Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Enhanced Higher Education - Industry Cooperation Improving Work Capabilities of Sales Engineering Graduates Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Computer-Aided Occupational Risk Assessment of Physical Workload in the Logistics 4.0

verfasst von : Anna Maczewska, Aleksandra Polak-Sopinska, Zbigniew Wisniewski

Erschienen in: Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Background: The fourth industrial revolution entails many changes, e.g. in logistics, needed employees’ skills. Current society is also changing, because of increasing life expectancy, globalization. The non-simultaneous modernization, caused by different economic situation in every country, needs agile and adequate solutions to protect health and safety of employees. Objectives: To overview the methods of assessing physical workload with emphasis on the suitability for intralogistics tasks in the context of Industry 4.0, Logistics 4.0 and following demographical changes. Methods: A critical review of the literature currently available on this topic. Results: There are many methods adjusted to assess physical workload of intralogistics workers besides of the one dedicated them. Only a few of them are implemented in computer applications based on DHM. Several allow modeling different populations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Selecting the Business Information Security Officer with ECU@Risk and the Critical Role Model
Nächstes Kapitel Resistance in the Change Process
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Maczewska, A., Polak-Sopinska, A., Wisniewski, Z., Krason, P.: The concept of teaching modeling and simulation of manufacturing systems. In: Goossens, R. (ed.) Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics, AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 792, pp. 87–96. Springer, Cham (2019)
4.
Wrobel-Lachowska, M., Wisniewski, Z., Polak-Sopinska, A., Lachowski, R.: ICT in logistics as a challenge for mature workers. Knowledge management role in information society. In: Goossens, R. (ed.) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics, AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 605, pp. 171–178. Springer, Cham (2018)
5.
Polak-Sopinska, A., Wrobel-Lachowska, M., Wisniewski, Z., Jalmuzna, I.: Physical work intensity of in-plant milk run operator. Part I - guidelines for assessment. In: Karwowski, W., Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control, AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 793, pp. 66–76. Springer, Cham (2019)
6.
Polak-Sopinska, A., Maczewska, A., Kalinowska, P.: Assessment of the usefulness of software applications for estimating human energy expenditure in workplace organization. The Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnów Research Papers Collection, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 63–78 (2018)
7.
Bartevyan, L.: Industry 4.0 – Summary report (2015)
8.
Barreto, L., Amaral, A., Pereira, T.: Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1245–1252 (2017)CrossRef
9.
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937. IEEE, Koloa (2016)
10.
Galińska, B.: Logistics megatrends and their influence on supply chains, business logistics in modern management. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Scientific Conference, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, pp. 583–601. Osijek (2018)
11.
Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., Vogel-Heuser, B.: Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik: Anwendung Technologien Migration. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014)
12.
Bielecki, M., Galińska, B.: Total logistics management concept and principles in manufacturing enterprise. In: Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Business Logistic in Modern Management Conference, pp. 93–107. Osijek (2017)
13.
Botthof, A., Hartmann, E.A. (eds.): Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Springer (2015)
14.
Wrobel-Lachowska, M., Polak-Sopinska, A., Wisniewski, Z.: Challenges for logistics education in Industry 4.0. In: Nazir, S., Teperi, A.M., Polak-Sopińska, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences, AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 785, pp. 329–336. Springer, Cham (2019)
15.
Polak-Sopinska, A.: Physical work intensity of in-plant milk run operator. Part II – case study. In: Karwowski, W., Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control, AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 793, pp. 77–89. Springer, Cham (2019)
16.
Rohrbach, T. (ed.): German Industry 4.0 Index. Study, Staufen AG and Staufen Digital Workx (2016)
17.
Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.-I.: Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 132, 2–17 (2018)CrossRef
18.
Sąsiadek, M., Basl, J.: Świadomość i poziom wdrożenia koncepcji Przemysł 4.0 w wybranych polskich i czeskich przedsiębiorstwach. In: Knosala, R. (ed.) Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji, pp. 189–198. Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, Opole (2018)
19.
Slusarczyk, B.: Industry 4.0 - are we ready? Polish J. Manag. Stud. 17(1), 232–248 (2018)CrossRef
20.
Klitou, D., Conrads, J., Rasmussen, M.: Poland: Initiative for Polish Industry 4.0 - The Future Industry Platform. Report, European Commission (2018)
21.
22.
23.
24.
Takala, E.P., et al.: Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Heal. 36(1), 3–24 (2010)CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
28.
Schaub, K., Caragnano, G., Britzke, B., Bruder, R.: The European assembly worksheet. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 14(6), 616–639 (2013)CrossRef
29.
Keyserling, W.M., Brouwer, M., Silverstein, B.A.: A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors resulting from awkward postures of the legs, trunk and neck. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 9, 283–301 (1992)CrossRef
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., Fine, L.J.: Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7), 749–776 (1993)CrossRef
40.
Occhipinti, E.: OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics 41(9), 1290–1311 (1998)CrossRef
41.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P., Kuorinka, I.: Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl. Ergon. 8(4), 199–201 (1977)CrossRef
42.
Buchholz, B., Paquet, V., Punnet, L., Lee, D., Moir, S.: PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Appl. Ergon. 27(3), 177–187 (1996)CrossRef
43.
Kemmlert, K.: A method assigned for the identification of ergonomic hazards — PLIBEL. Appl. Ergon. 26(3), 199–211 (1995)CrossRef
44.
Li, G., Buckle, P.: A practical method for the assessment of work-related musculoskeletal risks – Quick Exposure Check (QEC). In: Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 42, no. 19, pp. 1351–1355 (1998)CrossRef
45.
46.
Hignett, S., McAtamney, L.: Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Appl. Ergon. 31(2), 201–205 (2000)CrossRef
47.
McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of world-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24(2), 91–99 (1993)CrossRef
48.
Garg, A., Moore, J.S.: The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 56(May), 443–458 (1995)
49.
Garg, A., Moore, J.S., Kapellusch, J.: The strain index to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders: model validation. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 497–499. IEEE, Singapore (2007)
50.
Snook, S.H., Ciriello, V.M.: The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 34(9), 1197–1213 (1991)CrossRef
51.
Asadi, N.: A comparative assessment of manual load lifting using NIOSH equation and WISHA index methods in industrial workers of Shiraz City. J. Heal. Sci. Surveill. Syst. 3(1), 1–5 (2015)MathSciNet
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
Fritzsche, L., Jendrusch, R., Leidholdt, W., Bauer, S., Jäckel, T., Pirger, A.: Introducing ema (Editor for Manual Work Activities) – a new tool for enhancing accuracy and efficiency of human simulations in digital production planning. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) Digital Uman Modeling, ICDHM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6777, pp. 272–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRef
57.
58.
Chiang, J., Stephens, A., Potvin, J.: Retooling Jack’s static strength prediction tool. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 1, April (2016)
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Polak-Sopinska, A.: Incorporating human factors in in-plant milk run system planning models. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds.) Human Systems Engineering and Design, IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 876, pp. 160–166. Springer, Cham (2019)
64.
Fišerová, S.: Methods of cognitive ergonomics in assessment of psychosocial risks in work systems. Probl. Profesjologii 1, 181–197 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Computer-Aided Occupational Risk Assessment of Physical Workload in the Logistics 4.0
verfasst von
Anna Maczewska
Aleksandra Polak-Sopinska
Zbigniew Wisniewski
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20153-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-20154-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20154-8_35

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise