nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

01.06.2021 | Technical paper

Compressive strength prediction model of high-strength concrete with silica fume by destructive and non-destructive technique

verfasst von: Rahul Biswas, Baboo Rai, Pijush Samui

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The study proposes a new model for estimating the compressive strength of high-strength concrete using destructive and non-destructive testing. The effect of silica fume replacement level and its cementing efficiency factor on compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) were experimentally examined. In the present work, the cementing efficiency factor (k) for silica fume at different percentage replacement level has been assumed, and at the constant water-to-binder ratio, the compressive strength has been obtained. An exponential relationship is proposed between UPV and compressive strength with a high correlation coefficient. A statistically noteworthy model with a high correlation coefficient R² > 0.90 is established to study the influence of the variables (%SF and k) on UPV results. Finally, the two proposed models were amalgamated to develop a new model to predict the 28-day compressive strength of high-strength concrete. The validity of the model has been verified with the results obtained by different researchers on different types of specimens. The proposed new model is for the strength range of the 40–75 MPa.

Vorheriger Artikel Introduction of the strain rate and cyclic loading effects on shape memory alloys constitutive law models

Nächster Artikel Experimental investigation of Bambara nut shell ash in the production of concrete and mortar

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ACI Committee 318 (1995) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-95) and commentary (ACI 318R-95). Am Concr Inst 552:503

C. CEB-FIP, Model Code 1990, Com. Euro-International Du Beton, Paris. (1991) 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430

Shen D, Wen C, Zhu P, Wu Y, Yuan J (2020) Influence of Barchip fiber on early-age autogenous shrinkage of high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119223CrossRef

Shen D, Li C, Feng Z, Wen C, Ojha B (2019) Influence of strain rate on bond behavior of concrete members reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer rebars. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116755CrossRef

Shen D, Wen C, Zhu P, Li M, Ojha B, Li C (2020) Bond behavior between basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119518CrossRef

Villar-Cociña E, Rodier L, Savastano H, Lefrán M, Rojas MF (2020) A comparative study on the Pozzolanic activity between bamboo leaves ash and silica fume: kinetic parameters. Waste Biomass Valorization 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-00556-y

Sharaky IA, Megahed FA, Seleem MH, Badawy AM (2019) The influence of silica fume, nano silica and mixing method on the strength and durability of concrete. SN Appl Sci 6:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0621-2CrossRef

Güneyisi E, Gesoǧlu M, Karaoǧlu S, Mermerdaş K (2012) Strength, permeability and shrinkage cracking of silica fume and metakaolin concretes. Constr Build Mater 34:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.017CrossRef

Siddique R, Khan MI (2011) Supplementary cementing materials. In: Springer Sci. Business, Media, pp 67–120

10.

Wang F, Li S (2012) Effect of silica fume on workability and water impermeability of concrete. Appl Mech Mater 238:157–160. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.238.157CrossRef

11.

Mohan A, Mini KM (2018) Strength and durability studies of SCC incorporating silica fume and ultra fine GGBS. Constr Build Mater 171:919–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.186CrossRef

12.

Khayat KH, Yahia A, Sayed M (2008) Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on rheological properties, bleeding, and strength of structural grout. ACI Mater J 35:842–849. https://doi.org/10.14359/20200CrossRef

13.

Maage M (1989) Efficiency factors for condensed silica fume in concrete. ACI Spec Publ 114:783–798

14.

Bhanja S, Sengupta B (2002) Investigations on the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using statistical methods. Cem Concr Res 32:1391–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00787-1CrossRef

15.

Albattat RAI, Jamshidzadeh Z, Alasadi AKR (2020) Assessment of compressive strength and durability of silica fume-based concrete in acidic environment. Innov Infrastruct Solut 5:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0269-1CrossRef

16.

Smith IA (1967) The design of fly ash concretes. Proc Inst Civ Eng 36:769–790. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1967.8472CrossRef

17.

Jahren P (1983) Use of silica fume in concrete. ACI Spec Publ 79:677–694. https://doi.org/10.14359/6715CrossRef

18.

Sellevold EJ, Radjy FF (1983) Condensed silica fume (Microsilica) in concrete: water demand and strength development. Spec Publ 79:677–694

19.

Gopalan MK, Hague MN (1985) Design of flyash concrete. Cem Concr Res 15:694–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(85)90071-7CrossRef

20.

Babu KG, Rao GSN (1993) Efficiency of fly ash in concrete. Cem Concr Compos 15:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(93)90025-5CrossRef

21.

Feret R (1892) On the compactness of hydraulic mortars. Memoirs and documents relating to the art of constructions at the service of the engineer. Ann Des Ponts Chaussées. 2nd semest 5–161

22.

Bolomy (1927) Durcissemenr des morriers er betons. Bull Tech Suisse Rom 16–24

23.

Abrams DA (1918) Design of Concrete Mixtures, Bull. No. 1, Struct. Mater. Lab. Lewis Institute, Chicago, p 20

24.

Slanička Š (1991) The influence of condensed silica fume on the concrete strength. Cem Concr Res 21:462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(91)90094-XCrossRef

25.

Ganesh Babu K, Surya Prakash PV (1995) Efficiency of silica fume in concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00120-2CrossRef

26.

Loland K (1981) Silica concrete (Norwegian). In: J Nord Concr Fed

27.

Fagerlund G (1981) Definition of water/cement ratio using silica fume Swedish. In: Intern. Cem Rep

28.

Malathy R, Subramanian K (2007) Efficiency factor for silica fume & metakaoline at various replacement levels. Singapore Concr Inst (2007). http://cipremier.com/100032037%5Cnwww.cipremier.com

29.

Yoshitake I, Inoue S, Miyamoto K (2019) Strength properties of durable concrete made with various alternative. Interdepend Between Struct Eng Constr Manag 1–6

30.

Khan AN, Magar RB, Chore HS (2018) Efficiency factor of supplementary cementitious materials: a state of art. Int J Optim Civ Eng 8:247–253

31.

Li LG, Zheng JY, Ng PL, Zhu J, Kwan AKH (2019) Cementing efficiencies and synergistic roles of silica fume and nano-silica in sulphate and chloride resistance of concrete. Constr Build Mater 223:965–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.241CrossRef

32.

Sharaky IA, Megahed FA, Seleem MH, Badawy AM (2019) The influence of silica fume, nano silica and mixing method on the strength and durability of concrete. SN Appl Sci 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0621-2CrossRef

33.

Pereira N, Romão X (2016) Material strength safety factors for the seismic safety assessment of existing RC buildings. Constr Build Mater 119:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.055CrossRef

34.

Breysse D (2012) Nondestructive evaluation of concrete strength: an historical review and a new perspective by combining NDT methods. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.103CrossRef

35.

Lin Y, Lai CP, Yen T (2003) Prediction of ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) in concrete. ACI Mater J 100:21–28. https://doi.org/10.14359/12459CrossRef

36.

Ju M, Park K, Oh H (2017) Estimation of compressive strength of high strength concrete using non-destructive technique and concrete core strength. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7121249CrossRef

37.

Khan SRM, Noorzaei J, Kadir MRA, Waleed AMT, Jaafar MS (2007) UPV method for strength detection of high performance concrete. Struct Surv 25:61–73CrossRef

38.

Atici U (2011) Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.156CrossRef

39.

Najim KB (2017) Strength evaluation of concrete structures using ISonReb linear regression models: laboratory and site (case studies) validation. Constr Build Mater 149:639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.162CrossRef

40.

Atahan HN, Oktar ON, Tademir MA (2011) Factors determining the correlations between high strength concrete properties. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.005CrossRef

41.

Qasrawi HY (2000) Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00226-XCrossRef

42.

IS: 8112 (1989) Ordinary Portland cement, 43 grade-Specification. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi

43.

IS:383 (2016) Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi, India, pp 1–18

44.

IS:516 (2004) Method of tests for strength of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi, India

45.

Biswas R, Rai B (2020) Effect of cementing efficiency factor on the mechanical properties of concrete incorporating silica fume. J Struct Integr Maint 5:190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2020.1765269CrossRef

46.

IS:10262, IS:10262-2009 (2009) Indian standards recommended Guidelines for concrete mix design. In: Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi, India

47.

IS: 1199 (1959) Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi

48.

IS: 516 (1959) Method of test for strength of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi

49.

IS:13311 (Part-1) (1992) Non-destructuctive testing of concrete- method of testing. Bur. Indian Stand., New Delhi

50.

Khatri RP, Sirivivatnanon V, Gross W (1995) Effect of different supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical properties of high performance concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)00128-LCrossRef

51.

Mazloom M, Ramezanianpour AA, Brooks JJ (2004) Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00017-9CrossRef

52.

Kovler K, Roussel N (2011) Properties of fresh and hardened concrete. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.009CrossRef

53.

Behnood A, Ziari H (2008) Effects of silica fume addition and water to cement ratio on the properties of high-strength concrete after exposure to high temperatures. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.06.003CrossRef

54.

Ismeik M (2009) Effect of mineral admixtures on mechanical properties of high strength concrete made with locally available materials. Jordan J. Civ, Eng

55.

Kadri EH, Duval R (2009) Hydration heat kinetics of concrete with silica fume. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.008CrossRef

56.

Kashiyani BK, Pitroda J, Shah DBK (2012) A study of utilization aspect of polypropylene fibre for making value added concrete. Int J Sci Res 2:103–106. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/feb2013/37CrossRef

57.

Alwash M, Breysse D, Sbartaï ZM (2015) Non-destructive strength evaluation of concrete: analysis of some key factors using synthetic simulations. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.023CrossRef

58.

Alwash M, Sbartaï ZM, Breysse D (2016) Non-destructive assessment of both mean strength and variability of concrete: a new bi-objective approach. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.120CrossRef

59.

A.I. of Japan (1983) Manual of nondestructive test methods for the evaluation of concrete strength. In: Archit. Inst. Japan Tokyo, Japan

60.

Kim WM, Oh H, Oh KC (2016) Estimating the compressive strength of high-strength concrete using surface rebound value and ultrasonic velocity. J Korea Inst Struct Maint Insp 20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.2.001CrossRef

61.

Rashid K, Waqas R (2017) Compressive strength evaluation by non-destructive techniques: an automated approach in construction industry. J Build Eng 12:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.05.010CrossRef

62.

Bungey J (1984) The use of ultrasonics for NDT of concrete. In: Brit J NDT, pp 366–369

63.

Galan A (1990) Combined ultrasound methods of concrete testing. In: North-Holland, Elsevier, Amsterdam

64.

Ismail M, Yusof K, Ibrahim A (1996) A combined ultrasonic method on the estimation of compressive concrete strength. INSIGHT 38:781–785

65.

Pascale GP, Di Leo A, Carli R (2000) Evaluation of actual compressive strength of high strength concrete by NDT. 15th World conf. non-destructive test, 10p. https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn527/idn527.htm

66.

Atici U (2010) Prediction of the strength of mineral-addition concrete using regression analysis. Mag Concr Res 62:585–592. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2010.62.8.585CrossRef

67.

Del Río LM, Jiménez A, López F, Rosa FJ, Rufo MM, Paniagua JM (2004) Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 42:527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.053CrossRef

68.

Mohammed BS, Azmi NJ, Abdullahi M (2011) Evaluation of rubbercrete based on ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer tests. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.004CrossRef

69.

Khan MI (2012) Evaluation of non-destructive testing of high strength concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious composites. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.013CrossRef

70.

Trtnik G, Kavčič F, Turk G (2009) Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics 49:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001CrossRef

71.

Malhotra V, Carino N (2010) Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete, 2nd ed. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040050

72.

Sorensen EV (1983) Freezing and thawing resistance of condensed silica fume (Microsilica) concrete exposed to deicing chemicals. ACI Spec Publ 79:709–718. https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&i=6720

73.

Yamato T, Emoto Y (1989) Chemical resistance of concrete containing condensed silica fume. Spec Publ 114:897–914

Titel: Compressive strength prediction model of high-strength concrete with silica fume by destructive and non-destructive technique
verfasst von: Rahul Biswas
Baboo Rai
Pijush Samui
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00447-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Efficacy of palm oil fuel ash as filler on mechanical properties of aerated concrete

Feasibility study of utilisation of ferrochrome slag as fine aggregate and rice husk ash as cement replacement for developing sustainable concrete

Blast analysis of tunnels in Manhattan-Schist and Quartz-Schist using coupled-Eulerian–Lagrangian method

Failure assessment of dysfunctional flexible pavement drainage facility using fuzzy analytical hierarchical process

Effect of soil burial exposure on durability of alkali-activated binder-treated jute geotextile

Progress in sustainable structural engineering: a review