nach oben

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Erschienen in:

01.09.2023 | Research paper

Comparison of nanotechnology research for coronaviruses and influenza from 2000 to 2022

verfasst von: Thomas S. Woodson, Swaneet Jha

Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Ausgabe 9/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In a race to manage the COVID-19 pandemic, innovations in nanomedicine were crucial for vaccine development. This study compares nanotechnology research on coronaviruses (nanocovid) and nanotechnology research on influenza (nanoflu) to understand the unique characteristics and drivers of nanocovid research. The main differences between nanoflu and nanocovid relate to the number of publications. We find that from 2000 to the summer of 2022, there were 3445 nanocovid articles and 1643 nanoflu articles. Moreover, from 2000 to 2018, there was limited nanocovid research, despite prominent coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Nanocovid research gained substantial momentum only during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nanoflu research, on the other hand, had consistent but slow growth since 2000. Nanocovid and nanoflu researches are similar in many aspects. The most active countries and institutions researching nanocovid and nanoflu are similar, the research is published in similar journals, and both fields use similar keywords. Despite the severity of influenza on global health and well-being, it receives little attention from nanotechnology researchers. Coronavirus research only got significant attention after the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings show that factors other than disease severity drive research portfolios.

Vorheriger Artikel Differential pulse voltammetry determination of acetaminophen and codeine in pharmaceutical formulations using a Mn/UiO-66 modified glassy carbon electrode

Nächster Artikel Performance evaluation of all-inorganic cesium-based perovskite solar cell with BaSnO3 as ETL

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Chauhan G et al (2020) Nanotechnology for COVID-19: therapeutics and vaccine research. ACS Nano 14(7):7760–7782CrossRef

Ziqi W et al (2022) Nanotechnology‐facilitated vaccine development during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Exploration 2(5):20210082

National Science and Technology Council (2022) The national nanotechnology initiative supplement to the president’s 2022 Budget. https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/NNI-FY22-Budget-Supplement.pdf. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

Mulabbi EN, Tweyongyere R, Byarugaba DK (2021) The history of the emergence and transmission of human coronaviruses. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 88(1):1872

Chiu WT, Huang JS, Ho YS (2004) Bibliometric analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related research in the beginning stage. Scientometrics 61(1):69–77CrossRef

World Health Organization (2023) MERS situation update, 2023. https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/mers-cov/mers-outbreaks.html. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

Prime H, Wade M, Browne DT (2020) Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am Psychol 75(5):631CrossRef

Hodder A (2020) New technology, work and employment in the era of COVID-19: reflecting on legacies of research. New Technol Work Employ 35(3):262–275). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12173

Greer SL, King EJ, da Fonseca M, Andre Peralta-Santos E (2020) The comparative politics of COVID-19: the need to understand government responses. Glob Public Health 15(9):1413–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab&aria-labelledby=full-articleCrossRef

10.

Dattani S, Spooner F (2022) How many people die from the flu. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/influenza-deaths. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

11.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022) What is the difference between influenza (flu) and COVID-19? https://www.cdc.gov/flu/symptoms/flu-vs-covid19.htm. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

12.

Iuliano AD, Roguski KM, Chang HH, Muscatello DJ, Palekar R, Tempia S, Cohen C, Gran JM, Schanzer D, Cowling BJ, Wu P, Kyncl J, Ang LW, Park M, Redlberger-Fritz M, Yu H, Espenhain L, Krishnan A, Emukule G, … Mustaquim D (2018) Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study. Lancet 391(10127):1285–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2

13.

Coronavirus deaths (2023) Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

14.

Fedson DS, Hirota Y, Shin HK, Cambillard PE, Kiely J, Ambrosch F, ... Strikas RA (1997) Influenza vaccination in 22 developed countries: an update to 1995. Vaccine 15(14):1506–1511

15.

Ganaie SA, Wani JA (2021) Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Nanotechnology Research Field. COLLNET J Scientometr Inform Manag 15(2):445–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.2008780CrossRef

16.

Godin B (2006) On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 69(1):109–133CrossRef

17.

Kokol P, Blažun Vošner H, Završnik J (2021) Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Inform Libr J 38(2):125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12295CrossRef

18.

Takeda Y, Mae S, Kajikawa Y, Matsushima K (2009) Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 80(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1897-3CrossRef

19.

Chen K, Guan J (2011) A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. J Informetri 5(2):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.007CrossRef

20.

Wang J, Shapira P (2011) Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 87(3):563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5CrossRef

21.

Woodson T, Rodriguez V (2019) Analysis of inequality in nanomedicine using clinical trials and disease burden. Nanomedicine 14(13):1745–1757. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0456CrossRef

22.

Cozzens SE, Cortes R, Soumonni O, Woodson T (2013) Nanotechnology and the millennium development goals: water, energy, and agri-food. J Nanopart Res 15(11):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2001-yCrossRef

23.

Maclurcan DC (2010) Nanotechnology and the hope for a more equitable world: a mixed methods study. Dissertation. University of Technology Sydney

24.

Kostoff RN, Stump JA, Johnson D, Murday JS, Lau CGY, Tolles WM (2006) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanoparticle Res 8(3–4):301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-9035-8CrossRef

25.

Liu X, Zhang P, Li X, Chen H, Dang Y, Larson C, Roco M, Wang X (2009) Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. J Nanopart Res 11(8):1845–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7CrossRef

26.

Guan J, Ma N (2007) China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology a comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants.’ Res Policy 36(6):880–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.004CrossRef

27.

Zyoud SH (2016) Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis 16(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1600-5

28.

Wang Z, Chen Y, Cai G, Jiang Z, Liu K, Chen B, Jiang J, Gu H (2016) A bibliometric analysis of PubMed literature on Middle East respiratory syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060583

29.

Aristovnik A, Ravšelj D, Umek L (2020) A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(21):1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219132CrossRef

30.

Dehghanbanadaki H, Seif F, Vahidi Y, Razi F, Hashemi E, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H (2020) Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on coronavirus (COVID-19). M J Islam Repub Iran 34(1). https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.51

31.

Farooq R, Rehman S, Ashiq M, Siddique N, Ahmad S (2021) Bibliometric analysis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature published in Web of Science 2019–2020. J Fam Commun Med 28(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_332_20

32.

Wang P, Tian D (2021) Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19. J Biosaf Biosecur 3(1):4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002

33.

Zhai F, Zhai Y, Cong C, Song T, Xiang R, Feng T, Liang Z, Zeng Y, Yang J, Yang J, Liang J (2020). Research progress of coronavirus based on bibliometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113766

34.

Fan J, Gao Y, Zhao N, Dai R, Zhang H, Feng X, Shi G, Tian J, Chen C, Hambly BD, Bao S (2020) Bibliometric analysis on COVID-19: a comparison of research between English and Chinese studies. Front Public Health 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477

35.

Jacimovic J, Jakovljevic A, Nagendrababu V, Fergus Duncan H, DummerDummer PMH (2021) A bibliometric analysis of the dental scientific literature on COVID-19. Clin Oral Investig 25:6171–6183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03916-6/PublishedCrossRef

36.

Lunardi CN, Subrinho FL, de Freitas Barros MP, Lima RC, de Queiroz Melo ACM, Barbosa D de M, de Negreiros LG, Rodrigues BS, Neiva MS, Linhares JVR, Dalla Costa GF, Gomes A de J (2022) Bibliometric analysis: nanotechnology and COVID-19. Curr Topics Med Chem 22(8):629–638. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026622666220307125446CrossRef

37.

Moulick A, Richtera L, Milosavljevic V, Cernei N, Haddad Y, Zitka O, ... Adam V (2017) Advanced nanotechnologies in avian influenza: current status and future trends–a review. Anal Chim Acta 983:42–53

38.

Liverani M, Song K, Rudge JW (2023) Mapping emerging trends and South-South cooperation in regional knowledge networks: a bibliometric analysis of avian influenza research in Southeast Asia. J Int Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3746CrossRef

39.

Castillo-Pérez JJ, Muñoz-Valera L, García-Gómez F, Mejía-Aranguré JM (2015) Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científi ca sobre la infl uenza en México. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 53(3):294–301

40.

Chen N, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Liu L, Yan Z, Tao L, Guo X, Luo Y, Yan A (2015) Technology resource, distribution, and development characteristics of global influenza virus vaccine: a patent bibliometric analysis. PLoS One 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136953

41.

Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Abutaha AS, Zyoud SH (2017) Bibliometric analysis of worldwide publications on antimalarial drug resistance (2006–2015). Malaria Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6429410

42.

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342CrossRef

43.

NCBI (2022) PubMed overview. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

44.

Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2012) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0903-6CrossRef

45.

Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11(4):959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.00710.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. (Elsevier)CrossRef

46.

Linnenluecke MK, Marrone M, Singh AK (2020) Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust J Manag 45(2):175–194. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

47.

Benoit K, Watanabe K, Wang H, Nulty P, Obeng A, Müller S, Matsuo A (2018) quanteda: an R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. J Open Source Softw 3(30):774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774

48.

Ramos J (2003) Using TF-IDF to determine word relevance in document queries. Proc First Instr Conf Mach Learn 242:29–48

49.

BBC News (2022) Covid map: coronavirus cases, deaths, vaccinations by country. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51235105. Accessed 29 Jun 2023

50.

Soteriades ES, Falagas ME (2005) Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States. BMJ 331(7510):192–194. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7510.192CrossRef

51.

Hou L, Pan Y, Zhu JJH (2021) Impact of scientific, economic, geopolitical, and cultural factors on international research collaboration. J Inform 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101194

52.

Monroe-White T, Woodson TS (2016) Inequalities in scholarly knowledge: public value failures and their impact on global science. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev 8(2):178–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147204CrossRef

53.

Hart P, Farrar J (2021) The influenza vaccines roadmap – a better future through improved influenza vaccines. Vaccine 39(45):6570–6572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.071. (Elsevier Ltd)CrossRef

54.

Bellis de N de (2009) Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science of citation to cybermetrics. The Scarecrow Press

Titel: Comparison of nanotechnology research for coronaviruses and influenza from 2000 to 2022
verfasst von: Thomas S. Woodson
Swaneet Jha
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Ausgabe 9/2023
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05831-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2023

Shape-controlled RGO/Er2O3-based glass substrates for robust superhydrophobicity

Macrophage membrane-coated biomimetic magnetic nanoparticle loaded with interleukin 10 as potential candidate towards anti-atherosclerotic therapy: characterization and in vitro studies

A redox-responsive delivery system for paclitaxel based on heparin—pluronic F127 nanogel

Ln2O3:Eu nanoparticles: host lattices and their impact on photoluminescence, Raman, optical, and crystal properties

Comparative investigation of iron oxide nanoparticles and microparticles using the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation and in vivo Allium chromosome aberration and comet assays

Titanate nanotubes modified with gallium and cerium and their cytotoxic activity

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten