Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The Chinese state and its institutional development have been central to the study of think tanks in China. In this light, this chapter reviews major issues raised in the book through a brief but comparative analysis of the case studies presented in the previous chapters. Similarly, the chapter questions the main challenges and innovations, as well as limitations that have emerged vis-à-vis the knowledge research scenario in contemporary China. The conclusion remarks on both the external and internal factors contributing to the development of Chinese think tanks in the last decade, among which are the new plan by the Xi Jinping administration to set up think tanks with Chinese characteristics, China’s growing presence as an actor in global affairs, and the growing internationalization process that has occurred in the think-tank sector.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2010. Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Beland and Robert Henry Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Chan, Kaimin. 2014. Zhongguo zhiku guoji zhuanxing de kunjing chulu (Chinese Think Tanks’ Transformation Dilemma and Way Out). Xiandai Guoji Guanxi (Contemporary International Relations) 3: 30–38.
Chen, Lijun, and Yan Fu. 2017. Dynamics of the Rise of the Privately-Run and Government Subsidised Think Tanks and Its Influence in Talent Policy Making – Case Study of the Zhejiang Institution of Talent Development. Journal of Chinese Governance 2 (1): 50–67. CrossRef
Eising, Rainer, Daniel Rasch, and Patrycja Rozbicka. 2015. Institutions, Policies and Arguments: Context and Strategy in the EU Policy Framing. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (4): 516–533. CrossRef
He, L. 2015. Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao’s China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howell, Jude. 2012. Civil Society, Corporatism and Capitalism in China. Journal of Comparative Asian Development 11 (2): 271–297. CrossRef
Kao, Ernest. 2016a. Pedestrian First: Hong Kong Think Tank Civic Exchangeplans Meeting to Encourage the Humble Hart of Walking. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/1913737/pedestrian-first-hong-kong-think-tank-civic
———. 2016b. Think Tanks in Hong Kong Have a Vital Role to Play in Examining Long Term Issues, Says Civic Exchange Chief. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1871233/think-tanks-hong-kong-have-vital-role-play-examining-long
Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl. 2016. The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lampton, David. 2014. Following the Leader. Ruiling China, from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping. Berkley: University of California Press.
Liao, Xuanli. 2006. Chinese Foreign Policy Think Tanks and China’s Policy Towards Japan. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
McGann, James, and Kent R. Weaver. 2000. Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Mertha, Andrew. 2009. ?Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0?: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly 200: 995. CrossRef
Sun, Wei. 2011. Zhongguo zhiku de xianzhuang ji qi canyu juece yanjiu (The Status-Quo of Chinese Think Tanks and Their Participation into the Decision-Making Process). Zhongzhou Xuekan (Academic Journal of Zhongzhou) 2: 119–122.
Zhu, Xufeng. 2013. The Rise of Think Tanks in China. New York: Routledge.
- Conclusions: Rethinking Think Tanks in Contemporary China
- Chapter 6
Die Corporate Supply Strategy bei Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG/© [M] michalchm89 | Fotolia