Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
How Leadership Works Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Connection

verfasst von : Nik Kinley, Shlomo Ben-Hur

Erschienen in: Leadership OS

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors introduce the fourth component of momentum in their Leadership OS model—connection. Using both their own and previous research, they describe the social and neural underpinnings of connection and the functions it plays in a leaders’ Operating System—how it affects people’s performance. They introduce a case study (Herb Kelleher at Southwest Airlines) showing the role and importance of connection in a leaders’ OS. They then describe practical techniques leaders can use to increase the degree to which their OS enables and supports connection. Finally, they introduce a checklist leaders can use to test the extent people experience connection in their OS.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Empowerment
Nächstes Kapitel The Imprint You Make, the Legacy You Leave
Literatur
1.
M. Sherif, O. Harvey, B. White, W. Hood and C. Sherif, “Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment,” in University of Oklahoma book exchange, Norman, OK, 1961, pp. 155–184.
2.
E. Cornwell and L. Waite, “Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 2009.CrossRef
3.
E. Lee, T. Park and B. Koo, “Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 1049–1080, 2015.CrossRef
4.
B. Mullen and C. Cooper, “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 115, pp. 210–227, 1994.CrossRef
5.
F. Chiocchio and H. Essiembre, “Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams,” Small Group Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 382–420, 2009.CrossRef
6.
B. Mullen and C. Copper, “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 115, no. 2, p. 210, 1994.CrossRef
7.
S. Gully, D. Devine and D. Whitney, “A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence,” Small Group Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 497–520, 1995.CrossRef
8.
R. Keller, “Predictors of the performance of project groups in R & D organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 715–726, 1986.
9.
A. Jobst, A. Albert, C. Bauriedl-Schmidt, C. Mauer, B. Renneberg, A. Buchheim, L. Sabass, P. Falkai, P. Zill and F. Padberg, “Social exclusion leads to divergent changes of Oxytocin levels in borderline patients and healthy subjects,” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, vol. 83, pp. 252–254, 2014.CrossRef
10.
J. Cacioppo and L. Hawkley, “Perceived social isolation and cognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 447–454, 2009.CrossRef
11.
J. Dovidio, J. Piliavin, S. Gaertner, D. Schroeder and R. Clark III, “The arousal: Cost-reward model and the process of intervention: A review of the evidence,” in M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 12. Prosocial behavior, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1991, pp. 86–118.
12.
S. Haslam, C. Powell and J. Turner, “Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes,” Applied Psychology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 2000.CrossRef
13.
S. Taggar, “Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 315–330, 2002.
14.
J. Mathieu, S. Tannenbaum, M. Kukenberger, J. Donsbach and G. Alliger, “Team role experience and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 6–34, 2015.CrossRef
15.
T. Craig and J. Kelly, “Group cohesiveness and creative performance,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 243, 1999.CrossRef
16.
C. Huang, “Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan,” Technovation, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 786–797, 2009.CrossRef
17.
R. Mitchell, B. Boyle, V. Parker, M. Giles, V. Chiang and P. Joyce, “Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity,” Human Resource Management, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 217–239, 2015.CrossRef
18.
R. Gal, “Unit Morale: From a Theoretical Puzzle to an empirical illustration—An Israeli example,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 549–564, 1986.CrossRef
19.
D. van Knippenberg and N. Ellemers, “Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented effort,” in S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, and N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice, New York, NY, Psychology Press, 2019, pp. 29–42.
20.
T. Schnell, T. Höge and E. Pollet, “Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 543–554, 2013.CrossRef
21.
H. Okamura, A. Tsuda and T. Matsuishi, “The relationship between perceived loneliness and cortisol awakening responses on work days and weekends,” Japanese Psychological Research, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2012.CrossRef
22.
R. AbuAlRub, “Job stress, job performance, and social support among hospital nurses,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2004.CrossRef
23.
J. Williams, J. Brown, R. Bray, E. Anderson Goodell, K. Rae Olmsted and A. Adler, “Unit cohesion, resilience, and mental health of soldiers in basic combat training,” Military Psychology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 241–250, 2016.CrossRef
24.
F. Walumbwa, B. Avolio and W. Zhu, “How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 793–825, 2008.CrossRef
25.
Y. Luo, L. Hawkley, L. Waite and J. Cacioppo, “Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 907–914, 2012.CrossRef
26.
R. Boyatis, K. Rochford and A. Jack, “Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 114, 2014.
27.
A. Tziner and Y. Vardi, “Effects of command style and group cohesiveness on the performance effectiveness of self-selected tank crews,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67, no. 6, p. 769, 1982.CrossRef
28.
C. Reade, “Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1269–1291, 2001.CrossRef
29.
J. Fuller, K. Hester, T. Barnett, L. Frey, C. Relyea and D. Beu, “Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process,” Human Relations, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 815–846, 2006.CrossRef
30.
D. Man and S. Lam, “The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis,” Journal of Organizational Behaviour, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 979–1001, 2003.CrossRef
31.
L. Jans, T. Postmes and K. Van der Zee, “Sharing differences: The inductive route to social identity formation,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1145–1149, 2012.CrossRef
32.
R. Bakeman and R. Helmreich, “Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and causality in an undersea environment,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 478–489, 1975.CrossRef
33.
J. Mathieu, M. Kukenberger, L. D’innocenzo and G. Reilly, “Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, no. 3, p. 713, 2015.CrossRef
34.
B. Mullen, T. Anthony, E. Salas and J. Driskell, “Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis,” Small Group Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 1994.CrossRef
35.
L. Dyaram and T. Kamalanabhan, “Unearthed: The other side of group cohesiveness,” Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 2005.CrossRef
36.
C. Langfred, “Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance,” Small Group Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 124–143, 1998.CrossRef
37.
J. Mpeera Ntayi, W. Byabashaija, S. Eyaa, M. Ngoma and A. Muliira, “Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officers,” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 68–92, 2010.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Connection
verfasst von
Nik Kinley
Shlomo Ben-Hur
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Leadership OS

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27292-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-27293-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27293-7_16

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise