Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Conflicting Rationalities and Southern Planning Theory

verfasst von : Richard de Satgé, Vanessa Watson

Erschienen in: Urban Planning in the Global South

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter provides the theoretical framing for the rest of the book. It explains how a ‘southern turn’ in several areas of scholarship, including planning, has raised awareness of the relative neglect of global South perspectives in theory development, as well as the tendency to assume the universality of theoretical ideas even when they have been entirely shaped by global North experiences and ideas. In urban planning, various scholars have pointed to the essentially parochial nature of much of mainstream planning theory which often assumes that the nature of cities and their societies, economies, culture and governance is so similar from place to place that the need to geographically specify the relevance of ideas is not necessary. The generalisation of ideas and policy transfers across very different societies has often resulted in serious planning failures.
However, the idea of a southern planning perspective requires clarification as it is all too easily interpreted as a geographically bounded approach to theorising, hence creating problematic binaries with imagined global north perspectives. This chapter therefore explores what southern perspectives in planning may, and may not, offer.
New lines of inquiry need to theoretically frame an understanding of what goes on in cities which are rapidly growing and resource poor. From a planning perspective, the book offers the concept of ‘conflicting rationalities’ arising at the interface between the different logics (or rationalities) of various urban actors. This chapter explains how the book tests and refines this idea.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Our definition of the terms ‘Global South’ and ‘southern’ in this book is borrowed from Dados and Connell (2012, 13): “Global South functions as more than a metaphor for underdevelopment. It references an entire history of colonialism, neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social change through which large inequalities in living standards, life expectancy and access to resources are maintained; and opens new possibilities in politics and social science”.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allmendinger, Philip. 2002. Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory. Planning Theory 1 (1): 77–99.CrossRef Allmendinger, Philip. 2002. Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory. Planning Theory 1 (1): 77–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhan, Gautam. 2016. In the Public’s Interest: Evictions, Citizenship and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan. Bhan, Gautam. 2016. In the Public’s Interest: Evictions, Citizenship and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
Zurück zum Zitat Brownill, Sue, and Gavin Parker. 2010. Why Bother with Good Works? The Relevance of Public Participation(s) in Planning in a Post-collaborative Era. Planning Practice and Research 25 (3): 275–282.CrossRef Brownill, Sue, and Gavin Parker. 2010. Why Bother with Good Works? The Relevance of Public Participation(s) in Planning in a Post-collaborative Era. Planning Practice and Research 25 (3): 275–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bunnell, Tim. 2015. Antecedent Cities and Inter-Referencing Effects: Learning from and Extending Beyond Critiques of Neoliberalisation. Urban Studies 52 (11): 1983–2000.CrossRef Bunnell, Tim. 2015. Antecedent Cities and Inter-Referencing Effects: Learning from and Extending Beyond Critiques of Neoliberalisation. Urban Studies 52 (11): 1983–2000.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee, Partha. 2011. Lineages of Political Society: Studies in Postcolonial Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press. Chatterjee, Partha. 2011. Lineages of Political Society: Studies in Postcolonial Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 2012. Theory from the South: Or How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. London: Paradigm Publishers. Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 2012. Theory from the South: Or How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. London: Paradigm Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Australia: Allen and Unwin. Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2014. Using Southern Theory: Decolonizing Social Thought in Theory, Research and Application. Planning Theory 13 (2): 210–223.CrossRef ———. 2014. Using Southern Theory: Decolonizing Social Thought in Theory, Research and Application. Planning Theory 13 (2): 210–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Corbridge, Stuart, Glyn Williams, Manoj Srivastava, and René Véron. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Corbridge, Stuart, Glyn Williams, Manoj Srivastava, and René Véron. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell. 2012. The Global South. Contexts [American Sociological Association] 11(1): 12–13. Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell. 2012. The Global South. Contexts [American Sociological Association] 11(1): 12–13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage. Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Derickson, Kate D. 2015. Urban geography 1: Locating Urban Theory in the ‘Urban Age’. Progress in Human Geography 39 (5): 647–657.CrossRef Derickson, Kate D. 2015. Urban geography 1: Locating Urban Theory in the ‘Urban Age’. Progress in Human Geography 39 (5): 647–657.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, Debbie, and Robert Morrell. 2012. Approaching Southern Theory. Explorations of Gender in South African Education. Gender and Education 24 (5): 469–482.CrossRef Epstein, Debbie, and Robert Morrell. 2012. Approaching Southern Theory. Explorations of Gender in South African Education. Gender and Education 24 (5): 469–482.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fincher, Ruth, and Jane M. Jacobs, eds. 1998. Cities of Difference. New York/London: Guilford Press. Fincher, Ruth, and Jane M. Jacobs, eds. 1998. Cities of Difference. New York/London: Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2004. Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. Planning Theory and Research 5 (3): 283–306.CrossRef ———. 2004. Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. Planning Theory and Research 5 (3): 283–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flyvbjerg, Bent, and Tim Richardson. 2002. Planning and Foucault: In search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory. In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, ed. Philip Allmendinger and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. London/New York: Routledge. Flyvbjerg, Bent, and Tim Richardson. 2002. Planning and Foucault: In search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory. In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, ed. Philip Allmendinger and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press. Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Harraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. Harraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Harriss-White, Barbara. 2003. India Working: Essays on Society and Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harriss-White, Barbara. 2003. India Working: Essays on Society and Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey, Patsy. 2012. The Universal and the Contingent: Some Reflections on the Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices. Planning Theory 11 (2): 188–207.CrossRef Healey, Patsy. 2012. The Universal and the Contingent: Some Reflections on the Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices. Planning Theory 11 (2): 188–207.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillier, Jean. 2003. Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot be ‘Real’. Planning Theory 2 (1): 37–59.CrossRef Hillier, Jean. 2003. Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot be ‘Real’. Planning Theory 2 (1): 37–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship. Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press. Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship. Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hountondji, Paulin J. 1988. L’appropriation collective du savoir: Tâche nouvelles pour une politique scientifique. Genève-Afrique 26 (1): 49–66. Hountondji, Paulin J. 1988. L’appropriation collective du savoir: Tâche nouvelles pour une politique scientifique. Genève-Afrique 26 (1): 49–66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulme, Mike. 2010. Problems with Making and Governing Global Kinds of Knowledge. Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 558–564.CrossRef Hulme, Mike. 2010. Problems with Making and Governing Global Kinds of Knowledge. Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 558–564.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huxley, Margo. 2000. The Limits to Communicative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (4): 369–377.CrossRef Huxley, Margo. 2000. The Limits to Communicative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (4): 369–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huxley, Margo, and Oren Yiftachel. 2000. New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 333–342.CrossRef Huxley, Margo, and Oren Yiftachel. 2000. New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 333–342.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve. Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve. Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Lydia H., ed. 1999. Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations. Durham: Duke University Press. Liu, Lydia H., ed. 1999. Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat McFarlane, Colin. 2010. The Comparative City, Knowledge, Learning and Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (4): 725–742.CrossRef McFarlane, Colin. 2010. The Comparative City, Knowledge, Learning and Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (4): 725–742.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meth, Paula. 2010. Unsettling Insurgency: Reflections on Women’s Insurgent Practices in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice 11 (2): 241–263.CrossRef Meth, Paula. 2010. Unsettling Insurgency: Reflections on Women’s Insurgent Practices in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice 11 (2): 241–263.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Metzger, Jonathan, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. 2014. The Contested Terrain of European Territorial Governance: New Perspectives on Democratic Deficits and Political Displacements. In Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. Jonathan Metzger, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck, 1–28. New York: Routledge. Metzger, Jonathan, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. 2014. The Contested Terrain of European Territorial Governance: New Perspectives on Democratic Deficits and Political Displacements. In Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. Jonathan Metzger, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck, 1–28. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Mignolo, Walter. 2007. Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 449–514.CrossRef Mignolo, Walter. 2007. Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 449–514.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miraftab, Faranak. 2009. Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South. Planning Theory 8 (1): 32–50.CrossRef Miraftab, Faranak. 2009. Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South. Planning Theory 8 (1): 32–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ong, Aihwa, and Stephen J. Collier, eds. 2008. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Ong, Aihwa, and Stephen J. Collier, eds. 2008. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Pløger, John. 2014. Impossible Common Ground: Planning and Reconciliation. In Planning Against the Political. Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. Jonathan Metzger, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck, 107–128. Routledge: London. Pløger, John. 2014. Impossible Common Ground: Planning and Reconciliation. In Planning Against the Political. Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. Jonathan Metzger, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck, 107–128. Routledge: London.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, Libby. 2010. Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Aldershot: Ashgate. Porter, Libby. 2010. Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2018. Postcolonial Consequences and New Meanings. In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, ed. Michael Gunder, Ali Mandanipour, and Vanessa Watson, 167–179. London/New York: Routledge. ———. 2018. Postcolonial Consequences and New Meanings. In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, ed. Michael Gunder, Ali Mandanipour, and Vanessa Watson, 167–179. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Purcell, Mark. 2009. Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements. Planning Theory 8 (2): 140–165.CrossRef Purcell, Mark. 2009. Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements. Planning Theory 8 (2): 140–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London/New York: Routledge. Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2011. Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23.CrossRef ———. 2011. Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosa, Marcelo. 2014. Theories of the South: Limits and Perspectives of an Emergent Movement in the Social Sciences. Current Sociology 62 (6): 1–17.CrossRef Rosa, Marcelo. 2014. Theories of the South: Limits and Perspectives of an Emergent Movement in the Social Sciences. Current Sociology 62 (6): 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, Ananya. 2009a. The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory. Regional Studies 43 (6): 819–830.CrossRef Roy, Ananya. 2009a. The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory. Regional Studies 43 (6): 819–830.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009b. Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence and the Idiom of Urbanization. Planning Theory 8 (1): 76–87.CrossRef ———. 2009b. Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence and the Idiom of Urbanization. Planning Theory 8 (1): 76–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2011a. Conclusion. Postcolonial Urbanism: Speed, Hysteria, Mass Dreams. In Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, ed. Ananya Roy and Aihwa Ong, 307–335. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef ———. 2011a. Conclusion. Postcolonial Urbanism: Speed, Hysteria, Mass Dreams. In Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, ed. Ananya Roy and Aihwa Ong, 307–335. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2011b. Slumdog cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238.CrossRef ———. 2011b. Slumdog cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2015. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1): 200–209.CrossRef ———. 2015. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1): 200–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roy, Ananya, and Aihwa Ong, eds. 2011. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Roy, Ananya, and Aihwa Ong, eds. 2011. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, Allen J., and Michael Storper. 2014. The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1): 1–15.CrossRef Scott, Allen J., and Michael Storper. 2014. The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1): 1–15.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sintomer, Yves, Carsten Herzberg, and Anja Röcke. 2008. Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 164–178.CrossRef Sintomer, Yves, Carsten Herzberg, and Anja Röcke. 2008. Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 164–178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Carey Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–316. Illinois: University of Illinois.CrossRef Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Carey Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–316. Illinois: University of Illinois.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stiftel, Bruce, and Chandrima Mukhopadhyay. 2007. Thoughts on Anglo-American Hegemony in Planning Scholarship. Town Planning Review 78 (5): 545–572.CrossRef Stiftel, Bruce, and Chandrima Mukhopadhyay. 2007. Thoughts on Anglo-American Hegemony in Planning Scholarship. Town Planning Review 78 (5): 545–572.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watson, Vanessa. 2002. Do We Learn from Planning Practice? The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2): 178–187.CrossRef Watson, Vanessa. 2002. Do We Learn from Planning Practice? The Contribution of the Practice Movement to Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2): 178–187.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2003. Conflicting Rationalities: Implications for Planning Theory and Ethics. Planning Theory and Practice 4 (4): 395–408.CrossRef ———. 2003. Conflicting Rationalities: Implications for Planning Theory and Ethics. Planning Theory and Practice 4 (4): 395–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2006. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory 5 (1): 31–50.CrossRef ———. 2006. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory 5 (1): 31–50.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies 46 (11): 2259–2275.CrossRef ———. 2009. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies 46 (11): 2259–2275.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2013. Planning and the ‘Stubborn Realities’ of Global South-East Cities: Some Emerging Ideas. Planning Theory 12 (1): 81–100.CrossRef ———. 2013. Planning and the ‘Stubborn Realities’ of Global South-East Cities: Some Emerging Ideas. Planning Theory 12 (1): 81–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2016. Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning 1 (4): 32–41.CrossRef ———. 2016. Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning 1 (4): 32–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yiftachel, Oren. 2006a. Re-Engaging Planning Theory? Towards ‘South-Eastern’ Perspectives. Planning Theory 5 (3): 211–222.CrossRef Yiftachel, Oren. 2006a. Re-Engaging Planning Theory? Towards ‘South-Eastern’ Perspectives. Planning Theory 5 (3): 211–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2006b. Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ———. 2006b. Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009. Theoretical Notes on ‘Gray Cities’: The Coming of Urban Apartheid? Planning Theory 8 (1): 88–100.CrossRef ———. 2009. Theoretical Notes on ‘Gray Cities’: The Coming of Urban Apartheid? Planning Theory 8 (1): 88–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2016. Commentary. The Aleph – Jerusalem as Critical Learning. City 20 (3): 483–494.CrossRef ———. 2016. Commentary. The Aleph – Jerusalem as Critical Learning. City 20 (3): 483–494.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conflicting Rationalities and Southern Planning Theory
verfasst von
Richard de Satgé
Vanessa Watson
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69496-2_2

Premium Partner