Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Conclusions: Rethinking Think Tanks in Contemporary China

verfasst von : Silvia Menegazzi

Erschienen in: Rethinking Think Tanks in Contemporary China

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Chinese state and its institutional development have been central to the study of think tanks in China. In this light, this chapter reviews major issues raised in the book through a brief but comparative analysis of the case studies presented in the previous chapters. Similarly, the chapter questions the main challenges and innovations, as well as limitations that have emerged vis-à-vis the knowledge research scenario in contemporary China. The conclusion remarks on both the external and internal factors contributing to the development of Chinese think tanks in the last decade, among which are the new plan by the Xi Jinping administration to set up think tanks with Chinese characteristics, China’s growing presence as an actor in global affairs, and the growing internationalization process that has occurred in the think-tank sector.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2010. Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Beland and Robert Henry Cox. New York: Oxford University Press. Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2010. Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Beland and Robert Henry Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef ———. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, Kaimin. 2014. Zhongguo zhiku guoji zhuanxing de kunjing chulu (Chinese Think Tanks’ Transformation Dilemma and Way Out). Xiandai Guoji Guanxi (Contemporary International Relations) 3: 30–38. Chan, Kaimin. 2014. Zhongguo zhiku guoji zhuanxing de kunjing chulu (Chinese Think Tanks’ Transformation Dilemma and Way Out). Xiandai Guoji Guanxi (Contemporary International Relations) 3: 30–38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Lijun, and Yan Fu. 2017. Dynamics of the Rise of the Privately-Run and Government Subsidised Think Tanks and Its Influence in Talent Policy Making – Case Study of the Zhejiang Institution of Talent Development. Journal of Chinese Governance 2 (1): 50–67.CrossRef Chen, Lijun, and Yan Fu. 2017. Dynamics of the Rise of the Privately-Run and Government Subsidised Think Tanks and Its Influence in Talent Policy Making – Case Study of the Zhejiang Institution of Talent Development. Journal of Chinese Governance 2 (1): 50–67.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eising, Rainer, Daniel Rasch, and Patrycja Rozbicka. 2015. Institutions, Policies and Arguments: Context and Strategy in the EU Policy Framing. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (4): 516–533.CrossRef Eising, Rainer, Daniel Rasch, and Patrycja Rozbicka. 2015. Institutions, Policies and Arguments: Context and Strategy in the EU Policy Framing. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (4): 516–533.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat He, L. 2015. Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao’s China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. He, L. 2015. Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao’s China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell, Jude. 2012. Civil Society, Corporatism and Capitalism in China. Journal of Comparative Asian Development 11 (2): 271–297.CrossRef Howell, Jude. 2012. Civil Society, Corporatism and Capitalism in China. Journal of Comparative Asian Development 11 (2): 271–297.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl. 2016. The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl. 2016. The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lampton, David. 2014. Following the Leader. Ruiling China, from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping. Berkley: University of California Press. Lampton, David. 2014. Following the Leader. Ruiling China, from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping. Berkley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao, Xuanli. 2006. Chinese Foreign Policy Think Tanks and China’s Policy Towards Japan. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. Liao, Xuanli. 2006. Chinese Foreign Policy Think Tanks and China’s Policy Towards Japan. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat McGann, James, and Kent R. Weaver. 2000. Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Jersey: Transaction Publisher. McGann, James, and Kent R. Weaver. 2000. Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. New Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Zurück zum Zitat Mertha, Andrew. 2009. ?Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0?: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly 200: 995.CrossRef Mertha, Andrew. 2009. ?Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0?: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly 200: 995.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, Wei. 2011. Zhongguo zhiku de xianzhuang ji qi canyu juece yanjiu (The Status-Quo of Chinese Think Tanks and Their Participation into the Decision-Making Process). Zhongzhou Xuekan (Academic Journal of Zhongzhou) 2: 119–122. Sun, Wei. 2011. Zhongguo zhiku de xianzhuang ji qi canyu juece yanjiu (The Status-Quo of Chinese Think Tanks and Their Participation into the Decision-Making Process). Zhongzhou Xuekan (Academic Journal of Zhongzhou) 2: 119–122.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu, Xufeng. 2013. The Rise of Think Tanks in China. New York: Routledge. Zhu, Xufeng. 2013. The Rise of Think Tanks in China. New York: Routledge.
Metadaten
Titel
Conclusions: Rethinking Think Tanks in Contemporary China
verfasst von
Silvia Menegazzi
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57300-7_6

Premium Partner