Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55205-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-55206-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55206-9_37