Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Case for Climate Policy Integration Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Concepts and Theories for CPI

verfasst von : Heiner von Lüpke

Erschienen in: Climate Policy Integration

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Policy integration is an emerging scientific field, which is used to advance understanding and real-life policymaking to address recent day, complex, and urgent problems such as climate change. This book uses a definition of climate policy integration as being characterized by the increasingly ambitious incorporation of climate policy goals into all stages of policymaking and governance systems in other policy fields, and by attempts to minimize contradictions between climate policy and other policies. CPI is not an end in itself, but sectoral integration is an inherent feature of climate policy that leads to an integrated climate policy and related policy outcomes. In this book, CPI accounts for fine balances between climate policy objectives and development priorities, as they are typically defined by sectoral policy fields.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Case for Climate Policy Integration
Nächstes Kapitel Compound Comparative Analysis: Motivations for Country and Sector Selection and Methods
Fußnoten
1
In a more elaborated form, “The Convention requires all Parties, keeping in mind their responsibilities and capabilities, to formulate and implement programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change. Such programmes target economic activity with an aim to incentivize actions that are cleaner or disincentivize those that result in large amounts of GHGs. They include policies, incentive schemes and investment programmes which address all sectors, including energy generation and use, transport, buildings, industry, agriculture, forestry and other land use, and waste management. Mitigation measures are translated into, for example, an increased use of renewable energy, the application of new technologies such as electric cars, or changes in practices or behaviours, such as driving less or changing one’s diet. Further, they include expanding forests and other sinks to remove greater amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere, or simply making improvements to a cookstove design.” https://​unfccc.​int/​topics/​mitigation/​the-big-picture/​introduction-to-mitigation
 
3
Definition by Howlett and Cashore (2014: 281): “Public policies are the results of efforts made by governments to alter aspects of their own or social behaviour in order to carry out some end or purpose and are comprised of complex arrangements of policy goals and policy means.”
 
4
For a discussion on the use of the term mainstreaming, see section “CPI and mainstreaming: commonalities and differences” above. I use it here in the sense of “integrating climate policy objectives into sectoral policies, budgets and programs,” which is a similar definition as CPI, although underlying approaches and subject-matter ramifications differ.
 
5
In some cases, climate change considerations bring about changes in long-standing patterns of sector governance. In South Africa, for example, the Copenhagen pledge led to a process of reconsidering South Africa’s integrated resource plan for electricity to include carbon reduction as one among multiple criteria (Republic of South Africa, 2011). In India, the establishment of national sectoral “missions” had the effect of creating new institutional mechanisms in the case of the National Solar Mission, or of raising the profile and importance of particular ministries or departments as in the example of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (Dubash 2011). In other cases, climate mainstreaming was facilitated by prior political shifts in governance of a sector. Brazil’s climate approach particularly emphasizes the forest sector (La Rovere 2011). Progress on the Brazilian plan was enabled by prior domestic political consensus around a far-reaching Forest Code (Hochstetler and Viola 2012).
 
6
For Mexico in turn, Hogenboom (2014) finds that despite political reforms during the years 2000–2006, lobby groups, in particular of big business sectors, continue to influence politics to a large degree.
 
Literatur
Adam C et al (2019) Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: the missing link between policy production and implementation. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract 21(5):499–517
Adelle C, Russel D (2013) Climate policy integration: a case of Deja vu? Environ Policy Gov 23(1):1–12CrossRef
Ahmad IH (2009) Climate policy integration: towards operationalization. (DESA Working Paper No. 73): 1–18
Ajaz W (2017) A multiple streams explanation of Pakistan’s climate change policy. J Politi Stud 24(1):175
Aleksandrova M (2020) Principles and considerations for mainstreaming climate change risk into national social protection frameworks in developing countries. Clim Dev 12(6):511–520CrossRef
Bauer A, Rametsteiner E (2006) Policy integration and coordination: theoretical; methodical and conceptual aspects. 1st COST Action E51 Joint MC and WG Meeting
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM (2015) Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: needed and challenging. Public Adm Rev 75:647–663CrossRef
Bryson JM et al (2009) Designing and managing cross-sector collaboration: a case study in reducing traffic congestion. IBM Center for The Business of Goverment:78–81
Burstein P, Linton A (2002) The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Soc Forces 81(2):381–408CrossRef
Cairney P, Heikkila T (2014) A comparison of theories of the policy process. Theories of the Policy Process:363–389
Candel J, Biesbroek R (2016) Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sci 49(3):211–231CrossRef
Casado-asensio J, Steurer R (2014) Integrated strategies on sustainable development, climate change mitigation and adaptation in western Europe: communication rather than coordination. Discussion Paper 3, Institute of Forest, Environmental, and Natural Resource Policy, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Cejudo G, Michel C (2015) Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration. Second International Conference on Public Policy
Chan S et al (2016) Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of non-state climate actions. Clim Pol:1–12
Day T, Röser F, Kurdziel M (2016) Conditionality of intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). International Partnership on Mitigation and MRV
Di Gregorio M et al (2017) Environmental science & policy climate policy integration in the land use sector: mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environ Sci Policy 67:35–43CrossRef
Dupont C (2013) Climate policy integration into EU energy policy. Uitgeverij University Press, Zelzate
Dupont C, Oberthür S (2012) Insufficient climate policy integration in EU energy policy: the importance of the long-term perspective. Earth Systems Governance 8(2):228–247
Dupont C, Primova R (2011) Combating complexity: the integration of EU climate and energy policies. European Integration Online Papers 15(1):1–21
Dupuis J, Biesbroek R (2013) Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1476–1487CrossRef
EBRD and GRI (2011) Special report on climate change: the low carbon transition
Emerson K, Murchie P (2010) Collaborative governance and climate change: opportunities for public administration. The future of public administration, public management, and public service around the world: the minnowbrook perspective. 141–161
England M et al (2018) How do sectoral policies support climate compatible development? An empirical analysis focusing on southern Africa. Environ Sci Policy 79(October):9–15CrossRef
Fankhauser S, Stern N (2016) Climate change, development, poverty and economics. In: Grantham research institute on climate change and the environment
Fuhr H, Lederer M (2009) Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing countries. J Environ Dev 18(4):327–345CrossRef
Gomez-Echeverri L (2010) Can climate change finance draw lessons from aid effectiveness initiatives? A comment on outcomes of the Asia Pacific climate change finance and aid effectiveness dialogue–Bangkok, 19/20 October, 2010. Oxford Energy and Environment Comment (November): 1–6
Gullberg A (2008) Rational lobbying and EU climate policy. Int Environ Agreem: Politics Law Econ 8(2):161–178CrossRef
Hajer M (1993) Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press
Hansen KM, Ejersbo N (2002) The relationship between politicians and administrators–a logic of disharmony. Public Adm 80(4):733–750CrossRef
Hein J (2013) Climate change mitigation in emerging economies the case of Indonesia–hot air or leadership? Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
Hjern B (1982) Implementation research: the link gone missing. J Publ Policy 2(3):301–308CrossRef
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A (1995) Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, Toronto
Jordan A, Lenschow A (2010) Policy paper environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Gov 20(3):147–158CrossRef
Kammerer M, Namhata C (2018) What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion. Policy Sci 51:477–513CrossRef
Keast R, Brown K, Mandell M (2007) Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meanings and strategies. Int Public Manag J 10(1):9–33CrossRef
Kingdon J (2014) Agendas, alternatives and public policies, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Harlow
Klinsrisuk R, Nitivattananon V, Wongsurawat W (2013) Effective coordination and integration of energy and transport policies for CO2 mitigation in Thailand. Environ Dev Sustain 15(5):1227–1244CrossRef
Krott M, Hasanagas N (2006) Measuring bridges between sectors: causative evaluation of cross-Sectorality. Forest Policy Econ 8(5):555–563CrossRef
Lafferty W, Hovden E (2003) Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ Polit 4016(May):157–159
Lang A, Tosun J (2014) Policy Integration Und Verwandte Ansätze: Möglichkeiten Der Theorieintegration. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft:1–20
Lima B et al (2017) A reality check on the landscape approach to REDD+: lessons from Latin America. Forest Policy Econ 78:10–20CrossRef
Lindner R (2014) Cross-sectoral coordination of STI-policies: governance principles to bridge policy-fragmentation. In: Innovation system revisited: experience from 40 years of Fraunhofer ISI research. Fraunhofer Institute, Karlsruhe
Lovell H, Bulkeley HA, Owens SE (2009) Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies inthe UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27(1):90–109CrossRef
Matland R (1995) Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. J Public Adm Res Theory 5(2):145–174
Mcfatridge S, et al. (2012) Best practices for mainstreaming climate change in national planning processes: annotated bibliography October 2012
Michaelowa A, Allen M, Sha F (2018) Policy instruments for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C–can humanity rise to the challenge? Clim Pol 18
Mickwitz P et al (2009) Climate policy integration as a necessity for an efficient climate policy. In: Iop Conference Series Earth And Environmental Science 2009
Mickwitz P et al. (2010) Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER Report No 2
Nilsson M et al (2012) Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environ Policy Gov 22(6):395–423CrossRef
OECD (2010) Making reform happen: lessons from OECD Countries. OECD
OECD (2019) Policy coherence for sustainable development 2019: empowering people and ensuring inclusiveness and equality. Paris
Persson Å et al. (2018) Environmental policy integration: taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environmental Science and Policy Special is
Peters BG (1998) Managing Horizontal government: the politics of co-ordination. Canadian centre for management development
Peters BG (2006) Concepts and theories of horizontal policy management. Handbook of Public Policy:115–138
Priambodo C, et al. (2013) Status of climate finance in vietnam: country assessment report. Climate and development knowledge network
Price RA (2019) Mainstreaming climate and environmental considerations into existing development programmes. K4D Helpdesk Report
Purdon M (2015) Advancing comparative climate change politics: theory and method. Global Environmental Politics 15:3CrossRef
Rahman MS, Giessen L (2017) Formal and informal interests of donors to allocate aid: spending patterns of USAID, GIZ, and EU Forest development policy in Bangladesh. World Dev 94:250–267CrossRef
Rietig K (2012) Climate policy integration beyond principled priority: a framework for analysis Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 99
Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin KV et al (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat Clim Chang 8:325–332CrossRef
Roux D et al (2008) Improving cross-sector policy integration and cooperation in support of freshwater conservation. Conserv Biol 22(6):1382–1387CrossRef
Ryan D (2016) The Design of Climate Institutions: contributions for the analysis. Ambiente e Sociedade 19(4):249–250CrossRef
Salamat MR (2013) Mainstreaming climate change into national development strategies. Capacity development workshop and expert group Meeting on mainstreaming sustainable development in national development strategies New York
Schaffrin A, Sewerin S, Seubert S (2015) Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Stud J 43(2):257–282CrossRef
Schneider V, Ollmann J (2013) Punctuations and displacements in policy discourse: the climate change issue in Germany 2007-2010. In: Silvern S, Young S (eds) Environmental change and sustainability. Rijeka, InTech, pp 157–183
Scrase JI, Ockwell DG (2010) The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy-an accessible introduction. Energy Policy 38(5):2225–2233CrossRef
Setzer J, Nachmany M (2016) The State’s role in steering polycentric action. In: Jordan A (ed) Governing climate change: Polycentricty in action? pp 47–62
Suggett D (2011) The implementation challenge: strategy is only as good as its execution. Occasional Paper 15, The Australian and New Zealand School of Government
Szarka J (2010) Bringing interests Back in: using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies. J Eur Publ Policy 17(6):836–853CrossRef
Temby O et al (2017) Examining the role of trust and informal communication on mutual learning in government: the case of climate change policy in New York. Organ Environ 30(1):71–97CrossRef
Tosun J, Lang A (2017) Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies 38(6):553–570CrossRef
Trein P, Meyer I, Maggetti M (2019) The integration and coordination of public policies: a systematic comparative review. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract 21(4):332–349
UN (2018) Working together: integration, institutions and the sustainable development goals
Underdal A (1980) Integrated marine policy: what? Why? How? Mar Policy 4(3):159–169CrossRef
Upadhyaya P et al (2018) Comparing climate policy processes in India, Brazil, and South Africa: domestic engagements with international climate policy frameworks. Journal of Environment and Development 27(2):186–209CrossRef
van Meter D, van Horn C (1975) The policy implementation process. Admin Soc 6(4):445–488CrossRef
Weible CM, Sabatier PA (2006) A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In: Fischer F, Miller G, Sidney MS (eds) Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods. CRC Press, pp 123–136CrossRef
Wellstead A, Stedman R (2015) Mainstreaming and beyond: policy capacity and climate change decision-making. Michigan Journal of Sustainability 3:47–63CrossRef
Wibowo A, Giessen L (2015) Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in Forest-related land use politics: the Ministry of Forestry and its Competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the one map policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy 49:131–141CrossRef
Workman S, Jones BD, Jochim A (2009) Information processing and policy dynamics. Policy Stud J 37(1)
Weible C, Sabatier PA (2018) In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA (eds) Theories of the policy process, 4th edn. RoutledgeCrossRef
Kok M, Metz B, Verhagen J, Van Rooijen S (2008) Integrating development and climate policies: national and international benefits. Clim Pol 8(January 2013):103–118CrossRef
Iacobuta G et al (2018) National climate change mitigation legislation, strategy and targets: a global update. Clim Pol 18(9):1114–1132CrossRef
Jochim AE, May PJ (2010) Beyond subsystems: policy regimes and governance. Policy Stud J 38:303–327CrossRef
Schmidt VA (2010) Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. Eur Polit Sci Rev 2(1):1–25CrossRef
Sabatier PA, Weible CM (2014) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Westview Press
Baumgartner F, Jones BD (1993) Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Karapin R (2012) Explaining success and failure in climate policies: developing theory through German case studies. Comp Politics 45(1):46–68CrossRef
Hill M, Hupe P (2002) Implementing public policy. Sage Publications
Bakthiari F, Hinostroza M, Puig D (2018) Institutional capacities for NDC implementation: a guidance document. UNEP DTU Partnership, Copenhagen
Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2011) An integrative framework for collaborative governance (June 2009)
Alam K, Shamsuddoha M, Tanner T, Sultana M, Huq MJ, Kabir SS (2011) The political economy of climate resilient development planning in Bangladesh. IDS Bull 42:52–61CrossRef
Steurer R (2007) From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross-sectoral policy integration. 214:201–214
Trein P, Meyer I, Maggetti M (2017) Horizontal policy integration: a systematic review of the literature. Unpublished paper. Université de Lausanne
Dubash NK (2011) From norm taker to norm maker? Indian energy governance in global context. Global Pol 2:66–79CrossRef
La Rovere EL (2011) Mitigation actions in Brazil. Country Study for the mitigation action plans and scenarios. MAPS Programme, Rio de Janeiro
Hochstetler K, Viola E (2012) Brazil and the politics of climate change: beyond the global commons. Environ Politics 21(5):753–771CrossRef
Hogenboom B (2014) The changing politics of lobbying: private sector organizations in Mexico. J Public Aff 14:296–309CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Concepts and Theories for CPI
verfasst von
Heiner von Lüpke
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
Climate Policy Integration

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18926-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-18927-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18927-2_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise